11 found
Sort by:
  1. Daniel Sperling (2013). Bringing Life From Death: Is There a Good Justification for Posthumous Cloning? Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 1 (S1).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Daniel Sperling (2013). Death, Posthumous Harm, and Bioethics by J. S. Taylor, 2012 New York: Routledgexiv +228 Pp, £80.00 (Hb). [REVIEW] Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (3):285-287.
  3. Daniel Sperling (2013). The Right to Know One's Genetic Origin: Are Gamete Donations and Misattributed Paternity Cases Alike? American Journal of Bioethics 13 (5):60-62.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Daniel Sperling (2012). Socializing the Public: Invoking Hannah Arendt's Critique of Modernity to Evaluate Reproductive Technologies. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):53-60.
    The article examines the writings of one of the most influential political philosophers, Hannah Arendt, and specifically focuses on her views regarding the distinction between the private and the public and the transformation of the public to the social by modernity. Arendt’s theory of human activity and critique of modernity are explored to critically evaluate the social contributions and implications of reproductive technologies especially where the use of such technologies is most dominant within Western societies. Focusing on empirical studies on (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Daniel Sperling & Gabriel M. Gurman (2012). Factors Encouraging and Inhibiting Organ Donation in Israel. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (4):479-497.
    Although transplantation surgeries are relatively successful and save the lives of many, only few are willing to donate organs. In order to better understand the reasons for donation or refusing donation and their implications on and influence by public policy, we conducted a survey examining public views on this issue in Israel. Between January and June 2010, an anonymous questionnaire based on published literature was distributed among random and selected parts of Israeli society and included organ recipients, organ donors, soldiers, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Daniel Sperling (2011). The Therapeutic Triumph: Making Poor Claims and Offering a Revised Conceptualization to Justify Embryo Selection. Ethical Perspectives 18 (3):407-440.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Daniel Sperling (2010). Commanding the “Be Fruitful and Multiply” Directive: Reproductive Ethics, Law, and Policy in Israel. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (03):363-371.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Daniel Sperling (2010). Food Law, Ethics, and Food Safety Regulation: Roles, Justifications, and Expected Limits. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):267-278.
    Recent food emergencies throughout the world have raised some serious ethical and legal concerns for nations and health organizations. While the legal regulations addressing food risks and foodborne illnesses are considerably varied and variously effective, less is known about the ethical treatment of the subject. The purpose of this article is to discuss the roles, justifications, and limits of ethics of food safety as part of public health ethics and to argue for the development of this timely and emergent field (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Daniel Sperling (2009). From Iran to Latin America: Must Prenatal Diagnosis Necessarily Be Provided With Abortion for Congenital Abnormalities? American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):61-63.
  10. Daniel Sperling (2009). Talk to Whom? In Sandra Shapshay (ed.), Bioethics at the Movies. Johns Hopkins University Press. 312.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Daniel Sperling (2008). Law and Bioethics : A Rights-Based Relationship and its Troubling Implications. In Michael D. A. Freeman (ed.), Law and Bioethics / Edited by Michael Freeman. Oxford University Press.
    Some argue that law is the discipline which has mixed most prominently with bioethics, and that bioethicists can be seduced by the law and by legal procedures. While there is a great consensus that law has influenced bioethics in significant and important ways, certainly much more than it influenced other "law and..." disciplines, scholars dispute as to the exact role which the law plays in bioethics, the goals it purports to achieve and the implications of its relationship with the discipline (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation