6 found
Sort by:
  1. Connie M. Ulrich, Gwenyth R. Wallen, Autumn Feister & Christine Grady (forthcoming). Respondent Burden in Clinical Research: When Are We Asking Too Much of Subjects? Irb.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Connie M. Ulrich (2010). Nurse Practitioners: What Does the Public Need to Know? American Journal of Bioethics 10 (8):14-15.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Connie M. Ulrich, Ann B. Hamric & Christine Grady (2010). Moral Distress: A Growing Problem in the Health Professions? Hastings Center Report 40 (1):20-22.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Christine Grady, Marion Danis, Karen L. Soeken, Patricia O'Donnell, Carol Taylor, Adrienne Farrar & Connie M. Ulrich (2008). Does Ethics Education Influence the Moral Action of Practicing Nurses and Social Workers? American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):4 – 11.
    Purpose/methods: This study investigated the relationship between ethics education and training, and the use and usefulness of ethics resources, confidence in moral decisions, and moral action/activism through a survey of practicing nurses and social workers from four United States (US) census regions. Findings: The sample (n = 1215) was primarily Caucasian (83%), female (85%), well educated (57% with a master's degree). no ethics education at all was reported by 14% of study participants (8% of social workers had no ethics education, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Connie M. Ulrich & Sarah J. Ratcliffe (2007). Hypothetical Vignettes in Empirical Bioethics Research. Advances in Bioethics 11:161-181.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Connie M. Ulrich & Karen L. Soeken (2005). A Path Analytic Model of Ethical Conflict in Practice and Autonomy in a Sample of Nurse Practitioners. Nursing Ethics 12 (3):305-316.
    The purpose of this study was to test a causal model of ethical conflict in practice and autonomy in a sample of 254 nurse practitioners working in the primary care areas of family health, pediatrics, adult health and obstetrics/gynecology in the state of Maryland. A test of the model was conducted using a path analytic approach with LISREL 8.30 hypothesizing individual, organizational and societal/market factors influencing ethical conflict in practice and autonomy. Maximum likelihood estimation was used to estimate the parameters (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation