1. E. E. Smith & D. N. Osherson (eds.) (1995). Invitation to Cognitive Science. MIT Press.
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  2. D. N. Osherson & E. E. Smith (1990). Thinking, Vol. 3 De. In Daniel N. Osherson & Edward E. Smith (eds.), An Invitation to Cognitive Science. MIT Press
    No categories
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  33
    D. N. Osherson, M. Stob & S. Weinstein (1987). Social Learning and Collective Choice. Synthese 70 (3):319 - 347.
    To be pertinent to democratic practice, collective choice functions need not apply to all possible constellations of individual preference, but only to those that are humanly possible in an appropriate sense. The present paper develops a theory of humanly possible preference within the context of the mathematical theory of learning. The theory of preference is then exploited in an attempt to resolve Arrow's voting paradox through restriction of the domain of majoritarian choice functions.
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography