10 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Dan Zeman (University of the Basque Country)
  1. Dan Zeman (2014). Meaning, Expression and Extremely Strong Evidence: A Reinforced Critique of Davis' Account of Speaker Meaning. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):218-224.
    This short paper follows up on the exchange between Ray Buchanan and Wayne Davis concerning the theory of speaker meaning put forward by Davis in previous work. I briefly present Davis' main tenets, Buchanan's objections, Davis' replies, and then offer a new case that enforces the problem raised by Buchanan to Davis' theory for speaker meaning.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Dan Zeman (2013). Expereincer Phrases, Predicates of Personal Taste and Relativism: On Cappelen and Hawthorne's Critique of the Operator Argument. Croatian Journal of Philosophy (39):375-398.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Dan Zeman (2013). Temporal and Composite Tense Operators. Disputatio (37):323-328.
    This is my contribution to a symposium on Berit Brogaard's book "Transient Truths" in which I criticize her treatment of various linguistic phenomena related to tense.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Max Kölbel & Dan Zeman (2012). Introduction: “Relativism About Value”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):529-537.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Dan Zeman (2011). Unarticulated Constituents, Variadic Functions and Relativism. Logique Et Analyse 54 (216).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Dan Zeman (2010). Knowledge Attributions and Relevant Epistemic Standards. In François Recanati, Isidora Stojanovic & Neftali Villanueva (eds.), Context-dependence, Perspective and Relativity. Mouton de Gruyter.
    The paper is concerned with the semantics of knowledge attributions (K-claims,for short) and proposes a position holding that K-claims are contextsensitive that differs from extant views on the market. First I lay down the data a semantic theory for K-claims needs to explain. Next I present and assess three views purporting to give the semantics for K-claims: contextualism, subject-sensitive invariantism and relativism. All three views are found wanting with respect to their accounting for the data. I then propose a hybrid (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Dan Zeman (2009). Relativism and Monadic Truth, by Herman Cappelen and John Hawthorne. Disputatio.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Dan Zeman (2007). Context Sensitivity: Indexicalism, Contextualism, Relativism. In D. C. Richardson B. Kokinov (ed.), Modeling and Using Context. Springer. 545--557.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Dan Zeman (2007). Relativism and Alethic Functionalism. Organon F 14 (1):53-71.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation