Search results for 'Creationism Philosophy' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Michael Ruse (1990). Making Use of Creationism. A Case-Study for the Philosophy of Science Classroom. Studies in Philosophy and Education 10 (1):81-92.score: 174.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Edward L. Schoen (2008). Sahotra Sarkar, Doubting Darwin: Creationist Designs on Evolution (Blackwell Public Philosophy Series). [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (3):167-171.score: 126.0
  3. Leroy S. Rouner (1974). Creationism and Emanationism: A Problem in Radhakrishnan's Philosophy. Philosophy East and West 24 (2):227-238.score: 126.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Gordon Campbell (2009). Philosophy (D.N.) Sedley Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. (Sather Classical Lectures 66). Berkeley and London: University of California Press, 2007. Pp. Xvii + 269. $29.95/£17.95. 9780520253643. [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 129:227-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Roy R. Bode (1955). Creationism in Physics and Philosophy. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 29:135-139.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Elliott Sober (2000). Philosophy of Biology. Westview Press.score: 102.0
    Perhaps because of it implications for our understanding of human nature, recent philosophy of biology has seen what might be the most dramatic work in the philosophies of the ”special” sciences. This drama has centered on evolutionary theory, and in the second edition of this textbook, Elliott Sober introduces the reader to the most important issues of these developments. With a rare combination of technical sophistication and clarity of expression, Sober engages both the higher level of theory and the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Robert T. Pennock (1996). Naturalism, Evidence and Creationism: The Case of Phillip Johnson. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 11 (4):543-559.score: 72.0
    Phillip Johnson claims that Creationism is a better explanation of the existence and characteristics of biological species than is evolutionary theory. He argues that the only reason biologists do not recognize that Creationist's negative arguments against Darwinism have proven this is that they are wedded to a biased ideological philosophy —Naturalism — which dogmatically denies the possibility of an intervening creative god. However,Johnson fails to distinguish Ontological Naturalism from Methodological Naturalism. Science makes use of the latter and I (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Grzegorz Bugajak & Jacek Tomczyk (2009). Human Origins: Continuous Evolution Versus Punctual Creation. In Pranab Das (ed.), Global Perspectives on Science and Spirituality. Templeton Press. 143–164.score: 72.0
    One of the particular problems in the debate between science and theology regarding human origins seems to be an apparent controversy between the continuous character of evolutionary processes leading to the origin of Homo sapiens and the punctual understanding of the act of creation of man seen as taking place in a moment in time. The paper elaborates scientific arguments for continuity or discontinuity of evolution, and what follows, for the existence or nonexistence of a clear borderline between our species (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Christine James (2008). Evolution and Conservative Christianity: How Philosophy of Science Pedagogy Can Begin the Conversation. Spontaneous Generations 2 (1):185-212.score: 66.0
    I teach Philosophy of Science at a four-year state university located in the southeastern United States with a strong college of education. This means that the Philosophy of Science class I teach attracts large numbers of students who will later become science teachers in Georgia junior high and high schools—the same schools that recently began including evolution "warning" stickers in science textbooks. I am also a faculty member in a department combining Religious Studies and Philosophy. This means (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Christopher Winch (2008). Philosophy of Education: The Key Concepts. Routledge.score: 66.0
    This new edition of Philosophy of Education: The Key Concepts is an easy to use A-Z guide summarizing all the key terms, ideas and issues central to the study of educational theory today. Fully updated, the book is cross-referenced throughout and contains pointers to further reading, as well as new entries on such topics as: Citizenship and Civic Education Liberalism Capability Well-being Patriotism Globalisation Open-mindedness Creationism and Intelligent Design. Comprehensive and authoritative this highly accessible guide provides all that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Massimo Pigliucci (2005). More Than You Ever Wanted to Know About Intelligent Design. [REVIEW] Evolution 59 (12):2717-2720.score: 60.0
    The so-called evolution wars (Futuyma 1995; Pigliucci 2002) between the scientific understanding of the history of life on earth and various religiously inspired forms of cre- ationism are more than ever at the forefront of the broader ‘‘science wars,’’ themselves a part of the even more encom- passing ‘‘cultural wars.’’ With all these conflicts going on, and at a time when a potentially historical case on the teach- ing of Intelligent Design (ID) in public schools is being de- bated in (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Christopher Norris & Marianna Papastephanou (2002). Deconstruction, Anti–Realism and Philosophy of Science—an Interview with Christopher Norris. Journal of Philosophy of Education 36 (2):265–289.score: 60.0
    In this interview, Christopher Norris discusses a wide range of issues having to do with postmodernism, deconstruction and other controversial topics of debate within present-day philosophy and critical theory. More specifically he challenges the view of deconstruction as just another offshoot of the broader postmodernist trend in cultural studies and the social sciences. Norris puts the case for deconstruction as continuing the 'unfinished project of modernity' and—in particular—for Derrida's work as sustaining the values of enlightened critical reason in various (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Massimo Pigliucci (2007). Evolution, Schmevolution: Jon Stewart and the Culture Wars. In J. Holt (ed.), The Daily Show and Philosophy. Wiley.score: 60.0
    Jon Stewart, the famous comic of the Daily Show, takes on creationism, intelligent design and evolution.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Michael Ruse (ed.) (1988). But is It Science?: The Philosophical Question in the Creation/Evolution Controversy. Prometheus Books.score: 60.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Igor I. Kondrashin (2008). The Motion in Quality as The Scientific Alternative to Ideas of Creationism. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 17:97-106.score: 60.0
    Rethinking “philosophy” to-day, it is necessary to think first of all about ontological foundations of the modern scientific universe description and rethink them on the ground of modern scientific knowledge, because until now there is no any precise scientific conception of the structure of the universe, of reasons and movingforces of its permanent evolution. All of it create basis to propose various unscientific ideas of creationism. Until now most of philosophers associate the motion of Matter on the whole (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Robert T. Pennock & Michael Ruse (eds.) (2009). But is It Science?: The Philosophical Question in the Creation/Evolution Controversy. Prometheus Books.score: 60.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. John S. Wilkins (2001). Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (2):302 – 304.score: 54.0
    Book Information Tower of Babel: the evidence against the new creationism. By Robert T. Pennock. Bradford/MIT Press. Cambridge MA. 1999. Pp. xviii + 429.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Paul Thagard, Evolution, Creation, and the Philosophy of Science.score: 54.0
    Debates about evolution and creation inevitably raise philosophical issues about the nature of scientific knowledge. What is a theory? What is an explanation? How is science different from non- science? How should theories be evaluated? Does science achieve truth? The aim of this chapter is to give a concise and accessible introduction to the philosophy of science, focusing on questions relevant to understanding evolution by natural selection, creation, and intelligent design. For the questions just listed, I state what I (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. J. Dupre (1996). Review of Sober's "Philosophy of Biology". [REVIEW] Philosophical Explorations 63:143-145.score: 54.0
    Elliott Sober is among the leading contemporary contributors to the philosophy of biology. He also has an exceptional ability to explain difficult ideas clearly. He is therefore very well equipped to provide an accessible yet state-of-the-art introduction to the philosophy of biology, and in most respects this optimistic prognosis is justified by the present volume. Focussing on evolutionary biology, Sober provides a general overview of evolutionary theory; a chapter on creationism that serves as a vehicle for the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. William Dembski (2006). In Defence of Intelligent Design. In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oup Oxford. 715-731.score: 48.0
    Accession Number: ATLA0001712271; Hosting Book Page Citation: p 715-731.; Physical Description: il ; Language(s): English; General Note: Bibliography: p 728-731.; Issued by ATLA: 20130825; Publication Type: Essay.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. David Sackris (2013). A Defense of Causal Creationism in Fiction. Philosophical Writings 41 (1):32-46.score: 48.0
    In this paper I seek defend the view that fictional characters are author-created abstract entities against objections offered by Stuart Brock in his paper “The Creationist Fiction: The Case against Creationism about Fictional Characters.” I argue that his objections fall far short of his goal of showing that if philosophers want to believe in fictional characters as abstract objects, they should not view them as author-created. My defense of creationism in fiction in part rests on tying the act (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. David B. Wilson & Warren D. Dolphin (eds.) (1996). Did the Devil Make Darwin Do It?: Modern Perspectives on the Creation-Evolution Controversy. Iowa State University Press.score: 48.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Michael J. Reiss (2011). How Should Creationism and Intelligent Design Be Dealt with in the Classroom? Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):399-415.score: 42.0
    Until recently, little attention has been paid in the school classroom to creationism and almost none to intelligent design. However, creationism and possibly intelligent design appear to be on the increase and there are indications that there are more countries in which schools are becoming battle-grounds over them. I begin by examining whether creationism and intelligent design are controversial issues, drawing on Robert Dearden's epistemic criterion of the controversial and more recent responses to and defences of this. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. D. N. Sedley (2008). Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. University of California Press.score: 42.0
