6 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Daniel Buchman [4]Daniel Z. Buchman [2]
  1. Daniel Z. Buchman & Anita Ho (forthcoming). What's Trust Got to Do with It? Revisiting Opioid Contracts. Journal of Medical Ethics:2013-101320.
    Prescription opioid abuse (POA) is an escalating clinical and public health problem. Physician worries about iatrogenic addiction and whether patients are ‘drug seeking’, ‘abusing’ and ‘diverting’ prescription opioids exist against a backdrop of professional and legal consequences of prescribing that have created a climate of distrust in chronic pain management. One attempt to circumvent these worries is the use of opioid contracts that outline conditions patients must agree to in order to receive opioids. Opioid contracts have received some scholarly attention, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Emily Borgelt, Daniel Buchman & Judy Illes (2012). Practicioners' Views on Neuroimaging : Mental Health, Patient Consent, and Choice. In Sarah Richmond, Geraint Rees & Sarah J. L. Edwards (eds.), I Know What You're Thinking: Brain Imaging and Mental Privacy. Oxford University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Emily Borgelt, Daniel Buchman & Judy Illes (2011). Erratum: “ This is Why You've Been Suffering”: Reflections of Providers on Neuroimaging in Mental Health Care. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1):107-107.
    Erratum: “ This is Why you’ve Been Suffering”: Reflections of Providers on Neuroimaging in Mental Health Care Content Type Journal Article Pages 107-107 DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9284-4 Authors Emily Borgelt, National Core for Neuroethics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Daniel Z. Buchman, National Core for Neuroethics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Judy Illes, National Core for Neuroethics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Journal Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Online ISSN 1872-4353 Print ISSN 1176-7529 Journal Volume Volume 8 Journal Issue Volume (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Daniel Buchman, Judy Illes & Peter Reiner (2011). The Paradox of Addiction Neuroscience. Neuroethics 4 (2):65-77.
    Neuroscience has substantially advanced the understanding of how changes in brain biochemistry contribute to mechanisms of tolerance and physical dependence via exposure to addictive drugs. Many scientists and mental health advocates scaffold this emerging knowledge by adding the imprimatur of disease, arguing that conceptualizing addiction as a brain disease will reduce stigma amongst the folk. Promoting a brain disease concept is grounded in beneficent and utilitarian thinking: the language makes room for individuals living with addiction to receive the same level (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Daniel Buchman & Peter Reiner (2009). Stigma and Addiction: Being and Becoming. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (9):18-19.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Daniel Z. Buchman (2007). Neglecting the Social System: Clinical Neuroimaging and the Biological Reductionism of Addiction. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 2 (2):1-5.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation