9 found
Sort by:
  1. D. M. Rasmussen (2012). The Emerging Domain of the Political. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (4-5):457-466.
    This essay deals with two conceptions of the political, one that entails a clash of civilizations associated with a Schmittian critique of liberalism and a second which envisions the political as an emerging domain. The latter idea can be associated with the later work of John Rawls which separates the comprehensive from the political. I argue that it is this idea, when reconstructed in relationship to a theory of multiple modernities, that can be appropriated for an emerging notion of global (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. D. M. Rasmussen (2010). Conflicted Modernity: Toleration as a Principle of Justice. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (3-4):339-352.
    The recognition of conflict puts an end to the idea that cosmopolitanism may be legitimized by a comprehensive doctrine. The article argues that within the limits of a post-secular society, toleration must be conceived as a principle of justice, based on regard for the law, within a society in which not only others’ rights but also other cultures must be respected.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. D. M. Rasmussen (2009). Political Liberalism and the Good Life: Fred Dallmayr, In Search of the Good Life: A Pedagogy for Troubled Times (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 2007). Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (9):1119-1125.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. D. M. Rasmussen (2004). Defending Reasonability: The Centrality of Reasonability in the Later Rawls. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (5-6):525-540.
    Against arguments that suggest that Rawls’s notion of reasonability is ‘obscure’ and ‘unclear’ I argue in this essay that the idea of reasonability in the later Rawls can be defended in three ways. First, it can be shown that reasonability is fundamental to the architectonic of the later work. Reasonability, and the subordination of reason to reasonability, is fundamental to the later (post-1980) writings. Second, it can be shown that reasonability is not necessarily a vague term as many have claimed. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. A. O’Byrne, M. A. Penner, D. Perpich, D. M. Rasmussen, T. Rayner, S. Benso, B. Bergo, P. Burke, P. Cabestan & S. Critchley (2003). Dallery, AB, 351 Fielding, H., 1 Gall, RS, 177 Irigaray, L., 353 Mader, MB, 367. Continental Philosophy Review 36 (449).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. D. M. Rasmussen (1992). Reflections on the "End of History" : Politics, Identity and Civil Society. Philosophy and Social Criticism 18 (3-4):235-250.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. D. M. Rasmussen (1988). Introduction. Philosophy and Social Criticism 14 (3-4):237-242.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. D. M. Rasmussen (1984). Reviews : Comments on Twilight of Subjectivity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 10 (2):111-114.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. D. M. Rasmussen (1982). The Enlightenment Project: After Virtue. Philosophy and Social Criticism 9 (3-4):381-394.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation