Search results for 'Compatibility' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. B. J. C. Madison (2009). On the Compatibility of Epistemic Internalism and Content Externalism. Acta Analytica 24 (3):173-183.score: 8.0
    In this paper I consider a recent argument of Timothy Williamson’s that epistemic internalism and content externalism are indeed incompatible, and since he takes content externalism to be above reproach, so much the worse for epistemic internalism. However, I argue that epistemic internalism, properly understood, remains substantially unaffected no matter which view of content turns out to be correct. What is key to the New Evil Genius thought experiment is that, given everything of which the inhabitants are consciously aware, the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Richard P. Cooper, Caroline Catmur & Cecilia Heyes (2013). Are Automatic Imitation and Spatial Compatibility Mediated by Different Processes? Cognitive Science 37 (4):605-630.score: 8.0
    Automatic imitation or “imitative compatibility” is thought to be mediated by the mirror neuron system and to be a laboratory model of the motor mimicry that occurs spontaneously in naturalistic social interaction. Imitative compatibility and spatial compatibility effects are known to depend on different stimulus dimensions—body movement topography and relative spatial position. However, it is not yet clear whether these two types of stimulus–response compatibility effect are mediated by the same or different cognitive processes. We present (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Rodolfo Cristian Ertola Biraben & Hernán Javier San Martín (2011). On Some Compatible Operations on Heyting Algebras. Studia Logica 98 (3):331-345.score: 8.0
    We study some operations that may be defined using the minimum operator in the context of a Heyting algebra. Our motivation comes from the fact that 1) already known compatible operations, such as the successor by Kuznetsov, the minimum dense by Smetanich and the operation G by Gabbay may be defined in this way, though almost never explicitly noted in the literature; 2) defining operations in this way is equivalent, from a logical point of view, to two clauses, one corresponding (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. J. L. Castiglioni & H. J. San Martín (2011). Compatible Operations on Residuated Lattices. Studia Logica 98 (1-2):203-222.score: 8.0
    This work extend to residuated lattices the results of [ 7 ]. It also provides a possible generalization to this context of frontal operators in the sense of [ 9 ]. Let L be a residuated lattice, and f : L k → L a function. We give a necessary and sufficient condition for f to be compatible with respect to every congruence on L . We use this characterization of compatible functions in order to prove that the variety of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Krystyna Mruczek-Nasieniewska (2010). The Varieties Defined by P - Compatible Identities of Modular Ortholattices. Studia Logica 95 (1/2):21 - 35.score: 8.0
    In the present paper we give syntactical and semantical characterization of the class of algebras defined by P-compatible identities of modular ortholattices. We also describe the lattice of some subvarieties of the variety MOL Ex defined by so called externally compatible identities of modular ortholattices.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. J. L. Castiglioni & H. J. San Martín (2011). Compatible Operations on Residuated Lattices. Studia Logica 98 (1/2):203 - 222.score: 8.0
    This work extend to residuated lattices the results of [7]. It also provides a possible generalization to this context of frontal operators in the sense of [9]. Let L be a residuated lattice, and f: L k → L a function. We give a necessary and sufficient condition for f to be compatible with respect to every congruence on L. We use this characterization of compatible functions in order to prove that the variety of residuated lattices is locally affine complete. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Karin Bohmann (1989). About the Sense of Social Compatibility. AI and Society 3 (4):323-331.score: 8.0
    The debate in the Federal Republic of Germany on the estimation of the social compatibility of the consequences of technology as a criterion for the evaluation of technical systems has been going on since the mid seventies. The approach presented discusses the normative structurally transcending perspective of the viability and developmental capacity of society. The question of desirable social development as opposed to the technically possible is raised. A criteria system for evaluating social compatibility of new information and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Krystyna Mruczek-Nasieniewska (2007). Externally Compatible Abelian Groups of the Type (2,1,0). Logic and Logical Philosophy 15 (3):239-250.score: 8.0
    In [4] the lattice of all subvarieties of the variety G n Ex defined by so called externally compatible identities of Abelian groups together with the identity x n ≈ y n , for any n ∈ N and n ≥ 1 was described. In that paper classes of models of the type (2,1) where considered. It appears that diagrams of lattices of subvariaties defined by externally compatible identities satisfied in a given equational theory depend on the language of the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Rodolfo Cristian Ertola Biraben & Hernán Javier San Martín (2011). On Some Compatible Operations on Heyting Algebras. Studia Logica 98 (3):331 - 345.score: 8.0
    We study some operations that may be defined using the minimum operator in the context of a Heyting algebra. Our motivation comes from the fact that 1) already known compatible operations, such as the successor by Kuznetsov, the minimum dense by Smetanich and the operation G by Gabbay may be defined in this way, though almost never explicitly noted in the literature; 2) defining operations in this way is equivalent, from a logical point of view, to two clauses, one corresponding (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Fernando Castro-Chavez (2012). The Rules of Variation Expanded, Implications for the Research on Compatible Genomics. Biosemiotics 5 (1):121-145.score: 8.0
    The main focus of this article is to present the practical aspect of the code rules of variation and the search for a second set of genomic rules, including comparison of sequences to understand how to preserve compatible organisms in danger of extinction and how to generate biodiversity. Three new rules of variation are introduced: 1) homologous recombination, 2) a healthy fertile offspring, and 3) comparison of compatible genomes. The novel search in the natural world for fully compatible genomes capable (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Christiane Diefenbach, Martina Rieger, Cristina Massen & Wolfgang Prinz (2013). Action-Sentence Compatibility: The Role of Action Effects and Timing. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 8.0
    Research on embodied approaches to language comprehension suggests that we understand linguistic descriptions of actions by mentally simulating these actions. Evidence is provided by the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE) which shows that sensibility judgments for sentences are faster when the direction of the described action matches the response direction. In two experiments, we investigated whether the ACE relies on actions or on intended action effects. Participants gave sensibility judgments of auditorily presented sentences by producing an action effect on a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Brenda Ocampo & Matthew Finkbeiner (2013). The Negative Compatibility Effect with Relevant Masks: A Case for Automatic Motor Inhibition. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 8.0
    For many years controversy has surrounded the so-called ‘negative compatibility effect’ (NCE), a surprising phenomenon whereby responses to a target stimulus are delayed when the target is preceded by an unconscious, response-compatible prime. According to proponents of the ‘self-inhibition’ hypothesis, the NCE occurs when a low-level self-inhibitory mechanism supresses early motor activations that are no longer supported by perceptual evidence. This account has been debated, however, by those who regard the NCE to be a stimulus-specific phenomenon that can be (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Ronald Mallon & Stephen P. Stich (2000). The Odd Couple: The Compatibility of Social Construction and Evolutionary Psychology. Philosophy Of Science 67 (1):133-154.score: 7.0
    Evolutionary psychology and social constructionism are widely regarded as fundamentally irreconcilable approaches to the social sciences. Focusing on the study of the emotions, we argue that this appearance is mistaken. Much of what appears to be an empirical disagreement between evolutionary psychologists and social constructionists over the universality or locality of emotional phenomena is actually generated by an implicit philosophical dispute resulting from the adoption of different theories of meaning and reference. We argue that once this philosophical dispute is recognized, (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. John V. Canfield (1962). The Compatibility of Free Will and Determinism. Philosophical Review 71 (July):352-368.score: 7.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Clement Dore (1963). Is Free Will Compatible with Determinism? Philosophical Review 72 (October):500-501.score: 7.0
    If we maintain that free will requires the absence of determinism, Then can we claim to be free without any wants? if we had no wants at all, What sense would there to be talk about free will? the difference between free will and the absence of free will is not that between indeterminism and determinism. Free choice presupposes determinism in that in order to make a choice an individual must have some motive or reason for so doing. The difference (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Stephen P. Stich & Ron Mallon (2000). The Odd Couple: The Compatibility of Social Construction and Evolutionary Psychology. Philosophy of Science 67 (1):133-154.score: 7.0
    Evolutionary psychology and social constructionism are widely regarded as fundamentally irreconcilable approaches to the social sciences. Focusing on the study of the emotions, we argue that this appearance is mistaken. Much of what appears to be an empirical disagreement between evolutionary psychologists and social constructionists over the universality or locality of emotional phenomena is actually generated by an implicit philosophical dispute resulting from the adoption of different theories of meaning and reference. We argue that once this philosophical dispute is recognized, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. William P. Bechtel (1988). Connectionism and Rules and Representation Systems: Are They Compatible? Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):5-16.score: 7.0
    The introduction of connectionist or parallel distributed processing (PDP) systems to model cognitive functions has raised the question of the possible relations between these models and traditional information processing models which employ rules to manipulate representations. After presenting a brief account of PDP models and two ways in which they are commonly interpreted by those seeking to use them to explain cognitive functions, I present two ways one might relate these models to traditional information processing models and so not totally (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Richard J. Wallace (1972). Spatial S-R Compatibility Effects Involving Kinesthetic Cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):163.score: 7.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Irving Biederman & Robert Kaplan (1970). Stimulus Discriminability and S-R Compatibility: Evidence for Independent Effects in Choice Reaction Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (3):434.score: 7.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Louis D. Costa, Morton Horwitz & Herbert G. Vaughan Jr (1966). Effects of Stimulus Uncertainty and S-R Compatibility on Speed of Digit Coding. Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (6):895.score: 7.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Steven W. Keele (1967). Compatibility and Time-Sharing in Serial Reaction Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (4):529.score: 7.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Akio Nishimura & Chikashi Michimata (2013). Pointing Hand Stimuli Induce Spatial Compatibility Effects and Effector Priming. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 7.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Antonello Pellicano, Valeria Barna, Roberto Nicoletti, Sandro Rubichi & Carlo A. Marzi (2013). Interhemispheric Vs. Stimulus-Response Spatial Compatibility Effects in Bimanual Reaction Times to Lateralized Visual Stimuli. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 7.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Paul M. Fitts & Irving Biederman (1965). S-R Compatibility and Information Reduction. Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (4):408.score: 7.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Paul M. Fitts & Charles M. Seeger (1953). S-R Compatibility: Spatial Characteristics of Stimulus and Response Codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (3):199.score: 7.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Charles L. Folk (2013). Dissociating Compatibility Effects and Distractor Costs in the Additional Singleton Paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 7.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. O. Joseph Harm & Joseph S. Lappin (1973). Probability, Compatibility, Speed, and Accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology 100 (2):416.score: 7.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Harold L. Hawkins & James R. Underhill (1971). S-R Compatibility and the Relative Frequency Effect in Choice Reaction Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (2):280.score: 7.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Richard P. LeMay & J. Richard Simon (1969). Temporal and Symbolic S-R Compatibility in a Sequential Information-Processing Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):558.score: 7.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Krystyna Mruczek-Nasieniewska (2005). P-Compatible Abelian Groups. Logic and Logical Philosophy 14 (2):253-263.score: 7.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. J. Richard Simon, James V. Hinrichs & John L. Craft (1970). Auditory S-R Compatibility: Reaction Time as a Function of Ear-Hand Correspondence and Ear-Response-Location Correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):97.score: 7.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Andrew K. Solarz (1960). Latency of Instrumental Responses as a Function of Compatibility with the Meaning of Eliciting Verbal Signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (4):239.score: 7.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Dennis L. Wack & Nickolas B. Cottrell (1969). Interactive Effect of Drive and S-R Compatibility on Speed of Digit Coding. Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):562.score: 7.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Richard J. Wallace (1971). S-R Compatibility and the Idea of a Response Code. Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (3):354.score: 7.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Kristin L. Borreggine & Michael P. Kaschak (2006). The Action–Sentence Compatibility Effect: It's All in the Timing. Cognitive Science 30 (6):1097-1112.score: 7.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. James Callan, Diane Klisz & Oscar A. Parsons (1974). Strength of Auditory Stimulus-Response Compatability as a Function of Task Complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (6):1039.score: 7.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. E. Scott Geller, Charles P. Whitman & John C. Farris (1972). Probability Discrimination Indicated by Stimulus Prediction and Reaction Speed: Effects of S-R Compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (2):404.score: 7.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Anthony G. Greenwald (1972). On Doing Two Things at Once: Time Sharing as a Function of Ideomotor Compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology 94 (1):52.score: 7.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Harvey G. Shulman & Alan McConkie (1973). S-R Compatability, Response Discriminability, and Response Codes in Choice Reaction Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (2):375.score: 7.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Charles P. Whitman & E. Scott Geller (1971). Prediction Outcome, S-R Compatibility, and Choice Reaction Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (2):299.score: 7.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Nicholas Maxwell (1988). Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Compatible? Philosophy of Science 55 (4):640-645.score: 6.0
    Are special relativity and probabilism compatible? Dieks argues that they are. But the possible universe he specifies, designed to exemplify both probabilism and special relativity, either incorporates a universal "now" (and is thus incompatible with special relativity), or amounts to a many world universe (which I have discussed, and rejected as too ad hoc to be taken seriously), or fails to have any one definite overall Minkowskian-type space-time structure (and thus differs drastically from special relativity as ordinarily understood). Probabilism and (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Nicola Ciprotti & Luca Moretti (2009). Logical Pluralism is Compatible with Monism About Metaphysical Modality. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (2):275-284.score: 6.0
    Beall and Restall 2000; 2001; 2006 advocate a comprehensive pluralist approach to logic, which they call Logical Pluralism, according to which there is not one true logic but many equally acceptable logical systems. They maintain that Logical Pluralism is compatible with monism about metaphysical modality, according to which there is just one correct logic of metaphysical modality. Wyatt 2004 contends that Logical Pluralism is incompatible with monism about metaphysical modality. We first suggest that if Wyatt were right, Logical Pluralism would (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Pirooz Fatoorchi (2010). Four Conceptions of Creatio Ex Nihilo and the Compatibility Questions. In David B. Burrell, Carlo Cogliati, Janet M. Soskice & William R. Stoeger (eds.), Creation and the God of Abraham. Cambridge University Press.score: 6.0
    The notion of creatio ex nihilo has become a doctrine firmly established in the three Abrahamic religions (i.e., Christianity, Judaism and Islam). Almost all groups of Islamic thinkers accept the truth of the createdness (creatio) of the universe, and that it is preceded by its “non-existence” (ex nihilo). However, there is a diversity of opinions as to whether the concept of creatio ex nihilo is compatible with alternative accounts of the origin of the physical world, and this diversity is particularly (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Milena Ivanova (2011). Friedman's Relativised A Priori and Structural Realism: In Search of Compatibility. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):23 - 37.score: 6.0
    In this article I discuss a recent argument due to Dan McArthur, who suggests that the charge that Michael Friedman?s relativised a priori leads to irrationality in theory change can be avoided by adopting structural realism. I provide several arguments to show that the conjunction of Friedman?s relativised a priori with structural realism cannot make the former avoid the charge of irrationality. I also explore the extent to which Friedman?s view and structural realism are compatible, a presupposition of McArthur?s argument. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Jeff Speaks (2011). Foreknowledge, Evil, and Compatibility Arguments. Faith and Philosophy 28 (3):269-293.score: 6.0
    Most arguments against God’s existence aim to show that it is incompatible with various apparent features of the world, such as the existence of evil or of human free will. In response, theists have sought to show that God’s existence is compatible with these features of the world. However, the fact that the proposition that God exists is necessary if possible introduces some underappreciated difficulties for these arguments.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Peter Pagin (1997). Is Compositionality Compatible with Holism? Mind and Language 12 (1):11-33.score: 6.0
    Peter Pagin Is the principle of semantic compositionality compatible with the principle of semantic holism? The question is of interest, since both principles have a lot that speaks for them, and since they do seem to be in conflict. The view that natural languages have compositional structure is almost unavoidable, since linguistic communication by means of new combinations of words would be virtually incomprehensible otherwise. And holism too seems generally plausible, since the meaning of an expression is directly connected with (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Daniel C. Dennett & Alvin Plantinga (2011). Science and Religion: Are They Compatible? OUP USA.score: 6.0
    One of today's most controversial and heated issues is whether or not the conflict between science and religion can be reconciled. In Science and Religion: Are They Compatible?, renowned philosophers Daniel C. Dennett and Alvin Plantinga expand upon the arguments that they presented in an exciting live debate held at the 2009 American Philosophical Association Central Division conference. An enlightening discussion that will motivate students to think critically, Science and Religion: Are They Compatible? opens with Plantinga's assertion that Christianity is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Valer Ambrus (1999). Is Putnam's Causal Theory of Meaning Compatible with Internal Realism? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 30 (1):1-16.score: 6.0
    Putnam originally developed his causal theory of meaning in order to support scientific realism and reject the notion of incommensurability. Later he gave up this position and adopted instead what he called ‘internal realism’, but apparently without changing his mind on topics related to his former philosophy of language. The question must arise whether internal realism, which actually is a species of antirealism, is compatible with the causal theory of meaning. In giving an answer I begin with an analysis of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Jeeloo Liu (2002). Physical Externalism and Social Externalism: Are They Really Compatible? Journal of Philosophical Research 27:381-404.score: 6.0
    Putnam and Burge have been viewed as launching a joint attack on individualism, the view that the content of one's psychological state is determined by what is in the head . Putnam argues that meanings are not in the head while Burge argues that beliefs are not in the head either, and both have come up with convincing arguments against individualism. It is generally conceived that Putnam's view is a version of physical externalism, which argues that factors in the physical (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. William P. Bechtel (2001). The Compatibility of Complex Systems and Reduction: A Case Analysis of Memory Research. [REVIEW] Minds And Machines 11 (4):483-502.score: 6.0
    Some theorists who emphasize the complexity of biological and cognitive systems and who advocate the employment of the tools of dynamical systems theory in explaining them construe complexity and reduction as exclusive alternatives. This paper argues that reduction, an approach to explanation that decomposes complex activities and localizes the components within the complex system, is not only compatible with an emphasis on complexity, but provides the foundation for dynamical analysis. Explanation via decomposition and localization is nonetheless extremely challenging, and an (...)
    Direct download (17 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000