El siglo XX planteó a los filósofos la demanda de una filosofía de la historia. Los historiadores que concibieron historias universales con el fin de entender la crisis de la civilización occidental fueronestudiosos tales como Arnold Toynbee, Pitirim Sorokin, Christopher Dawson, Lewis Mumford y William McNeilP. Los grandes filósofos que respondieron a semejante demanda, Martin Heidegger, Karl Jaspersy Eric Voegelin. Este texto propone una comparación entre los dos últimos. Al igual que Heidegger, ambos comprendieron la historia enun sentido ontológico.

Paper edition (unseen), $19.95. Annotation copyrighted by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR.

To the question of the beginning Hegel gives three answers. The major texts in which he elaborates them are: the section in the Science of Logic entitled "With What Must the Beginning of Science Be Made?"; the early stages of science proper in the Encyclopedia ; within science proper, the late stages of the philosophy of Logos and the philosophy of Spirit; the "Preface" of the Phenomenology of Spirit; and the late section on absolute Knowledge in the Phenomenology of Spirit. (...) Other texts also mention something on the question, especially the introductions to his lectures, but they add nothing essential to the published works. Part One of this communication will offer an account of the three beginnings of Hegelian science. (shrink)

After the Introduction (pp. 1-22), the course falls into two parts, "Meditation on the dictum [μΕέτα τò πâv]-the difference between beings and Being" (pp. 23-93), and "The originary utterance of Being in the fragmentary saying of Anaximander" (pp. 94-123). The Introduction, each chapter of Part One, and the first subdivision of Part Two ends with a "recapitulation'; here only the last will be treated separately.