14 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Daniel Friedrich [8]Daniel R. Friedrich [6]
See also:
Profile: Daniel Friedrich (Humboldt-University, Berlin)
  1. Daniel Friedrich (2013). A Duty to Adopt? Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (1):25-39.
    All over the world millions of children are without parental care. As a consequence they are liable to suffer serious harm. I argue the general duty to assist those in need extends to children without parental care and that some people are under a moral duty to adopt rather than have biological children. I defend this claim against the following objections: (1) intimate decisions are excluded from the duty to assist, (2) adopting children is too costly to be required by (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Daniel Friedrich (2013). Belief and Motivation. Theoria 80 (2).
    Humeans claim that all motivation is by desire. Anti-Humeans maintain that some beliefs can motivate all by themselves. This dispute, I argue, hinges on the question whether belief can rationalize motivation. Moreover, I argue belief can rationalize motivation since rationality requires that one be motivated to φ if one believes one has most reason to φ, and it is possible to be motivated to φ because one believes one has most reason to φ and one exercises one's capacity for rational (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Norbert Anwander & Daniel Friedrich (2012). Apologies and Relationships: Solving a Puzzle. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 46 (3):331-338.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Daniel Friedrich (2012). The Alluringness of Desire. Philosophical Explorations 15 (3):291 - 302.
    A central aspect of desire is the alluringness with which the desired object appears to the desirer. But what explains the alluringness of desire? According to the standard view, desire presents its objects with a certain allure because desire involves believing that the desired object is good. However, this cannot explain how those who lack the cognitive sophistication required for evaluative concepts can nonetheless have desires, how nihilists can continue to have desires, nor how we can desire things we believe (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Daniel Friedrich & Nicholas Southwood (2011). Promises and Trust. In Hanoch Sheinman (ed.), Promises and Agreement: Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
    In this article we develop and defend what we call the “Trust View” of promissory obligation, according to which making a promise involves inviting another individual to trust one to do something. In inviting her trust, and having the invitation accepted (or at least not rejected), one incurs an obligation to her not to betray the trust that one has invited. The distinctive wrong involved in breaking a promise is a matter of violating this obligation. We begin by explicating the (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Daniel Friedrich (2010). Moral Realism as a Moral Doctrine. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):759-760.
    Includes bibliographical references (p. [365]-374) and index Introduction -- Mind-independence -- Determinate correctness -- Uniform applicability -- Invariance -- Transindividual concurrence -- Impartiality -- Truth-aptitude -- Further dimensions of ethical objectivity? -- Supervenience as an ethical phenomenon.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Daniel Friedrich, Bryn Jaastad & Thomas S. Popkewitz (2010). Democratic Education: An (Im)Possibility That yet Remains to Come. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (5-6):571-587.
    Efforts to develop democratic schools have moved along particular rules and standards of ‘reasoning’ even when expressed through different ideological and paradigmatic lines. From attempts to make a democratic education to critical pedagogy, different approaches overlap in their historical construction of the reason of schooling: designing society by designing the child. These approaches to democracy make inequality into the premise of equality, assuming a consensual partition of the world and the need for specific agents to monitor partitioned boundaries, thus reinserting (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Alena M. Buyx, Daniel R. Friedrich & Bettina Schoene-Seifert (2009). Marginal Effectiveness as a Reason for Rationing-Conceptual Clarification and Preliminary Ethical Considerations. Ethik in der Medizin 21 (2):89-100.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Dr med Alena M. Buyx, Daniel R. Friedrich & Prof Dr Bettina Schöne-Seifert (2009). Marginale Wirksamkeit als Posteriorisierungskriterium – Begriffsklärungen und ethisch relevante Vorüberlegungen. Ethik in der Medizin 21 (2):89-100.
    Die demografische Entwicklung und der medizinische Fortschritt werden die Problematik der Ressourcenknappheit im Gesundheitswesen in Zukunft weiter verschärfen. Auch Deutschland steht eine Prioritätensetzung im Gesundheitswesen bevor. Diese sollte in möglichst transparenter Weise nach klaren Kriterien erfolgen. Ein nur selten in diesem Kontext besprochenes Kriterium der Verteilung von Mitteln in der Gesundheitsversorgung ist die marginale Wirksamkeit medizinischer Leistungen. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird dieses Kriterium vorgestellt und auf seine Fairness hin untersucht. Nach der kritischen Diskussion einiger Argumente gegen den offenen Einsatz von (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Daniel R. Friedrich, Kathrin Alber, Birgitta Bayerl & Dr Thorsten Meyer (2009). Priorities 2008. Ethik in der Medizin 21 (2):149-152.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Daniel R. Friedrich, Kathrin Alber, Birgitta Bayerl & Thorsten Meyer (2009). Priorities 2008. Ethik in der Medizin 21 (2):149-152.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Daniel R. Friedrich & Bettina Schöne-Seifert (2009). Marginale Wirksamkeit als Posteriorisierungskriterium–Begriffsklärungen und ethisch relevante Vorüberlegungen. Ethik in der Medizin 21 (2):89-100.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Nicholas Southwood & Daniel Friedrich (2009). Promises Beyond Assurance. Philosophical Studies 144 (2):261 - 280.
    Breaking a promise is generally taken to involve committing a certain kind of moral wrong, but what (if anything) explains this wrong? According to one influential theory that has been championed most recently by T.M. Scanlon, the wrong involved in breaking a promise is a matter of violating an obligation that one incurs to a promisee in virtue of giving her assurance that one will perform or refrain from performing certain acts. In this paper, we argue that the “Assurance View”, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Daniel R. Friedrich (2008). „Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly“. [REVIEW] Ethik in der Medizin 20 (1):64-68.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation