75 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Daniel Cohen (Colby College)
Profile: Daniel Cohen (Charles Sturt University)
  1.  7
    Daniel H. Cohen (2013). Virtue, In Context. Informal Logic 33 (4):471-485.
    Virtue argumentation theory provides the best framework for accommodating the notion of an argument that is “fully satisfying” in a robust and integrated sense. The process of explicating the notion of fully satisfying arguments requires expanding the concept of arguers to include all of an argument’s participants, including judges, juries, and interested spectators. And that, in turn, requires expanding the concept of an argument itself to include its entire context.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  2. Adam Bales, Daniel Cohen & Toby Handfield (2014). Decision Theory for Agents with Incomplete Preferences. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (3):453-70.
    Orthodox decision theory gives no advice to agents who hold two goods to be incommensurate in value because such agents will have incomplete preferences. According to standard treatments, rationality requires complete preferences, so such agents are irrational. Experience shows, however, that incomplete preferences are ubiquitous in ordinary life. In this paper, we aim to do two things: (1) show that there is a good case for revising decision theory so as to allow it to apply non-vacuously to agents with incomplete (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3. Daniel Cohen & Toby Handfield (2010). Rational Capacities, Resolve, and Weakness of Will. Mind 119 (476):907 - 932.
    In this paper we present an account of practical rationality and weakness of will in terms of rational capacities. We show how our account rectifies various shortcomings in Michael Smith's related theory. In particular, our account is capable of accommodating cases of weak-willed behaviour that are not `akratic', or otherwise contrary to the agent's better judgement. Our account differs from Smith's primarily by incorporating resolve: a third rational capacity for resolute maintenance of one's intentions. We discuss further two ways to (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4. Daniel Cohen & Toby Handfield (2007). Finking Frankfurt. Philosophical Studies 135 (3):363--74.
    Michael Smith has resisted Harry Frankfurt's claim that moral responsibility does not require the ability to have done otherwise. He does this by claiming that, in Frankfurt cases, the ability to do otherwise is indeed present, but is a disposition that has been `finked' or masked by other factors. We suggest that, while Smith's account appears to work for some classic Frankfurt cases, it does not work for all. In particular, Smith cannot explain cases, such as the Willing Addict, where (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  5.  5
    Daniel H. Cohen (forthcoming). Argumentative Virtues as Conduits for Reason’s Causal Efficacy: Why the Practice of Giving Reasons Requires That We Practice Hearing Reasons. Topoi:1-8.
    Psychological and neuroscientific data suggest that a great deal, perhaps even most, of our reasoning turns out to be rationalizing. The reasons we give for our positions are seldom either the real reasons or the effective causes of why we have those positions. We are not as rational as we like to think. A second, no less disheartening observation is that while we may be very effective when it comes to giving reasons, we are not that good at getting reasons. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  13
    Andrew Aberdein & Daniel H. Cohen (forthcoming). Introduction: Virtues and Arguments. Topoi:1-5.
    It has been a decade since the phrase virtue argumentation was introduced, and while it would be an exaggeration to say that it burst onto the scene, it would be just as much of an understatement to say that it has gone unnoticed. Trying to strike the virtuous mean between the extremes of hyperbole and litotes, then, we can fairly characterize it as a way of thinking about arguments and argumentation that has steadily attracted more and more attention from argumentation (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  6
    Daniel Cohen (2004). Arguments and Metaphors in Philosophy. University Press of America.
    In this book, Daniel Cohen explores the connections between arguments and metaphors, most pronounced in philosophy because philosophical discourse is both thoroughly metaphorical and replete with argumentation. Cohen covers the nature of arguments, their modes and structures, and the principles of their evaluation, and addresses the nature of metaphors, their place in language and thought, and their connections to arguments, identifying and reconciling arguments' and metaphors' respective roles in philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  8. Nick Trakakis & Daniel Cohen (eds.) (2008). Essays on Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Cambridge Scholars.
  9.  45
    Daniel H. Cohen (1988). A Reply to Cahn. Analysis 48 (2):109 - 110.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  9
    Daniel H. Cohen (1995). TArgument is War...And War is Hell: Philosophy, Education, and Metaphors for Argumentation. Informal Logic 17 (2).
    The claim that argumentation has no proper role in either philosophy or education, and especially not in philosophical education, flies in the face of both conventional wisdom and traditional pedagogy. There is, however, something to be said for it because it is really only provocative against a certain philosophical backdrop. Our understanding of the concept "argument" is both reflected by and molded by the specific metaphor that argument-is-war, something with winners and losers, offensive and defensive moments, and an essentially adversarial (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  11.  9
    Daniel H. Cohen & George Miller (forthcoming). What Virtue Argumentation Theory Misses: The Case of Compathetic Argumentation. Topoi:1-10.
    While deductive validity provides the limiting upper bound for evaluating the strength and quality of inferences, by itself it is an inadequate tool for evaluating arguments, arguing, and argumentation. Similar remarks can be made about rhetorical success and dialectical closure. Then what would count as ideal argumentation? In this paper we introduce the concept of cognitive compathy to point in the direction of one way to answer that question. It is a feature of our argumentation rather than my argument or (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  4
    Daniel Cohen (forthcoming). Responsibility From the Margins, by David Shoemaker. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  42
    Daniel Cohen (2009). Creating the Best Possible World: Some Problems From Parfit. Sophia 48 (2):143-150.
    It is sometimes argued that if God were to exist, then the actual world would be the best possible world. However, given that the actual world is clearly not the best possible world, then God doesn’t exist. In response, some have argued that the world could always be improved with the creation of new people and that there is thus no best possible world. I argue that this reasoning gives rise to an instance of Parfit’s mere addition paradox and should (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  4
    Daniel H. Cohen, Virtue Epistemology and Argumentation Theory.
    Virtue epistemology was modeled on virtue ethics theories to transfer their ethical insights to epistemology. VE has had great success: broadening our perspective, providing new answers to traditional questions, and raising exciting new questions. I offer a new argument for VE based on the concept of cognitive achievements, a broader notion than purely epistemic achievements. The argument is then extended to cognitive transformations, especially the cognitive transformations brought about by argumentation.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  3
    Daniel H. Cohen, Arguments That Backfire.
    One result of successful argumentation – able arguers presenting cogent arguments to competent audiences – is a transfer of credibility from premises to conclusions. From a purely logical perspective, neither dubious premises nor fallacious inference should lower the credibility of the target conclusion. Nevertheless, some arguments do backfire this way. Dialectical and rhetorical considerations come into play. Three inter-related conclusions emerge from a catalogue of hapless arguers and backfiring arguments. First, there are advantages to paying attention to arguers and their (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  8
    Daniel E. Cohen (1980). Degree Problems for Modular Machines. Journal of Symbolic Logic 45 (3):510-528.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  18
    Jeffrey L. Kasser & Daniel Cohen (2002). Putnam, Truth and Informal Logic. Philosophica 70:85-108.
  18.  15
    Daniel H. Cohen (1986). A New Axiomatization of Belnap's Conditional Assertion. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 (1):124-132.
  19.  3
    Daniel H. Cohen (2001). Evaluating Arguments and Making Meta-Arguments. Informal Logic 21 (2).
    This paper explores the outlines of a framework for evaluating arguments. Among the factors to take into account are the strength of the arguers' inferences, the level of their engagement with objections raised by other interlocutors, and their effectiveness in rationally persuading their target audiences. Some connections among these can be understood only in the context of meta-argumentation and meta-rationality. The Principle of Meta-Rationality (PMR)--that reasoning rationally includes reasoning about rationality-is used to explain why it can be rational to resist (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  38
    Daniel I. A. Cohen (1994). The Hate That Dare Not Speak its Name: Pornography Qua Semi-Political Speech. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 13 (2):195 - 239.
    In this essay we shall examine the contemporary jurisprudential thinking and legal precedents surrounding the issue of the sanctionability of pornography. We shall catalogue them by their logical presumptions, such as whether they view pornography as speech or act, whether they view pornography as obscenity, political hate-speech or anomalous other, whether they would scrutinize legislation governing pornography by a balancing of the harm of repression against the harm of permission, and who exactly they view as the victims.We shall take a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  36
    Daniel Cohen & Morgan Luck (2009). Why a Victim's Age is Irrelevant When Assessing the Wrongness of Killing. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):396-401.
    abstract Intuitively, all killings are equally wrong, no matter how old one's victim. In this paper we defend this claim — The Equal Wrongness of Killings Thesis — against a challenge presented by Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen. Lippert-Rasmussen shows The Equal Wrongness of Killings Thesis to be incompatible with two further theses: The Unequal Wrongness of Renderings Unconscious Thesis and The Equivalence Thesis. Lippert-Rasmussen argues that, of the three, The Equal Wrongness of Killings Thesis is the least defensible. He suggests that the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  9
    Daniel H. Cohen (1988). The Word as Will and Idea. Philosophical Studies 32:126-140.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  32
    Daniel Cohen (2006). Openness, Accidentality and Responsibility. Philosophical Studies 127 (3):581 - 597.
    In this paper, I present a novel argument for scepticism about moral responsibility. Unlike traditional arguments, this argument doesn’t depend on contingent empirical claims about the truth or falsity of causal determinism. Rather, it is argued that the conceptual conditions of responsibility are jointly incompatible. In short, when an agent is responsible for an action, it must be true both that the action was non-accidental, and that it was open to the agent not to perform that action. However, as I (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  25
    Daniel Cohen (2003). Review of Agency and Responsibility: A Common-Sense Moral Psychology. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):444 – 445.
    Review: Agency and Responsibility: A Common-Sense Moral Psychology. Agency and Responsibility: A Common-Sense Moral Psychology Jeanette Kennett New York Oxford University Press 2001 viii + 229 Hardback US$45 By Jeanette Kennett. Oxford University Press. New York. Pp. viii + 229. Hardback:US$45.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  24
    Daniel Cohen (2010). Real Materialism and Other Essays. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):758-759.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Daniel E. Cohen (1987). Computability and Logic. Halsted Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  7
    Daniel H. Cohen (1985). Putting Paradoxes to Pedagogical Use in Philosophy. Teaching Philosophy 8 (4):309-317.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  3
    Daniel H. Cohen, Commentary On: Katharina von Radziewsky's "The Virtuous Arguer: One Person, Four Characters".
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  4
    Daniel Cohen (2013). Finocchiaro, Maurice., Meta-Argumentation: An Approach to Logic and Argumentation Theory. Review of Metaphysics 67 (2):428-430.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  26
    Daniel H. Cohen (1993). Nonsensical Representation and Senseless Interpretation: Wittgenstein on Nonsense Judgments. Philosophia 22 (3-4):407-424.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  4
    Hans V. Hansen & Daniel H. Cohen, Are There Methods of Informal Logic?
    This presentation seeks to understand informal logic as a set of methods for the logical evaluation of natural language arguments. Some of the methods identified are the fallacies method, deductivism, warrantism and argument schemes. A framework for comparing the adequacy of the methods is outlined consisting of the following categories: learner- and user-efficiency, subjective and objective reliability, and scope. Within this framework, it is also possible to compare informal and formal logic.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  2
    Daniel H. Cohen, Just and Unjust Wars - and Just and Unjust Arguments.
    For all its problems, there is still much to be gleaned from the argument-is-war paradigm. Much of the conceptual vocabulary that we use to talk about wars is commonly applied to arguments. Other concepts in the war-cluster can also be readily adapted to arguments. Some parts, of course, do not seem to apply so easily, if at all. Of most interest here are those war-concepts that have not been deployed in thinking about arguments but really should be because of the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  16
    Daniel H. Cohen (1987). The Problem of Counterpossibles. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29 (1):91-101.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  2
    Daniel Cohen & George Thomas Goodnight, Academic Arguments.
    Calling an argument “merely academic” impugns its seriousness, belittles its substance, dis-misses its importance, and deflates hope of resolution, while ruling out negotiation and compromise. How-ever, “purely academic” argumentation, as an idealized limit case, is a valuable analytical tool for argumen-tation theorists because while the telos of academic argumentation may be cognitive, it is cognitive in the service of a community, which, in turn, is a community in the service of the cognitive.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  16
    Daniel H. Cohen (1991). Conditionals, Quantification, and Strong Mathematical Induction. Journal of Philosophical Logic 20 (3):315 - 326.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  4
    Daniel H. Cohen (1988). A Reply to Steven M Cahn. Analysis 48.
    Steven m cahn, In the june 1987 issue of "analysis", Asks how a principled divesture of stocks is possible. Selling stock requires a buyer, So no net reduction of objectionable economic behavior results. Is divestiture merely self-Righteous cleansing of one's own hands? not necessarily. It is argued that divesture as a means to influence corporate behavior, And not just as a means to a clean portfolio, Can be justified.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  4
    Daniel H. Cohen (2005). Rescher's Epistemic Logic, Cognitive Harmony & Realism and Pragmatic Epistemology. Informal Logic 25 (2):179-184.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  3
    Daniel H. Cohen (2004). Fogelin's Walking the Tightrope of Reason: The Precarious Life of a Rational Animal by Robert Fogelin. Informal Logic 23 (1).
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  1
    Marcelo Dascal, Amnon Knoll & Daniel Cohen, Cognitive Systemic Dichotomization’ in Public Argumentation and Controversies.
    We describe and analyze an important cognitive obstacle in inter- and intra-community ar-gumentation processes, which we propose to call 'Cognitive Systemic Dichotomization' . This social phenomenon consists in the collective use of shared cognitive patterns based upon dichotomous schemati-zation of knowledge, values, and affection. We discuss the formative role of CSD on a community’s collec-tive cognition, identity, and public discourse, as well as the challenges it raises to reasoned argumentation, and how different approaches to argumentation undertake to face this obstacle (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  4
    Daniel H. Cohen (2002). Informal Logic and the Surprise Exam. Informal Logic 22 (2).
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Daniel H. Cohen (1990). Review: Robert K. Meyer, Georg Dorn, P. Weingartner, A Farewell to Entailment. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (1):352-353.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  3
    Daniel Cohen (1985). The End of Keynesianism. Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1985 (63):139-147.
    Are Keynesian policies doomed? The experience of both Chirac and Mauroy might make one think so. Yet too severe a judgment would overlook an important counter-example: the actual economic recovery in the United States. As happened under the Kennedy-Johnson administration 20 years ago, the United States is experiencing a recovery that follows the textbook precepts of Keynesianism: an increase in military spending and a decrease in taxes, all of which is accompanied by (as predicted by the theory) an increase in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  1
    Daniel Cohen (1997). Justice Publique Et Justice Privée. Archives de Philosophie du Droit 41:149-162.
    Notion de justice. Définitions justice publique, justice privée. Place et diversité de la justice privée. Dualisme ou unité de la justice publique et de la justice privée? I. Dissemblances. A. - Rapports d'antagonisme. B. - Raisons historiques. C. - Origines différentes de la fonction juridictionnelle exercée. II. - Convergences. A. - Influence du privé sur la justice publique. B. - Influence du public sur la justice privée. C. - Perspectives communes. Juridicité. Finalité poursuivie.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  1
    Daniel Cohen (1990). On What Cannot Be. In J. Dunn & A. Gupta (eds.), Truth or Consequences. Kluwer 123--132.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  6
    Jeremy D. Bendik‐Keymer, Thom Brooks, Daniel B. Cohen, Michael Davis, Sara Goering, Barbara V. Nunn, Michael J. Stephens, James C. Taggart, Roy T. Tsao & Lori Watson (2003). Book Notes. [REVIEW] Ethics 113 (2):456-462.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  2
    Daniel Cohen (1987). Review: Anthony Appiah, Assertion and Conditionals. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (4):1051-1052.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  2
    Daniel H. Cohen (1998). Schoolhouses, Jailhouses and the House of Being: The Tragedy of Philosophy's Metaphors. Metaphilosophy 29 (1‐2):6-19.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  5
    Daniel H. Cohen (1992). Book Review:If P, Then Q: Conditionals and the Foundations of Reasoning David H. Sanford. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 59 (2):331-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  1
    Daniel H. Cohen (1990). Meyer Robert K.. A Farewell to Entailment. Foundations of Logic and Linguistics, Problems and Their Solutions, Edited by Dorn Georg and Weingartner P., Plenum Press, New York and London 1985, Pp. 577–636. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (1):352-353.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  1
    Daniel Cohen (2010). L'assimilation par la connaissance dans le De Principiis de Damascius. Laval Théologique et Philosophique 66 (1):61-83.
    Dans son De Principiis, Damascius propose une définition originale de la «connaissance» . Les développements doctrinaux qui y sont exposés semblent rompre avec la conception plotinienne, principalement issue de l’exégèse du De Anima d’Aristote, lequel envisageait la connaissance, du moins dans sa modalité supérieure qu’est l’intellection , comme une «identité» du connaissant et du connu. Cette étude se propose de clarifier la gnoséologie de Damascius et de montrer que la connaissance y est envisagée comme une altérité surmontée sans pour autant (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 75