29 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Daniel Rothschild (Oxford University)
  1. Daniel Rothschild (2013). Do Indicative Conditionals Express Propositions? Noûs 47 (1):49-68.
    Discusses how to capture the link between the probability of indicative conditionals and conditional probability using a classical semantics for conditionals.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  2. Daniel Rothschild (2012). Expressing Credences. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (1pt1):99-114.
    After presenting a simple expressivist account of reports of probabilistic judgements, I explore a classic problem for it, namely the Frege-Geach problem. I argue that it is a problem not just for expressivism but for any reasonable account of ascriptions of graded judgements. I suggest that the problem can be resolved by appropriately modelling imprecise credences.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  3.  78
    Nathan Klinedinst & Daniel Rothschild (2012). Connectives Without Truth Tables. Natural Language Semantics 20 (2):137-175.
    There are certain uses of and and or that cannot be explained by their normal meanings as truth-functional connectives, even with sophisticated pragmatic resources. These include examples such as The cops show up, and a fight will break out (‘If the cops show up, a fight will break out’), and I have no friends, or I would throw a party (‘I have no friends. If I did have friends, I would throw a party.’). We argue that these uses are indeed (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  4.  33
    Daniel Rothschild & Gabriel Segal (2009). Indexical Predicates. Mind and Language 24 (4):467-493.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  5. Daniel Rothschild (2007). Presuppositions and Scope. Journal of Philosophy 104 (2):71-106.
    This paper discusses the apparent scope ambiguities between definite descriptions and modal operators. I argue that we need the theory of presupposition to explain why these ambiguities are not always present, and that once that theory is in hand, Kripke’s modal argument loses much of its force.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  6. Daniel Rothschild & Gabriel Segal (2009). Indexical Predicates. Mind and Language 24 (4):467--493.
    We discuss the challenge to truth-conditional semantics presented by apparent shifts in extension of predicates such as 'red'. We propose an explicit indexical semantics for 'red' and argue that our account is preferable to the alternatives on conceptual and empirical grounds.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  7.  64
    Daniel Rothschild (2013). Game Theory and Scalar Implicatures. Philosophical Perspectives 27 (1):438-478.
  8.  37
    Daniel Rothschild (2015). Conditionals and Propositions in Semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (6):781-791.
    IntroductionThe project of giving an account of meaning in natural languages goes largely by assigning truth-conditional content to sentences. I will call the view that sentences have truth-conditional content propositionalism as it is common to identify the truth-conditional content of a sentence with the proposition it expresses. This content plays an important role in our explanations of the speech-acts, attitude ascriptions, and the meaning of sentences when they appear as parts of longer sentences. Much work in philosophy of language and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  46
    Daniel Rothschild (2011). Explaining Presupposition Projection with Dynamic Semantics. Semantics and Pragmatics 4 (3):1-43.
    Presents a version of dynamic semantics for a language with presuppositions that predicts basic facts about presupposition projection in a non-stipulative way.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  10. John Hawthorne, Daniel Rothschild & Levi Spectre (2016). Belief is Weak. Philosophical Studies 173 (5):1393-1404.
    It is tempting to posit an intimate relationship between belief and assertion. The speech act of assertion seems like a way of transferring the speaker’s belief to his or her audience. If this is right, then you might think that the evidential warrant required for asserting a proposition is just the same as the warrant for believing it. We call this thesis entitlement equality. We argue here that entitlement equality is false, because our everyday notion of belief is unambiguously a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  96
    Daniel Rothschild & Seth Yalcin (2015). On the Dynamics of Conversation. Noûs 49 (3).
    There is a longstanding debate in the literature about static versus dynamic approaches to meaning and conversation. A formal result due to van Benthem is often thought to be important for understanding what, conceptually speaking, is at issue in the debate. We introduce the concept of a conversation system, and we use it to clarify the import of van Benthem's result. We then distinguish two classes of conversation systems, corresponding to two concepts of staticness. The first class corresponds to a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12.  82
    Daniel Rothschild (2014). Capturing the Relationship Between Conditionals and Conditional Probability with a Trivalent Semantics. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 24 (1-2):144-152.
    (2014). Capturing the relationship between conditionals and conditional probability with a trivalent semantics. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics: Vol. 24, Three-Valued Logics and their Applications, pp. 144-152. doi: 10.1080/11663081.2014.911535.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  13.  25
    Daniel Rothschild, Transparency Theory and its Dynamic Alternatives: Commentary on “Be Articulate”.
    “Be Articulate: A Pragmatic Theory of Presupposition Projection” is a remarkable paper in at least two respects: First, it is the only broadly Gricean treatment of presuppositions that generates precise and accurate predictions about the pattern of presupposition projection. Schlenker proposes that presuppositions arise as a result of a pragmatic prohibition against using one short construction to express two independent meanings. This basic idea is quite an old one.1 But no one has ever elaborated this pragmatic story in a way (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  14.  3
    Daniel Rothschild & Seth Yalcin (2015). On the Dynamics of Conversation. Noûs 50 (2).
    There is a longstanding debate in the literature about static versus dynamic approaches to meaning and conversation. A formal result due to van Benthem is often thought to be important for understanding what, conceptually speaking, is at issue in the debate. We introduce the concept of a conversation system, and we use it to clarify the import of van Benthem's result. We then distinguish two classes of conversation systems, corresponding to two concepts of staticness. The first class corresponds to a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  54
    Emmanuel Chemla, Vincent Homer & Daniel Rothschild (2011). Modularity and Intuitions in Formal Semantics: The Case of Polarity Items. Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (6):537-570.
    Linguists often sharply distinguish the different modules that support linguistics competence, e.g., syntax, semantics, pragmatics. However, recent work has identified phenomena in syntax (polarity sensitivity) and pragmatics (implicatures), which seem to rely on semantic properties (monotonicity). We propose to investigate these phenomena and their connections as a window into the modularity of our linguistic knowledge. We conducted a series of experiments to gather the relevant syntactic, semantic and pragmatic judgments within a single paradigm. The comparison between these quantitative data leads (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  31
    Daniel Rothschild, Non-Monotonic NPI-Licensing, Definite Descriptions, and Grammaticalized Implicatures.
    A downward-entailing context has the property that the replacement of the predicate in the context by a stronger predicate preserves truth. So, for instance, presuppositions aside, the context after “every” in (1) where the NPI “ever” appears is downward entailing.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17.  42
    Daniel Rothschild (2008). Presupposition Projection and Logical Equivalence. Noûs 42 (1):473 - 497.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  18.  37
    Daniel Rothschild, Making Dynamics Semantics Explanatory: Presupposition Projection.
    Understanding the pattern by which complex sentences inherit the presuppositions of their parts (presupposition projection) has been a major topic in formal pragmatics since the 1970s. Heim’s classic paper “On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions” (1983) proposed a replacement of truth-conditional semantics with a dynamic semantics that treats meanings as instructions to update the common ground. Heim’s system predicts the basic pattern of presupposition projection quite accurately. The classic objection to this program (including other versions of dynamic semantics) is that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19.  75
    Daniel Rothschild, A Note on Conditionals and Restrictors.
    This note relates the Lewis/Kratzer view of conditionals as restrictors to the philosophical debate over the meaning of conditionals.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  46
    Daniel Rothschild (2007). The Elusive Scope of Descriptions. Philosophy Compass 2 (6):910–927.
    (1) Every miner went to a meeting. It seems that (1) can mean either that there was one meeting that every miner went to, or that every miner went to at least one meeting with no guarantee that they all went to the same meeting. In the language of first-order logic we can represent these two readings as a matter of the universal and existential quantifiers having different scope with respect to each other.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21.  37
    Nathan Klinedinst & Daniel Rothschild (forthcoming). Exhaustivity in Questions with Non-Factives. Semantics and Pragmatics.
  22.  37
    Daniel Rothschild, Definite Descriptions and Negative Polarity.
    The argument here comes from consideration of a certain sort of linguistic expression called negative polarity items (NPIs). These are expressions such as “any,” “at all” and “ever.” NPIs are of particular interest for semantics because they can only be used in contexts with a certain rather abstract semantic feature. However, the precise characterization of the feature is itself a matter of some controversy. For those interested in the semantics of natural language it is worthwhile to figure out precisely what (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  30
    Daniel Rothschild, Structuralism and Reference.
    The argument is directed at the view that scientific knowledge is just knowledge of the structure of the natural world and not knowledge of its intrinsic nature. The origin of the view is the post-Galilean conception of modern science, which views science as yielding a picture of nature stripped of all color, explaining all physical processes purely in terms of space-time, particles, fields, forces and the like, the intrinsic natures of which are never themselves analyzed. It is safe to say (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Daniel Rothschild, Conditionals and Probability: A Classical Approach.
    Draft of a paper for the Sinn und Bedeutung 14 conference. Explains how to capture the link between conditionals the probability of indicative conditionals and conditional probability using a classical semantics for conditionals. (Note: some introductory material is shared with a twin paper, "Capturing the Relationship Between Conditionals and Conditional Probability with a Trivalent Semantics".).
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Daniel Rothschild, Syllabus.
    We will look at recent work on some topics at the intersection of semantics and pragmatics. First, we’ll begin surveying some foundational work in semantics and pragmatics. After this we’ll spend a few weeks each on: presupposition, scalar implicature, and unarticulated constituents. Two additional possible topics (if time permits) are: wide-scope indefinites and donkey anaphora. Anyone with particular interests in related areas are welcome to suggest topics or readings which can be substituted for existing topics.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Nathan Klinedist & Daniel Rothschild (eds.) (2009). Proceedings of Workshop on New Directions in the Theory of Presuppositions. Essli 2009.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Daniel Rothschild, Grice, Utterance Choice, and Rationality.
    This paper is about pragmatic explanations of certain linguistic phenomenon based on Grice’s theory of conversational implicature. According to Grice’s theory, audiences draw inferences about what the speaker is trying to convey based on the idea that the speaker is following certain maxims governing conversation. Such explanations of the inferences audiences make about the speaker play a central role in many parts of philosophy of language and linguistics.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Daniel Rothschild (2008). Presupposition Projection and Logical Equivalence. Philosophical Perspectives 22 (1):473-497.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Daniel Rothschild, Structuralism and Reference.
    The argument is directed at the view that scientific knowledge is just knowledge of the structure of the natural world and not knowledge of its intrinsic nature. The origin of the view is the post-Galilean conception of modern science, which views science as yielding a picture of nature stripped of all color, explaining all physical processes purely in terms of space-time, particles, fields, forces and the like, the intrinsic natures of which are never themselves analyzed. It is safe to say (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography