Search results for 'Daniel Lessard Levin' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Albert W. Dzur & Daniel Lessard Levin (2007). The Primacy of the Public: In Support of Bioethics Commissions as Deliberative Forums. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):133-142.
    : In a 2004 article, we argued that bioethics commissions should be assessed in terms of their usefulness as public forums. A 2006 article by Summer Johnson argued that our perspective was not supported by the existing literature on presidential commissions, which had not previously identified commissions as public forums and that we did not properly account for the political functions of commissions as instruments of presidential power. Johnson also argued that there was nothing sufficiently unique about bioethics commissions to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  14
    Albert W. Dzur & Daniel Lessard Levin (2004). The "Nation's Conscience:" Assessing Bioethics Commissions as Public Forums. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):333-360.
    : As the fifth national bioethics commission has concluded its work and a sixth is currently underway, it is time to step back and consider appropriate measures of success. This paper argues that standard measures of commissions' influence fail to fully assess their role as public forums. From the perspective of democratic theory, a critical dimension of this role is public engagement: the ability of a commission to address the concerns of the general public, to learn how average citizens resolve (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  3.  18
    Daniel T. Levin, Sarah B. Drivdahl, Nausheen Momen & Melissa R. Beck (2002). False Predictions About the Detectability of Visual Changes: The Role of Beliefs About Attention, Memory, and the Continuity of Attended Objects in Causing Change Blindness Blindness. Consciousness and Cognition 11 (4):507-527.
    Recently, a number of experiments have emphasized the degree to which subjects fail to detect large changes in visual scenes. This finding, referred to as “change blindness,” is often considered surprising because many people have the intuition that such changes should be easy to detect. Levin, Momen, Drivdahl, and Simons documented this intuition by showing that the majority of subjects believe they would notice changes that are actually very rarely detected. Thus subjects exhibit a metacognitive error we refer to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  4.  17
    Melissa R. Beck, Daniel T. Levin & Bonnie L. Angelone (2007). Metacognitive Errors in Change Detection: Lab and Life Converge. Consciousness and Cognition 16 (1):58-62.
    Smilek, Eastwood, Reynolds, and Kingstone suggests that the studies reported in Beck, M. R., Levin, D. T. and Angelone, B. A. are not ecologically valid. Here, we argue that not only are change blindness and change blindness blindness studies in general ecologically valid, but that the studies we reported in Beck, Levin, and Angelone, 2007 are as well. Specifically, we suggest that many of the changes used in our study could reasonably be expected to occur in the real (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5. Daniel J. Simons & Daniel T. Levin (1997). Change Blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (1):241-82.
  6.  30
    Steve Mitroff, Daniel J. Simons & Daniel T. Levin (2004). Nothing Compares 2 Views: Change Blindness Results From Failures to Compare Retained Information. Perception and Psychophysics 66 (8):1268-1281.
  7. Bonnie L. Angelone, Daniel T. Levin & Daniel J. Simons (2003). The Relationship Between Change Detection and Recognition of Centrally Attended Objects in Motion Pictures. Perception 32 (8):947-962.
  8.  61
    Daniel T. Levin, Nausheen Momen, Sarah B. Drivdahl & Daniel J. Simons (2000). Change Blindness Blindness: The Metacognitive Error of Overestimating Change-Detection Ability. Visual Cognition 7 (1):397-412.
  9. Daniel T. Levin, Daniel J. Simons, Bonnie L. Angelone & Christopher Chabris (2002). Memory for Centrally Attended Changing Objects in an Incidental Real-World Change Detection Paradigm. British Journal of Psychology 93:289-302.
  10.  72
    Melissa R. Beck, Daniel T. Levin & Bonnie L. Angelone (2007). Change Blindness Blindness: Beliefs About the Roles of Intention and Scene Complexity in Change Detection. Consciousness and Cognition 16 (1):31-51.
    Observers have difficulty detecting visual changes. However, they are unaware of this inability, suggesting that people do not have an accurate understanding of visual processes. We explored whether this error is related to participants’ beliefs about the roles of intention and scene complexity in detecting changes. In Experiment 1 participants had a higher failure rate for detecting changes in an incidental change detection task than an intentional change detection task. This effect of intention was greatest for complex scenes. However, participants (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  11.  32
    Daniel T. Levin (2002). Change Blindness Blindness as Visual Metacognition. Journal of Consciousness Studies 9 (5-6):111-30.
    Many experiments have demonstrated that people fail to detect seemingly large visual changes in their environment. Despite these failures, most people confidently predict that they would see changes that are actually almost impossible to see. Therefore, in at least some situations visual experience is demonstrably not what people think it is. This paper describes a line of research suggesting that overconfidence about change detection reflects a deeper metacognitive error founded on beliefs about attention and the role of meaning as a (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  12.  74
    Daniel T. Levin & D. Alexander Varakin (2004). No Pause for a Brief Disruption: Failures of Visual Awareness During Ongoing Events. Consciousness and Cognition 13 (2):363-372.
    Past research has repeatedly documented the close relationship between visual attention and awareness. Most recently, research exploring change blindness, inattentional blindness, repetition blindness, and the attentional blink has converged on the conclusion that attention to one aspect of a scene or event may lead to a highly circumscribed awareness of only the specific information attended, while other information, even that which is spatially or temporally nearby can go completely unnoticed. In the present report, we extend these observations to the dynamic (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13. Daniel T. Levin (2000). Race as a Visual Feature: Using Visual Search and Perceptual Discrimination Tasks to Understand Face Categories and the Cross-Race Recognition Deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129 (4):559-574.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  14.  19
    D. Alexander Varakin, Daniel T. Levin & Roger Fidler (2004). Unseen and Unaware: Implications of Recent Research on Failures of Visual Awareness for Human-Computer Interface Design. Human-Computer Interaction 19 (4):389-422.
  15.  4
    Gregory A. Miller, Daniel N. Levin, Michael J. Kozak, Edwin W. Cook, Alvin McLean & Peter J. Lang (1987). Individual Differences in Imagery and the Psychophysiology of Emotion. Cognition and Emotion 1 (4):367-390.
  16.  6
    Kingsley Martin, Daniel Mornet & Lawrence M. Levin (1930). French Liberal Thought in the Eighteenth Century: A Study of Political Ideas From Bayle to Condorcet. Journal of Philosophy 27 (20):553-559.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Daniel T. Levin & Mahzarin R. Banaji (2006). Distortions in the Perceived Lightness of Faces: The Role of Race Categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135 (4):501-512.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  18.  5
    Jonathan S. Herberg, Megan M. Saylor, Palis Ratanaswasd, Daniel T. Levin & D. Mitchell Wilkes (2008). Audience‐Contingent Variation in Action Demonstrations for Humans and Computers. Cognitive Science 32 (6):1003-1020.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  9
    Tom L. Beauchamp, Baruch Brody, Marion Danis, Samia A. See Hurst, David Degrazia, Must We Have, Alber W. Dzur, Daniel Levin, Daniel M. Fox & Diane Gianelli (2007). By Author. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (4):405-407.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  5
    Lewis J. Baker & Daniel T. Levin (2015). The Role of Relational Triggers in Event Perception. Cognition 136:14-29.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  7
    Kent Bach, Daniel Buring, Paul Dekker, Shalom Lappin, Peter Lasersohn, Beth Levin, Julie Sedivy, Martin Stokhof, Thomas Ede & Ian Lyons (2004). Pauline Jacobson. Linguistics and Philosophy 27:777-778.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Frank C. Keil, Daniel T. Levin, Bethany A. Richman & Grant Gutheil (1999). Mechanism and Explanation in the Development of Biological Thought: The Case of Disease. In D. Medin & S. Atran (eds.), Folkbiology. MIT Press
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  23.  2
    Irwin P. Levin, Richard D. Johnson & Daniel P. Chapman (1991). Individual Differences in Dealing with Incomplete Information: Judging Clinical Competence. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (5):451-454.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  1
    Gregory A. Miller, Daniel N. Levin, Michael J. Kozak, Edwin W. Cook Iii, Alvin McLean Jr & Peter J. Lang (1987). Individual Differences in Imagery and the Psychophysiology of Emotion. Cognition and Emotion 1 (4):367-390.
  25.  1
    Daniel T. Levin (2012). Concepts About Agency Constrain Beliefs About Visual Experience. Consciousness and Cognition 21 (2):875-888.
    Recent research exploring phenomena such as change blindness, inattentional blindness, attentional blink and repetition blindness has revealed a number of counterintuitive ways in which apparently salient visual stimuli often go unnoticed. In fact, large majorities of subjects sometimes predict that they would detect visual changes that actually are rarely noticed, suggesting that people have strong beliefs about visual experience that are demonstrably incorrect. However, for other kinds of visual metacognition, such as picture memory, people underpredict performance. This paper describes two (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  1
    Peter J. Lang, Gregory A. Miller & Daniel N. Levin (1983). Anxiety and Fear. In Richard J. Davidson, Gary E. Schwartz & D. H. Shapiro (eds.), Consciousness and Self-Regulation. Plenum 123--151.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Elias Bongmba, Toyin Falola, Paul Griffiths, Jeff Levin, Gilbert Meilaender, Margaret Somerville, Daniel Sulmasy, John Swinton & S. Kay Toombs (forthcoming). Human Dignity and the Future of Health Care. Bioethics.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Matthew Brown, Derek Besner, Daniel T. Levin & Donald A. Varakin (2004). Larry Cahill, Lukasz Gorski, Annabelle Belcher, and Quyen Huynh. The Influence of Sex Versus Sex-Related Traits on Long-Term. Consciousness and Cognition 13:212.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Jonathan Herberg, Megan Saylor, Palis Ratanaswasd, Daniel Levin & D. Mitchell Wilkes (2008). Audience-Contingent Variation in Action Demonstrations for Humans and Computers. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal 32 (6):1003-1020.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Harold A. Larrabee, Kingsley Martin, Daniel Mornet & Lawrence M. Levin (1930). French Liberal Thought in the Eighteenth Century: A Study of Political Ideas From Bayle to Condorcet.French Thought in the Eighteenth Century. Journal of Philosophy 27 (20):553.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Paul Skokowski, Daniel J. Simons, Christopher F. Chabris, Tatiana Schnur, Daniel T. Levin, Boris Kotchoubey, Andrea Kübler, Ute Strehl, Niels Birbaumer & Jürgen Fell (2001). Nachshon Meiran, Bernhard Hommel, Uri Bibi, and Idit Lev. Consciousness and Control in Task. Consciousness and Cognition 10:598.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  4
    Michael E. Daniel (2007). Daniel Mannix: Wit and Wisdom [Book Review]. The Australasian Catholic Record 84 (1):114.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  10
    Daniel J. Velleman (1998). Review of Levin's ”Putnam on Reference and Constructible Sets' (1997). [REVIEW] MATHEMATICAL REVIEWS 98:1364.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  34. Brendan Shea (2015). Daniel Dennett's Intuition Pumps. Reason Papers 37 (2).
    A review of Daniel Dennett's Intuition Pumps (W.V. Norton: 2013).
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. John M. DePoe (2013). RoboMary, Blue Banana Tricks, and the Metaphysics of Consciousness: A Critique of Daniel Dennett's Apology for Physicalism. Philosophia Christi 15 (1):119-132.
    Daniel Dennett has argued that consciousness can be satisfactorily accounted for in terms of physical entities and processes. In some of his most recent publications, he has made this case by casting doubts on purely conceptual thought experiments and proposing his own thought experiments to "pump" the intuition that consciousness can be physical. In this paper, I will summarize Dennett's recent defenses of physicalism, followed by a careful critique of his position. The critique presses two flaws in Dennett's defense (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  87
    William Simpson (2014). The Mystical Stance: The Experience of Self‐Loss and Daniel Dennett's “Center of Narrative Gravity”. Zygon 49 (2):458-475.
    For centuries, mystically inclined practitioners from various religious traditions have articulated anomalous and mystical experiences. One common aspect of these experiences is the feeling of the loss of the sense of self, referred to as “self-loss.” The occurrence of “self-loss” can be understood as the feeling of losing the subject/object distinction in one's phenomenal experience. In this article, the author attempts to incorporate these anomalous experiences into modern understandings of the mind and “self” from philosophy and psychology. Accounts of self-loss (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37.  56
    John Corcoran (1999). CORCORAN'S 27 ENTRIES IN THE 1999 SECOND EDITION. In Robert Audi (ed.), Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. CAMBRIDGE UP 65-941.
    Corcoran’s 27 entries in the 1999 second edition of Robert Audi’s Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy [Cambridge: Cambridge UP]. -/- ancestral, axiomatic method, borderline case, categoricity, Church (Alonzo), conditional, convention T, converse (outer and inner), corresponding conditional, degenerate case, domain, De Morgan, ellipsis, laws of thought, limiting case, logical form, logical subject, material adequacy, mathematical analysis, omega, proof by recursion, recursive function theory, scheme, scope, Tarski (Alfred), tautology, universe of discourse. -/- The entire work is available online free at more than (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  89
    Mario Alai (2012). Levin and Ghins on the “No Miracle” Argument and Naturalism. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):85-110.
    On the basis of Levin’s claim that truth is not a scientific explanatory factor, Michel Ghins argues that the “no miracle” argument (NMA) is not scientific, therefore scientific realism is not a scientific hypothesis, and naturalism is wrong. I argue that there are genuine senses of ‘scientific’ and ‘explanation’ in which truth can yield scientific explanations. Hence, the NMA can be considered scientific in the sense that it hinges on a scientific explanation, it follows a typically scientific inferential pattern (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  44
    Anthony Freeman (2006). A Daniel Come to Judgement? Dennett and the Revisioning of Transpersonal Theory. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (3):95-109.
    Transpersonal psychology first emerged as an academic discipline in the 1960s and has subsequently broadened into a range of transpersonal studies. Jorge Ferrer (2002) has called for a 'revisioning' of transpersonal theory, dethroning inner experience from its dominant role in defining and validating spiritual reality. In the current paradigm he detects a lingering Cartesianism, which subtly entrenches the very subject-object divide that transpersonalists seek to overcome. This paper outlines the development and current shape of the transpersonal movement, compares Ferrer's epistemology (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  40.  18
    Don Ross (2010). Daniel Dennett. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (2):295-299.
    Contemporary Philosophy in Focus will offer a series of introductory volumes to many of the dominant philosophical thinkers of the current age. Each volume will consist of newly commissioned essays that will cover all the major contributions of a preeminent philosopher in a systematic and accessible manner. Author of such groundbreaking and influential books as Consciousness Explained and Darwin's Dangerous Idea, Daniel C. Dennett has reached a huge general and professional audience that extends way beyond the confines of academic (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  30
    Christopher Toner (2011). The Virtues (and a Few Vices) of Daniel Russell's Practical Intelligence and the Virtues. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):453-468.
    Daniel Russell's Practical Intelligence and the Virtues is principally a defense of the Aristotelian claim that phronesis is part of every unqualified virtue—a defense of what Russell calls "hard virtue theory" and "hard virtue ethics." The main support for this is the further claim that we would be unable to act well reliably, or form our character reliably, without phronesis performing its "twin roles": correctly identifying the mean of each virtue, and integrating the mean of each virtue with those (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  5
    Kent Bach, Shalom Lappin, Martin Stokhof, Daniel Buring, Peter Lasersohn, Thomas Ede, Paul Dekker Beth Levin Zimmermann, Julie Sedivy & Ben Russell (2005). Pauline Jacobson. Linguistics and Philosophy 28:781-782.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43. Louis P. Pojman & James Fieser (eds.) (2007). Introduction to Philosophy: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford University Press.
    Now in a third edition, Introduction to Philosophy: Classical and Contemporary Readings is a highly acclaimed, topically organized collection that covers five major areas of philosophy--theory of knowledge, philosophy of religion, philosophy of mind, freedom and determinism, and moral philosophy. Editor Louis P. Pojman enhances the text's topical organization by arranging the selections into a pro/con format to help students better understand opposing arguments. He also includes accessible introductions to each chapter, subsection, and individual reading, a unique feature for an (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  35
    David Bain (2005). Daniel Dennett. Reconciling Science and Our Self-Conception. By Matthew. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 55 (219):369-371.
    Review of Matthew 's Elton's book, *Daniel Dennett: Reconciling Science and Our Self-Conception*.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  28
    Andrew Brook & Don Ross (eds.) (2002). Daniel Dennett. Cambridge University Press.
    Contemporary Philosophy in Focus will offer a series of introductory volumes to many of the dominant philosophical thinkers of the current age. Each volume will consist of newly commissioned essays that will cover all the major contributions of a preeminent philosopher in a systematic and accessible manner. Author of such groundbreaking and influential books as Consciousness Explained and Darwin's Dangerous Idea, Daniel C. Dennett has reached a huge general and professional audience that extends way beyond the confines of academic (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  20
    Giovanni Battista Grandi (2009). Comments on Daniel E. Flage's “Berkeley's Contingent Necessities”. Philosophia 37 (3):373-378.
    According to Daniel Flage, Berkeley thinks that all necessary truths are founded on acts of will that assign meanings to words. After briefly commenting on the air of paradox contained in the title of Flage’s paper, and on the historical accuracy of Berkeley’s understanding of the abstractionist tradition, I make some remarks on two points made by Flage. Firstly, I discuss Flage’s distinction between the ontological ground of a necessary truth and our knowledge of a necessary truth. Secondly, I (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  5
    Ayelen Sánchez (2014). La concepción del yo en Daniel Dennett: Un análisis de la relación entre la perspectiva heterofenomenológica y el enfoque memético. Logos: Revista de Lingüística, Filosofía y Literatura 24 (1):40-50.
    El presente trabajo se propone analizar la posición de Daniel Dennett con respecto a la realidad y naturaleza del yo. El autor considera que la concepción del yo humano propia del sentido común, en tanto que un elemento único, simple, idéntico y continuo, es fundamentalmente una ficción. A partir de este diagnóstico, Dennett se propone ofrecer una explicación de este fenómeno ilusorio desde una doble perspectiva: la heterofenomenología y la memética. La primera y segunda parte de este trabajo estarán (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  2
    Nathaniel Goldberg (2014). Intuition Pumps by Daniel C. Dennett. [REVIEW] Philosophy Now 101:39-40.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  2
    Marius Jucan (2010). Daniel Barbu, Politica Pentru Barbari (Politics for Barbarians). Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 5 (13):165-166.
    Daniel Barbu, Politica pentru barbari (Politics for Barbarians) Nemira, Bucharest 2005, 242 pages.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Hermann Levin Goldschmidt & Willi Goetschel (1994). Perspektiven der Dialogik Zürcher Kolloquium Zum 80. Geburtstag von Hermann Levin Goldschmidt. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000