54 found
Sort by:
  1. Daniel E. Flage (2014). Can Berkeley Have It Both Ways? The Philosophers' Magazine 66:55-60.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Daniel E. Flage (2014). Descartes and the Real Distinction Between Mind and Body. Review of Metaphysics 68 (1):93-106.
    In this paper I examine Descartes's argument for the real distinction between mind and body in Meditation Six. As a real distinction, it is a distinction between kinds of substances, that is, a distinction based upon essences. Descartes's argument is epistemic. It rests upon the contention that God can create anything we clearly and distinctly conceive as we conceive it. Given the epistemic basis for an ontological distinction, commentators find the argument puzzling.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Daniel E. Flage (2014). Spencer, Mark G., Ed., David Hume: Historical Thinker, Historical Writer. Review of Metaphysics 68 (1):203-204.
  4. Ekaterina Y. Ksenjek & Daniel E. Flage (2012). Berkeley, the Author of Nature, and the Judeo-Christian God. History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (3):281-300.
    Does George Berkeley provide an argument for the existence of the Judeo-Christian God at Principles of Human Knowledge, part I, section 29? The standard answer is that he does. In this paper, we challenge that interpretation. First, we look at section 29 in the context of its preceding sections and argue that the most the argument establishes is that there are at least two minds, that is, that the thesis of solipsism is false. Next, we examine the argument in section (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Daniel E. Flage (2011). Analysis in Berkeley's Theory of Vision. In Timo Airaksinen & Bertil Belfrage (eds.), Berkeley's Lasting Legacy: 300 Years Later. Cambridge Scholars.
    In Section 38 of the Theory of Vision Vindicated, George Berkeley claims that he had used the method of analysis throughout the Theory of Vision. What does that mean? I first show that "analysis" denoted a fairly well-defined method in the early modern period: it was regularly described as a method of discovery. Then I show that the discussion of distance perception in the Theory of Vision exemplifies the method of analysis and may be seen as a modification of a (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Daniel E. Flage (2010). Berkeley's Epistemic Ontology. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (1):25-60.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Daniel E. Flage (2009). Berkeley's Contingent Necessities. Philosophia 37 (3):361-372.
    The paper provides an account of necessary truths in Berkeley based upon his divine language model. If the thesis of the paper is correct, not all Berkeleian necessary truths can be known a priori.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Daniel E. Flage (2009). Remarks on Grandi's Comments. Philosophia 37 (3):379-380.
    This note is a reply to some of Giovanni Grandi’s comments on my paper “Berkeley’s Contingent Necessities.”.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Daniel E. Flage (2004). Berkeley's Epistemic Ontology: The Principles. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (1):25 - 60.
  10. Daniel E. Flage, George Berkeley. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Daniel E. Flage (2004). Hume's Philosophy of the Self. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):276-278.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Daniel E. Flage (2003). Notes and Discussions: Berkeleyis Principles, Section 10. Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (4):543-551.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Daniel E. Flage (2001). Critical Thinking. Inquiry 20 (4):13-18.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Clarence A. Bonnen & Daniel E. Flage (2000). Descartes. International Studies in Philosophy 32 (4):1-11.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Daniel E. Flage (2000). Flow Charts for Critical Thinking. Informal Logic 20 (3).
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Daniel E. Flage (2000). Locke and Natural Law. Dialogue 39 (03):435-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Daniel E. Flage (1999). Descartes and Method: A Search for a Method in Meditations. Routledge.
    Rene Descartes credited his success in philosophy, mathematics, and physics to the discovery of a universal method of inquiry, but he provided no systematic description of his method. Descartes and Method carefully examines Descartes' scattered remarks on his application and puts forward a systematic account of his method with particular attention to the role it plays in the Meditations . Daniel E. Flage and Clarence A. Bonnen boldly and convincingly argue against the orthodox conception that Descartes had no method. Through (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Daniel E. Flage (1998). Descartes's Legacy: Minds and Meaning in Early Modern Philosophy (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (3):465-466.
  19. Daniel E. Flage (1997). Hume's Missing Shade of Blue. Modern Schoolman 75 (1):55-63.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Daniel E. Flage & Clarence A. Bonnen (1997). Descartes on Causation. Review of Metaphysics 50 (4):841 - 872.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Daniel E. Flage (1996). An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts James Tully Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, Xii + 333 P., $59.95, $18.95 Paper. [REVIEW] Dialogue 35 (04):825-.
  22. Daniel E. Flage (1996). Hume's Theory of Consciousness. International Philosophical Quarterly 36 (2):236-238.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Daniel E. Flage (1995). Evidence and Inquiry. Review of Metaphysics 49 (1):136-138.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Daniel E. Flage & Ronald J. Glass (1995). Hume's Problem and the Possibility of Normative Ethics. Journal of Value Inquiry 29 (2):231-239.
  25. Daniel E. Flage (1993). Descartes's Three Hypothetical Doubts. Modern Schoolman 70 (3):201-208.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Daniel E. Flage (1993). On Friedman's Look. Hume Studies 19 (1):187-197.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Daniel E. Flage (1992). Hume's Hobbism and His Anti-Hobbism. Hume Studies 18 (2):369-382.
  28. Daniel E. Flage (1992). Library Research Guide to Philosophy. Teaching Philosophy 15 (4):409-411.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Daniel E. Flage & Clarence A. Bonnen (1992). Descartes and the Epistemology of Innate Ideas. History of Philosophy Quarterly 9 (1):19 - 33.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Daniel E. Flage & Clarence A. Bonnen (1992). Innate Ideas and Cartesian Dispositions. International Studies in Philosophy 24 (1):65-80.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Daniel E. Flage (1990). Berkeley. Review of Metaphysics 44 (2):447-448.
  32. Daniel E. Flage (1990). David Hume's Theory of Mind. Routledge.
    INTRODUCTION Anyone who reads David Hume's Treatise of Human Nature cannot but be struck by the diversity of philosophical issues Hume addresses, ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Daniel E. Flage (1989). Remembering the Past. Hume Studies 15 (1):236-246.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Daniel E. Flage (1989). The Essences of Spinoza's God. History of Philosophy Quarterly 6 (2):147 - 160.
  35. Daniel E. Flage & Clarence A. Bonnen (1989). Descartes's Factitious Ideas of God. Modern Schoolman 66 (3):197-208.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. T. L. S. Sprigge & Daniel E. Flage (1988). Berkeley's Theory of Notions. Philosophical Quarterly 38 (150):134.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Daniel E. Flage (1987). Berkeley's Doctrine of Notions: A Reconstruction Based on His Theory of Meaning. St. Martin's Press.
  38. Berkeley an Abstraction & Daniel E. Flage (1986). Marx, Justice, and the Dialectic Method, PHILIP J. KAIN Allen Wood has Argued That for Marx the Concept of Justice Belonging to Any Society Grows Out of That Society's Mode of Production in Such a Way That Each Social Epoch Can Be Judged by its Own Standards Alone, and, in Wood's View, Capitalism is Perfectly Just, for Marx. Others, Like ZI Hu. New Scholasticism 60 (4).
  39. Daniel E. Flage (1986). Berkeley on Abstraction. Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (4):483-501.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Daniel E. Flage (1986). Hume on Denotation and Connotation. Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (4):451-461.
  41. Daniel E. Flage (1985). Berkeley's Notions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (3):407-425.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Daniel E. Flage (1985). Descartes's Cogito. History of Philosophy Quarterly 2 (2):163 - 178.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Daniel E. Flage (1985). Descartes' 'Cogito'. History of Philosophy Quarterly 2:163-178.
    IT IS ARGUED THAT DESCARTES DREW A METHODOLOGICAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE ORDER IN WHICH ONE ENTERTAINS PROPOSITIONS AND THE ORDER OF EPISTEMIC PRIMACY. RECOGNIZING THIS RECONCILES ANY "PRIMA FACIE" INCONSISTENCIES AMONG THE "COGITO" PASSAGES, MOST NOTABLY, THOSE BETWEEN THE "COGITO" PASSAGES IN THE "PRINCIPLES OF PHILOSOPHY" AND THE "SECOND REPLIES".
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Daniel E. Flage (1985). Hume's Ethics. Philosophical Topics 13 (3):71-88.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Daniel E. Flage (1985). Hume on Memory and Causation. Hume Studies 1985 (1):168-188.
  46. Daniel E. Flage (1985). Perchance to Dream: Reply to Traiger. Hume Studies 11 (2):173-182.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Daniel E. Flage & Ronald J. Glass (1984). Hume on the Cartesian Theory of Substance. Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (4):497-508.
    While most of hume's criticisms of the doctrine of substance are epistemological and theory-Independent, We show that in "treatise" i.Iv.5, Hume develops a metaphysical criticism of the cartesian theory of substance. Using three of pierre bayle's arguments of his own ends, He argues that on an empiricist theory of meaning, The cartesian theory of substance is reduced to absurdity.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Daniel E. Flage (1983). Errata: Hume's Dualism. Noûs 17 (2):339.
  49. Daniel E. Flage (1983). Hume's Philosophy of Mind. Hume Studies 9 (1):82-88.
  50. Daniel E. Flage (1982). Hume's Dualism. Noûs 16 (4):527-541.
1 — 50 / 54