Search results for 'Compatibility' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Richard P. Cooper, Caroline Catmur & Cecilia Heyes (2013). Are Automatic Imitation and Spatial Compatibility Mediated by Different Processes? Cognitive Science 37 (4):605-630.score: 24.0
    Automatic imitation or “imitative compatibility” is thought to be mediated by the mirror neuron system and to be a laboratory model of the motor mimicry that occurs spontaneously in naturalistic social interaction. Imitative compatibility and spatial compatibility effects are known to depend on different stimulus dimensions—body movement topography and relative spatial position. However, it is not yet clear whether these two types of stimulus–response compatibility effect are mediated by the same or different cognitive processes. We present (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Karin Bohmann (1989). About the Sense of Social Compatibility. AI and Society 3 (4):323-331.score: 24.0
    The debate in the Federal Republic of Germany on the estimation of the social compatibility of the consequences of technology as a criterion for the evaluation of technical systems has been going on since the mid seventies. The approach presented discusses the normative structurally transcending perspective of the viability and developmental capacity of society. The question of desirable social development as opposed to the technically possible is raised. A criteria system for evaluating social compatibility of new information and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Christiane Diefenbach, Martina Rieger, Cristina Massen & Wolfgang Prinz (2013). Action-Sentence Compatibility: The Role of Action Effects and Timing. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 24.0
    Research on embodied approaches to language comprehension suggests that we understand linguistic descriptions of actions by mentally simulating these actions. Evidence is provided by the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE) which shows that sensibility judgments for sentences are faster when the direction of the described action matches the response direction. In two experiments, we investigated whether the ACE relies on actions or on intended action effects. Participants gave sensibility judgments of auditorily presented sentences by producing an action effect on a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Brenda Ocampo & Matthew Finkbeiner (2013). The Negative Compatibility Effect with Relevant Masks: A Case for Automatic Motor Inhibition. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 24.0
    For many years controversy has surrounded the so-called ‘negative compatibility effect’ (NCE), a surprising phenomenon whereby responses to a target stimulus are delayed when the target is preceded by an unconscious, response-compatible prime. According to proponents of the ‘self-inhibition’ hypothesis, the NCE occurs when a low-level self-inhibitory mechanism supresses early motor activations that are no longer supported by perceptual evidence. This account has been debated, however, by those who regard the NCE to be a stimulus-specific phenomenon that can be (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. B. J. C. Madison (2009). On the Compatibility of Epistemic Internalism and Content Externalism. Acta Analytica 24 (3):173-183.score: 22.0
    In this paper I consider a recent argument of Timothy Williamson’s that epistemic internalism and content externalism are indeed incompatible, and since he takes content externalism to be above reproach, so much the worse for epistemic internalism. However, I argue that epistemic internalism, properly understood, remains substantially unaffected no matter which view of content turns out to be correct. What is key to the New Evil Genius thought experiment is that, given everything of which the inhabitants are consciously aware, the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Ronald Mallon & Stephen P. Stich (2000). The Odd Couple: The Compatibility of Social Construction and Evolutionary Psychology. Philosophy of Science 67 (1):133-154.score: 21.0
    Evolutionary psychology and social constructionism are widely regarded as fundamentally irreconcilable approaches to the social sciences. Focusing on the study of the emotions, we argue that this appearance is mistaken. Much of what appears to be an empirical disagreement between evolutionary psychologists and social constructionists over the universality or locality of emotional phenomena is actually generated by an implicit philosophical dispute resulting from the adoption of different theories of meaning and reference. We argue that once this philosophical dispute is recognized, (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. John V. Canfield (1962). The Compatibility of Free Will and Determinism. Philosophical Review 71 (July):352-368.score: 21.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Stephen P. Stich & Ron Mallon (2000). The Odd Couple: The Compatibility of Social Construction and Evolutionary Psychology. Philosophy of Science 67 (1):133-154.score: 21.0
    Evolutionary psychology and social constructionism are widely regarded as fundamentally irreconcilable approaches to the social sciences. Focusing on the study of the emotions, we argue that this appearance is mistaken. Much of what appears to be an empirical disagreement between evolutionary psychologists and social constructionists over the universality or locality of emotional phenomena is actually generated by an implicit philosophical dispute resulting from the adoption of different theories of meaning and reference. We argue that once this philosophical dispute is recognized, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Richard J. Wallace (1972). Spatial S-R Compatibility Effects Involving Kinesthetic Cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):163.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Irving Biederman & Robert Kaplan (1970). Stimulus Discriminability and S-R Compatibility: Evidence for Independent Effects in Choice Reaction Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (3):434.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Louis D. Costa, Morton Horwitz & Herbert G. Vaughan Jr (1966). Effects of Stimulus Uncertainty and S-R Compatibility on Speed of Digit Coding. Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (6):895.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Paul M. Fitts & Charles M. Seeger (1953). S-R Compatibility: Spatial Characteristics of Stimulus and Response Codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (3):199.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Steven W. Keele (1967). Compatibility and Time-Sharing in Serial Reaction Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (4):529.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. [deleted]Akio Nishimura & Chikashi Michimata (2013). Pointing Hand Stimuli Induce Spatial Compatibility Effects and Effector Priming. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 21.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. [deleted]Antonello Pellicano, Valeria Barna, Roberto Nicoletti, Sandro Rubichi & Carlo A. Marzi (2013). Interhemispheric Vs. Stimulus-Response Spatial Compatibility Effects in Bimanual Reaction Times to Lateralized Visual Stimuli. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 21.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Paul M. Fitts & Irving Biederman (1965). S-R Compatibility and Information Reduction. Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (4):408.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. [deleted]Charles L. Folk (2013). Dissociating Compatibility Effects and Distractor Costs in the Additional Singleton Paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 21.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. O. Joseph Harm & Joseph S. Lappin (1973). Probability, Compatibility, Speed, and Accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology 100 (2):416.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Harold L. Hawkins & James R. Underhill (1971). S-R Compatibility and the Relative Frequency Effect in Choice Reaction Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (2):280.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Richard P. LeMay & J. Richard Simon (1969). Temporal and Symbolic S-R Compatibility in a Sequential Information-Processing Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):558.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. J. Richard Simon, James V. Hinrichs & John L. Craft (1970). Auditory S-R Compatibility: Reaction Time as a Function of Ear-Hand Correspondence and Ear-Response-Location Correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):97.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Dennis L. Wack & Nickolas B. Cottrell (1969). Interactive Effect of Drive and S-R Compatibility on Speed of Digit Coding. Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):562.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Richard J. Wallace (1971). S-R Compatibility and the Idea of a Response Code. Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (3):354.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Kristin L. Borreggine & Michael P. Kaschak (2006). The Action–Sentence Compatibility Effect: It's All in the Timing. Cognitive Science 30 (6):1097-1112.score: 21.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Anthony G. Greenwald (1972). On Doing Two Things at Once: Time Sharing as a Function of Ideomotor Compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology 94 (1):52.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Charles P. Whitman & E. Scott Geller (1971). Prediction Outcome, S-R Compatibility, and Choice Reaction Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (2):299.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Pirooz Fatoorchi (2010). Four Conceptions of Creatio Ex Nihilo and the Compatibility Questions. In David B. Burrell, Carlo Cogliati, Janet M. Soskice & William R. Stoeger (eds.), Creation and the God of Abraham. Cambridge University Press.score: 18.0
    The notion of creatio ex nihilo has become a doctrine firmly established in the three Abrahamic religions (i.e., Christianity, Judaism and Islam). Almost all groups of Islamic thinkers accept the truth of the createdness (creatio) of the universe, and that it is preceded by its “non-existence” (ex nihilo). However, there is a diversity of opinions as to whether the concept of creatio ex nihilo is compatible with alternative accounts of the origin of the physical world, and this diversity is particularly (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Milena Ivanova (2011). Friedman's Relativised A Priori and Structural Realism: In Search of Compatibility. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):23 - 37.score: 18.0
    In this article I discuss a recent argument due to Dan McArthur, who suggests that the charge that Michael Friedman?s relativised a priori leads to irrationality in theory change can be avoided by adopting structural realism. I provide several arguments to show that the conjunction of Friedman?s relativised a priori with structural realism cannot make the former avoid the charge of irrationality. I also explore the extent to which Friedman?s view and structural realism are compatible, a presupposition of McArthur?s argument. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. José G. Vargas & Douglas G. Torr (1997). The Construction of Teleparallel Finsler Connections and the Emergence of an Alternative Concept of Metric Compatibility. Foundations of Physics 27 (6):825-843.score: 18.0
    The issue of whether teleparallel nonlinear connections exist is resolved by their explicit construction on Finslerian metrics that arise in the Robertson test theory of special relativity (RTTSR), and on the Minkowski metric in particular. The method is an adaptation to the Finsler bundle of a similar construction for teleparallel linear connections. It suggests the existence of a concept of metric compatibility alternative toω μλ +ω λμ = 0 for teleparallel nonlinear connections. A sophisticated system of partial differential equations (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Ping Tian (2009). Narrow Memory and Wide Knowledge: An Argument for the Compatibility of Externalism and Self-Knowledge. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):604-615.score: 18.0
    The development of the semantic externalism in the 1970s was followed by a debate on the compatibility of externalism and self-knowledge. Boghossian’s memory argument is one of the most important arguments against the compatibilist view. However, some compatibilists attack Boghossian’s argument by pointing out that his understanding of memory is internalistic. Ludlow and others developed the externalist view of memory to defend the compatibility of externalism and self-knowledge. However, the externalist view of memory undermines the epistemic status of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Gary M. Hardegree (1977). Relative Compatibility in Conventional Quantum Mechanics. Foundations of Physics 7 (7-8):495-510.score: 18.0
    The notion of relative compability is introduced, according to which compatibility is construed as relative to individual quantum states. The compatibility domain of two observablesA, B is defined to be the set com(A, B) of states relative to whichA andB are compatible. Three basic categories of relative compatibility are then defined according to the character of com(A, B): absolute compatibility (ordinary compatibility), absolute incompatibility, and partial compatibility. Then com(A, B) is seen to be a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Fuchuan Yao (2008). The Compatibility Between Bodhisattva Compassion and 'No-Self'. Asian Philosophy 18 (3):267 – 278.score: 18.0
    _Since arguably Bodhisattva Practice (bodhisattva-carya) is the foundation of Mahayana Buddhist ethics, it is significantly important for Bodhisattva compassion to be compatible with other Buddhist doctrines, specifically with the doctrine of 'no-self ' (anatta). There are two thoughts on the relation between compassion and 'no-self ': they are compatible or incompatibility. Most Buddhist authors accept the former view. However, the principal problem with the two views is that their arguments have not been singled out. So the acceptance or denial of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. John Hawthorne (1989). On the Compatibility of Connectionist and Classical Models. Philosophical Psychology 2 (1):5-16.score: 18.0
    This paper presents considerations in favour of the view that traditional (classical) architectures can be seen as emergent features of connectionist networks with distributed representation. A recent paper by William Bechtel (1988) which argues for a similar conclusion is unsatisfactory in that it fails to consider whether the compositional syntax and semantics attributed to mental representations by classical models can emerge within a connectionist network. The compatibility of the two paradigms hinges largely, I suggest, on how this question is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Anthony Brueckner (2000). On an Attempt to Demonstrate the Compatibility of Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom. Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):132-134.score: 18.0
    Ted A. Warfield seeks to establish the compatibility in question by getting the incompatibilist to reject an unpersuasive argument from fatalism to the conclusion that a given action is not freely done. He maintains that such a rejection requires the the incompatibilist to hold that there is a possible world in which the fatalist’s premise is true and in which the conclusion is false (and so the given action is freely done). If a foreknowing God exists in that world, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Kenneth Einar Himma (2001). Bringing Hart and Raz to the Table: Coleman's Compatibility Thesis. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (4):609-627.score: 18.0
    Inclusive and exclusive positivists disagree on whether criteria of validity can incorporate moral norms. Inclusive positivists believe there are conceptually possible legal systems in which the criteria of validity include moral norms (the ‘Incorporation Thesis’). Exclusive positivists, following Joseph Raz, reject the Incorporation Thesis on the ground that subjects of a putative legal system incorporating moral criteria of validity could not identify the law without evaluating the very reasons the law is supposed to replace. Since law cannot be authoritative unless (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Diderik Batens & Joke Meheus (2000). The Adaptive Logic of Compatibility. Studia Logica 66 (3):327-348.score: 18.0
    This paper describes the adaptive logic of compatibility and its dynamic proof theory. The results derive from insights in inconsistency-adaptive logic, but are themselves very simple and philosophically unobjectionable. In the absence of a positive test, dynamic proof theories lead, in the long run, to correct results and, in the short run, sometimes to final decisions but always to sensible estimates. The paper contains a new and natural kind of semantics for S5from which it follows that a specific subset (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. J. Brabec & P. Pták (1982). On Compatibility in Quantum Logics. Foundations of Physics 12 (2):207-212.score: 18.0
    We offer a variant of the intrinsic definition of compatibility in logics. We shown that any compatible subset can be embedded into a Boolean σ-algebra, we show how the algebra is constructed, and we demonstrate that our definition cannot be weakened unless we put additional assumptions on the logic.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Gianpiero Cattaneo & Giuseppe Nisticò (1994). Coexistence of Questions Versus Piron's Compatibility. Foundations of Physics 24 (8):1131-1152.score: 18.0
    The notion of coexistence between questions is introduced in the framework of Piron's approach to quantum physics, using Aerts' notion of performable-together questions. Relationships between coexistence of questions and Piron's compatibility of propositions are investigated. In particular, properties generated by coexistent and primitive questions are compatible.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. David P. Hunt (1996). The Compatibility of Omniscience and Intentional Action: A Reply to Tomis Kapitan. Religious Studies 32 (1):49 - 60.score: 18.0
    The paper that follows continues a discussion with Tomis Kapitan in the pages of this journal over the compatibility of divine agency with divine foreknowledge. I had earlier argued against two premises in Kapitan's case for omniscient impotence: (i) that intentionally A-ing presupposes prior acquisition of the intention to A, and (ii) that acquiring the intention to A presupposes prior ignorance whether one will A. In response to my criticisms, Kapitan has recently offered new defences for these two premises. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Le Cheng (2011). Administration of Justice and Multimodality in Media: Semiotic Translation, Conflict and Compatibility. [REVIEW] International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 24 (4):491-502.score: 18.0
    Law as one sign system can be recorded and interpreted by another sign system—media. If each transaction in court is taken as a sign, it can be interpreted or transferred by different signs of media for the same purpose, though with different effects. This study focuses on the transformative effects of the semiotic revolution in media on law. The present research revealed that the evolution of media has driven the administration of justice to pay more attention to the process of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Kelly McCormick (2014). Holding Responsibility Hostage: Responsibility, Justification, and the Compatibility Question. Journal of Value Inquiry 48 (4):623-641.score: 18.0
    Traditional work on moral responsibility has for quite some time focused on the compatibility question: is moral responsibility compatible with determinism (or indeterminism)? But there is a second question that has also played a central role, though perhaps less explicitly. Call this second question the justificatory question:Can our reactive attitudes, judgments about moral responsibility, and the attendant practice of moral praising and blaming be rationally maintained and justified?It is not uncommon to take providing an answer to the compatibility (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Demin Duan (2014). Reviving the Past for the Future?: The (In)Compatibility Between Confucianism and Democracy in Contemporary China. Asian Philosophy 24 (2):147-157.score: 18.0
    The issue of (in)compatibility between Confucianism and modern democracy, particularly in China, has attracted much debate over the decade. This article singles out the particular notion of Minben ??, which is at the center of the argument for a ?Confucian democracy?, and argues that it is fundamentally different from modern democracy. However, this does not mean that Confucianism could not be connected with modern democracy. The important question is: what exactly does it mean to ?connect? Confucianism to the modern (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Sylvia Pulmannová (1980). Relative Compatibility and Joint Distributions of Observables. Foundations of Physics 10 (7-8):641-653.score: 18.0
    The notion of relative compatibility of observables is treated and its relation to the existence of joint distributions is obtained. The case of conventional quantum mechanics is studied and a generalization to the case of the quantum logic approach to quantum mechanics is given. It is shown that relative compatibility is equivalent to the existence of so-called “type 1” joint distributions.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Rimvydas Norkus & Edvardas Sinkevičius (2012). Issues of Compatibility Between Insolvency Proceedings and Commercial Arbitration. Jurisprudence 19 (4):1459-1478.score: 18.0
    Arbitration and insolvency proceedings are legal instruments governed by different objectives and different legal principles. While in arbitration the autonomy of the parties plays a major role, all insolvency proceedings are collective proceedings where autonomy of the parties is strictly limited, the majority of issues are regulated by binding legal provisions and strong controlling powers are vested into insolvency court. Therefore, in this article the authors analyse the issues of compatibility between insolvency proceedings and arbitration. The Lithuanian legal framework (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. M. Wilf, N. P. Holmes, I. Schwartz & T. R. Makin (2012). Dissociating Between Object Affordances and Spatial Compatibility Effects Using Early Response Components. Frontiers in Psychology 4:591-591.score: 18.0
    Perception and action are tightly linked: objects may be perceived not only in terms of visual features, but also in terms of possibilities for action. Previous studies showed that when a centrally located object has a salient graspable feature (e.g., a handle), it facilitates motor responses corresponding with the feature's position. However, such so-called affordance effects have been criticized as resulting from spatial compatibility effects, due to the visual asymmetry created by the graspable feature, irrespective of any affordances. In (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Andrew K. Solarz (1960). Latency of Instrumental Responses as a Function of Compatibility with the Meaning of Eliciting Verbal Signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (4):239.score: 17.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. E. Scott Geller, Charles P. Whitman & John C. Farris (1972). Probability Discrimination Indicated by Stimulus Prediction and Reaction Speed: Effects of S-R Compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (2):404.score: 17.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. William P. Bechtel (2001). The Compatibility of Complex Systems and Reduction: A Case Analysis of Memory Research. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 11 (4):483-502.score: 16.0
    Some theorists who emphasize the complexity of biological and cognitive systems and who advocate the employment of the tools of dynamical systems theory in explaining them construe complexity and reduction as exclusive alternatives. This paper argues that reduction, an approach to explanation that decomposes complex activities and localizes the components within the complex system, is not only compatible with an emphasis on complexity, but provides the foundation for dynamical analysis. Explanation via decomposition and localization is nonetheless extremely challenging, and an (...)
    Direct download (17 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Jeff Speaks (2011). Foreknowledge, Evil, and Compatibility Arguments. Faith and Philosophy 28 (3):269-293.score: 16.0
    Most arguments against God’s existence aim to show that it is incompatible with various apparent features of the world, such as the existence of evil or of human free will. In response, theists have sought to show that God’s existence is compatible with these features of the world. However, the fact that the proposition that God exists is necessary if possible introduces some underappreciated difficulties for these arguments.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Dean W. Zimmerman (1999). The Compatibility of Materialism and Survival. Faith and Philosophy 16 (2):194-212.score: 16.0
    It is not easy to be a materialist and yet believe that there is a way for human beings to survive death. Peter van Inwagen identifies the central obstacle the materialist faces: Namely, the need to posit appropriate “immanent-causal” connections between my body as it is at death and some living body elsewhere or elsewhen. I offer a proposal, consistent with van Inwagen’s own materialist metaphysics, for making materialism compatible with the possibility of survival.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000