42 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
David Sosa [37]D. Sosa [4]Díaz Sosa [1]
See also:
Profile: David Sosa (University of Texas at Austin)
  1. Josh Dever, David Sosa & Daniel Bonevac, Unconditionals.
    Conditionality is a modal feature (in only the trivial sense, in the case of the material conditional). For φ to be conditioned on ψ is for the appearance of φ and ψ to be connected in some way over some region of modal space.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. David Sosa, Epistemic Luck.
    About what are internalists and externalists in dispute fundamentally? Different sorts of thing.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Terence E. Horgan & David Sosa (eds.) (forthcoming). Collection on the Philosophy of Jaegwon Kim.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Terence Horgan, Marcelo Sabates & David Sosa (eds.) (forthcoming). Qualia and Mental Causation in a Physical World: Themes From the Philosophy of Jaegwon Kim,. Cambridge University Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. D. Sosa (forthcoming). Slouching Towards Dualism. Revue Internationale de Philosophie.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. D. Sosa (2013). Profligate or Abstemious Millianism. Analysis 73 (1):51-56.
    Any developed Millianism is forced to make an arbitrary choice. Some Millian theories are profligate: it suffices for believing that Clark flies that you assent to some way of taking that proposition. But Lois no more believes that Clark flies than she fails to believe that Superman flies. An abstemious Millianism requires for believing that Superman flies that you not refrain from assenting to any way of taking that proposition. Profligate Millianism gives subjects beliefs they do not seem to have. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. D. Bonevac, J. Dever & D. Sosa (2012). The Counterexample Fallacy. Mind 120 (480):1143-1158.
    Manley and Wasserman (2008) join the chorus of opposition to the possibility of conditional analysis of dispositions. But that score cannot be settled without more careful attention to the implicit philosophical methodology. Some of the opposition to such an analysis badly overestimates the effect of counterexamples, as if the Gettier example were sufficient to refute the possibility of conjunctive analysis of knowledge. A general objection to a form of analysis must satisfy a number of constraints, and Manley and Wasserman join (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. David Sosa (2011). Some of the Structure of Experience and Belief. Philosophical Issues 21 (1):474-484.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. David Sosa (2011). Two Forms of Dualism. Dialogue 50 (02):307-313.
    ABSTRACT: I distinguish two sorts of motivation for dualism. One motivation is driven by the distinctive character of conscious phenomenology. The other is driven by the special character of normativity: Is rationality an even problem than consciousness? There is no dramatic climax in which I show that these two dualist currents have a common source; in fact, I think they are relatively independent.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. David Sosa (ed.) (2010). Philosophical Books (Analytic Philosophy).
  11. David Sosa (2010). The Fine Line. Analysis 70 (2):347-358.
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    No categories
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. González Ulloa Aguirre, Pablo Armando, Díaz Sosa & Christian Eduardo (eds.) (2009). María Zambrano: Pensadora de Nuestro Tiempo. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, Plaza y Valdés.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. David Sosa (2009). Dubious Assertions. Philosophical Studies 146 (2):269 - 272.
    The knowledge account of assertion—roughly: one should not assert what one does not know—aspires to identify the norm distinctive of assertion. One main argument given in support of the knowledge account has been the success with which it explains a variety of Moore-paradoxical assertion. But that explanation does not generalize satisfactorily.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. David Sosa (2009). What is It Like to Be a Group? Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (1):212-226.
    Consequentialist and Kantian theories differ over the ethical relevance of consequences of actions. I investigate how they might differ too over the relevance of what actions are consequence of. Focusing on the case of group action and collective responsibility, I argue that there's a kind of analog to the problem of aggregating the value of consequencesthat Kantian theories will not confront and consequentialist theories will. The issue provides a useful way to characterize a deep difference between Kantian and consequentialist theories (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. David Sosa (2008). Rigidity. In Ernest Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oup Oxford.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. David Sosa (2007). Perceptual Friction. Philosophical Issues 17 (1):245–261.
  17. David Sosa (2007). The Inference That Leaves Something to Chance. In Sanford Goldberg (ed.), Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. 219.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Daniel Bonevac, Josh Dever & David Sosa (2006). The Conditional Fallacy. Philosophical Review 115 (3):273 - 316.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. David Sosa (2006). Scenes Seen. Philosophical Books 47 (4):314-325.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. David Sosa (2006). Scepticism About Intuition. Philosophy 81 (4):633-648.
  21. David Sosa (2006). 20.1 WHAT is RIGIDITY? In Barry C. Smith (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press. 476.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. David Sosa (2004). T.M. Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998) A Big, Good Thing. Noûs 38 (2):359-377.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. David Sosa (2004). Review: A Big, Good Thing. [REVIEW] Noûs 38 (2):359 - 377.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. David Sosa (2004). A Big, Good Thing: T.M. Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998). Noûs 38 (2):359–377.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Aloysius Martinich & David Sosa (eds.) (2001). A Companion to Analytic Philosophy. Blackwell.
    This volume is a vital resource for anyone interested in analytic philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Aloysius Martinich & David Sosa (eds.) (2001). Analytic Philosophy: An Anthology. Blackwell.
    P. Grice and P. F. Strawson. 45. Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man. (Wilfrid Sellars). 46. From The Blue and the Brown Books. (Ludwig Wittgenstein).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. D. Sosa (2001). Perception and Reason. Philosophical Review 110 (4):635-638.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. David Sosa (2001). Analyses Critiques. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 55 (216):257-263.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. David Sosa (2001). Pathetic Ethics. In Brian Leiter (ed.), Objectivity in Law and Morals. Cambridge University Press. 287--329.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. David Sosa (2001). Rigidity in the Scope of Russell's Theory. Noûs 35 (1):1–38.
  31. David Sosa & A. P. Martinich (eds.) (2001). Blackwell Companion to Analytic Philosophy. Blackwell.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. David Sosa (1999). Checking Searle's Background. Teorema 18 (1):109-123.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. David Sosa (1998). Getting Clear on the Concept. Philosophical Issues 9:317-322.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. David Sosa (1997). Meaningful Explanation. Philosophical Issues 8:351-356.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. David Sosa (1997). Naturalizing the Mind. Philosophical Review 106 (3):429-431.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. David Sosa (1996). Getting Acquainted with Perception. Philosophical Issues 7:209-214.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. David Sosa (1996). Representing Thoughts and Language. Dissertation, Princeton University
  38. David Sosa (1996). The Import of the Puzzle About Belief. Philosophical Review 105 (3):373-402.
    Relocating Kripke's puzzle about belief, this paper investigates i) in what the puzzle consists, exactly; ii) the method used in its construction; and iii) relations between meaning and rationality. Essential to Kripke's puzzle is a normative notion of contradictory belief. Different positions about the meaning of names yield different views of what constitutes the attribution of contradictory belief; and Kripke's puzzle unwittingly _imports a Millian assumption. Accordingly, the puzzle about belief is not independent of positions about the meaning of names.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. David Sosa (1995). Reference From a Perspective Versus Reference. Philosophical Issues 6:79-89.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. David Sosa (1994). ¿Dónde se encuentra el enigma sobre la creencia? Critica 26 (76/77):7 - 50.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. David Sosa (1993). Consequences of Consequentialism. Mind 102 (405):101-122.