1. E. E. Smith & D. N. Osherson (eds.) (1995). Invitation to Cognitive Science. Mit Press.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. D. N. Osherson & E. E. Smith (1990). Thinking, Vol. 3 De. In Daniel N. Osherson & Edward E. Smith (eds.), An Invitation to Cognitive Science. Mit Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. D. N. Osherson, M. Stob & S. Weinstein (1987). Social Learning and Collective Choice. Synthese 70 (3):319 - 347.
    To be pertinent to democratic practice, collective choice functions need not apply to all possible constellations of individual preference, but only to those that are humanly possible in an appropriate sense. The present paper develops a theory of humanly possible preference within the context of the mathematical theory of learning. The theory of preference is then exploited in an attempt to resolve Arrow's voting paradox through restriction of the domain of majoritarian choice functions.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation