Search results for 'Dan C. Shahar' (try it on Scholar)

5 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Dan C. Shahar (University of Arizona)
  1. Dan C. Shahar (2011). Conflict and Comparison Between Species. Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (2):163 - 166.score: 870.0
    Ethics, Policy & Environment, Volume 14, Issue 2, Page 163-166, June 2011.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Or Sela, Boaz Tamir, Shahar Dolev & Avshalom C. Elitzur (2009). Can Special Relativity Be Derived From Galilean Mechanics Alone? Foundations of Physics 39 (5):499-509.score: 30.0
    Special relativity is based on the apparent contradiction between two postulates, namely, Galilean vs. c-invariance. We show that anomalies ensue by holding the former postulate alone. In order for Galilean invariance to be consistent, it must hold not only for bodies’ motions, but also for the signals and forces they exchange. If the latter ones do not obey the Galilean version of the Velocities Addition Law, invariance is violated. If, however, they do, causal anomalies, information loss and conservation laws’ violations (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ignazio Licata & Ammar Sakaji (eds.) (2008). Physics of Emergence and Organization. World Scientific.score: 24.0
    This book is a state-of-the-art review on the Physics of Emergence. Foreword v Gregory J. Chaitin Preface vii Ignazio Licata Emergence and Computation at the Edge of Classical and Quantum Systems 1 Ignazio Licata Gauge Generalized Principle for Complex Systems 27 Germano Resconi Undoing Quantum Measurement: Novel Twists to the Physical Account of Time 61 Avshalom C. Elitzur and Shahar Dolev Process Physics: Quantum Theories as Models of Complexity 77 Kirsty Kitto A Cross-disciplinary Framework for the Description of Contextually (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Shahar Ayal, Dan Zakay & Guy Hochman (2012). Deliberative Adjustments of Intuitive Anchors: The Case of Diversification Behavior. Synthese 189 (S1):131-145.score: 24.0
    As part of the rationality debate, we examine the impact of deliberative and intuitive thinking styles on diversity preference behavior. A sample of 230 students completed the Rational Experiential Inventory and the Diversity Preference Questionnaire, an original measure of diversification behavior in different real-life situations. In cases where no normative solution was available, we found a clear preference for diversity-seeking in the gain domain and diversity-aversion in the loss domain, regardless of cognitive thinking style. However, in cases where one alternative (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Avshalom C. Elitzur & Shahar Dolev (2008). Undoing Quantum Measurements: Novel Twists to the Physical Account of Time. In World Scientific (ed.), Physics of Emergence and Organization. 61--75.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation