13 found
Order:
  1.  35
    F. G. Miller, R. D. Truog & D. W. Brock (2010). The Dead Donor Rule: Can It Withstand Critical Scrutiny? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (3):299-312.
    Transplantation of vital organs has been premised ethically and legally on "the dead donor rule" (DDR)—the requirement that donors are determined to be dead before these organs are procured. Nevertheless, scholars have argued cogently that donors of vital organs, including those diagnosed as "brain dead" and those declared dead according to cardiopulmonary criteria, are not in fact dead at the time that vital organs are being procured. In this article, we challenge the normative rationale for the DDR by rejecting the (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  2.  34
    D. W. Brock (2006). Is a Consensus Possible on Stem Cell Research? Moral and Political Obstacles. Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (1):36-42.
    Neither of the two central moral and political obstacles to human embryonic stem cell research survives critical scrutinyThis paper argues that neither of the two central moral and political obstacles to human embryonic stem cell research survives critical scrutiny: first, that derivation of HESCs requires the destruction of human embryos which are full human persons or are at least deserving of respect incompatible with their destruction; second, that creation of HESCs using somatic cell nuclear transfer or cloning is immoral. First, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  3.  3
    D. W. Brock (2014). Reflections on the Patient Preference Predictor Proposal. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (2):153-160.
    There are substantial data establishing that surrogates are often mistaken in predicting what treatments incompetent patients would have wanted and that supplements such as advance directives have not resulted in significant improvements. Rid and Wendler’s Patient Preference Predictor (PPP) proposal will attempt to gather data about what similar patients would prefer in a variety of treatment choices. It accepts the usual goal of patient autonomy and the Substituted Judgment principle for surrogate decisions. I provide reasons for questioning sole reliance on (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4. F. Baylis, H. Brody, M. P. Aulisio, D. W. Brock, W. Winslade, R. M. Arnold & S. J. Youngner (2003). Character and Ethics Consultation: Even the Ethicists Don't Agree. In Mark P. Aulisio, Robert M. Arnold & Stuart J. Youngner (eds.), Ethics Consultation: From Theory to Practice. Johns Hopkins University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  5.  1
    D. W. Brock & A. E. Buchanan (1987). The Profit Motive in Medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (1):1-35.
    The ethical implications of the growth of for-profit health care institutions are complex. Two major moral criticisms of for-profit medicine are analyzed. The first claim is that for-profit health care institutions fail to fulfill their obligations to do their fair share in providing health care to the poor and so exacerbate the problem of access to health care. The second claim is that profit seeking in medicine will damage the physician-patient relationship, creating conflicts of interest that will diminish the quality (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6.  5
    D. W. Brock, D. Callahan, D. S. Diekema, R. Dworkin, T. Nagel, R. Nozick, J. Rawls, T. Scanlon, J. J. Thomson & J. J. Fins (2005). A Favorites Reading List From the Cambridge Consortium for Bioethics Education. Ethics 14 (2):141-6.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  2
    F. Rouse, S. Johnson, D. W. Brock, L. Emanuel, S. M. Wolf, D. Mason, M. Mezey, R. B. Purtilo & E. L. McCloskey (1991). Practicing the PSDA. Hastings Center Report 21 (5):S1.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  2
    D. W. Brock (1992). Competence as Accountability. Journal of Clinical Ethics 3 (1):88.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  2
    D. W. Brock (1991). What is the Moral Basis of the Authority of Family Members to Act as Surrogates for Incompetent Patients? Journal of Clinical Ethics 3 (2):121-123.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. D. W. Brock (1993). Books in Review. Political Theory 21 (4):705-709.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. D. W. Brock & W. T. Reich (forthcoming). Death and Dying: Euthanasia and Sustaining Life. Encyclopedia of Bioethics.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. D. W. Brock (2015). Good Medical Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (1):34-36.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. H. Janjua, D. Postigo, R. Rowden, I. Viciani, J. C. Cohen, P. Illingworth, N. Daniels, D. W. Brock, D. B. Resnik & C. C. Macpherson (2003). No Man is an Island: HIV/AIDS and the G8. Developing World Bioethics 3 (1):27-48.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography