Search results for 'Daniel I. Wikler' (try it on Scholar)

44 found
Sort by:
  1. Daniel I. Wikler (1984). Conceptual Issues in the Definition of Death: A Guide for Public Policy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (2).score: 870.0
    Current medical and legal literature generally favors a definition of death based on total cessation of brain functioning. It does not, however, supply the reasoning for this recommendation. None of the arguments for whole-brain death is convincing; there exists, however, a satisfactory rationale for identifying death with cortical death. Policymakers should refrain from endorsing any of these arguments, focussing instead on the pragmatic tasks involved in guiding medical care at the end of life.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Daniel I. Wikler (1979). Ought We to Try to Save Aborted Fetuses? Ethics 90 (1):58-65.score: 870.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Allen Buchanan, Dan W. Brock, Norman Daniels & Daniel Wikler (forthcoming). Reproductive Freedom and the Prevention of Harm. Bioethics.score: 253.3
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Buchanan Allen, Dan W. Brock, Norman Daniels & Daniel Wikler (2002). BRICKHOUSE Thomas C. And Nicholas D. Smith (Eds): The Trial And. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (3):507-511.score: 253.3
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Ramón J. Betanzos, M. Martin, Roy Bhaskar, James Bohman, Finn Bowring, Stephen Eric Bronner, Allen Buchanan, Dan W. Brock, Morman Daniels & Daniel Wikler (2001). Althusser, Louis. Machievelli and Us. Ed. François Matheron. Verso, 1999. Pp. 136. $30.00 Cloth. Angus, Ian.(Dis) Figurations: Discourse/Critique/Ethics. Verso, 2000. Pp. 269. $20 Paper. Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics, Books VIII and IX. Ed. Michael Pakaluk. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (1):115-122.score: 253.3
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Allen Buchanan, Allen Dan, W. Brock, Norman Daniels, Daniel Wikler & Helga Kuhse (2002). Book Reviews-From Chance to Choice--Genetics and Justice. Bioethics-Oxford 16 (3):298-298.score: 253.3
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Allen E. Buchanan, Dan W. Brock, Norman Daniels & Daniel Wikler (2000). From Chance to Choice. Cambridge University Press.score: 253.3
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Daniel Wikler (2002). Personal and Social Responsibility for Health. Ethics and International Affairs 16 (2):47–55.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Michael B. Green & Daniel Wikler (2009). Brain Death and Personal Identity. In John P. Lizza (ed.), Defining the Beginning and End of Life: Readings on Personal Identity and Bioethics. Johns Hopkins University Press. 105 - 133.score: 240.0
  10. Daniel Wikler (1979). Paternalism and the Mildly Retarded. Philosophy and Public Affairs 8 (4):377-392.score: 240.0
  11. Harald Schmidt, Kristin Voigt & Daniel Wikler, Carrots, Sticks, and Health Care Reform — Problems with Wellness Incentives.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Daniel Wikler (1987). Introduction. Ethics 97 (4):775.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Daniel Wikler (1988). Ought the Young Make Health Care Decisions for Their Aged Selves? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (1):57-71.score: 240.0
    Though the chief responsibility for providing for the health care of older Americans has been (and should remain) society's, there has been increasing interest in private solutions. Individual provision, however, would require not only adequate wealth but prudent planning, demanding in turn more discipline, self-control, and foresightedness than many individuals are normally capable of. One possible corrective is pre-commitment, a strategy of binding oneself to a plan chosen to allocate resources optimally over the life span. Though pre-commitment may have some (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Daniel Wikler (1997). Presidential Address: Bioethics and Social Responsibility. Bioethics 11 (3-4):185-192.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Daniel Wikler (1994). Bioethics Commissions Abroad. HEC Forum 6 (5):290-304.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Daniel Wikler & Jeremiah Barondess (1993). Bioethics and Anti-Bioethics in Light of Nazi Medicine: What Must We Remember? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3 (1):39-55.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Daniel Wikler (1993). Brain Death: A Durable Consensus? Bioethics 7 (2-3):239-246.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Daniel Wikler & Nir Eyal (2013). Nudges and Noodges: The Ethics of Health Promotion—New York Style. Public Health Ethics 6 (3):pht033.score: 240.0
    Michael Bloomberg's three terms in New York City's mayoral office are coming to a close. His model of governance for public health influenced cities and governments around the world. What should we make of that model? This essay introduces a symposium in which ethicists Sarah Conly, Roger Brownsword and Alex Rajczi discuss that legacy.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Norman Fost, David Chudwin & Daniel Wikler (1980). The Limited Moral Significance of 'Fetal Viability'. Hastings Center Report 10 (6):10-13.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Daniel Wikler (2010). Cognitive Disability, Paternalism, and the Global Burden of Disease. In Eva Feder Kittay & Licia Carlson (eds.), Cognitive Disability and its Challenge to Moral Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell. 183--199.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Daniel Wikler (1988). Not Dead, Not Dying: Ethical Categories And Persistent Vegetative State. Hastings Center Report 18 (February-March):41-47.score: 240.0
  22. Daniel Wikler (2009). Pain and the Senses [Commentary]. Brain and Mind 908:315.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Sarah Marchand & Daniel Wikler (2002). Health Inequalities and Justice. In Julia Lai Po-Wah Tao (ed.), Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the (Im) Possibility of Global Bioethics. Kluwer Academic Pub.. 209--221.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Daniel Wikler (1989). Institutional Agendas and Ethics Committees. Hastings Center Report 19 (5):21-23.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Margaret Pabst Battin & Daniel Wikler (1991). All Together, Now. Hastings Center Report 22 (1):3-4.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Wikler Daniel (2002). Personal and Social Responsibility for Health. Ethics and International Affairs 16 (2).score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Nicholas Sadovnikoff & Daniel Wikler (2014). Brain Dead Patients Are Still Whole Organisms. American Journal of Bioethics 14 (8):39-40.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Daniel Wikler (ed.) (forthcoming). Fairness and Goodness in Health. World Health Organization.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Daniel Wikler (2006). Justice, Socioeconomic Status, and Responsibility for Health. In Sudhir Anand, Fabienne Peter & Amartya Sen (eds.), Public Health, Ethics, and Equity. Oup Oxford.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Daniel Wikler & Dan W. Brock (2008). Population-Level Bioethics : Mapping a New Agenda. In Ronald Michael Green, Aine Donovan & Steven A. Jauss (eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Daniel Wikler (2010). Paternalism in the Age of Cognitive Enhancement: Do Civil Liberties Presuppose Roughly Equal Mental Ability? In Julian Savulescu & Nick Bostrom (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oup Oxford.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Pascal Couillard (2003). From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice Allen Buchanan, Dan W. Brock, Norman Daniels Et Daniel Wikler Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000, Xii, 398 P. [REVIEW] Dialogue 42 (02):408-.score: 120.0
  33. D. Wikler (1999). Can We Learn From Eugenics? Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):183-194.score: 120.0
    Eugenics casts a long shadow over contemporary genetics. Any measure, whether in clinical genetics or biotechnology, which is suspected of eugenic intent is likely to be opposed on that ground. Yet there is little consensus on what this word signifies, and often only a remote connection to the very complex set of social movements which took that name. After a brief historical summary of eugenics, this essay attempts to locate any wrongs inherent in eugenic doctrines. Four candidates are examined and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Baruch Brody (2002). Allen Buchanan, Dan Brock, Norman Daniels, and Daniel Wikler, From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice: Buchanan, Allen ; Brock, Dan ; Daniels, Norman ; and Wikler, Daniel . From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Pp. 398. $33.00 (Cloth); $23.00 (Paper). [REVIEW] Ethics 112 (2):358-361.score: 120.0
  35. Health Inequalities And (2002). Sarah Marchand and Daniel Wikler. In Julia Lai Po-Wah Tao (ed.), Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the (Im) Possibility of Global Bioethics. Kluwer Academic Pub..score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Allen Buchanan, Dan Brock, Norman Daniels & Dan Wikler, Why Not the Best?score: 93.3
    "Be All You Can Be," the Army recruiting poster urges young men and women. Many parents share the sentiment. They want their children to be the best they can be. For many parents, their most important project in life is to pursue that goal, and they make sacrifices to see it happen. And why shouldn't parents aim to make their offspring the best they can be?
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Nils Holtug (2011). Equality and the Treatment-Enhancement Distinction. Bioethics 25 (3):137-144.score: 81.0
    In From Chance to Choice, Allen Buchanan, Dan Brock, Norman Daniels and Daniel Wikler propose a new way of defending the moral significance of the distinction between genetic treatments and enhancements. They develop what they call a ‘normal function model’ of equality of opportunity and argue that it offers a ‘limited’ defence of this distinction. In this article, I critically assess their model and the support it (allegedly) provides for the treatment-enhancement distinction. First, I argue that there is (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Richard Arneson, Is Moral Theory Perplexed by New Genetic Technology?score: 81.0
    Richard J. Arneson From Choice to Chance: Genes and the Just Society1 intelligently addresses difficult issues at the intersection of medical ethics and the theory of justice. The authors, Dan Brock, Allen Buchanan, Norman Daniels, and Daniel Wikler, repeatedly emphasize their opinion that advances in genetic technology force upon us entirely new ethical questions which previous moral theories lack the resources to resolve.2 The claims that new scientific discoveries render previous moral theories obsolete should be regarded with suspicion. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Larry A. Herzberg (2007). Genetic Enhancement and Parental Obligation. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):98-111.score: 45.0
    Among moral philosophers, general disapproval of genetic enhancement has in recent years given way to the view that the permissibility of a eugenic policy depends only on its particular features. Buchanan, Brock, Daniels, and Wikler have extensively defended such a view. However, while these authors go so far as to argue that there are conditions under which parents are not only permitted but also obligated to proeure genetic treatments for their intended child, they stop short of arguing that there (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Jennifer S. Hawkins & Ezekiel J. Emanuel (2008). Exploitation and Developing Countries: The Ethics of Clinical Research. Princeton Univ Pr.score: 24.0
    "--Daniel Wikler, Harvard School of Public Health "This book contributes significantly to the literature on exploitation in clinical research conducted in the developing world."--Patricia Marshall, Case Western Reserve University.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Royce P. Jones (1985). The Logical Status of Brain Death Criteria. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (4):387-396.score: 24.0
    This article is an attempt to clarify a confusion in the brain death literature between logical sufficiency/necessity and natural sufficiency/necessity. We focus on arguments that draw conclusions regarding empirical matters of fact from conceptual or ontological definitions. Specifically, we critically analyze arguments by Tom Tomlinson and Michael B. Green and Daniel Wikler. which, respectively, confuse logical and natural sufficiency and logical and natural necessity. Our own conclusion is that it is especially important in discussing the brain death issue (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Peter Wenz (2005). Engineering Genetic Injustice. Bioethics 19 (1):1–11.score: 24.0
    In their jointly written book, From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice, Allen Buchanan, Dan Brock, Norman Daniels and Daniel Wikler defend ’the development and deployment of genetic intervention technologies?.?.?.’, including genetic enhancements, against charges that they exacerbate injustice. The present paper examines some of their arguments. The first section shows that the authors confuse real societies with just societies. The second shows that without this confusion, their arguments reveal the enormous justice-impairing potential of deploying genetic enhancements in (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. G. J. Agich & R. P. Jones (1985). The Logical Status of Brain Death Criteria. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (4):387-396.score: 24.0
    This article is an attempt to clarify a confusion in the brain death literature between logical sufficiency/necessity and natural sufficiency/necessity. We focus on arguments that draw conclusions regarding empirical matters of fact from conceptual or ontological definitions. Specifically, we critically analyze arguments by Tom Tomlinson and Michael B. Green and Daniel Wikler. which, respectively, confuse logical and natural sufficiency and logical and natural necessity. Our own conclusion is that it is especially important in discussing the brain death issue (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Ben Almassi (2010). Disability, Functional Diversity, and Trans/Feminism. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 3 (2):126-149.score: 9.3
    Feminist approaches to bioethics have the striking ability to usefully disrupt conversations otherwise in danger of calcifying into immovable opposing camps. Take, for instance, debates between theorists in disability studies and bioethicists who often take two different approaches to understanding disability. On one side are those such as Buchanan, Brock, Daniels, and Wikler (2000) who seek to locate the apparent functional deficiency of disability in biologically abnormal bodies. Let us call this a normal functioning approach to understanding disability. On (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation