Search results for 'Daniel Levinson' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Daniel B. M. Haun, Christian J. Rapold, Gabriele Janzen & Stephen C. Levinson (2011). Plasticity of Human Spatial Cognition: Spatial Language and Cognition Covary Across Cultures. Cognition 119 (1):70-80.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Daniel Levinson (1975). Logic in Contingency. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 5 (1):132-141.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Stephen C. Levinson, Sotaro Kita, Daniel B. M. Haun & Björn H. Rasch (2002). Returning the Tables: Language Affects Spatial Reasoning. Cognition 84 (2):155-188.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. [deleted]Daniel B. Levinson, Eli L. Stoll, Sonam D. Kindy, Hillary L. Merry & Richard J. Davidson (2014). A Mind You Can Count On: Validating Breath Counting as a Behavioral Measure of Mindfulness. Frontiers in Psychology 5.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Daniel Levinson (1977). Philosophy in the Classroom. Teaching Philosophy 2 (3/4):392-393.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Asifa Majid, Melissa Bowerman, Sotaro Kita, Daniel B. M. Haun & Stephen C. Levinson (2004). Can Language Restructure Cognition? The Case for Space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (3):108-114.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Derek Matravers & Jerrold Levinson (2005). Jerrold Levinson. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 79 (1):211–227.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Jerrold Levinson (2013). Reply to Nicholas Riggle's “Levinson on the Aesthetic Ideal”. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 71 (3):281-282.score: 180.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Michael E. Daniel (2007). Daniel Mannix: Wit and Wisdom [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 84 (1):114.score: 180.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Franz Alexander (1950). Book Review:Authoritarianism and the Individual. Harold W. Metz, Charles A. H. Thompson; The Authoritarian Personality. T. W. Adorno, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel J. Levinson, R. Nevitt Sanford. [REVIEW] Ethics 61 (1):76-.score: 120.0
  11. M. Featherstone (1979). The Seasons of a Man's Life. By Daniel J. Levinson, C.N. Darrow, E.B. Klein, M.H. Levinson & B. McKee Pp. Xiv + 352. (Knopf, New York, 1978.) Price $ 10.95. [REVIEW] Journal of Biosocial Science 11 (3):363-365.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Daniel Jacobson (1999). Jerrold Levinson, Ed., Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection:Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Ethics 110 (1):215-219.score: 36.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Derek C. Penn, Keith J. Holyoak & Daniel J. Povinellia (2009). Commentary/Evans & Levinson: The Myth of Language Universals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32:5.score: 36.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Matthew Kieran (2010). Teaching & Learning Guide For: Art, Morality and Ethics: On the (Im)Moral Character of Art Works and Inter-Relations to Artistic Value. Philosophy Compass 5 (5):426-431.score: 24.0
    Up until fairly recently it was philosophical orthodoxy – at least within analytic aesthetics broadly construed – to hold that the appreciation and evaluation of works as art and moral considerations pertaining to them are conceptually distinct. However, following on from the idea that artistic value is broader than aesthetic value, the last 15 years has seen an explosion of interest in exploring possible inter-relations between the appreciative and ethical character of works as art. Consideration of these issues has a (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Sherri Irvin (2009). Teaching and Learning Guide For: Authors, Intentions and Literary Meaning. Philosophy Compass 4 (1):287-291.score: 24.0
    The relationship of the author's intention to the meaning of a literary work has been a persistently controversial topic in aesthetics. Anti-intentionalists Wimsatt and Beardsley, in the 1946 paper that launched the debate, accused critics who fueled their interpretative activity by poring over the author's private diaries and life story of committing the 'fallacy' of equating the work's meaning, properly determined by context and linguistic convention, with the meaning intended by the author. Hirsch responded that context and convention are not (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Emmon Bach, Semantic Universals.score: 24.0
    The controversies surrounding Daniel Everett's characterization of the Amazonian language Pirahã and the Evans and Levinson paper about "the myth of language universals" (2009) are just two recent manifestations of a debate about linguistic theory and methodology that is anything but new.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Anthony Freeman (2006). A Daniel Come to Judgement? Dennett and the Revisioning of Transpersonal Theory. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (3):95-109.score: 24.0
    Transpersonal psychology first emerged as an academic discipline in the 1960s and has subsequently broadened into a range of transpersonal studies. Jorge Ferrer (2002) has called for a 'revisioning' of transpersonal theory, dethroning inner experience from its dominant role in defining and validating spiritual reality. In the current paradigm he detects a lingering Cartesianism, which subtly entrenches the very subject-object divide that transpersonalists seek to overcome. This paper outlines the development and current shape of the transpersonal movement, compares Ferrer's epistemology (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. William Simpson (2014). The Mystical Stance: The Experience of Self‐Loss and Daniel Dennett's “Center of Narrative Gravity”. Zygon 49 (2):458-475.score: 24.0
    For centuries, mystically inclined practitioners from various religious traditions have articulated anomalous and mystical experiences. One common aspect of these experiences is the feeling of the loss of the sense of self, referred to as “self-loss.” The occurrence of “self-loss” can be understood as the feeling of losing the subject/object distinction in one's phenomenal experience. In this article, the author attempts to incorporate these anomalous experiences into modern understandings of the mind and “self” from philosophy and psychology. Accounts of self-loss (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. David Bain (2005). Daniel Dennett. Reconciling Science and Our Self-Conception. By Matthew. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 55 (219):369-371.score: 24.0
    Review of Matthew's Elton's book, *Daniel Dennett: Reconciling Science and Our Self-Conception*.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. John M. DePoe (2013). RoboMary, Blue Banana Tricks, and the Metaphysics of Consciousness: A Critique of Daniel Dennett's Apology for Physicalism. Philosophia Christi 15 (1):119-132.score: 24.0
    Daniel Dennett has argued that consciousness can be satisfactorily accounted for in terms of physical entities and processes. In some of his most recent publications, he has made this case by casting doubts on purely conceptual thought experiments and proposing his own thought experiments to "pump" the intuition that consciousness can be physical. In this paper, I will summarize Dennett's recent defenses of physicalism, followed by a careful critique of his position. The critique presses two flaws in Dennett's defense (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Christopher Toner (2011). The Virtues (and a Few Vices) of Daniel Russell's Practical Intelligence and the Virtues. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):453-468.score: 24.0
    Daniel Russell's Practical Intelligence and the Virtues is principally a defense of the Aristotelian claim that phronesis is part of every unqualified virtue—a defense of what Russell calls "hard virtue theory" and "hard virtue ethics." The main support for this is the further claim that we would be unable to act well reliably, or form our character reliably, without phronesis performing its "twin roles": correctly identifying the mean of each virtue, and integrating the mean of each virtue with those (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Giovanni Battista Grandi (2009). Comments on Daniel E. Flage's “Berkeley's Contingent Necessities”. Philosophia 37 (3):373-378.score: 24.0
    According to Daniel Flage, Berkeley thinks that all necessary truths are founded on acts of will that assign meanings to words. After briefly commenting on the air of paradox contained in the title of Flage’s paper, and on the historical accuracy of Berkeley’s understanding of the abstractionist tradition, I make some remarks on two points made by Flage. Firstly, I discuss Flage’s distinction between the ontological ground of a necessary truth and our knowledge of a necessary truth. Secondly, I (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Marius Jucan (2010). Daniel Barbu, Politica Pentru Barbari (Politics for Barbarians). Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 5 (13):165-166.score: 24.0
    Daniel Barbu, Politica pentru barbari (Politics for Barbarians) Nemira, Bucharest 2005, 242 pages.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Ayelen Sánchez (2014). La concepción del yo en Daniel Dennett: Un análisis de la relación entre la perspectiva heterofenomenológica y el enfoque memético. Logos: Revista de Lingüística, Filosofía y Literatura 24 (1):40-50.score: 24.0
    El presente trabajo se propone analizar la posición de Daniel Dennett con respecto a la realidad y naturaleza del yo. El autor considera que la concepción del yo humano propia del sentido común, en tanto que un elemento único, simple, idéntico y continuo, es fundamentalmente una ficción. A partir de este diagnóstico, Dennett se propone ofrecer una explicación de este fenómeno ilusorio desde una doble perspectiva: la heterofenomenología y la memética. La primera y segunda parte de este trabajo estarán (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Richard Menary (2006). Radical Enactivism: Intentionality, Phenomenology and Narrative: Focus on the Philosophy of Daniel D. Hutto. Amsterdam: J Benjamins.score: 21.0
    This collection is a much-needed remedy to the confusion about which varieties of enactivism are robust yet viable rejections of traditional representionalism...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Timothy O'Connor (2005). Pastoral Counsel for the Anxious Naturalist: Daniel Dennett's Freedom Evolves. Metaphilosophy 36 (4):436-448.score: 21.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Books by Daniel Dennett (2002). Brief Annotated Bibliography of Works by and About Daniel Dennett. In Andrew Brook & Don Ross (eds.), Daniel Dennett. Cambridge University Press.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Susan Schneider (2007). Daniel Dennett on the Nature of Consciousness. In Max Velmans & Susan Schneider (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness. Blackwell. 313--24.score: 18.0
    One of the most influential philosophical voices in the consciousness studies community is that of Daniel Dennett. Outside of consciousness studies, Dennett is well-known for his work on numerous topics, such as intentionality, artificial intelligence, free will, evolutionary theory, and the basis of religious experience. (Dennett, 1984, 1987, 1995c, 2005) In 1991, just as researchers and philosophers were beginning to turn more attention to the nature of consciousness, Dennett authored his Consciousness Explained. Consciousness Explained aimed to develop both a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Daniel Lim (2009). Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language. By Maxwell Bennett, Daniel Dennett, Peter Hacker, and John Searle. Zygon 44 (4):1003-1005.score: 18.0
  30. Eddy A. Nahmias (2002). When Consciousness Matters: A Critical Review of Daniel Wegner's the Illusion of Conscious Will. [REVIEW] Philosophical Psychology 15 (4):527-541.score: 18.0
    In The illusion of conscious will , Daniel Wegner offers an exciting, informative, and potentially threatening treatise on the psychology of action. I offer several interpretations of the thesis that conscious will is an illusion. The one Wegner seems to suggest is "modular epiphenomenalism": conscious experience of will is produced by a brain system distinct from the system that produces action; it interprets our behavior but does not, as it seems to us, cause it. I argue that the evidence (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Zandra Wagoner (2010). Deliberation, Reason, and Indigestion: Response to Daniel Dombrowski's Rawls and Religion: The Case for Political Liberalism. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 31 (3):179-195.score: 18.0
    Democracy requires a rather large tolerance for confusion and a secret relish for dissent. I am delighted to respond to Daniel Dombrowski’s book Rawls and Religion. Dombrowski and I share a number of what he would call comprehensive doctrine, such as the ethical treatment of animals, the relational worldview of process thought, and the idiosyncratic love of pacifism. So, immediately I was drawn in and claimed Dombrowski as a kindred spirit. With so many commonalities, including an interest in political (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Stephen Puryear (2010). Review of Daniel Garber, Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (8).score: 18.0
    Questions about Leibniz's views on the ontological status of the corporeal world have been at the center of debate in Leibniz scholarship for more than two decades, and one of the major players in these debates has been Daniel Garber. Having sketched his influential position in a number of articles over the years, he now gives full expression to his view in this highly anticipated and long-awaited book.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Samuel Levey (2011). On Two Theories of Substance in Leibniz: Critical Notice of Daniel Garber, Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. Philosophical Review 120 (2):285 - 320.score: 18.0
    The article is a critical notice of Daniel Garber, Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. Garber presents a developmental reading of Leibniz's metaphysics that focuses on Leibniz's evolving analysis of body and force as the key to his account of substance. Garber claims that Leibniz shifts from an early theory of body to a theory of corporeal substance in his middle years, and only develops a theory of monads in his later writings—and that even then Leibniz looks not to abandon the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Mike Kearns, Could Daniel Dennett Be a Zombie?score: 18.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Michelle Ciurria (2012). A New Mixed View of Virtue Ethics, Based on Daniel Doviak's New Virtue Calculus. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (2):259-269.score: 18.0
    In A New Form of Agent-Based Virtue Ethics , Daniel Doviak develops a novel agent-based theory of right action that treats the rightness (or deontic status) of an action as a matter of the action’s net intrinsic virtue value (net-IVV)—that is, its balance of virtue over vice. This view is designed to accommodate three basic tenets of commonsense morality: (i) the maxim that “ought” implies “can,” (ii) the idea that a person can do the right thing for the wrong (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. María G. Navarro (2013). Critical notice of 'Trucos del oficio de investigador' edited by Daniel Guinea-Martin. [REVIEW] Intersticios. Revista Sociológica de Pensamiento Crítico 7 (1):401-404.score: 18.0
    Trucos del oficio de investigador es un libro coordinado por Daniel Guinea-Martin, y en el que colaboran doce investigadores. ¿Se pueden encontrar respuestas regladas sobre el oficio y la tarea de investigar? Todos nosotros sabemos —tal vez con hartazgo—, que es un debate permanente cuestionar si la virtud se puede enseñar. Recordamos por ejemplo que Sócrates repetía obsesivamente esta pregunta a cualquier ciudadano ateniense. ¿Qué es la virtud? ¿En qué se cifra la virtud del médico? ¿Cuál es la virtud (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Daniel Read (2007). Experienced Utility: Utility Theory From Jeremy Bentham to Daniel Kahneman. Thinking and Reasoning 13 (1):45 – 61.score: 18.0
  38. David Atkinson (2007). On Poor and Not so Poor Thought Experiments. A Reply to Daniel Cohnitz. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (1):159 - 161.score: 18.0
    We have never entirely agreed with Daniel Cohnitz on the status and rôle of thought experiments. Several years ago, enjoying a splendid lunch together in the city of Ghent, we cheerfully agreed to disagree on the matter; and now that Cohnitz has published his considered opinion of our views, we are glad that we have the opportunity to write a rejoinder and to explicate some of our disagreements. We choose not to deal here with all the issues that Cohnitz (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Jennifer Kuzma (2011). Allhoff, Fritz, Patrick Lin, and Daniel Moore. 2010. What is Nanotechnology and Why Does It Matter? From Science to Ethics. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):209-211.score: 18.0
    Allhoff, Fritz, Patrick Lin, and Daniel Moore. 2010. What is nanotechnology and why does it matter? From science to ethics Content Type Journal Article Pages 209-211 DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9289-z Authors Jennifer Kuzma, University of Minnesota, Humphrey School of Public Affairs, 301 19th Ave So, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA Journal Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Online ISSN 1872-4353 Print ISSN 1176-7529 Journal Volume Volume 8 Journal Issue Volume 8, Number 2.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Daniel C. Dennett (2008). Daniel Dennett: Autobiography, Part 1. Philosophy Now 68:22-26.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Stephen Davies (2010). The Hypothetical Intentionalist's Dilemma: A Reply to Levinson. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (3):307-312.score: 18.0
    In a recent essay, Jerrold Levinson defends his version of hypothetical intentionalism (HI), which is a theory of literary interpretation, from two criticisms. The first, argued by Stephen Davies, is that it is equivalent to the value-maximizing view. The second, argued by Robert Stecker, is that there are straightforward counterexamples to HI. We will argue that Levinson does not successfully fend off either criticism, and further, that in the process of attempting to do so, creates another dilemma for (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Nora K. Bell (1989). Review: What Setting Limits May Mean: A Feminist Critique of Daniel Callahan's "Setting Limits". [REVIEW] Hypatia 4 (2):169 - 178.score: 18.0
    In Setting Limits, Daniel Callahan advances the provocative thesis that age be a limiting factor in decisions to allocate certain kinds of health services to the elderly. However, when one looks at available data, one discovers that there are many more elderly women than there are elderly men, and these older women are poorer, more apt to live alone, and less likely to have informal social and personal supports than their male counterparts. Older women, therefore, will make the heaviest (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Božidar Kante (2005). Contextualism, Art, and Rigidity: Levinson, Currie and Davies. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 20 (4):53-63.score: 18.0
    The topic of this paper is the role played by context in art. In this regard I examine three theories linked to the names of J. Levinson, G. Currie and D. Davies. Levinson’s arguments undermine the structural theory. He finds it objectionable because it makes the individuation of artworks independent of their histories. Secondly, such a consequence is unacceptable because it fails to recognise that works are created rather than discovered. But, if certain general features of provenance are (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. R. Stecker & S. Davies (2010). The Hypothetical Intentionalist's Dilemma: A Reply to Levinson. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (3):307-312.score: 18.0
    In a recent essay, Jerrold Levinson defends his version of hypothetical intentionalism (HI), which is a theory of literary interpretation, from two criticisms. The first, argued by Stephen Davies, is that it is equivalent to the value-maximizing view. The second, argued by Robert Stecker, is that there are straightforward counterexamples to HI. We will argue that Levinson does not successfully fend off either criticism, and further, that in the process of attempting to do so, creates another dilemma for (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Bill Uzgalis (2006). Interview with Daniel Dennett Conducted by Bill Uzgalis in␣Boston, Massachusetts on December 29, 2004. Minds and Machines 16 (1):7-19.score: 18.0
    A taped conversational interview with Daniel Dennett and Bill Uzgalis covers a wide range of topics arising from Dennett’s thoughts about computing and human beings. The background of Dennett’s work is explored as are his views about mind-brain identity theory, artificial intelligence, functionalism, human exceptionalism, animal culture, language, pain, freedom and determinism, and quality of life.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. William R. Newman (2001). Corpuscular Alchemy and the Tradition of Aristotle's Meteorology, with Special Reference to Daniel Sennert. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (2):145 – 153.score: 18.0
    (2001). Corpuscular alchemy and the tradition of Aristotle's Meteorology, with special reference to Daniel Sennert. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 145-153. doi: 10.1080/02698590120059013.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Andreas Blank (2011). Daniel Sennert on Poisons, Epilepsy, and Subordinate Forms. Perspectives on Science 19 (2):192-211.score: 18.0
    As Peter Niebyl has documented, one of the issues in which the Wittenberg-based physician and philosopher Daniel Sennert (1572–1637) departed from Paracelsus and his followers was the concept of disease. Paracelsus and some of his followers regarded diseases as real beings—so-called “disease-entities” (entia morbis) that can enter into the body of a living being and thereafter possess a clearly defined location in the affected organism. 1 For Sennert, such a view is a dangerous confusion between disease and its causes. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. J. Daniel Hammond (1994). The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics, Daniel M. Hausman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, Xi + 372 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 10 (02):338-.score: 18.0
  49. Kenneth Noe (2013). Review Essay: Daniel W. Smith, Essays on Deleuze. Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 21 (1):161-172.score: 18.0
    A review essay of Daniel W. Smith, Essays on Deleuze (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012).
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Erik Weber (2008). Reply to Daniel Steel's "with or Without Mechanisms". Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (2):267-270.score: 18.0
    In this discussion note I clarify the motivation behind my original paper "Social Mechanisms, Causal Inference and the Policy Relevance of Social Science." I argue that one of the tasks of philosophers of social science is to draw attention to methodological problems that are often forgotten or overlooked. Then I show that my original paper does not make the mistake or fallacy that Daniel Steel suggests in his comment on it. Key Words: social mechanisms • causal inference • social (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000