Search results for 'Cloning, Organism' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  5
    Christina Brandt (2012). Hybrid Times: Theses on the Temporalities of Cloning. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 35 (1):75-81.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2. Bernard E. Rollin (1999). Keeping Up with the Cloneses -- Issues in Human Cloning. Journal of Ethics 3 (1):51-71.
    The advent of cloning animals has created a maelstrom of social concern about the ethical issues associated with the possibility of cloning humans. When the ethical concerns are clearly examined, however, many of them turn out to be less matters of rational ethics than knee-jerk emotion, religious bias, or fear of that which is not understood. Three categories of real and spurious ethical concerns are presented and discussed: 1) that cloning is intrinsically wrong, 2) that cloning (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  31
    Arlene Judith Klotzko (2004). A Clone of Your Own?: The Science and Ethics of Cloning. Oxford University Press.
    Someday soon (if it hasn't happened in secret already), a human will be cloned, and mankind will embark on a scientific and moral journey whose destination cannot be foretold. In Copycats: The Science and Ethics of Cloning, Arlene Judith Klotzko describes the new world of possibilities that can be glimpsed over the horizon. In a lucid and engaging narrative, she explains that the technology to create clones of living beings already exists, inaugurated in 1996 by Dolly the sheep, the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  5
    Jane Maienschein (2001). On Cloning: Advocating History of Biology in the Public Interest. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 34 (3):423 - 432.
    Cloning -- the process of creating a cell, tissue line or even a complete organism from a single cell -- or the strands that led to the cloning of a mammal, Dolly, are not new. Yet the media coverage of Dolly's inception raised a range of reactions from fear or moral repulsion, to cautious optimism. The implications for controlling human reproduction were clearly in the forefront, though many issues about animals emerged as well. On topics of public (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  32
    Louis M. Guenin (2008). The Morality of Embryo Use. Cambridge University Press.
    Is it permissible to use a human embryo in stem cell research, or in general as a means for benefit of others? Acknowledging each embryo as an object of moral concern, Louis M.Guenin argues that it is morally permissible to decline intrauterine transfer of an embryo formed outside the body, and that from this permission and the duty of beneficence, there follows a consensus justification for using donated embryos in service of humanitarian ends. He then proceeds to show how (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  6.  4
    Elisa Eiseman (2003). The National Bioethics Advisory Commission: Contributing to Public Policy. Rand.
    Details goverment, private, and international response to the policy recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  51
    Robert P. George (2004). Human Cloning and Embryo Research: The 2003 John J. Conley Lecture on Medical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):3-20.
    The author, a member of the U.S.President's Council on Bioethics, discussesethical issues raised by human cloning, whetherfor purposes of bringing babies to birth or forresearch purposes. He first argues that everycloned human embryo is a new, distinct, andenduring organism, belonging to the speciesHomo sapiens, and directing its owndevelopment toward maturity. He then distinguishesbetween two types of capacities belonging toindividual organisms belonging to this species,an immediately exerciseable capacity and abasic natural capacity that develops over time. He argues that it is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  34
    Timothy Mosteller (2005). Aristotle and Headless Clones. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (4):339-350.
    Cloned organisms can be genetically altered so that they do not exhibit higher brain functioning. This form of therapeutic cloning allows for genetically identical organs and tissues to be harvested from the clone for the use of the organism that is cloned. “Spare parts” cloning promises many opportunities for future medical advances. What is the ontological and ethical status of spare parts, headless clones? This paper attempts to answer this question from the perspective of Aristotle’s view of the soul. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  58
    Masahiro Morioka (2006). The Ethics of Human Cloning and the Sprout of Human Life. In Heiner Roetz (ed.), Cross-Cultural Issues in Bioethics: The Example of Human Cloning. Rodopi 1-16.
    Abstract -/- In 1998, the Council for Science and Technology established the Bioethics Committee and asked its members to examine the ethical and legal aspects of human cloning. The Committee concluded in 1999 that human cloning should be prohibited, and, based on the report, the government presented a bill for the regulation of human cloning in 2000. After a debate in the Diet, the original bill was slightly modified and issued on December 6, 2000. In this paper, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  19
    Trevor Pearce (2014). The Origins and Development of the Idea of Organism-Environment Interaction. In Gillian Barker, Eric Desjardins & Trevor Pearce (eds.), Entangled Life: Organism and Environment in the Biological and Social Sciences. Springer
    The idea of organism-environment interaction, at least in its modern form, dates only to the mid-nineteenth century. After sketching the origins of the organism-environment dichotomy in the work of Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer, I will chart its metaphysical and methodological influence on later scientists and philosophers such as Conwy Lloyd Morgan and John Dewey. In biology and psychology, the environment was seen as a causal agent, highlighting questions of organismic variation and plasticity. In philosophy, organism-environment interaction (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Charles T. Wolfe (2014). The Organism as Ontological Go-Between. Hybridity, Boundaries and Degrees of Reality in its Conceptual History. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 1:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shps.
    The organism is neither a discovery like the circulation of the blood or the glycogenic function of the liver, nor a particular biological theory like epigenesis or preformationism. It is rather a concept which plays a series of roles – sometimes overt, sometimes masked – throughout the history of biology, and frequently in very normative ways, also shifting between the biological and the social. Indeed, it has often been presented as a key-concept in life science and the ‘theorization’ of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  96
    Leon Kass (1998). The Ethics of Human Cloning. Aei Press.
    Wilson and Kass talked about their book, The ethics of human cloning, which is about the ethical debate over human cloning.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  13. Joyce C. Havstad (2010). Human Reproductive Cloning: A Conflict of Liberties. Bioethics 24 (2):71-77.
    Proponents of human reproductive cloning do not dispute that cloning may lead to violations of clones' right to self-determination, or that these violations could cause psychological harms. But they proceed with their endorsement of human reproductive cloning by dismissing these psychological harms, mainly in two ways. The first tactic is to point out that to commit the genetic fallacy is indeed a mistake; the second is to invoke Parfit's non-identity problem. The argument of this paper is that (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  89
    Dagmar Bruß & Chiara Macchiavello (2003). On the Entanglement Structure in Quantum Cloning. Foundations of Physics 33 (11):1617-1628.
    We study the entanglement properties of the output state of a universal cloning machine. We analyse in particular bipartite and tripartite entanglement of the clones, and discuss the “classical limit” of infinitely many output copies.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Annette Dufner (2013). Potentiality Arguments and the Definition of “Human Organism”. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (1):33-34.
    Bettina Schöne-Seifert and Marco Stier present a host of detailed and intriguing arguments to the effect that potentiality arguments have to be viewed as outdated due to developments in stem cell research, in particular the possibility of re-setting the development potential of differentiated cells, such as skin cells. However, their argument leaves them without an explanation of the intuitive difference between skin cells and human beings, which seems to be based on the assumption that a skin cell is merely part (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  71
    Fredrik Svenaeus (2007). A Heideggerian Defense of Therapeutic Cloning. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (1):31-62.
    Debates about the legitimacy of embryonic stem-cell research have largely focused on the type of ethical value that should be accorded to the human embryo in␣vitro. In this paper, I try to show that, to broaden the scope of these debates, one needs to articulate an ontology that does not limit itself to biological accounts, but that instead focuses on the embryo’s place in a totality of relevance surrounding and guiding a human practice. Instead of attempting to substantiate the ethical (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  17.  62
    Hossam E. Fadel (2012). Developments in Stem Cell Research and Therapeutic Cloning: Islamic Ethical Positions, a Review. Bioethics 26 (3):128-135.
    Stem cell research is very promising. The use of human embryos has been confronted with objections based on ethical and religious positions. The recent production of reprogrammed adult (induced pluripotent) cells does not – in the opinion of scientists – reduce the need to continue human embryonic stem cell research. So the debate continues.Islam always encouraged scientific research, particularly research directed toward finding cures for human disease. Based on the expectation of potential benefits, Islamic teachings permit and support human embryonic (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  2
    Thomas V. Cunningham (2013). What Justifies the United States Ban on Federal Funding for Nonreproductive Cloning? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (4):825-841.
    This paper explores how current United States policies for funding nonreproductive cloning are justified and argues against that justification. I show that a common conceptual framework underlies the national prohibition on the use of public funds for cloning research, which I call the simple argument. This argument rests on two premises: that research harming human embryos is unethical and that embryos produced via fertilization are identical to those produced via cloning. In response to the simple argument, I (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19.  63
    Robert Sparrow (2009). Therapeutic Cloning and Reproductive Liberty. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (2):1-17.
    Concern for “reproductive liberty” suggests that decisions about embryos should normally be made by the persons who would be the genetic parents of the child that would be brought into existence if the embryo were brought to term. Therapeutic cloning would involve creating and destroying an embryo, which, if brought to term, would be the offspring of the genetic parents of the person undergoing therapy. I argue that central arguments in debates about parenthood and genetics therefore suggest that therapeutic (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  38
    Michał Horodecki, Ryszard Horodecki, Aditi Sen & Ujjwal Sen (2005). Common Origin of No-Cloning and No-Deleting Principles Conservation of Information. Foundations of Physics 35 (12):2041-2049.
    We discuss the role of the notion of information in the description of physical reality. We consider theories for which dynamics is linear with respect to stochastic mixing. We point out that the no-cloning and no-deleting principles emerge in any such theory, if law of conservation of information is valid, and two copies contain more information than one copy. We then describe the quantum case from this point of view.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  6
    J. W. Bull & A. Gordon (2015). Schrödinger’s Microbe: Implications of Coercing a Living Organism Into a Coherent Quantum Mechanical State. Biology and Philosophy 30 (6):845-856.
    Consideration of the experimental activities carried out in one discipline, through the lens of another, can lead to novel insights. Here, we comment from a biological perspective upon experiments in quantum mechanics proposed by physicists that are likely to feasible in the near future. In these experiments, an entire living organism would be knowingly placed into a coherent quantum state for the first time, i.e. would be coerced into demonstrating quantum phenomena. The implications of the proposed experiment for a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  75
    Robert Lane (2006). Safety, Identity and Consent: A Limited Defense of Reproductive Human Cloning. Bioethics 20 (3):125–135.
    Some opponents of reproductive human cloning have argued that, because of its experimental nature, any attempt to create a child by way of cloning would risk serious birth defects or genetic abnormalities and would therefore be immoral. Some versions of this argument appeal to the consent of the person to be conceived in this way. In particular, they assume that if an experimental reproductive technology has not yet been shown to be safe, then, before we use it, we (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  53
    S. Camporesi & L. Bortolotti (2008). Reproductive Cloning in Humans and Therapeutic Cloning in Primates: Is the Ethical Debate Catching Up with the Recent Scientific Advances? Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):e15-e15.
    After years of failure, in November 2007 primate embryonic stem cells were derived by somatic cellular nuclear transfer, also known as therapeutic cloning. The first embryo transfer for human reproductive cloning purposes was also attempted in 2006, albeit with negative results. These two events force us to think carefully about the possibility of human cloning which is now much closer to becoming a reality. In this paper we tackle this issue from two sides, first summarising what scientists (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  12
    Yuichiro Kitajima (2015). Imperfect Cloning Operations in Algebraic Quantum Theory. Foundations of Physics 45 (1):62-74.
    No-cloning theorem says that there is no unitary operation that makes perfect clones of non-orthogonal quantum states. The objective of the present paper is to examine whether an imperfect cloning operation exists or not in a C*-algebraic framework. We define a universal \ -imperfect cloning operation which tolerates a finite loss \ of fidelity in the cloned state, and show that an individual system’s algebra of observables is abelian if and only if there is a universal \ (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  25
    R. Cole-Turner (1999). Cloning Humans From the Perspective of the Christian Churches. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):33-46.
    The announcement of the birth of Dolly the cloned sheep evoked widespread response from the Christian Churches. These responses are identified, organized thematically, and discussed critically. The churches have viewed reproductive human cloning either with unqualified opposition or with grave suspicion. Some statements have discussed animal cloning, generally granting limited approval, and nonreproductive human cloning, either in opposition or expressing an openness to entertain specific proposals as the technology develops.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  12
    Matthew H. Haber (2014). In Defense of the Organism. Biology and Philosophy 29 (6):885-895.
    Thomas Pradeu’s The Limits of the Self provides a precise account of biological identity developed from the central concepts of immunology. Yet the central concepts most relevant to this task are themselves deemed inadequate, suffering from ambiguity and imprecision. Pradeu seeks to remedy this by proposing a new guiding theory for immunology, the continuity theory. From this, an account of biological identity is provided in terms of uniqueness and individuality, ultimately leading to a defense of the heterogeneous organism as (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  25
    Sandra Shapshay (2012). Procreative Liberty, Enhancement and Commodification in the Human Cloning Debate. Health Care Analysis 20 (4):356-366.
    The aim of this paper is to scrutinize a contemporary standoff in the American debate over the moral permissibility of human reproductive cloning in its prospective use as a eugenic enhancement technology. I shall argue that there is some significant and under-appreciated common ground between the defenders and opponents of human cloning. Champions of the moral and legal permissibility of cloning support the technology based on the right to procreative liberty provided it were to become as safe as in vitro (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  14
    Laurentiu Staicu (2012). Human Cloning and the Myth of Disenchantment. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 11 (31):148-169.
    This study has a twofold objective: firstly, it aims to examine the main types of argument that have been formulated against human cloning, to identify their presuppositions and to evaluate their strength; secondly, it aims to argue that the most important objections against human cloning are philosophical and religious, in particular the objection that human cloning represents a radical form of disenchantment or an abuse of rationality. The birth of a cloned mammal, a sheep named Dolly, which (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  10
    Nestor Micheli Morales (2009). Psychological and Ideological Aspects of Human Cloning: A Transition to a Transhumanist Psychology. Journal of Evolution and Technology 20 (2):19-42.
    The prospect of replication of human beings through genetic manipulation has engendered one of the most controversial debates about reproduction in our society. Ideology is clearly influencing the direction of research and legislation on human cloning, which may present one of the greatest existential challenges to the meaning of creation. In this article, I argue that, in view of the possibility that human cloning and other emerging technologies could enhance physical and cognitive abilities, there is a need for a different (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  3
    Jessica L. W. Carey (2015). Taking Responsibility for Cloning: Discourses of Care and Knowledge in Biotechnological Approaches to Nonhuman Life. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (3):589-599.
    This article examines the practice of animal cloning in relation to discourses of care and responsibility, in particular a common cultural interpretation of care theorized by Michel Foucault. This interpretation figures care as a “pastoral” relation premised in essential differences between carers and objects of care, and its interspecies implications are increasingly drawing the attention of theorists in animal studies. This article argues that, perhaps despite appearances, animal welfare in the form of pastoral care and abstract conceptualizations of animals (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  25
    Lantz Miller (1998). Filling the Gaps in the Risks Vs. Benefits of Mammalian Adult-Cell Cloning: Taking Bernard Rollin's Philosophy its Next Step. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (1):1-16.
    A critique is made of Bernard Rollin''s examination of the ethics of cloning adult mammalian cells. The primary concern is less to propound an anticloning or procloning position than to call for full exploration of the ethical complexities before a rush to judgment is made. Indeed, the ethical examination in question rushes toward an ethical position in such a way that does not appear consistent with Rollin''s usual methodology. By extending this methodology – which entails full weighing of benefits (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  4
    Mihai Curelaru, Adrian Neculau & Mioara Cristea (2012). What People Think About Cloning? Social Representation of This Technique and its Associated Emotions. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 11 (31):3-30.
    This study explores the social representations of cloning taking in consideration a series of associated emotions and the subjects' level of religiosity. The participants in our study consisted of 356 subjects of different ages and professions. The data collection included four tasks for the subjects to fill in. First, they had to fill in a free task association: starting from the stimulus-word „cloning" they had to associate five words or expressions, and then rank these five words according to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  5
    Francesco De Martini, Fabio Sciarrino, Nicolò Spagnolo & Chiara Vitelli (2011). Generation of Highly Resilient to Decoherence Macroscopic Quantum Superpositions Via Phase-Covariant Quantum Cloning. Foundations of Physics 41 (3):492-508.
    In this paper we analyze the resilience to decoherence of the Macroscopic Quantum Superpositions (MQS) generated by optimal phase-covariant quantum cloning according to two coherence criteria, both based on the concept of Bures distance in Hilbert spaces. We show that all MQS generated by this system are characterized by a high resilience to decoherence processes. This analysis is supported by the results of recent MQS experiments of N=3.5×104 particles.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  2
    Nicu Gavriluta (2010). Clonarea - Blasfemie sau Binecuvantare? Structuri mitico-religioase, controverse etice si consecinte sociale/ Cloning: Blasfemy or Blessing? Mythical-religious Structures, Ethical Controversies and Social Consequences. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 3 (8):109-117.
    Starting as a scientific presentation of the phenomenon of cloning, in which etymology, the definitions and some already classical examples are emphasized, this paper actually focuses on a less discussed perspective in nowadays debates on cloning. Thus, the paper aims at showing which are (if any) the mythical-religious structures of cloning, certainly without ignoring the social consequences, the advantages and disadvantages and the juridical effects of cloning. Discussing Mircea Eliadeís novella Les trois graces, the purpose of (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  37
    Charles T. Wolfe (2014). The Organism – Reality or Fiction? The Philosophers' Magazine (67).
    A reflection on organisms as real entities, as constructions, or as fictions.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Timo Jarvilehto (2000). The Theory of the Organism-Environment System: IV. The Problem of Mental Activity and Consciousness. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 35 (1):35-57.
  37.  46
    Alison Reiheld (2014). BOOK REVIEW: Technologies of Life and Death: From Cloning to Capital Punishment by Kelly Oliver. [REVIEW] Environmental Values 23 (2).
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  41
    Sebastian Rand (2011). Organism, Normativity, Plasticity: Canguilhem, Kant, Malabou. Continental Philosophy Review 44 (4):341-357.
    Some of Catherine Malabou’s recent work has developed her conception of plasticity (originally deployed in a reading of Hegelian Aufhebung ) in relation to neuroscience. This development clarifies and advances her attempt to bring contemporary theory into dialogue with the natural sciences, while indirectly indicating her engagement with the French tradition in philosophy of science and philosophy of medicine, especially the work of Georges Canguilhem. I argue that we can see her development of plasticity as an answer to some specific (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  32
    Robert Sparrow (2006). Cloning, Parenthood, and Genetic Relatedness. Bioethics 20 (6):308–318.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40. David Morris (2008). The Time and Place of the Organism: Merleau-Ponty's Philosophy in Embryo. Alter: revue de phénoménologie 16:69-86.
    Merleau-Ponty’s philosophy attempts to locate meaning-sense-within being. Space and time are thus ingredient in sense. This is apparent in his earlier studies of structure, fields, expression and the body schema, and the linkage of space, time and sense becomes thematic in Merleau-Ponty’s later thinking about institution, chiasm and reversibility. But the space-time-sense linkage is also apparent in his studies of embryogenesis. The paper shows this by reconstructing Merleau-Ponty’s critical analysis of Driesch’s embryology (in the nature lectures) to demonstrate how, for (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  13
    David L'Hôte, Paul Laissue, Catherine Serres, Xavier Montagutelli, Reiner A. Veitia & Daniel Vaiman (2010). Interspecific Resources: A Major Tool for Quantitative Trait Locus Cloning and Speciation Research. Bioessays 32 (2):132-142.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  7
    Hans Driesch (1908/1979). The Science and Philosophy of the Organism. Ams Press.
  43.  9
    Susan M. Kerr (1997). Mammalian Cloning: Implications for Science and Society 26–27 June 1997, Washington, D.C. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (4):491-498.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  22
    Carson Strong (2008). Cloning and Adoption: A Reply to Levy and Lotz. Bioethics 22 (2):130–136.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  22
    Glenn McGee (1999). Cloning, the Family and Adoption. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):47-54.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Robert F. Almeder & James M. Humber (1998). Human Cloning. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Dorothy Mary Emmet (1966/1981). Whitehead's Philosophy of Organism. Greenwood Press.
  48. M. Kirti Singh (2009). The Philosophy of Organism: A Comparative Study of A.N. Whitehead. Akansha Pub. House.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. M. Kirti Singh (2009). The Philosophy of Organism: A Comparative Study of A. Akansha Pub. House.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Samuel Mejías Valbuena (2005). Philosophical, Scientist, Moral, Ethics and Religious Analysis in the Juridical Compared Science in the Law of Cloning. S. Mejías Valbuena.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000