114 found
Order:
  1. Daniel A. Dombrowski (2002). Bears, Zoos, and Wilderness: The Poverty of Social Constructionism. Society and Animals 10 (2):195-202.
    It is the purpose of this short article to defend the realism of Holmes Rolston and other environmental philosophers against the social constructionism of Neil Evernden and others who have written on the social construction of nature. This defense is attempted through appeal to a deceptively simple example: seeing a bear in a zoo.The following four claims are defended in the effort to show the deficiencies of the anthropocentrism of social constructionists like Evernden: there is a difference between a bear (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  58
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2006). Is the Argument From Marginal Cases Obtuse? Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2):223–232.
  3.  4
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2009). Contemporary Athletics & Ancient Greek Ideals. University of Chicago Press.
    The ancient background -- Weiss and the pursuit of bodily excellence -- Huizinga and the homo ludens hypothesis -- Feezell, moderation, and irony -- The process of becoming virtuous.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  4. Daniel A. Dombrowski (2001). Rawls and Religion the Case for Political Liberalism. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  5. Daniel A. Dombrowski (1997). Babies and Beasts: The Argument From Marginal Cases. University of Illinois Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  6.  81
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2006). Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. Cambridge University Press.
    In recent years, the ontological argument and theistic metaphysics have been criticized by philosophers working in both the analytic and continental traditions. Responses to these criticisms have primarily come from philosophers who make use of the traditional, and problematic, concept of God. In this volume, Daniel A. Dombrowski defends the ontological argument against its contemporary critics, but he does so by using a neoclassical or process concept of God, thereby strengthening the case for a contemporary theistic metaphysics. Relying on the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  7.  2
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2009). A Platonic Philosophy of Religion: A Process Perspective. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (1):177 - 181.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  8.  35
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1990). Aldo Leopold. Newsletter of the Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy 18 (56):37-39.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Jeffrey A. Bell, Vikki Bell, Judith Butler, Daniel A. Dombrowski, Jeremy D. Fackenthal, Kirsten M. Gerdes, Sigridur Guðmarsdóttir, Catherine Keller, Matthew S. LoPresti, Astrid Lorange, Randy Ramal & Alan Van Wyk (2012). Butler on Whitehead: On the Occasion. Lexington Books.
    Considered together, Butler and Whitehead draw from a wide palette of disciplines to develop distinctive theories of becoming, of syntactical violence, and creative opportunities of limitation. The contributors of this volume offer a unique contribution to and for the humanities in the struggles of politics, economy, ecology, and the arts.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  17
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2004). Divine Beauty: The Aesthetics of Charles Hartshorne. Vanderbilt University Press.
    While considered by many as one of the greatest philosophers of religion and metaphysicians of the 20th century, Charles Hartshorne’s contributions to the study of aesthetics are perhaps the most neglected aspect of his extensive and highly nuanced thought. DIVINE BEAUTY offers the first detailed explication of Hartshorne’s aesthetic theory and its place within his theocentric philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  11.  8
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2015). Religion, Solitariness, and the Bloodlands. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 36 (3):226-239.
    One of the most controversial features of Alfred North Whitehead’s enormous influence on how philosophers and theologians think about God and religion is the close connection he sees between religion and solitariness in his classic work Religion in the Making.1 The purposes of the present article are: to understand the connection White-head sees between religion and solitariness; to understand why Whitehead’s view of this connection is so controversial; and nonetheless to defend the close connection that Whitehead sees. Regarding this last (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  21
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2001). The Divine Matrix. Process Studies 30 (1):173-174.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  19
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2002). Relational Deity. Process Studies 31 (2):167-167.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  3
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2012). The Face of Suffering The Faces of Intellectual Disability: Philosophical Reflections Carlson Licia Indiana University Press Bloomington. Journal of Animal Ethics 2 (2):205-211.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  3
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2012). Homer, Competition, and Sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 39 (1):33-51.
    In this article I argue both that an understanding of sport?s general character as competitive play can help us to read Homer more insightfully and that this reading can boomerang back to us to further illuminate the sport as competitive play thesis. My overall method is that of (Rawlsian) reflective equilibrium. The three sections of Homer that I examine are the Phaiacian games in Book 8 of the ?Odyssey?, the Patroclos games in Book 23 of the ?Iliad?, and the Penelope (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16. Daniel A. Dombrowski (1983). Gandhi, Sainthood, and Nuclear Weapons. Philosophy East and West 33 (4):401-406.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  2
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1998). Analytic Theism, Hartshorne, and the Concept of God. The Personalist Forum 14 (2):246-250.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  18.  13
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1990). Shapes of Culture. Social Philosophy Today 4:433-434.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  3
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2011). A Response to Deckers. Journal of Animal Ethics 1 (2):210-214.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  29
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1981). Raphael's School of Athens in a Philosophy Classroom. Teaching Philosophy 4 (1):65-70.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  1
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1988). Hartshorne and the Metaphysics of Animal Rights. State University of New York Press.
    Charles Hartshorne is one of the premier metaphysicians and philosophers of religion in the twentieth century.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  22. Daniel A. Dombrowski (1986). Erazim Kohák: "The Embers and the Stars". [REVIEW] The Thomist 50 (3):481.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  5
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2015). Are Nonhuman Animals Persons? A Process Theistic Response. Journal of Animal Ethics 5 (2):135-143.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  12
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1989). Ambition. Journal of Social Philosophy 20 (3):130-137.
  25.  44
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2010). Just War Theory, Afghanistan, and Walzer. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):1-7.
    In this short article I call into question the view that the current United States war in Afghanistan is a war of necessity. In this effort I am primarily engaged with the thought of the famous just war theorist Michael Walzer as it has developed from 1977 until 2009.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  3
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2001). Visions and Voices VS. Mystic Union. Sophia 40 (1):33-43.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  7
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1991). Taking the World Seriously. Modern Schoolman 69 (1):33-57.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  4
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1996). Hartshorne on Heidegger. Process Studies 25:19-33.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29.  55
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2007). Oppy, Infinity, and the Neoclassical Concept of God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (1):25 - 37.
    In this article I concentrate on three issues. First, Graham Oppy’s treatment of the relationship between the concept of infinity and Zeno’s paradoxes lay bare several porblems that must be dealt with if the concept of infinity is to do any intellectual work in philosophy of religion. Here I will expand on some insightful remarks by Oppy in an effort ot adequately respond to these problems. Second, I will do the same regarding Oppy’s treatment of Kant’s first antinomy in the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  7
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1984). Martin Luther King, Jr. Idealistic Studies 14 (3):279-280.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  3
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2015). Tom Bailey and Valentina Gentile , Rawls and Religion. Social Theory and Practice 41 (4):750-754.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  11
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2012). Malone-France, Derek. Deep Empiricism: Kant, Whitehead, and the Necessity of Philosophical Theism. Review of Metaphysics 66 (2):375-376.
  33.  5
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1991). Charles Hartshorne's Concept of God. Process Studies 20 (2):116-118.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  4
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1994). How To Think About the Earth. Process Studies 23 (1):52-54.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  25
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1998). Rawls and Animals. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):63-77.
    In “Rawls and Animals” I try to do two things. First, I try to bring together for the first time Rawls’ thoughts on animals in “A Theory of Justice” as well as the often contradictory secondary literature on this topic. And second, I examine for the first time Rawls’ treatment of animals in his recent work “Political Liberalism.”.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  11
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2008). Animal Minds and Human Morals. Ancient Philosophy 15 (2):637-639.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  10
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1994). Mysticism and Divine Immutability. Process Studies 23 (3-4):149-154.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  24
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1992). On Why Patriotism Is Not a Virtue. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (1):1-4.
  39.  10
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1986). The Development of the Idea of History in Antiquity. Review of Metaphysics 39 (4):781-783.
  40.  14
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1994). Alston and Hartshorne on the Concept of God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 36 (3):129 - 146.
  41.  5
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1997). Process Thought and the Liberalism-Communitarianism Debate. Process Studies 26 (1/2):15-32.
  42.  9
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1987). The Confessions of St. Augustine and De Quincey. Augustinian Studies 18:151-164.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  22
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1981). Atlantis and Plato's Philosophy. Apeiron 15 (2):117 - 128.
    A moral orientation of a historically existing state is superior to an immoral one; but even a moral state or leader cannot be perfectly moral. The republic (or its symbol, ancient athens) is impossible for metaphysical and practical reasons, and it must suffer the same fate as atlantis in this story, i.e., Destruction at the hands of nature.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  2
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2012). Rival Concepts of God and Rival Versions of Mysticism. Process Studies 41 (1):189-191.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  4
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1980). Starnes on Augustine's Theory of Infancy. Augustinian Studies 11:125-133.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Daniel A. Dombrowski (1984). Vegetarianism and the Argument From Marginal Cases in Porphyry. Journal of the History of Ideas 45 (1):141.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  47.  31
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2007). Rorty Versus Hartshorne, or, Poetry Versus Metaphysics. Metaphilosophy 38 (1):88–110.
    The purpose of this article is to explore the relationship between the thought of Richard Rorty and that of his former teacher, Charles Hartshorne. There are important similarities between the two, but ultimately the differences are more readily apparent, especially in terms of the battle between poetry (in the wide sense of the term conceived by Rorty) and (Hartshornian) metaphysics. Hartshorne is defended against Rorty.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  19
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (2002). Rawls and War. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (2):185-200.
    The purpose of the present article is to explicate John Rawls’s views on war as they are scattered across several of his writings. Three claims are made: (1) Rawls is generally a just war theorist who usually argues against the “realist” view of war; (2) Under the influence of Michael Walzer, however, Rawls ends up making an illadvised concession to the realist view concerning conditions of “supreme emergency”; and (3), despite Rawls’s blend of just war theory/realism, the logic of his (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  3
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1995). Being is Power. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 16 (3):299 - 314.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  3
    Daniel A. Dombrowski (1985). Kazantzakis' Dipolar Theism. Sophia 24 (2):4-17.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 114