Search results for 'Daniel Lessard Levin' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Albert W. Dzur & Daniel Lessard Levin (2004). The "Nation's Conscience:" Assessing Bioethics Commissions as Public Forums. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):333-360.score: 870.0
    : As the fifth national bioethics commission has concluded its work and a sixth is currently underway, it is time to step back and consider appropriate measures of success. This paper argues that standard measures of commissions' influence fail to fully assess their role as public forums. From the perspective of democratic theory, a critical dimension of this role is public engagement: the ability of a commission to address the concerns of the general public, to learn how average citizens resolve (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Albert W. Dzur & Daniel Lessard Levin (2007). The Primacy of the Public: In Support of Bioethics Commissions as Deliberative Forums. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):133-142.score: 870.0
    : In a 2004 article, we argued that bioethics commissions should be assessed in terms of their usefulness as public forums. A 2006 article by Summer Johnson argued that our perspective was not supported by the existing literature on presidential commissions, which had not previously identified commissions as public forums and that we did not properly account for the political functions of commissions as instruments of presidential power. Johnson also argued that there was nothing sufficiently unique about bioethics commissions to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Daniel J. Simons & Daniel T. Levin (1997). Change Blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (1):241-82.score: 280.0
  4. Steve Mitroff, Daniel J. Simons & Daniel T. Levin (2004). Nothing Compares 2 Views: Change Blindness Results From Failures to Compare Retained Information. Perception and Psychophysics 66 (8):1268-1281.score: 280.0
  5. Melissa R. Beck, Daniel T. Levin & Bonnie L. Angelone (2007). Change Blindness Blindness: Beliefs About the Roles of Intention and Scene Complexity in Change Detection. Consciousness and Cognition 16 (1):31-51.score: 240.0
  6. Bonnie L. Angelone, Daniel T. Levin & Daniel J. Simons (2003). The Relationship Between Change Detection and Recognition of Centrally Attended Objects in Motion Pictures. Perception 32 (8):947-962.score: 240.0
  7. Daniel T. Levin, Nausheen Momen, Sarah B. Drivdahl & Daniel J. Simons (2000). Change Blindness Blindness: The Metacognitive Error of Overestimating Change-Detection Ability. Visual Cognition 7 (1):397-412.score: 240.0
  8. Daniel T. Levin & D. Alexander Varakin (2004). No Pause for a Brief Disruption: Failures of Visual Awareness During Ongoing Events. Consciousness and Cognition 13 (2):363-372.score: 240.0
  9. Daniel T. Levin, Daniel J. Simons, Bonnie L. Angelone & Christopher Chabris (2002). Memory for Centrally Attended Changing Objects in an Incidental Real-World Change Detection Paradigm. British Journal Of Psychology 93:289-302.score: 240.0
  10. Daniel T. Levin (2002). Change Blindness Blindness as Visual Metacognition. Journal of Consciousness Studies 9 (5-6):111-30.score: 240.0
  11. Melissa R. Beck, Daniel T. Levin & Bonnie L. Angelone (2007). Metacognitive Errors in Change Detection: Lab and Life Converge. Consciousness and Cognition 16 (1):58-62.score: 240.0
  12. D. Alexander Varakin, Daniel T. Levin & Roger Fidler (2004). Unseen and Unaware: Implications of Recent Research on Failures of Visual Awareness for Human-Computer Interface Design. Human-Computer Interaction 19 (4):389-422.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Daniel T. Levin, Sarah B. Drivdahl, Nausheen Momen & Melissa R. Beck (2002). False Predictions About the Detectability of Visual Changes: The Role of Beliefs About Attention, Memory, and the Continuity of Attended Objects in Causing Change Blindness Blindness. Consciousness and Cognition 11 (4):507-527.score: 240.0
  14. Kent Bach, Daniel Buring, Paul Dekker, Shalom Lappin, Peter Lasersohn, Beth Levin, Julie Sedivy, Martin Stokhof, Thomas Ede & Ian Lyons (2004). Pauline Jacobson. Linguistics and Philosophy 27:777-778.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Gregory A. Miller, Daniel N. Levin, Michael J. Kozak, Edwin W. Cook, Alvin McLean & Peter J. Lang (1987). Individual Differences in Imagery and the Psychophysiology of Emotion. Cognition and Emotion 1 (4):367-390.score: 240.0
  16. Tom L. Beauchamp, Baruch Brody, Marion Danis, Samia A. See Hurst, David Degrazia, Must We Have, Alber W. Dzur, Daniel Levin, Daniel M. Fox & Diane Gianelli (2007). By Author. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (4):405-407.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Peter J. Lang, Gregory A. Miller & Daniel N. Levin (1983). Anxiety and Fear. In. In Richard J. Davidson, Gary E. Schwartz & D. H. Shapiro (eds.), Consciousness and Self-Regulation. Plenum. 123--151.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Elias Bongmba, Toyin Falola, Paul Griffiths, Jeff Levin, Gilbert Meilaender, Margaret Somerville, Daniel Sulmasy, John Swinton & S. Kay Toombs (forthcoming). Human Dignity and the Future of Health Care. Bioethics.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Matthew Brown, Derek Besner, Daniel T. Levin & Donald A. Varakin (2004). Larry Cahill, Lukasz Gorski, Annabelle Belcher, and Quyen Huynh. The Influence of Sex Versus Sex-Related Traits on Long-Term. Consciousness and Cognition 13:212.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Jonathan S. Herberg, Megan M. Saylor, Palis Ratanaswasd, Daniel T. Levin & D. Mitchell Wilkes (2008). Audience‐Contingent Variation in Action Demonstrations for Humans and Computers. Cognitive Science 32 (6):1003-1020.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Frank C. Keil, Daniel T. Levin, Bethany A. Richman & Grant Gutheil (1999). Mechanism and Explanation in the Development of Biological Thought: The Case of Disease. In D. Medin & S. Atran (eds.), Folkbiology. Mit Press.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Daniel C. Krawczyk, Gerri Hanten, Elisabeth A. Wilde, Xiaoqi Li, Kathleen P. Schnelle, Tricia L. Merkley, Ana C. Vasquez, Lori G. Cook, Michelle McClelland, Sandra B. Chapman & Harvey S. Levin (2010). Deficits in Analogical Reasoning in Adolescents with Traumatic Brain Injury. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 4.score: 240.0
    Individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) exhibit deficits in executive control, which may impact their reasoning abilities. Analogical reasoning requires working memory and inhibitory abilities. In this study, we tested adolescents with moderate to severe TBI and typically-developing (TD) controls on a set of picture analogy problems. Three factors were varied: complexity (number of relations in the problems), distraction (distractor item present or absent), and animacy (living or non-living items in the problems). We found that TD adolescents performed significantly better (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Daniel T. Levin (2012). Concepts About Agency Constrain Beliefs About Visual Experience. Consciousness and Cognition 21 (2):875-888.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Irwin P. Levin, Richard D. Johnson & Daniel P. Chapman (1991). Individual Differences in Dealing with Incomplete Information: Judging Clinical Competence. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (5):451-454.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Gregory A. Miller, Daniel N. Levin, Michael J. Kozak, Edwin W. Cook Iii, Alvin McLean Jr & Peter J. Lang (1987). Individual Differences in Imagery and the Psychophysiology of Emotion. Cognition and Emotion 1 (4):367-390.score: 240.0
  26. Paul Skokowski, Daniel J. Simons, Christopher F. Chabris, Tatiana Schnur, Daniel T. Levin, Boris Kotchoubey, Andrea Kübler, Ute Strehl, Niels Birbaumer & Jürgen Fell (2001). Nachshon Meiran, Bernhard Hommel, Uri Bibi, and Idit Lev. Consciousness and Control in Task. Consciousness and Cognition 10:598.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Michael E. Daniel (2007). Daniel Mannix: Wit and Wisdom [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 84 (1):114.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Richard Shapcott (2013). Recovering International Relations: The Promise of Sustainable Critique, Daniel J. Levine (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012), 394 Pp., $99 Cloth, $34.99 Paper. [REVIEW] Ethics and International Affairs 27 (4):464-466.score: 34.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. T. Gregory Garvey (2013). Levine, Alan M. And Daniel S. Malachuk, Eds., A Political Companion to Ralph Waldo Emerson. Review of Metaphysics 67 (1):175-176.score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Daniel J. Velleman (1998). Review of Levin's ”Putnam on Reference and Constructible Sets' (1997). [REVIEW] Mathematical Reviews 98:1364.score: 24.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Kent Bach, Shalom Lappin, Martin Stokhof, Daniel Buring, Peter Lasersohn, Thomas Ede, Paul Dekker Beth Levin Zimmermann, Julie Sedivy & Ben Russell (2005). Pauline Jacobson. Linguistics and Philosophy 28:781-782.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Louis P. Pojman & James Fieser (eds.) (2008). Introduction to Philosophy: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford University Press.score: 24.0
    Now in a third edition, Introduction to Philosophy: Classical and Contemporary Readings is a highly acclaimed, topically organized collection that covers five major areas of philosophy--theory of knowledge, philosophy of religion, philosophy of mind, freedom and determinism, and moral philosophy. Editor Louis P. Pojman enhances the text's topical organization by arranging the selections into a pro/con format to help students better understand opposing arguments. He also includes accessible introductions to each chapter, subsection, and individual reading, a unique feature for an (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Mario Alai (2012). Levin and Ghins on the “No Miracle” Argument and Naturalism. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):85-110.score: 18.0
    On the basis of Levin’s claim that truth is not a scientific explanatory factor, Michel Ghins argues that the “no miracle” argument (NMA) is not scientific, therefore scientific realism is not a scientific hypothesis, and naturalism is wrong. I argue that there are genuine senses of ‘scientific’ and ‘explanation’ in which truth can yield scientific explanations. Hence, the NMA can be considered scientific in the sense that it hinges on a scientific explanation, it follows a typically scientific inferential pattern (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Anthony Freeman (2006). A Daniel Come to Judgement? Dennett and the Revisioning of Transpersonal Theory. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (3):95-109.score: 18.0
    Transpersonal psychology first emerged as an academic discipline in the 1960s and has subsequently broadened into a range of transpersonal studies. Jorge Ferrer (2002) has called for a 'revisioning' of transpersonal theory, dethroning inner experience from its dominant role in defining and validating spiritual reality. In the current paradigm he detects a lingering Cartesianism, which subtly entrenches the very subject-object divide that transpersonalists seek to overcome. This paper outlines the development and current shape of the transpersonal movement, compares Ferrer's epistemology (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. David Bain (2005). Daniel Dennett. Reconciling Science and Our Self-Conception. By Matthew. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 55 (219):369-371.score: 18.0
    Review of Matthew's Elton's book, *Daniel Dennett: Reconciling Science and Our Self-Conception*.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Christopher Toner (2011). The Virtues (and a Few Vices) of Daniel Russell's Practical Intelligence and the Virtues. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):453-468.score: 18.0
    Daniel Russell's Practical Intelligence and the Virtues is principally a defense of the Aristotelian claim that phronesis is part of every unqualified virtue—a defense of what Russell calls "hard virtue theory" and "hard virtue ethics." The main support for this is the further claim that we would be unable to act well reliably, or form our character reliably, without phronesis performing its "twin roles": correctly identifying the mean of each virtue, and integrating the mean of each virtue with those (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Giovanni Battista Grandi (2009). Comments on Daniel E. Flage's “Berkeley's Contingent Necessities”. Philosophia 37 (3):373-378.score: 18.0
    According to Daniel Flage, Berkeley thinks that all necessary truths are founded on acts of will that assign meanings to words. After briefly commenting on the air of paradox contained in the title of Flage’s paper, and on the historical accuracy of Berkeley’s understanding of the abstractionist tradition, I make some remarks on two points made by Flage. Firstly, I discuss Flage’s distinction between the ontological ground of a necessary truth and our knowledge of a necessary truth. Secondly, I (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. John M. DePoe (2013). RoboMary, Blue Banana Tricks, and the Metaphysics of Consciousness: A Critique of Daniel Dennett's Apology for Physicalism. Philosophia Christi 15 (1):119-132.score: 18.0
    Daniel Dennett has argued that consciousness can be satisfactorily accounted for in terms of physical entities and processes. In some of his most recent publications, he has made this case by casting doubts on purely conceptual thought experiments and proposing his own thought experiments to "pump" the intuition that consciousness can be physical. In this paper, I will summarize Dennett's recent defenses of physicalism, followed by a careful critique of his position. The critique presses two flaws in Dennett's defense (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. William Simpson (2014). The Mystical Stance: The Experience of Self‐Loss and Daniel Dennett's “Center of Narrative Gravity”. Zygon 49 (2):458-475.score: 18.0
    For centuries, mystically inclined practitioners from various religious traditions have articulated anomalous and mystical experiences. One common aspect of these experiences is the feeling of the loss of the sense of self, referred to as “self-loss.” The occurrence of “self-loss” can be understood as the feeling of losing the subject/object distinction in one's phenomenal experience. In this article, the author attempts to incorporate these anomalous experiences into modern understandings of the mind and “self” from philosophy and psychology. Accounts of self-loss (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Marius Jucan (2010). Daniel Barbu, Politica Pentru Barbari (Politics for Barbarians). Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 5 (13):165-166.score: 18.0
    Daniel Barbu, Politica pentru barbari (Politics for Barbarians) Nemira, Bucharest 2005, 242 pages.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Ayelen Sánchez (2014). La concepción del yo en Daniel Dennett: Un análisis de la relación entre la perspectiva heterofenomenológica y el enfoque memético. Logos: Revista de Lingüística, Filosofía y Literatura 24 (1):40-50.score: 18.0
    El presente trabajo se propone analizar la posición de Daniel Dennett con respecto a la realidad y naturaleza del yo. El autor considera que la concepción del yo humano propia del sentido común, en tanto que un elemento único, simple, idéntico y continuo, es fundamentalmente una ficción. A partir de este diagnóstico, Dennett se propone ofrecer una explicación de este fenómeno ilusorio desde una doble perspectiva: la heterofenomenología y la memética. La primera y segunda parte de este trabajo estarán (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Richard Menary (2006). Radical Enactivism: Intentionality, Phenomenology and Narrative: Focus on the Philosophy of Daniel D. Hutto. Amsterdam: J Benjamins.score: 15.0
    This collection is a much-needed remedy to the confusion about which varieties of enactivism are robust yet viable rejections of traditional representionalism...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Timothy O'Connor (2005). Pastoral Counsel for the Anxious Naturalist: Daniel Dennett's Freedom Evolves. Metaphilosophy 36 (4):436-448.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Books by Daniel Dennett (2002). Brief Annotated Bibliography of Works by and About Daniel Dennett. In Andrew Brook & Don Ross (eds.), Daniel Dennett. Cambridge University Press.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. J. Levine (2008). Review: Daniel Stoljar: Ignorance and Imagination: The Epistemic Origin of the Problem of Consciousness. [REVIEW] Mind 117 (465):228-231.score: 14.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Andrew Levine (2001). Daniel Brudney, Marx's Attempt to Leave Philosophy:Marx's Attempt to Leave Philosophy. Ethics 111 (4):806-809.score: 14.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Susan Schneider (2007). Daniel Dennett on the Nature of Consciousness. In Max Velmans & Susan Schneider (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness. Blackwell. 313--24.score: 12.0
    One of the most influential philosophical voices in the consciousness studies community is that of Daniel Dennett. Outside of consciousness studies, Dennett is well-known for his work on numerous topics, such as intentionality, artificial intelligence, free will, evolutionary theory, and the basis of religious experience. (Dennett, 1984, 1987, 1995c, 2005) In 1991, just as researchers and philosophers were beginning to turn more attention to the nature of consciousness, Dennett authored his Consciousness Explained. Consciousness Explained aimed to develop both a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Daniel Lim (2009). Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language. By Maxwell Bennett, Daniel Dennett, Peter Hacker, and John Searle. Zygon 44 (4):1003-1005.score: 12.0
  49. Eddy A. Nahmias (2002). When Consciousness Matters: A Critical Review of Daniel Wegner's the Illusion of Conscious Will. [REVIEW] Philosophical Psychology 15 (4):527-541.score: 12.0
    In The illusion of conscious will , Daniel Wegner offers an exciting, informative, and potentially threatening treatise on the psychology of action. I offer several interpretations of the thesis that conscious will is an illusion. The one Wegner seems to suggest is "modular epiphenomenalism": conscious experience of will is produced by a brain system distinct from the system that produces action; it interprets our behavior but does not, as it seems to us, cause it. I argue that the evidence (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Stephen Puryear (2010). Review of Daniel Garber, Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (8).score: 12.0
    Questions about Leibniz's views on the ontological status of the corporeal world have been at the center of debate in Leibniz scholarship for more than two decades, and one of the major players in these debates has been Daniel Garber. Having sketched his influential position in a number of articles over the years, he now gives full expression to his view in this highly anticipated and long-awaited book.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000