13 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Dan Zeman (University of the Basque Country)
  1. FIlippo Ferarri & Dan Zeman (2014). Radical Relativism, Retraction and 'Being at Fault'. In Fabio Bacchini, Stefano Caputo & Massimo Dell'Utri (eds.), New Frontiers in Truth. Cambrige Scholars Publishing. 80-102.
  2. Dan Zeman (2014). Meaning, Expression and Extremely Strong Evidence: A Reinforced Critique of Davis' Account of Speaker Meaning. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):218-224.
    This short paper follows up on the exchange between Ray Buchanan and Wayne Davis concerning the theory of speaker meaning put forward by Davis in previous work. I briefly present Davis' main tenets, Buchanan's objections, Davis' replies, and then offer a new case that enforces the problem raised by Buchanan to Davis' theory for speaker meaning.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Dan Zeman (2013). Expereincer Phrases, Predicates of Personal Taste and Relativism: On Cappelen and Hawthorne's Critique of the Operator Argument. Croatian Journal of Philosophy (39):375-398.
    In the debate between relativism and contextualism about various expressions, the Operator Argument, initially proposed by Kaplan , has been taken to support relativism. However, one widespread reaction against the argument has taken the form of arguing against one assumption made by Kaplan: namely, that certain natural language expressions are best treated as sentential operators. Focusing on the only extant version of the Operator Argument proposed in connection to predicates of personal taste such as “tasty” and experiencer phrases such as (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Dan Zeman (2013). Temporal and Composite Tense Operators. Disputatio (37):323-328.
    This is my contribution to a symposium on Berit Brogaard's book "Transient Truths" in which I criticize her treatment of various linguistic phenomena related to tense.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Max Kölbel & Dan Zeman (2012). Introduction: “Relativism About Value”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):529-537.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Dan Zeman (2011). Unarticulated Constituents, Variadic Functions and Relativism. Logique Et Analyse 54 (216).
  7. Dan Zeman (2010). Knowledge Attributions and Relevant Epistemic Standards. In François Recanati, Isidora Stojanovic & Neftali Villanueva (eds.), Context-dependence, Perspective and Relativity. Mouton de Gruyter.
    The paper is concerned with the semantics of knowledge attributions (K-claims,for short) and proposes a position holding that K-claims are contextsensitive that differs from extant views on the market. First I lay down the data a semantic theory for K-claims needs to explain. Next I present and assess three views purporting to give the semantics for K-claims: contextualism, subject-sensitive invariantism and relativism. All three views are found wanting with respect to their accounting for the data. I then propose a hybrid (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Dan Zeman (2009). Relativism and Monadic Truth, by Herman Cappelen and John Hawthorne. Disputatio.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Dan Zeman (2008). Review of Relativism and Monadic Truth. [REVIEW] Disputatio 3:134-142.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Dan Zeman (2007). Context Sensitivity: Indexicalism, Contextualism, Relativism. In D. C. Richardson B. Kokinov (ed.), Modeling and Using Context. Springer. 545--557.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Dan Zeman (2007). Overcoming the Obstacles to the Relativity of Truth. Organon F: Filozoficky Casopis 14 (2):232-241.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Dan Zeman (2007). Relativism and Alethic Functionalism. Organon F 14 (1):53-71.
    The essay is an attempt to offer a version of conceptual relativism that escapes Donald Davidson’s decisive criticisms of the notion of “conceptual scheme”. Two variants of relativism are distinguished, a weaker and a stronger one, and a clear formulation of what a strong version amounts to is put forward. The concrete proposal involves accepting a version of alethic pluralism. After discussing alethic pluralism in general, and after exploring both strong and weak versions of it, a suitable version is presented: (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation