Search results for 'Czech language Syntax' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  6
    Petr Sgall (ed.) (1984). Contributions to Functional Syntax, Semantics, and Language Comprehension. J. Benjamins Pub. Co..
    On the Notion "Type of Language" Petr Sgall It is well known that the high frequency of terminological vagueness and confusion has been a serious obstacle ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Tim Crane (1990). The Language of Thought: No Syntax Without Semantics. Mind and Language 5 (3):187-213.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  3.  33
    Yosef Grodzinsky (2000). The Neurology of Syntax: Language Use Without Broca's Area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):1-21.
    A new view of the functional role of the left anterior cortex in language use is proposed. The experimental record indicates that most human linguistic abilities are not localized in this region. In particular, most of syntax (long thought to be there) is not located in Broca's area and its vicinity (operculum, insula, and subjacent white matter). This cerebral region, implicated in Broca's aphasia, does have a role in syntactic processing, but a highly specific one: It is the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  4.  1
    Magda Petrjánošová & Sylvie Graf (2012). “The Austrians Were Surprised That I Didn’T Speak German”: The Role of Language in Czech-Austrian Relations. Human Affairs 22 (4):539-557.
    Respondents from Austria and the Czech Republic noted down their experiences with people from their neighbouring country and their attitudes to their own country and the neighbouring nation on feeling thermometers. The quantitative content analysis and qualitative critical discourse-inspired analysis of the open statements focused on the role of language in the construction of Czech-Austrian relations. Using qualitative analysis we enquired as to which themes were intertwined with the topic of language, and as to the ways (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5. Brent Strickland, Matthew Fisher, Frank Keil & Joshua Knobe (2014). Syntax and Intentionality: An Automatic Link Between Language and Theory-of-Mind. Cognition 133 (1):249–261.
    Three studies provided evidence that syntax influences intentionality judgments. In Experiment 1, participants made either speeded or unspeeded intentionality judgments about ambiguously intentional subjects or objects. Participants were more likely to judge grammatical subjects as acting intentionally in the speeded relative to the reflective condition (thus showing an intentionality bias), but grammatical objects revealed the opposite pattern of results (thus showing an unintentionality bias). In Experiment 2, participants made an intentionality judgment about one of the two actors in a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  18
    Barbara C. Scholz (2007). Systematicity and Natural Language Syntax. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7 (3):375-402.
    A lengthy debate in the philosophy of the cognitive sciences has turned on whether the phenomenon known as ‘systematicity’ of language and thought shows that connectionist explanatory aspirations are misguided. We investigate the issue of just which phenomenon ‘systematicity’ is supposed to be. The much-rehearsed examples always suggest that being systematic has something to do with ways in which some parts of expressions in natural languages (and, more conjecturally, some parts of thoughts) can be substituted for others without altering (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7. Christopher Potts, Comparative Economy Conditions in Natural Language Syntax.
    The most conceptually drastic change in natural language syntactic theory in recent years is the introduction of economy conditions (ECs). Although there is not a unified formal notion of economy, the intuition is that natural languages are governed by a general “less is more” principle. Those who take this seriously, and regard it not just as principle guiding the researcher but as something to be implemented directly in grammars, are often led to comparative economy conditions (comparative ECs), which select (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Richard Creath (2009). The Gentle Strength of Tolerance : The Logical Syntax of Language and Carnap's Philosophical Programme. In Pierre Wagner (ed.), Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language. Palgrave Macmillan 203--214.
  9.  28
    David Devidi & Graham Solomon (1995). Tolerance and Metalanguages in Carnap'slogical Syntax of Language. Synthese 103 (1):123 - 139.
    Michael Friedman has recently argued that Carnap'sLogical Syntax of Language is fundamentally flawed in a way that reveals the ultimate failure of logical positivism. Friedman's argument depends crucially on two claims: (1) that Carnap was committed to the view that there is a universal metalanguage and (2) that given what Carnap wanted from a metalanguage, in particular given that he wanted a definition of analytic for an object language, he was in fact committed to a hierarchy of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  10. Eric Loomis (2005). Speaking of Logical Form: The Tractatus and Carnap’s Logical Syntax of Language. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 8.
    Carnap’s Logical Syntax of Language was one of the first philosophical applications of the results in logical metatheory that appeared in the early 1930s. In using these results, Carnap claimed that he stood in general agreement with Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, but had overcome the limits on the scope of logic that Wittgenstein believed he had found. I argue that Carnap had in fact presupposed a conception of linguistic meaning fundamentally at odds with that presented in the Tractatus, and that (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  17
    Ömer Naci Soykan (2012). On the Relationships Between Syntax and Semantics with Regard to the Turkish Language. Cultura 9 (2):61-76.
    A belief commonly held in linguistics and philosophy is that semantics is defined by syntax. In this article, I will demonstrate that this does not hold true for Turkish. A fundamental syntactical rule builds around the successive order of words or speech units in a sentence. The order determines the meaning of the sentence, which in turn is rendered meaningless if the rule is not observed. In a given language, if a sentence retains meaning without this rule being (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  21
    Alan Richardson (2011). Pierre Wagner (Ed.): Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language. Palgrave-MacMillan, 2009, 288pp, £57.00 HB. [REVIEW] Metascience 20 (3):599-600.
    Pierre Wagner (ed.): Carnap’s logical syntax of language . Palgrave-MacMillan, 2009, 288pp, £57.00 HB Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-2 DOI 10.1007/s11016-011-9522-8 Authors Alan Richardson, Department of Philosophy, University of British Columbia, 1866 Main Mall—E370, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1 Canada Journal Metascience Online ISSN 1467-9981 Print ISSN 0815-0796.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  2
    Thomas Oberdan (1993). The Synthesis of Logicism and Formalism in Carnap’s Logical Syntax of Language. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 1:157-168.
    One important achievement Rudolf Carnap claimed for his book, The Logical Syntax of Language, was that it effected a synthesis of two seemingly antithetical philosophies of mathematics, logicism and formalism. Reconciling these widely divergent conceptions had been a goal of Carnap’s for several years. But in the years in which Carnap’s synthesis evolved, important intellectual developments influenced the direction of his efforts and, ultimately, the final outcome. These developments were, first of all, the epoch-making theorems proved by Kurt (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  3
    Curtis Carter, Painting and Language: A Pictoral Syntax of Shapes.
    In previous articles, the author proposed that paintings can have syntactic rules. In this article he develops his proposal further and shows that shapes act as syntactic elements in the languages of painting styles. He meets Nelson Goodman's objections to his proposal by showing that shapes meet the criterion of syntactic discreteness proposed by the latter to separate linguistic from other symbolic systems. His approach is to specify style as the domain of a language of painting, to show that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska (1998). Theory of Language Syntax. Categorial Approach. Studia Logica 61 (3):446-448.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  16. Susan Carey (2001). The Representation of Number in Natural Language Syntax and in Language of Thought: A Case Study of the Evolution and Development of Representational Resources. In João Branquinho (ed.), The Foundations of Cognitive Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press 23--53.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17. Roman Kralik (2013). The Reception of Soren Kierkegaard in Czech Language Writings. Filosoficky Casopis 61 (3):443-451.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Rudolf Carnap (1937). The Logical Syntax of Language. London, K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd..
    Available for the first time in 20 years, here is the Rudolf Carnap's famous principle of tolerance by which everyone is free to mix and match the rules of ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   137 citations  
  19.  25
    Pierre Wagner (ed.) (2009). Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language. Palgrave Macmillan.
    This volumes aim is to provide an introduction to Carnaps book from a historical and philosophical perspective, each chapter focusing on one specific issue. The book will be of interest not only to Carnap scholars but to all those interested in the history of analytical philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20. Vitor A. Nã³Brega & Shigeru Miyagawa (2015). The Precedence of Syntax in the Rapid Emergence of Human Language in Evolution as Defined by the Integration Hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21.  70
    Wolfram Hinzen (2013). Narrow Syntax and the Language of Thought. Philosophical Psychology 26 (1):1-23.
    A traditional view maintains that thought, while expressed in language, is non-linguistic in nature and occurs in non-linguistic beings as well. I assess this view against current theories of the evolutionary design of human grammar. I argue that even if some forms of human thought are shared with non-human animals, a residue remains that characterizes a unique way in which human thought is organized as a system. I explore the hypothesis that the cause of this difference is a grammatical (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  22.  16
    James Russell (2004). What is Language Development?: Rationalist, Empiricist, and Pragmatist Approaches to the Acquisition of Syntax. OUP Oxford.
    Language development is one of the major battle grounds within the humanities and sciences. This book presents, for the first time, an impartial account of the three dominant theories of language development. Written to be accessible for those within developmental psychology, philosophy, and linguistics, the book provides the reader with the information they need in order make up their own mind about this much debated issue.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  23.  28
    Jan Woleński (2012). Logic as Calculus Versus Logic as Language, Language as Calculus Versus Language as Universal Medium, and Syntax Versus Semantics. Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):587-596.
    This paper discusses the distinctions indicated in its title. It is argued that the distinction between syntax and semantics is much more important for the present situation in logic than other distinctions. In particular, doing formal syntax and formal semantics requires the use of an informal melanguage based on ordinary mathematics.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  32
    Richard Horsey (2001). Definitions: Implications for Syntax, Semantics, and the Language of Thought, by Annabel Cormack. Mind and Language 16 (3):345–349.
  25. Rie Asano & Cedric Boeckx (2015). Syntax in Language and Music: What is the Right Level of Comparison? Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  7
    Rudolf Carnap (2001). Logical Syntax of Language. Routledge.
    First published in 2000. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  27.  42
    H. D. Oakeley (1940). Epistemology and the Logical Syntax of Language. Mind 49 (196):427-444.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Rudolf Carnap (2010). Logical Syntax of Language. Routledge.
    First published in 2000. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  29. Kurt Gödel (1953). Is Mathematics Syntax of Language? In K. Gödel Collected Works. Oxford University Press: Oxford 334--355.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  30. Gail McKoon & Roger Ratcliff (2003). Meaning Through Syntax: Language Comprehension and the Reduced Relative Clause Construction. Psychological Review 110 (3):490-525.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  31.  6
    Philip Lieberman (2001). Human Language and Our Reptilian Brain: The Subcortical Bases of Speech, Syntax, and Thought. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 44 (1):32-51.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  32.  73
    Glen A. Mazis (1990). Merleau Ponty and the 'Syntax in Depth': Semiotics and Language as 'Another Less Heavy, More Transparent Body'. In Recent Developments in Theory and History: The Semiotic Web 1990.
  33.  10
    N. E. (1937). The Logical Syntax of Language. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 34 (11):303-304.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  3
    Rudolph Carnap (1937). The Logical Syntax of Language. Philosophical Review 46 (5):549-553.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  35.  16
    Sahotra Sarkar (1992). “The Boundless Ocean of Unlimited Possibilities”: Logic in Carnap'slogical Syntax of Language. [REVIEW] Synthese 93 (1-2):191 - 237.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36.  9
    Felix Budelmann (2007). De Jong (I.J.F.), Rijksbaron (A.) (Edd.) Sophocles and the Greek Language. Aspects of Diction, Syntax and Pragmatics. (Mnemosyne Supplementum 269.) Pp. Xiv + 267. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2006. Cased, ???102, US$146. ISBN: 978-90-04-14752-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 57 (01):21-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  9
    Karen Emmorey (2000). The Syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (9):363-364.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  6
    Czesław Lejewski & William Haas (1975). Syntax and Semantics of Ordinary Language. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 49 (1):127 - 169.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  39.  1
    Martin Strauss (1937). Mathematics as Logical Syntax — a Method to Formalize the Language of a Physical Theory. Erkenntnis 7 (1):147-153.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  40.  7
    Leslie Brothers & Michael J. Raleigh (1991). Simians, Space, and Syntax: Parallels Between Human Language and Primate Social Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):613-614.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  22
    Thomas Oberdan (1992). The Concept of Truth in Carnap'slogical Syntax of Language. Synthese 93 (1-2):239 - 260.
  42.  6
    Lokesh Joshi, Eric Smith & Harold Morowitz (2007). Glycobiology: The Sweet Language of Life, Complexity, and Morphogenesis: Syntax for Intermolecular and Intercellular Communication. Complexity 12 (6):9-10.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  6
    Niels Öffenberger (1979). The Three-Value Logic of Language—its Syntax, Semantics and Application in the Analysis of Language. Philosophy and History 12 (1):14-16.
  44.  5
    I. M. Campbell (1948). William G. Most: The Syntax of the Vitae Sanctorum Hiberniae. (Studies in Medieval and Renaissance Latin Language and Literature, Vol.XXI.) Pp. Xxvi+356. Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1946. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 62 (02):92-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Alan Richardson (1994). The Limits of Tolerance: Carnap's Logico-Philosophical Project in Logical Syntax of Language'. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 67:67-82.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46. María Azucena Penas Ibáñez (1994). Relations Between Semantics and Syntax in Literary Language. In Carlos Inchaurralde (ed.), Perspectives on Semantics and Specialised Languages. Departamento de Filología Inglesa y Alemana, Universidad de Zaragoza
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  1
    Sébastien Freddi, José Esteban & Vincent Dru (2015). Emotions and Language About Motion: Differentiating Affective Dominance with Syntax From Valence with Semantics. Consciousness and Cognition 38:22-37.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  4
    Curtis Carter, Syntax in Language and Painting.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  3
    S. C. Kleene (1939). Review: Rudolf Carnap, The Logical Syntax of Language. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 4 (2):82-87.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  9
    L. Susan Stebbing (1938). The Logical Syntax of Language. By Rudolf Carnap. Translated From the German by Amethe Smeaton (Countess von Zeppelin). (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd. 1937. Pp. Xvi + 352. Price 25s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 13 (52):485-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000