15 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
David A. Conway [15]David Alton Conway [1]
  1.  80
    David A. Conway (1975). D. Z. Phillips and 'The Inadequacy of Language'. Analysis 35 (3):93 - 97.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  67
    David A. Conway (1984). 'It Would Have Happened Already': On One Argument for a First Cause. Analysis 44 (4):159 - 166.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  88
    David A. Conway (1974). Capital Punishment and Deterrence: Some Considerations in Dialogue Form. Philosophy and Public Affairs 3 (4):431-443.
  4.  8
    David A. Conway (1983). Miracles, Evidence, and Contrary Religions. Sophia 22 (3):3 - 14.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5.  21
    David A. Conway (1988). The Philosophical Problem of Evil. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 24 (1/2):35 - 66.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  6
    David A. Conway (1986). Experience, Explanation and Faith. Teaching Philosophy 9 (3):270-273.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  19
    David A. Conway (1973). Sensations and Bodily Position: A Conclusive Argument? Philosophical Studies 24 (September):353-354.
  8.  2
    David A. Conway (1991). On the Distinction Between Convergent and Linked Arguments. Informal Logic 13 (3).
    Most recent writers of informal logic texts draw a distinction between "linked" and "convergent" arguments. According to its inventor, Stephen Thomas, the distinction is of the utmost importance; it "seems crucial to the analysis and evaluation of reasoning in natural language." I argue that the distinction has not been drawn in any way that makes it both clear and of any real originality or importance. Many formulations are obscure or conceptually incoherent. One formulation of the distinction does seem tolerably clear (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  1
    David A. Conway (1974). Law, Liberty and Indecency: David A. Conway. Philosophy 49 (188):135-147.
    The distinction between private immorality and public indecency plays a significant and perhaps a crucial role in H. L. A. Hart's argument in Law, Liberty, and Morality . This distinction, and the uses to which he puts it, have, however, been largely overshadowed in the ‘debate’ between Professor Hart and Lord Devlin which has centred around such ‘great’ questions as whether a shared morality is necessary for a society. I shall argue that Hart's position, in so far as it is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  19
    David A. Conway (1971). Mavrodes, Martin and the Verification of Religious Experience. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (3):156 - 171.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  2
    David A. Conway (1987). AIDS and Legal Paternalism. Social Theory and Practice 13 (3):287-302.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  3
    David A. Conway (1983). Concerning Infinite Chains, Infinite Trains, and Borrowing a Typewriter. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (2):71 - 86.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  4
    David A. Conway (1974). Possibility and Infinite Time. International Philosophical Quarterly 14 (2):201-208.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  7
    David A. Conway (1974). Law, Liberty and Indecency. Philosophy 49 (188):135 - 147.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. David A. Conway (1974). Possibility and Infinite Time: A Logical Paradox in St. Thomas’ Third Way. International Philosophical Quarterly 14 (2):201-208.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography