13 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Clinton Tolley (University of California, San Diego)
  1. Clinton Tolley (forthcoming). Kant on the Generality of Logic. In Proceedings of the 11th International Kant Congress. Vol. 2. De Gruyter. 431-442.
  2. Clinton Tolley (2013). The Non-Conceptuality of the Content of Intuitions: A New Approach. Kantian Review 18 (1):107-36.
    There has been considerable recent debate about whether Kant's account of intuitions implies that their content is conceptual. This debate, however, has failed to make significant progress because of the absence of discussion, let alone consensus, as to the meaning of in this context. Here I try to move things forward by focusing on the kind of content associated with Frege's notion of , understood as a mode of presentation of some object or property. I argue, first, that Kant takes (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Clinton Tolley (2012). Bolzano and Kant on the Nature of Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (4):307-327.
    Here I revisit Bolzano's criticisms of Kant on the nature of logic. I argue that while Bolzano is correct in taking Kant to conceive of the traditional logic as a science of the activity of thinking rather than the content of thought, he is wrong to charge Kant with a failure to identify and examine this content itself within logic as such. This neglects Kant's own insistence that traditional logic does not exhaust logic as such, since it must be supplemented (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Clinton Tolley (2012). Bolzano and Kant on the Place of Subjectivity in a Wissenschaftslehre. Grazer Philosophische Studien 85 (1):63-88.
  5. Clinton Tolley (2012). Kant on the Content of Cognition. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):200-228.
    I present an argument for an interpretation of Kant's views on the nature of the ‘content [Inhalt]’ of ‘cognition [Erkenntnis]’. In contrast to one of the longest standing interpretations of Kant's views on cognitive content, which ascribes to Kant a straightforwardly psychologistic understanding of content, and in contrast as well to the more recently influential reading of Kant put forward by McDowell and others, according to which Kant embraces a version of Russellianism, I argue that Kant's views on this topic (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Clinton Tolley (2012). The Generality of Kant's Transcendental Logic. Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (3):417-446.
  7. Clinton Tolley (2011). Frege's Elucidatory Holism. Inquiry 54 (3):226-251.
    Abstract I argue against the two most influential readings of Frege's methodology in the philosophy of logic. Dummett's ?semanticist? reading sees Frege as taking notions associated with semantical content?and in particular, the semantical notion of truth?as primitive and as intelligible independently of their connection to the activity of judgment, inference, and assertion. Against this, the ?pragmaticist? reading proposed by Brandom and Ricketts sees Frege as beginning instead from the independent and intuitive grasp that we allegedly have on the latter activity (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Clinton Tolley (2010). Entre sens et non-sens: Benoist sur l'explication realiste de l'intentionalite. Philosophiques 37 (2):491-98.
  9. Clinton Tolley (2008). Kant and the Normativity of Logic. In Valerio Rohden (ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Kant Congress. de Gruyter. 1--215.
  10. Clinton Tolley (2006). Kant on the Nature of Logical Laws. Philosophical Topics 34 (1/2):371-407.
  11. Clinton Tolley (2006). Review Of: Richard L. Mendelsohn, The Philosophy of Gottlob Frege. Philosophy in Review 26 (1):49-52.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Clinton Tolley (2005). Review Of: Arthur Melnick, Themes in Kant's Metaphysics and Ethics. Philosophy in Review 25 (3):196-198.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Clinton Tolley (2004). Review Of: A. B. Dickerson, Kant on Representation and Objectivity. Philosophy in Review 24 (6):405-407.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation