14 found
Order:
See also:
  1.  50
    Craige Roberts (2003). Uniqueness in Definite Noun Phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (3):287-350.
  2.  27
    Mandy Simons, David Beaver, Judith Tonhauser & Craige Roberts, What Projects and Why.
    The empirical phenomenon at the center of this paper is projection, which we define (uncontroversially) as follows: (1) Definition of projection An implication projects if and only if it survives as an utterance implication when the expression that triggers the implication occurs under the syntactic scope of an entailment-cancelling operator. Projection is observed, for example, with utterances containing aspectual verbs like stop, as shown in (2) and (3) with examples from English and Paraguayan Guaraní (Paraguay, Tupí-Guaraní).1 The Guaraní example in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  3.  36
    Craige Roberts (1989). Modal Subordination and Pronominal Anaphora in Discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (6):683 - 721.
  4.  12
    Craige Roberts (2002). Demonstratives as Definites. In K. van Deemter & R. Kibble (eds.), Information Sharing: Reference and Presupposition in Language Generation and Interpretation. CSLI Press 89-196.
  5.  73
    Patricia Amaral, Craige Roberts & E. Allyn Smith (2007). Review of the Logic of Conventional Implicatures by Chris Potts. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (6):707-749.
    We review Potts' influential book on the semantics of conventional implicature , offering an explication of his technical apparatus and drawing out the proposal's implications, focusing on the class of CIs he calls supplements. While we applaud many facets of this work, we argue that careful considerations of the pragmatics of CIs will be required in order to yield an empirically and explanatorily adequate account.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  6. Craige Roberts (2004). Pronouns as Definites. In Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions and Beyond. Clarendon Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  7.  28
    Craige Roberts, Information Structure: Afterword.
    As a graduate student in Linguistics at UMass/Amherst in the 1980s, I was fortunate to be exposed to a number of new developments bearing on the relationship between formal semantics and pragmatics. In the 1970s under the influence of Cresswell, Lewis, Montague, and Partee, enormous progress in semantics was made possible by narrowing the focus of the field mainly to the consideration of the conventional, truth conditional content of an indicative utterance, calculated compositionally as a function of the semantic contributions (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  50
    Mandy Simons, Craige Roberts, Judith Tonhauser & David I. Beaver (2009). Presuppositions, Conventional Implicature, and Beyond: A Unified Account of Projection. In Nathan Klinedist & Daniel Rothschild (eds.), Proceedings of Workshop on New Directions in the Theory of Presuppositions. Essli 2009
    We define a notion of projective meaning which encompasses both classical presuppositions and phenomena which are usually regarded as non-presuppositional but which also display projection behavior—Horn’s assertorically inert entailments, conventional implicatures (both Grice’s and Potts’) and some conversational implicatures. We argue that the central feature of all projective meanings is that they are not-at-issue, defined as a relation to the question under discussion. Other properties differentiate various sub-classes of projective meanings, one of them the class of presuppositions according to Stalnaker. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  8
    Alicia Cipria & Craige Roberts (2000). Spanish Imperfecto and Pretérito: Truth Conditions and Aktionsart Effects in a Situation Semantics. [REVIEW] Natural Language Semantics 8 (4):297-347.
    Spanish verbs display two past-tense forms, the pret´rito and the imperfecto. We offer an account of the semantics of these forms within a situation semantics, addressing a number of theoretically interesting questions about how to realize a semantics for tense and events in that type of framework. We argue that each of these forms is unambiguous, and that the apparent variety of readings attested for them derives from interaction with other factors in the course of interpretation. The meaning of the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  10. Craige Roberts (1997). Anaphora in Intensional Contexts. In Shalom Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Blackwell 215--246.
    In the semantic literature, there is a class of examples involving anaphora in intensional contexts, i.e. under the scope of modal operators or propositional attitude predicates, which display anaphoric relations that appear at first glance to violate otherwise well-supported generalizations about operator scope and anaphoric potential. In Section 1,I will illustrate this phenomenon, which, for reasons that should become clear below, I call modal subordination; I will develop a general schema for its identification, and show how it poses problems for (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  11.  7
    Craige Roberts (1995). Domain Restriction in Dynamic Semantics. In Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages. Kluwer 661--700.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12. Craige Roberts (2011). Only: A Case Study In Projective Meaning. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6 (1):14.
    I offer an integrated theory of the meaning of only in which the prejacent, while not presupposed, is both entailed and backgrounded, hence tends to project . Moreover, I argue, contra Beaver & Brady , that only is not conventionally associated with focus, the focus effects arising instead pragmatically. But I do adopt aspects of their semantics for only, including the presupposition of a pre-order over the elements of its domain.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Craige Roberts (2010). Only: A Case Study In Projective Meaning. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Judith Tonhauser, David Beaver, Craige Roberts & Mandy Simons (2013). Toward a Taxonomy of Projective Content. Language 89 (1):66-109.
    Projective contents, which include presuppositional inferences and Potts's conventional implicatures, are contents that may project when a construction is embedded, as standardly identified by the FAMILY-OF-SENTENCES diagnostic. This article establishes distinctions among projective contents on the basis of a series of diagnostics, including a variant of the family-of-sentences diagnostic, that can be applied with linguistically untrained consultants in the field and the laboratory. These diagnostics are intended to serve as part of a toolkit for exploring projective contents across languages, thus (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography