59 found
Order:
  1.  41
    Ekaterina Y. Ksenjek & Daniel E. Flage (2012). Berkeley, the Author of Nature, and the Judeo-Christian God. History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (3):281-300.
    Does George Berkeley provide an argument for the existence of the Judeo-Christian God at Principles of Human Knowledge, part I, section 29? The standard answer is that he does. In this paper, we challenge that interpretation. First, we look at section 29 in the context of its preceding sections and argue that the most the argument establishes is that there are at least two minds, that is, that the thesis of solipsism is false. Next, we examine the argument in section (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  44
    Daniel E. Flage (2004). Berkeley's Epistemic Ontology: The Principles. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (1):25 - 60.
  3.  17
    Daniel E. Flage (2014). Can Berkeley Have It Both Ways? The Philosophers' Magazine 66 (3):55-60.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  15
    Daniel E. Flage (2014). Descartes and the Real Distinction Between Mind and Body. Review of Metaphysics 68 (1):93-106.
    How does Descartes justify his claim that conceiving of a mind as a thinking thing and a body as an extended thing show that mind and body are distinct substances? The paper attempts to answer that question by following a clue Descartes gave Arnauld that virtually everything in Meditations Three through Five is germane to the real distinction between mind and body. The paper develops the distinction between material truth and formal truth from Descartes’s discussions of falsity in Meditation Three. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  35
    Daniel E. Flage (2009). Berkeley's Contingent Necessities. Philosophia 37 (3):361-372.
    The paper provides an account of necessary truths in Berkeley based upon his divine language model. If the thesis of the paper is correct, not all Berkeleian necessary truths can be known a priori.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  19
    Daniel E. Flage (1981). Hume's Relative Ideas. Hume Studies 7 (1):55-73.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  7.  14
    Daniel E. Flage (1985). Hume's Ethics. Philosophical Topics 13 (3):71-88.
    If there is a normative moral theory embedded in Hume's works and if the recent critics of the utilitarian interpretation of Hume are correct in claiming that he was not a utilitarian, then what is the nature of Hume's moral theory? In this paper I hope to provide a plausible answer to that question by examining Hume's contention that the moral sentiment is analogous to a secondary quality. I shall show that his discussions of the moral sentiment provide one with (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  12
    Daniel E. Flage (2014). Spencer, Mark G., Ed., David Hume: Historical Thinker, Historical Writer. Review of Metaphysics 68 (1):203-204.
  9.  13
    Daniel E. Flage (1990). Berkeley. Review of Metaphysics 44 (2):447-448.
    Irish philosopher George Bishop Berkeley was one of the greatest philosophers of the early modern period. Along with David Hume and John Locke he is considered one of the fathers of British Empiricism. Berkeley is a clear, concise, and sympathetic introduction to George Berkeley’s philosophy, and a thorough review of his most important texts. Daniel E. Flage explores his works on vision, metaphysics, morality, and economics in an attempt to develop a philosophically plausible interpretation of Berkeley’s oeuvre as whole. Many (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  28
    Daniel E. Flage (1997). Hume's Missing Shade of Blue. Modern Schoolman 75 (1):55-63.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  52
    Daniel E. Flage (1990). David Hume's Theory of Mind. Routledge.
    INTRODUCTION Anyone who reads David Hume's Treatise of Human Nature cannot but be struck by the diversity of philosophical issues Hume addresses, ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  12.  10
    Daniel E. Flage (1993). On Friedman's Look. Hume Studies 19 (1):187-197.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  15
    Daniel E. Flage & Clarence A. Bonnen (1992). Innate Ideas and Cartesian Dispositions. International Studies in Philosophy 24 (1):65-80.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  36
    Daniel E. Flage (1986). Berkeley on Abstraction. Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (4):483-501.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  6
    Clarence A. Bonnen & Daniel E. Flage (2000). Descartes. International Studies in Philosophy 32 (4):1-11.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  4
    Daniel E. Flage (1987). Berkeley's Doctrine of Notions: A Reconstruction Based on His Theory of Meaning. St. Martin's Press.
  17.  8
    Daniel E. Flage (1989). Remembering the Past. Hume Studies 15 (1):236-246.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  26
    Daniel E. Flage (1985). Berkeley's Notions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (3):407-425.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19.  45
    Daniel E. Flage (1999). Descartes and Method: A Search for a Method in Meditations. Routledge.
    Rene Descartes credited his success in philosophy, mathematics, and physics to the discovery of a universal method of inquiry, but he provided no systematic description of his method. Descartes and Method carefully examines Descartes' scattered remarks on his application and puts forward a systematic account of his method with particular attention to the role it plays in the Meditations . Daniel E. Flage and Clarence A. Bonnen boldly and convincingly argue against the orthodox conception that Descartes had no method. Through (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  7
    Daniel E. Flage (1982). Relative Ideas Revisited: A Reply to Thomas. Hume Studies 8 (2):158-171.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21.  10
    Daniel E. Flage (1998). Descartes's Legacy: Minds and Meaning in Early Modern Philosophy (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (3):465-466.
  22.  10
    Daniel E. Flage (1993). Descartes's Three Hypothetical Doubts. Modern Schoolman 70 (3):201-208.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  10
    Daniel E. Flage (1996). Hume's Theory of Consciousness. International Philosophical Quarterly 36 (2):236-238.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  20
    Daniel E. Flage (1983). Hume's Philosophy of Mind. Hume Studies 9 (1):82-88.
  25.  6
    Daniel E. Flage (1985). Perchance to Dream: Reply to Traiger. Hume Studies 11 (2):173-182.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  18
    Daniel E. Flage (2004). Hume's Philosophy of the Self. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):276-278.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  23
    Daniel E. Flage (1986). Hume on Denotation and Connotation. Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (4):451-461.
  28.  9
    Daniel E. Flage & Clarence A. Bonnen (1989). Descartes's Factitious Ideas of God. Modern Schoolman 66 (3):197-208.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  8
    Berkeley an Abstraction & Daniel E. Flage (1986). Marx, Justice, and the Dialectic Method, PHILIP J. KAIN Allen Wood has Argued That for Marx the Concept of Justice Belonging to Any Society Grows Out of That Society's Mode of Production in Such a Way That Each Social Epoch Can Be Judged by its Own Standards Alone, and, in Wood's View, Capitalism is Perfectly Just, for Marx. Others, Like ZI Hu. New Scholasticism 60 (4).
  30.  22
    Daniel E. Flage & Ronald J. Glass (1984). Hume on the Cartesian Theory of Substance. Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (4):497-508.
    While most of hume's criticisms of the doctrine of substance are epistemological and theory-Independent, We show that in "treatise" i.Iv.5, Hume develops a metaphysical criticism of the cartesian theory of substance. Using three of pierre bayle's arguments of his own ends, He argues that on an empiricist theory of meaning, The cartesian theory of substance is reduced to absurdity.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  8
    Daniel E. Flage (1982). Relative Ideas Revisited. Hume Studies 8 (2):158-171.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  7
    Daniel E. Flage (1985). Descartes' 'Cogito'. History of Philosophy Quarterly 2:163-178.
    IT IS ARGUED THAT DESCARTES DREW A METHODOLOGICAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE ORDER IN WHICH ONE ENTERTAINS PROPOSITIONS AND THE ORDER OF EPISTEMIC PRIMACY. RECOGNIZING THIS RECONCILES ANY "PRIMA FACIE" INCONSISTENCIES AMONG THE "COGITO" PASSAGES, MOST NOTABLY, THOSE BETWEEN THE "COGITO" PASSAGES IN THE "PRINCIPLES OF PHILOSOPHY" AND THE "SECOND REPLIES".
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  6
    Daniel E. Flage (1995). Evidence and Inquiry. Review of Metaphysics 49 (1):136-138.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  6
    Daniel E. Flage (1985). Hume on Memory and Causation. Hume Studies 1985 (1):168-188.
  35.  8
    Daniel E. Flage (1992). Hume's Hobbism and His Anti-Hobbism. Hume Studies 18 (2):369-382.
  36.  7
    Daniel E. Flage (2000). Flow Charts for Critical Thinking. Informal Logic 20 (3).
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  20
    Daniel E. Flage, George Berkeley. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  15
    Daniel E. Flage (1981). Locke's Relative Ideas. Theoria 47 (3):142-159.
  39.  12
    Daniel E. Flage & Clarence A. Bonnen (1992). Descartes and the Epistemology of Innate Ideas. History of Philosophy Quarterly 9 (1):19 - 33.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  13
    Daniel E. Flage (2000). Locke and Natural Law. Dialogue 39 (03):435-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  16
    Daniel E. Flage (1982). Hume's Dualism. Noûs 16 (4):527-541.
  42.  10
    Daniel E. Flage (1989). The Essences of Spinoza's God. History of Philosophy Quarterly 6 (2):147 - 160.
  43.  15
    Daniel E. Flage (2009). Remarks on Grandi's Comments. Philosophia 37 (3):379-380.
    This note is a reply to some of Giovanni Grandi’s comments on my paper “Berkeley’s Contingent Necessities.”.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  14
    Daniel E. Flage & Ronald J. Glass (1995). Hume's Problem and the Possibility of Normative Ethics. Journal of Value Inquiry 29 (2):231-239.
    In this essay we argue that if the covering-law model of moral justification is correct, Hume's "is"-"ought" paragraph calls the possibility of a justifiable theory of moral obligation in doubt. In the first section we delineate Hume's doubts. In the second section we develop a skeptical solution to those doubts.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  4
    Daniel E. Flage (1992). Library Research Guide to Philosophy. Teaching Philosophy 15 (4):409-411.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  4
    Daniel E. Flage (1985). Descartes's Cogito. History of Philosophy Quarterly 2 (2):163 - 178.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  8
    Daniel E. Flage & Clarence A. Bonnen (1997). Descartes on Causation. Review of Metaphysics 50 (4):841 - 872.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  10
    Daniel E. Flage (1983). Errata: Hume's Dualism. Noûs 17 (2):339.
  49.  3
    Daniel E. Flage (1996). An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts James Tully Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, Xii + 333 P., $59.95, $18.95 Paper. [REVIEW] Dialogue 35 (04):825-.
  50.  3
    Daniel E. Flage (2001). Critical Thinking. Inquiry 20 (4):13-18.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 59