21 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Daniel Cohen (Colby College)
  1. Daniel H. Cohen (2013). Virtue, In Context. Informal Logic 33 (4):471-485.
    Virtue argumentation theory provides the best framework for accommodating the notion of an argument that is “fully satisfying” in a robust and integrated sense. The process of explicating the notion of fully satisfying arguments requires expanding the concept of arguers to include all of an argument’s participants, including judges, juries, and interested spectators. And that, in turn, requires expanding the concept of an argument itself to include its entire context.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Daniel H. Cohen (2007). Paul Boghossian - Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. Informal Logic 27 (2):229-232.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Daniel H. Cohen (2005). Rescher's Epistemic Logic, Cognitive Harmony & Realism and Pragmatic Epistemology. Informal Logic 25 (2).
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Daniel H. Cohen (2004). Fogelin's Walking the Tightrope of Reason: The Precarious Life of a Rational Animal by Robert Fogelin. Informal Logic 23 (1).
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Daniel H. Cohen (2002). Informal Logic and the Surprise Exam. Informal Logic 22 (2).
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Daniel H. Cohen (2001). Evaluating Arguments and Making Meta-Arguments. Informal Logic 21 (2).
    This paper explores the outlines of a framework for evaluating arguments. Among the factors to take into account are the strength of the arguers' inferences, the level of their engagement with objections raised by other interlocutors, and their effectiveness in rationally persuading their target audiences. Some connections among these can be understood only in the context of meta-argumentation and meta-rationality. The Principle of Meta-Rationality (PMR)--that reasoning rationally includes reasoning about rationality-is used to explain why it can be rational to resist (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Daniel H. Cohen (1998). Schoolhouses, Jailhouses and the House of Being: The Tragedy of Philosophy's Metaphors. Metaphilosophy 29 (1‐2):6-19.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Daniel H. Cohen (1995). TArgument is War...And War is Hell: Philosophy, Education, and Metaphors for Argumentation. Informal Logic 17 (2).
    The claim that argumentation has no proper role in either philosophy or education, and especially not in philosophical education, flies in the face of both conventional wisdom and traditional pedagogy. There is, however, something to be said for it because it is really only provocative against a certain philosophical backdrop. Our understanding of the concept "argument" is both reflected by and molded by the specific metaphor that argument-is-war, something with winners and losers, offensive and defensive moments, and an essentially adversarial (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Daniel H. Cohen (1993). Nonsensical Representation and Senseless Interpretation: Wittgenstein on Nonsense Judgments. Philosophia 22 (3-4):407-424.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Daniel H. Cohen (1992). Book Review:If P, Then Q: Conditionals and the Foundations of Reasoning David H. Sanford. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 59 (2):331-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Daniel H. Cohen (1991). Conditionals, Quantification, and Strong Mathematical Induction. Journal of Philosophical Logic 20 (3):315 - 326.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Daniel H. Cohen (1990). Meyer Robert K.. A Farewell to Entailment. Foundations of Logic and Linguistics, Problems and Their Solutions, Edited by Dorn Georg and Weingartner P., Plenum Press, New York and London 1985, Pp. 577–636. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (1):352-353.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Daniel H. Cohen (1990). Review: Robert K. Meyer, Georg Dorn, P. Weingartner, A Farewell to Entailment. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (1):352-353.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Daniel H. Cohen (1989). Review: Richard Routley, Val Plumwood, Robert K. Meyer, Ross T. Brady, Relevant Logics and Their Rivals. Part I. The Basic Philosophical and Semantical Theory. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (1):293-296.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Daniel H. Cohen (1988). A Reply to Cahn. Analysis 48 (2):109 - 110.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Daniel H. Cohen (1988). A Reply to Steven M Cahn. Analysis 48.
    Steven m cahn, In the june 1987 issue of "analysis", Asks how a principled divesture of stocks is possible. Selling stock requires a buyer, So no net reduction of objectionable economic behavior results. Is divestiture merely self-Righteous cleansing of one's own hands? not necessarily. It is argued that divesture as a means to influence corporate behavior, And not just as a means to a clean portfolio, Can be justified.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Daniel H. Cohen (1988). Stalking the Wild Paradox. Metaphilosophy 19 (1):25–31.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Daniel H. Cohen (1988). The Word as Will and Idea. Philosophical Studies 32:126-140.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Daniel H. Cohen (1987). The Problem of Counterpossibles. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29 (1):91-101.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Daniel H. Cohen (1986). A New Axiomatization of Belnap's Conditional Assertion. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 (1):124-132.
  21. Daniel H. Cohen (1985). Putting Paradoxes to Pedagogical Use in Philosophy. Teaching Philosophy 8 (4):309-317.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation