4 found
Sort by:
  1. Dahlia W. Zaidel (2011). Evolution in Visual Art. In Elisabeth Schellekens & Peter Goldie (eds.), The Aesthetic Mind: Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford University Press. 44.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Dahlia W. Zaidel (2007). Overall Intelligence and Localized Brain Damage. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (2):173-174.
    Overall mean performance on intelligence tests by brain-damaged patients with focal lesions can be misleading in regard to localization of intelligence. The widely used WAIS has many subtests that together recruit spatially distant neural but individually the subtests reveal localized functions. Moreover, there are kinds of intelligence that defy the localizationist approach inferred from brain damage.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Dahlia W. Zaidel (1999). Neuronal Connectivity, Regional Differentiation, and Brain Damage in Humans. 22 (5):854-855.
    When circumscribed brain regions are damaged in humans, highly specific iimpairments in language, memory, problem solving, and cognition are observed. Neurosurgery such as "split brain" or hemispherectomy, for example has shown that encompassing regions, the left and right cerebral hemispheres each control human behavior in unique ways. Observations stretching over 100 years of patients with unilateral focal brain damage have revealed, withouth the theoretical benefits of "cognitive neuroscience" or "cognitive psychology," that human behavior is indeed controlled by the brain and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Dahlia W. Zaidel & Asa Kasher (1989). Hemispheric Memory for Surrealistic Versus Realistic Paintings. .
    The issue of hemispheric processing of art works, either alone or in relation to a certain aspect of language, was investigated in normal subjects. Three experiments were performed. In the first, memory for surrealistic versus realistic pictures was investigated. In the second, memory for metaphoric versus literal titles of these pictures was measured. In the third, memory for the paintings was determined as a function of the same titles. The results of the first experiment showed a right visual field (RVF) (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation