Search results for 'Danny Siegel' (try it on Scholar)

639 found
Sort by:
  1. Danny Siegel (ed.) (1983/1985). Where Heaven and Earth Touch: An Anthology of Midrash and Halachah. Town House Press.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Eli Siegel (1957). Free Poem on "the Siegel Theory of Opposites" in Relation to Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 16 (1):148-150.score: 180.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Harvey Siegel (1993). Siegel, From Page One. Inquiry 11 (4):17-22.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. P. Yule, Corpus der Minoischen, Mykenischen Siegel, F. Matz, N. Platon & I. Pini (1988). 2. iii. Iraklion, Archaologisches Museum. Die Siegel der Neupalastzeit. Journal of Hellenic Studies 108:257.score: 180.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Susanna Siegel (2002). The Role of Perception in Demonstrative Reference. Philosophers' Imprint 2 (1):1-21.score: 60.0
    Siegel defends "Limited Intentionism", a theory of what secures the semantic reference of uses of bare demonstratives ("this", "that" and their plurals). According to Limited Intentionism, demonstrative reference is fixed by perceptually anchored intentions on the part of the speaker.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Susanna Siegel (2010). The Contents of Visual Experience. Oxford.score: 60.0
    In this book, Susanna Siegel develops a framework for understanding the contents of visual experience, and argues that these contents involve all sorts of ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Susanna Siegel, Dialogue About Philosophy in Spanish.score: 60.0
    This is a compilations of short talks presented at a workshop held at Harvard in April 14 on the life of analytic philosophy today in Spanish. Authors include Susanna Siegel, Diana Acosta and Patricia Marechal, Diana Perez, Laura Pérez, and Josefa Toribio.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Harvey Siegel (1997). Rationality Redeemed?: Further Dialogues on an Educational Ideal. Routedge.score: 60.0
    In Educating Reason, Harvey Siegel presented the case regarding rationality and critical thinking as fundamental education ideals. In Rationality Redeemed? , a collection of essays written since that time, he develops this view, responds to major criticisms raised against it, and engages those critics in dialogue. In developing his ideas and responding to critics, Siegel addresses main currents in contemporary thought, including feminism, postmodernism and multiculturalism.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Harvey Siegel & John Biro (1997). Epistemic Normativity, Argumentation, and Fallacies. Argumentation 11 (3):277-292.score: 60.0
    In Biro and Siegel (1992) we argued that a theory of argumentation mustfully engage the normativity of judgments about arguments, and we developedsuch a theory. In this paper we further develop and defend our theory.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Harvey Siegel (1996). Instrumental Rationality and Naturalized Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 63 (3):124.score: 60.0
    In two recent papers, I criticized Ronald N. Giere's and Larry Laudan's arguments for 'naturalizing' the philosophy of science (Siegel 1989, 1990). Both Giere and Laudan replied to my criticisms (Giere 1989, Laudan 1990b). The key issue arising in both interchanges is these naturalists' embrace of instrumental conceptions of rationality, and their concomitant rejection of non-instrumental conceptions of that key normative notion. In this reply I argue that their accounts of science's rationality as exclusively instrumental fail, and consequently that (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Harvey Siegel (1988). Rationality and Anemia (Response to Baigrie). Philosophy of Science 55 (3):442-447.score: 60.0
    In his (1988), Brian Baigrie criticizes my earlier discussion of the rationality of science (Siegel 1985). In this response, I argue that (1) Baigrie misses the point of my tripartite distinction between different questions one can ask about science's rationality, (2) Baigrie's argument that the history of the development of methodological principles is crucial to philosophical discussion of the rationality of science is flawed, and (3) Baigrie's charge that my view is "anemic" rests on a failure to appreciate the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Tamar Gendler, Susanna Siegel & Steven M. Cahn (eds.) (2008). The Elements of Philosophy: Readings From Past and Present. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    The Elements of Philosophy: Readings from Past and Present is a comprehensive collection of historical and contemporary readings across the major fields of philosophy. With depth and quality, this introductory anthology offers a selection of readings that is both extensive and expansive; the readings span twenty-five centuries. They are organized topically into five parts: Religion and Belief, Moral and Political Philosophy, Metaphysics and Epistemology, Philosophy of Mind and Language, and Life and Death. The product of the collaboration of three highly (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Tim Luke, Paul Piccone, Fred Siegel & Michael Taves (1987). Roundtable on Intellectuals and the Academy. Telos 1987 (71):5-35.score: 60.0
    Taves: Let us begin with the claim that universities are deadly to serious intellectual work. The university ethos fosters mediocrity, boredom and gutlessness. It has become a haven for conformist intellectuals who value patronage and status over intellectual quality and challenge. “Radical” academics are no exception; they too have bought into hyperspecialization, empiricism, professionalization, abstract theory, and have become marginal, predictable and politically irrelevant. If such is the case, what are the implications? Siegel: There is certainly a sense of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Irwin M. Siegel (2000). Charcot and Duchenne: Of Mentors, Pupils, and Colleagues. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 43 (4):541-547.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Susanna Siegel & Nicholas Silins (forthcoming). The Epistemology of Perception. In Mohan Matthen (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception. Oxford.score: 30.0
    An overview of the epistemology of perception, covering the nature of justification, immediate justification, the relationship between the metaphysics of perceptual experience and its rational role, the rational role of attention, and cognitive penetrability. The published version will contain a smaller bibliography, due to space constraints in the volume.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Susanna Siegel (2010). Do Visual Experiences Have Contents? In Bence -Nanay (ed.), Perceiving the World. Oxford.score: 30.0
  17. Susanna Siegel (2012). Congnitive Penetrability and Perceptual Justification. Noûs 46 (2):201 - 222.score: 30.0
    In this paper I argue that it's possible that the contents of some visual experiences are influenced by the subject's prior beliefs, hopes, suspicions, desires, fears or other mental states, and that this possibility places constraints on the theory of perceptual justification that 'dogmatism' or 'phenomenal conservativism' cannot respect.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Susanna Siegel (2014). Affordances and the Contents of Perception. In Berit Brogaard (ed.), Does Perception Have Content? Oxford. 39-76.score: 30.0
  19. Susanna Siegel (forthcoming). How is Wishful Seeing Like Wishful Thinking? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.score: 30.0
    This paper makes the case that when wishful thinking ill-founds belief, the belief depends on the desire in ways can be recapitulated at the level of perceptual experience. The relevant kinds of desires include motivations, hopes, preferences, and goals. I distinguish between two modes of dependence of belief on desire in wishful thinking: selective or inquiry-related, and responsive or evidence-related. I offers a theory of basing on which beliefs are badly-based on desires, due to patterns of dependence that can found (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Susanna Siegel (2013). Can Selection Effects on Experience Influence its Rational Role? In Tamar Gendler (ed.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology volume 4. Oxford. 240.score: 30.0
    I distinguish between two kinds of selection effects on experience: selection of objects or features for experience, and anti-selection of experiences for cognitive uptake. I discuss the idea that both kinds of selection effects can lead to a form of confirmation bias at the level of perception, and argue that when this happens, selection effects can influence the rational role of experience.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Susanna Siegel (2013). The Epistemic Impact of the Etiology of Experience. Philosophical Studies 162 (3):697-722.score: 30.0
    In this paper I offer a theory of what makes certain influences on visual experiences by prior mental states (including desires, beliefs, moods, and fears) reduce the justificatory force of those experiences. The main idea is that experiences, like beliefs, can have rationally assessable etiologies, and when those etiologies are irrational, the experiences are epistemically downgraded.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Ned Block & Susanna Siegel (2013). Attention and Perceptual Adaptation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):205-206.score: 30.0
  23. Susanna Siegel (2006). Which Properties Are Represented in Perception? In Tamar S. Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Perceptual Experience. Oxford University Press. 481--503.score: 30.0
    In discussions of perception and its relation to knowledge, it is common to distinguish what one comes to believe on the basis of perception from the distinctively perceptual basis of one's belief. The distinction can be drawn in terms of propositional contents: there are the contents that a perceiver comes to believe on the basis of her perception, on the one hand; and there are the contents properly attributed to perception itself, on the other. Consider the content.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Susanna Siegel & Nicholas Silins (forthcoming). Attention and Perceptual Justification. In Adam Pautz & Daniel Stoljar (eds.), Festschrift for Ned Block. MIT Press.score: 30.0
  25. Susanna Siegel (2013). Are There Edenic Grounds of Perceptual Intentionality? Analysis 73 (2):329-344.score: 30.0
    This is a critical piece on *The Character of Consciousness* by David Chalmers. It focuses on Chalmers's two-stage view of perceptual content and the epistemology of perceptual belief that flows from this theory, and criticizes his theories of Edenic concepts, perceptual acquaintance, and perceptual belief.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Susanna Siegel (2006). Direct Realism and Perceptual Consciousness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2):378-410.score: 30.0
    In The Problem of Perception, A.D. Smith’s central aim is to defend the view that we can directly perceive ordinary objects, such as cups, keys and the like.1 The book is organized around the two arguments that Smith considers to be serious threats to the possibility of direct perception: the argument from illusion, and the argument from hallucination. The argument from illusion threatens this possibility because it concludes that indirect realism is true. Indirect realism is the view that we perceive (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Nicholas Silins & Susanna Siegel (forthcoming). Consciousness, Attention, and Justification. In Elia Zardini & Dylan Dodd (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Scepticism and Perceptual Jusification. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    We discuss the rational role of highly inattentive experiences, and argue that they can provide rational support for beliefs.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Susanna Siegel (2006). Subject and Object in the Contents of Visual Experience. Philosophical Review 115 (3):355--88.score: 30.0
    In this paper, I argue that certain perceptual relations are represented in visual experience.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Susanna Siegel (2008). The Epistemic Conception of Hallucination. In Adrian Haddock & Fiona Macpherson (eds.), Disjunctivism: Perception, Action and Knowledge. Oxford University Press. 205--224.score: 30.0
    Early formulations of disjunctivism about perception refused to give any positive account of the nature of hallucination, beyond the uncontroversial fact that they can in some sense seem to the same to the subject as veridical perceptions. Recently, some disjunctivists have attempt to account for hallucination in purely epistemic terms, by developing detailed account of what it is for a hallucinaton to be indiscriminable from a veridical perception. In this paper I argue that the prospects for purely epistemic treatments of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Susanna Siegel (forthcoming). Epistemic Evaluability and Perceptual Farce. In A. Raftopoulos (ed.), Cognitive Effects on Perception: New Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford.score: 30.0
  31. Alex Byrne, David Hilbert & Susanna Siegel (2007). Do We See More Than We Can Access? Behavioral and Brain Sciences (5-6):501-502.score: 30.0
    Short commentary on a paper by Ned Block.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Susanna Siegel (2013). Reply to Fumerton, Huemer, and McGrath. Philosophical Studies 162 (3):749-757.score: 30.0
    Fumerton, Huemer, and McGrath each contributed to a symposium on "The Epistemic Impact of the Etiology of Experience" in Philosophical Studies. These are my replies their contributions.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Susanna Siegel (2004). Indiscriminability and the Phenomenal. Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):91-112.score: 30.0
    In this paper, I describe and criticize M.G.F. Martin's version of disjunctivism, and his argument for it from premises about self-knowledge.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Susanna Siegel (2007). How Can We Discover the Contents of Experience? Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (S1):127-42.score: 30.0
    In this paper I discuss several proposals for how to find out which contents visual experiences have, and I defend the method I.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Susanna Siegel (2009). The Visual Experience of Causation. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236):519-540.score: 30.0
    In this paper I argue that causal relations between objects are represented in visual experience, and contrast my argument and its conclusion with Michotte's results from the 1960's.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Susanna Siegel (2013). Reply to Prinz. Philosophical Studies 163 (3).score: 30.0
    Reply to Jesse Prinz's contribution to a symposium on *The Contents of Visual Experience*.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Susanna Siegel, Misperception.score: 30.0
    In discussions of perception and its provision of knowledge, it is common to distinguish what one comes to believe on the basis of perception from the distinctively perceptual basis of one's belief. The distinction can be drawn in terms of propositional contents: there are the contents that a perceiver would normally come to believe on the basis of her perception, on the one hand; and there are the contents properly attributed to perception itself, on the other. Consider the content.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Susanna Siegel, The Contents of Perception. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 30.0
    This is the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on the contents of perception.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Susanna Siegel, The Dog and the Zombie.score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Susanna Siegel (2013). Reply to Travis. Philosophical Studies 163 (3).score: 30.0
    Reply to Charles Travis's contribution to a symposium on *The Contents of Visual Experience*.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Harvey Siegel (1986). Relativism, Truth, and Incoherence. Synthese 68 (2):225 - 259.score: 30.0
    There are many contemporary sources and defenders of epistemological relativism which have not been considered thus far. I have, for example, barely touched on the voluminous literature regarding frameworks, conceptual schemes, and Wittgensteinian forms of life. Davidson's challenge to the scheme/content distinction and thereby to conceptual relativism, Rorty's acceptance of the Davidsonian argument and his use of it to defend a relativistic position, Winchian and other sociological and anthropological arguments for relativism, recent work in the sociology of science, and Goodman's (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Susanna Siegel (2013). Reply to Campbell. Philosophical Studies 163 (3).score: 30.0
    Reply to John Campbell's contribution to a symposium on *The Contents of Visual Experience*.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Harvey Siegel (2007). Review of Paul Boghossian, Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (1).score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Susanna Siegel (2006). How Does Phenomenology Constrain Object-Seeing? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (3):429 – 441.score: 30.0
    Perception provides a form of contact with the world and the other people in it. For example, we can learn that Franco is sitting in his chair by seeing Franco; we can learn that his hair is gray by seeing the colour of his hair. Such perception enables us to understand primitive forms of language, such as demonstrative expressions.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Harvey Siegel (2008). Autonomy, Critical Thinking and the Wittgensteinian Legacy: Reflections on Christopher Winch, Education, Autonomy and Critical Thinking. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1):165-184.score: 30.0
    In this review of Christopher Winch's new book, Education, Autonomy and Critical Thinking (2006), I discuss its main theses, supporting some and criticising others. In particular, I take issue with several of Winch's claims and arguments concerning critical thinking and rationality, and deplore his reliance on what I suggest are problematic strains of the later Wittgenstein. But these criticisms are not such as to upend Winch's powerful critique of antiperfectionism and 'strong autonomy' or his defence of 'weak autonomy'. His account (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Max Siegel (2013). Revising the Principle of Alternate Possibilities. Stance 6:15-20.score: 30.0
    This paper examines the position in moral philosophy that Harry Frankfurt calls the Principle of Alternate Possibilities (PAP). The paper first describes the principle as articulated by A.J. Ayer. Subsequently, the paper examines Frankfurt’s critique and proposed revision of the principle and argues that Frankfurt’s proposal relies on an excessively simplistic account of practical reasoning, which fails to account for the possibility of moral dilemmas. In response, the paper offers a further revision of PAP, which accounts for Frankfurt’s critique, moral (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Susanna Siegel (2013). Precise of The Contents of Visual Experience. Philosophical Studies 163 (3):813-816.score: 30.0
  48. H. Siegel (1997). Review. Reason, Regulation, and Realism: Towards a Regulatory Systems Theory of Reason and Evolutionary Epistemology. CA Hooker. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):121-125.score: 30.0
  49. Harvey Siegel (1982). Relativism Refuted. Educational Philosophy and Theory 14 (2):47–50.score: 30.0
  50. Susanna Siegel (2005). The Phenomenology of Efficacy. Philosophical Topics 33 (1):265-84.score: 30.0
    In this paper I argue that certain type of first-personal causal property, efficacy, is represented in perceptual experience.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 639