    In this book, David Sedley examines this question and illuminates new historical perspectives on the pantheon of thinkers who laid the foundations of Western ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. David L. Hull (2001). Michael Ruse and His Fifteen Years of Booknotes – for Better or for Worse. Biology and Philosophy 16 (3):423-435.score: 42.0
    In this paper I trace Michael Ruse's Booknotes from the first volumeof Biology and Philosophy in 1986 to the present. I deal withboth the style and the content of these booknotes. Ruse paid specialattention to authors outside of the traditional English axis as wellas to feminist writers. He complained that too much attention wasbeing paid to certain topics (e.g., evolutionary ethics, evolutionaryepistemology, the species problem and reduction) while other, moreimportant topics were all but ignored (e.g., natural selection,population genetics, levels (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. George Nakhnikian (2004). It Ain't Necessarily So: An Essay Review of Intelligent Design Creationism and its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives. Philosophy of Science 71 (4):593-604.score: 38.0
    Nature exhibits a rich variety of adaptations. Cells contain complex biomolecular structures, such as proteins, that are exquisitely adapted to perform specific biological functions. Evolutionary biology explains how biomolecular structures evolve. Intelligent design creationists reject evolutionary explanations. They want to believe that all adaptations in nature are the handiwork of God. Their critics aver that “it ain't necessarily so.” The anthology under review is an excellent display of the issues between intelligent design creationists and their critics. I agree with the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Kelly C. Smith (2011). Foiling the Black Knight. Synthese 178 (2):219 - 235.score: 36.0
    Why is the academy in general, and philosophy in particular, not more involved in the fight against the creationist threat? And why, when a response is offered, is it so curiously ineffective? I argue, by using an analogy with the battle against the Black Knight from the movie Monty Python and the Holy Grail, that the difficulty lies largely in a failure to see the nature of the problem clearly. By modifying the analogy, it is possible to see both (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Norman Kretzmann (1997). Creation Without Creationism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 21 (1):118-144.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Michael Ruse (2009). Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (3):pp. 464-466.score: 36.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Marian Hillar (2000). Creationism and Evolution Misconceptions About Science and Religion and the Socinian Solution. Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 8:1-27.score: 36.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Michael Ruse (1984). Book Review:Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism Philip Kitcher. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 51 (2):348-.score: 36.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Philip Kitcher (2003). In Mendel's Mirror: Philosophical Reflections on Biology. Oxford University Press.score: 36.0
    Philip Kitcher is one of the leading figures in the philosophy of science today. Here he collects, for the first time, many of his published articles on the philosophy of biology, spanning from the mid-1980's to the present. The book's title refers to Gregor Mendel, an Augustinian monk who was one of the first scientists to develop a theory of heredity. Mendel's work has been deeply influential to our understanding of our selves and our world, just as the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Doren Recker (2007). Scientific Creationism, Intelligent Design, and the Demarcation Problem. Southwest Philosophy Review 23 (1):27-38.score: 36.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Daniel W. Graham (2009). Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. Ancient Philosophy 29 (2):423-427.score: 36.0
  35. Francisco J. Ayala (2006). Evolution Vs. Creationism. [REVIEW] History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 28 (1):71 - 82.score: 36.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. John Robert Baker (1992). The Epistemological Veil of Scientific Creationism. Southwest Philosophy Review 8 (1):173-181.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Frederick J. Crosson (1984). Is God a Creationist? Faith and Philosophy 1 (3):343-345.score: 36.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Ronald L. Numbers (2010). Clarifying Creationism: Five Common Myths. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33 (1):129-139.score: 36.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. D. R. Griffin (2007). Creationism, God, and Global Ethic. Philosophy and Culture 397:27-40.score: 36.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. William A. Rottschaefer (1986). Willard A. Young, Fallacies of Creationism Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 6 (8):411-412.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Niall Shanks (2003). Robert T. Pennock, Ed., Intelligent Design Creationism and its Critics: Philosophical, Theological and Scientific Perspectives Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 23 (4):270-272.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Adolf Grünbaum (2004). The Poverty of Theistic Cosmology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):561 - 614.score: 30.0
    Philosophers have postulated the existence of God to explain (I) why any contingent objects exist at all rather than nothing contingent, and (II) why the fundamental laws of nature and basic facts of the world are exactly what they are. Therefore, we ask: (a) Does (I) pose a well-conceived question which calls for an answer? and (b) Can God's presumed will (or intention) provide a cogent explanation of the basic laws and facts of the world, as claimed by (II)? We (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Bokyoung Son & Yeonoh Son (2008). The Principle of Human Essence. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 17:423-429.score: 30.0
    Even though many people have been looking for the origin of human beings, we still don’t know how human beings came into existence. So far, there are two major theories to explain human beings’ starting point – creationism and the theory of evolution. These theories are so abstract that it is hard to accept either one.This essay presents a new theory which explains how human beings and all beings come into existence and carries implications bearing on human conduct. The (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Eric Dietrich (2011). There Is No Progress in Philosophy. Essays in Philosophy 12 (2):9.score: 27.0
    Except for a patina of twenty-first century modernity, in the form of logic and language, philosophy is exactly the same now as it ever was; it has made no progress whatsoever. We philosophers wrestle with the exact same problems the Pre-Socratics wrestled with. Even more outrageous than this claim, though, is the blatant denial of its obvious truth by many practicing philosophers. The No-Progress view is explored and argued for here. Its denial is diagnosed as a form of anosognosia, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Babette E. Babich (2003). On the Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy : Nietzsche's Lying Truth, Heidegger's Speaking Language, and Philosophy. In C. G. Prado (ed.), A House Divided: Comparing Analytic and Continental Philosophy. Humanity Books.score: 27.0
    On the political nature of the analytic - continental distinction in professional philosophy and the general tendency to discredit continental philosophy while redesignating the rubric as analytically conceived.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Lydia Patton (2010). Review: Makkreel and Luft (Eds), Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 30 (4):280-282.score: 27.0
    A volume dealing seriously with the influence of the major schools of Neo-Kantian thought on contemporary philosophy has been needed sorely for some time. But this volume of essays aims higher: it 'is published in the hopes that it will secure Neo-Kantianism a significant place in contemporary philosophical discussions' (Introduction, 1). The aim of the book, then, is partly to provide a history of major Neo-Kantian thinkers and their influence, and partly to argue for their importance in contemporary (continental) (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Joshua Knobe (2007). Experimental Philosophy. Philosophy Compass 2 (1):81–92.score: 27.0
    Claims about people's intuitions have long played an important role in philosophical debates. The new field of experimental philosophy seeks to subject such claims to rigorous tests using the traditional methods of cognitive science – systematic experimentation and statistical analysis. Work in experimental philosophy thus far has investigated people's intuitions in philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, epistemology, and ethics. Although it is now generally agreed that experimental philosophers have made surprising discoveries about people's intuitions in (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Neil Levy & Yasuko Kitano (2011). We're All Folk: An Interview with Neil Levy About Experimental Philosophy and Conceptual Analysis. Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 19:87-98.score: 27.0
    The following is a transcript of the interview I (Yasuko Kitano) conducted with Neil Levy (The Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, CAPPE) on the 23rd in July 2009, while he was in Tokyo to give a series of lectures on neuroethics at The University of Tokyo Center for Philosophy. I edited his words for publication with his approval.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Jennifer Nagel & Kaija Mortensen (forthcoming). Armchair-Friendly Experimental Philosophy. In Justin Sytsma & Wesley Buckwalter (eds.), A Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Blackwell.score: 27.0
    Once symbolized by a burning armchair, experimental philosophy has in recent years shifted away from its original hostility to traditional methods. Starting with a brief historical review of the experimentalist challenge to traditional philosophical practice, this chapter looks at research undercutting that challenge, and at ways in which experimental work has evolved to complement and strengthen traditional approaches to philosophical questions.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Ian Hacking (2011). Why is There Philosophy of Mathematics AT ALL? South African Journal of Philosophy 30 (1):1-15.score: 27.0
    Mathematics plays an inordinate role in the work of many of famous Western philosophers, from the time of Plato, through Husserl and Wittgenstein, and even to the present. Why? This paper points to the experience of learning or making mathematics, with an emphasis on proof. It distinguishes two sources of the perennial impact of mathematics on philosophy. They are classified as Ancient and Enlightenment. Plato is emblematic of the former, and Kant of the latter. The Ancient fascination arises from (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000