55 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Daniel Miller [23]Dana Miller [10]Dana R. Miller [9]Danuta Miller [9]
Daniel J. Miller [3]Dan Miller [1]Daniel K. Miller [1]Dana Roby Miller [1]

Not all matches are shown. Search with initial or firstname to single out others.

See also:
Profile: Daniel Miller
Profile: Daniel Miller (University of Sheffield)
Profile: Daniel Miller (University of St. Thomas, Minnesota)
Profile: Daniel J. Miller (Florida State University)
  1.  6
    Daniel J. Miller (forthcoming). Reasonable Foreseeability and Blameless Ignorance. Philosophical Studies:1-21.
    This paper draws attention to a fundamental problem for a version of the tracing strategy defended by a number of theorists in the current literature :295–313, 2004; Fischer and Tognazzini in Noûs, 43:531–556, 2009). I argue that versions of the tracing strategy that require reasonable foreseeability are in tension with the view that blameless ignorance excuses. A stronger version of the tracing strategy is consistent with the view that blameless ignorance excuses and is therefore preferable for those tracing theorists who (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Daniel Miller (1998). A Theory of Shopping. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  3.  34
    Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller (2015). Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    Hypocrites are often thought to lack the standing to blame others for faults similar to their own. Although this claim is widely accepted, it is seldom argued for. We offer an argument for the claim that nonhypocrisy is a necessary condition on the standing to blame. We first offer a novel, dispositional account of hypocrisy. Our account captures the commonsense view that hypocrisy involves making an unjustified exception of oneself. This exception-making involves a rejection of the impartiality of morality and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  4
    Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller (2015). Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    Hypocrites are often thought to lack the standing to blame others for faults similar to their own. Although this claim is widely accepted, it is seldom argued for. We offer an argument for the claim that nonhypocrisy is a necessary condition on the standing to blame. We first offer a novel, dispositional account of hypocrisy. Our account captures the commonsense view that hypocrisy involves making an unjustified exception of oneself. This exception-making involves a rejection of the impartiality of morality and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  3
    Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller (2015). Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    Hypocrites are often thought to lack the standing to blame others for faults similar to their own. Although this claim is widely accepted, it is seldom argued for. We offer an argument for the claim that nonhypocrisy is a necessary condition on the standing to blame. We first offer a novel, dispositional account of hypocrisy. Our account captures the commonsense view that hypocrisy involves making an unjustified exception of oneself. This exception-making involves a rejection of the impartiality of morality and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Daniel Miller (1987). Material Culture and Mass Consumption. B. Blackwell.
  7.  2
    Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller (2015). Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    Hypocrites are often thought to lack the standing to blame others for faults similar to their own. Although this claim is widely accepted, it is seldom argued for. We offer an argument for the claim that nonhypocrisy is a necessary condition on the standing to blame. We first offer a novel, dispositional account of hypocrisy. Our account captures the commonsense view that hypocrisy involves making an unjustified exception of oneself. This exception-making involves a rejection of the impartiality of morality and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  2
    Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller (2015). Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    Hypocrites are often thought to lack the standing to blame others for faults similar to their own. Although this claim is widely accepted, it is seldom argued for. We offer an argument for the claim that nonhypocrisy is a necessary condition on the standing to blame. We first offer a novel, dispositional account of hypocrisy. Our account captures the commonsense view that hypocrisy involves making an unjustified exception of oneself. This exception-making involves a rejection of the impartiality of morality and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  2
    Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller (2015). Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2):n/a-n/a.
    Hypocrites are often thought to lack the standing to blame others for faults similar to their own. Although this claim is widely accepted, it is seldom argued for. We offer an argument for the claim that nonhypocrisy is a necessary condition on the standing to blame. We first offer a novel, dispositional account of hypocrisy. Our account captures the commonsense view that hypocrisy involves making an unjustified exception of oneself. This exception-making involves a rejection of the impartiality of morality and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  2
    Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller (2015). Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    Hypocrites are often thought to lack the standing to blame others for faults similar to their own. Although this claim is widely accepted, it is seldom argued for. We offer an argument for the claim that nonhypocrisy is a necessary condition on the standing to blame. We first offer a novel, dispositional account of hypocrisy. Our account captures the commonsense view that hypocrisy involves making an unjustified exception of oneself. This exception-making involves a rejection of the impartiality of morality and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  2
    Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller (2015). Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    Hypocrites are often thought to lack the standing to blame others for faults similar to their own. Although this claim is widely accepted, it is seldom argued for. We offer an argument for the claim that nonhypocrisy is a necessary condition on the standing to blame. We first offer a novel, dispositional account of hypocrisy. Our account captures the commonsense view that hypocrisy involves making an unjustified exception of oneself. This exception-making involves a rejection of the impartiality of morality and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  21
    Dana Miller (2000). Howland, Jacob. The Paradox of Political Philosophy: Socrates' Philosophic Trial. Review of Metaphysics 53 (4):936-937.
  13.  2
    Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller (2015). Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    Hypocrites are often thought to lack the standing to blame others for faults similar to their own. Although this claim is widely accepted, it is seldom argued for. We offer an argument for the claim that nonhypocrisy is a necessary condition on the standing to blame. We first offer a novel, dispositional account of hypocrisy. Our account captures the commonsense view that hypocrisy involves making an unjustified exception of oneself. This exception-making involves a rejection of the impartiality of morality and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  2
    Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller (2015). Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    Hypocrites are often thought to lack the standing to blame others for faults similar to their own. Although this claim is widely accepted, it is seldom argued for. We offer an argument for the claim that nonhypocrisy is a necessary condition on the standing to blame. We first offer a novel, dispositional account of hypocrisy. Our account captures the commonsense view that hypocrisy involves making an unjustified exception of oneself. This exception-making involves a rejection of the impartiality of morality and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  19
    Dana R. Miller (1999). Method in Ancient Philosophy. Review of Metaphysics 52 (4):942-944.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  14
    Dana Miller (2004). Fast and Loose About Being. Ancient Philosophy 24 (2):339-363.
  17.  1
    Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller (2015). Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    Hypocrites are often thought to lack the standing to blame others for faults similar to their own. Although this claim is widely accepted, it is seldom argued for. We offer an argument for the claim that nonhypocrisy is a necessary condition on the standing to blame. We first offer a novel, dispositional account of hypocrisy. Our account captures the commonsense view that hypocrisy involves making an unjustified exception of oneself. This exception-making involves a rejection of the impartiality of morality and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  1
    Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller (2015). Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    Hypocrites are often thought to lack the standing to blame others for faults similar to their own. Although this claim is widely accepted, it is seldom argued for. We offer an argument for the claim that nonhypocrisy is a necessary condition on the standing to blame. We first offer a novel, dispositional account of hypocrisy. Our account captures the commonsense view that hypocrisy involves making an unjustified exception of oneself. This exception-making involves a rejection of the impartiality of morality and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  1
    Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller (2015). Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    Hypocrites are often thought to lack the standing to blame others for faults similar to their own. Although this claim is widely accepted, it is seldom argued for. We offer an argument for the claim that nonhypocrisy is a necessary condition on the standing to blame. We first offer a novel, dispositional account of hypocrisy. Our account captures the commonsense view that hypocrisy involves making an unjustified exception of oneself. This exception-making involves a rejection of the impartiality of morality and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  1
    Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller (2015). Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2):n/a-n/a.
    Hypocrites are often thought to lack the standing to blame others for faults similar to their own. Although this claim is widely accepted, it is seldom argued for. We offer an argument for the claim that nonhypocrisy is a necessary condition on the standing to blame. We first offer a novel, dispositional account of hypocrisy. Our account captures the commonsense view that hypocrisy involves making an unjustified exception of oneself. This exception-making involves a rejection of the impartiality of morality and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  1
    Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller (2015). Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    Hypocrites are often thought to lack the standing to blame others for faults similar to their own. Although this claim is widely accepted, it is seldom argued for. We offer an argument for the claim that nonhypocrisy is a necessary condition on the standing to blame. We first offer a novel, dispositional account of hypocrisy. Our account captures the commonsense view that hypocrisy involves making an unjustified exception of oneself. This exception-making involves a rejection of the impartiality of morality and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  2
    Daniel Miller (2013). The Doctrine of the Trinity and Christian Environmental Action. New Blackfriars 94 (1049):20-31.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  1
    Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller (2015). Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2):n/a-n/a.
    Hypocrites are often thought to lack the standing to blame others for faults similar to their own. Although this claim is widely accepted, it is seldom argued for. We offer an argument for the claim that nonhypocrisy is a necessary condition on the standing to blame. We first offer a novel, dispositional account of hypocrisy. Our account captures the commonsense view that hypocrisy involves making an unjustified exception of oneself. This exception-making involves a rejection of the impartiality of morality and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  22
    Daniel Miller (2014). Answerability, Blameworthiness, and History. Philosophia 42 (2):469-486.
    This paper focuses on a non-volitional account that has received a good deal of attention recently, Angela Smith's rational relations view. I argue that without historical conditions on blameworthiness for the non-voluntary non-volitionist accounts like Smith’s are (i) vulnerable to manipulation cases and (ii) fail to make sufficient room for the distinction between badness and blameworthiness. Towards the end of the paper I propose conditions aimed to supplement these deficiencies. The conditions that I propose are tailored to suit non-volitional accounts (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  10
    Dana R. Miller (2000). Lang, Helen S. The Order of Nature in Aristotle's Physics: Place and the Elements. Review of Metaphysics 54 (1):155-157.
  26.  37
    Dan Miller (2010). Review of Slavoj Žižek and John Milbank's, the Monstrosity of Christ: Paradox or Dialectic? Edited by Creston Davis. [REVIEW] Sophia 49 (1):165-167.
    The Monstrosity of Christ provides an exchange between the Slovenian theorist Slavoj Žižek and the British theologian John Milbank. Both authors argue that Christianity is the religion of ‘absolute truth,’ but provide very different accounts of this. Milbank argues that Christianity is true insofar as only the incarnation of Christ mediates the paradoxical metaphysical participation of the finite within the infinite. Žižek argues that the crucifixion of Christ constitutes the death of God, demonstrating that there is no providential or transcendent (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  5
    E. J. Capaldi & Daniel J. Miller (1988). Rats Classify Qualitatively Different Reinforcers as Either Similar or Different by Enumerating Them. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26 (2):149-151.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  22
    Dana Miller (2011). The Earliest Syriac Translation of Aristotle's Categories: Text, Translation, and Commentary. History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (1):104 - 106.
    History and Philosophy of Logic, Volume 33, Issue 1, Page 104-106, February 2012.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  14
    Dana R. Miller (1997). Plutarch's Argument for a Plurality of Worlds in De Defectu Oraculorum 424c10–425e. Ancient Philosophy 17 (2):375-395.
  30.  19
    Dana Miller (2006). The Midwife of Platonism. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2):235-236.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  24
    Dana Miller (2009). Protagoras (U.) Zilioli Protagoras and the Challenge of Relativism. Plato's Subtlest Enemy. Pp. Xii + 160, Ills. Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2007. Cased, £50, US$99.95. ISBN: 978-0-7546-6078-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 59 (02):375-.
  32.  15
    Dana R. Miller (2006). Art or Experience. Review of Metaphysics 59 (4):889-891.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  6
    Daniel K. Miller (2012). Killing on the Frontier: Meat Eating as an Extreme Case for Christian Ethics. Modern Theology 28 (1):53-80.
    This article argues that killing animals for food represents an extreme case within Christian moral thinking comparable to Karl Barth's Grenzfall argument against such violent acts as suicide, abortion, killing in self‐defense, capital punishment, and war. This position is in contrast to the view of many environmental philosophers who hold human hunting to be comparable to animal predation. It also disputes the language of substitutionary sacrifice prevalent in some Christian discussions of meat eating.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  24
    Daniel W. Miller (2003). Homeodynamics in Consciousness. Advances in Mind-Body Medicine 19 (3):35-46.
  35.  12
    Dana Miller (2007). Plato's Cosmology and its Ethical Dimensions—Gabriela Roxana Carone. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):498-500.
  36. Daniel Miller, Christopher Y. Tilley & Theoretical Archaeology Group (1984). Ideology, Power, and Prehistory. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37.  12
    Dana R. Miller (2004). Plato's Timaeus as Cultural Icon. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (3):445-446.
  38.  5
    Dana Miller (2012). The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity. International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (1):119-121.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  10
    Dana R. Miller (1998). Rationality in Greek Thought. International Philosophical Quarterly 38 (3):319-320.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  5
    Dana Miller (2004). Anaximander in Context. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):111-113.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  1
    E. J. Capaldi & Daniel J. Miller (1988). A Different View of Numerical Processes in Animals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (4):582.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  1
    Dana R. Miller (1997). Commentary on Brisson. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 13 (1):177-185.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Monique Dixsaut, Klaus Brinkmann, Christopher R. Matthews, Martin Andic, John Cooper, Phillip Mitsis, Robert Bolton, William Wians, Dana Miller, Nicholas Smith, David Roochnik, Malcolm Schofield, Rachana Kamteker, Julius Moravcsik, Luc Brisson & David Konstan (1999). Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy: Volume Xiii. Brill.
    This latest volume of BACAP Proceedings contains some innovative research by international scholars on Plato, Aristotle, and Sophocles. It covers such themes as Plato on the philosopher ruler, and Aristotle on essence and necessity in science. This publication has also been published in paperback, please click here for details.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Daniel Miller (2007). Book Review. [REVIEW] Journal of the American Oriental Society 127 (1):109-110.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Danuta Miller (2000). Konkurencja, współzawodnictwo, rywalizacja. Prakseologia 140 (140).
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Danuta Miller (2005). Obligatoryjne i nieobligatoryjne przedmity nauczania na wyższych uczelniach. Prakseologia 145 (145):85-94.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Danuta Miller (2006). O poglądach religijnych Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego. Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 57 (1):133-137.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Danuta Miller (2006). Opiekun spolegliwy w koncepcji Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego. Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 57 (1):139-147.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Danuta Miller (2004). Obszary zrównoważonego rozwoju. Prakseologia 144 (144):67-76.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Danuta Miller (2002). Odpowidzialność z wielu perspektyw. Prakseologia 142 (142):37-46.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 55