Search results for 'David A. Robertson' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. R. Robertson (1982). Book Reviews: Sociological Impressionism: A Reassessment of Georg Simmel's Social Theory: By David Frisby, London: Heinemann, 1981,Pp Xi 190 $14.95, 13.25. [REVIEW] Theory, Culture and Society 1 (1):94-97.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  7
    E. G. Turner, M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven, E. Boswinkel, E. P. Wegener, A. H. R. E. Paap, M. Hombert & Cl Preaux (1953). Papyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Papyrologicum Universitatis Lugduno-Batavae, moderantibus M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven. I. The Warren PapyriPapyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Papyrologicum Universitatis Lugduno-Batavae, moderantibus M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven. II. Einige Wiener PapyriPapyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Papyrologicum Universitatis Lugduno-Batavae, moderantibus M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven. III. Some Oxford PapyriPapyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Papyrologicum Universitatis Lugduno-Batavae, moderantibus M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven. IV. De Herodoti reliquiis in papyris et membranis Aegyptiis servatisPapyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Papyrologicum Universitatis Lugduno-Batavae, moderantibus M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven. V. Recherches sur le Recensement dans l'Egypte romaine Papyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Pap. [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 73:163.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  13
    Thomas Frangenberg & Ludovico David (1994). The Geometry of a Dome: Ludovico David 's Dichiarazione Della Pittura Della Capella Del Collegio Clementino di Roma. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 57:191-208.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  3
    G. C. Robertson (1879). MIND. A Quarterly Review, Etc., Edit. By G. C. Robertson. October 1878. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 7:98 - 101.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  2
    G. C. Robertson (1877). MIND: A Quarterly Review, Etc., Edited by G. C. Robertson. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 3:546 - 550.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  1
    G. Croom Robertson (1877). MIND. A Quarterly Review, Etc., Edited By. G. Croom Robertson. July 1877. London. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 4:340 - 342.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. George Croom Robertson, Alexander Bain & Thomas Whittaker (1894). Philosophical Remains of George Croom Robertson with a Memoir. Williams and Norgate.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  40
    Arthur M. Glenberg, David A. Robertson, Michael P. Kaschak & Alan J. Malter (2003). Embodied Meaning and Negative Priming. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):644-647.
    Standard models of cognition are built from abstract, amodal, arbitrary symbols, and the meanings of those symbols are given solely by their interrelations. The target article (Glenberg 1997t) argues that these models must be inadequate because meaning cannot arise from relations among abstract symbols. For cognitive representations to be meaningful they must, at the least, be grounded; but abstract symbols are difficult, if not impossible, to ground. As an alternative, the target article developed a framework in which representations are grounded (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  6
    David Meconi (2009). Christ as Mediator: A Study of the Theologies of Eusebius of Caesarea, Marcellus of Ancyra, and Athanasius of Alexandria. By Jon M. Robertson. Heythrop Journal 50 (4):707-708.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  2
    R. B. Sher & M. A. Stewart (1985). William Robertson and David Hume: Three Letters. Hume Studies 1985 (1):69-86.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. David A. Conway (1974). Law, Liberty and Indecency: David A. Conway. Philosophy 49 (188):135-147.
    The distinction between private immorality and public indecency plays a significant and perhaps a crucial role in H. L. A. Hart's argument in Law, Liberty, and Morality . This distinction, and the uses to which he puts it, have, however, been largely overshadowed in the ‘debate’ between Professor Hart and Lord Devlin which has centred around such ‘great’ questions as whether a shared morality is necessary for a society. I shall argue that Hart's position, in so far as it is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12. David A. White (1994). Is Kripke Really at The Helm?: David A. White. Religious Studies 30 (1):45-54.
    There is a very interesting phenomenon which takes place in philosophy. Theories which appeared ten or fifteen years ago in the literature of, say, the philosophy of language or the philosophy of mind, often make a reappearance in current discussions of problems in the philosophy of religion. As Yogi Berra once remarked, ‘It's déjà vu all over again’. However, there is always a possibility that the transition from the earlier context to the later one will be less than smooth. For (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  36
    David Bakhurst, F. T. Mikhailov, V. S. Bibler, V. A. Lektorsky & V. V. Davydov (1995). Social Being and the Human Essence: An Unresolved Issue in Soviet Philosophy. A Dialogue with Russian Philosophers Conducted by David Bakhurst. Studies in East European Thought 47 (1/2):3-60.
    This is a transcription of a debate on the concept of a person conducted in Moscow in 1983. David Bakhurst argues that Evald Ilyenkov's social constructivist conception of personhood, founded on Marx's thesis that the human essence is 'the ensemble of social relations', is either false or trivially true. F. T. Mikhailov, V. S. Bibler, V. A. Lektorsky and V. V. Davydov critically assess Bakhurst's arguments, elucidate and contextualize Ilyenkov's views, and defend, in contrasting ways, the claim that human (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14. David A. DeSteno (1997). Of the Self-Concept David A. DeSteno and Peter Salovey. Cognition and Emotion 2 (4).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  2
    David A. Buehler (1996). Ann Alpers, JD, is an Assistant Professor of Medicine and Member of the Program In Medical Ethics, University of California, San Francisco. David A. Bennahum Is Professor of Medicine and Family and Community Medi-Cine, Center for Ethics, Law and the Humanities, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque. [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 5:4-5.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. David A. Reidy, Hume's System: An Examination of the First Book of His Treatise, by David Pears. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990. Reviewed by David A. Reidy, Jr., University of Kansas. [REVIEW]
  17. Anthony Skelton (2013). Sidgwick’s Argument for Utilitarianism and His Moral Epistemology: A Reply to David Phillips. Revue d'Etudes Benthamiennes 12.
    David Phillips’s Sidgwickian Ethics is a penetrating contribution to the scholarly and philosophical understanding of Henry Sidgwick’s The Methods of Ethics. This note focuses on Phillips’s understanding of (aspects of) Sidgwick’s argument for utilitarianism and the moral epistemology to which he subscribes. In § I, I briefly outline the basic features of the argument that Sidgwick provides for utilitarianism, noting some disagreements with Phillips along the way. In § II, I raise some objections to Phillips’s account of the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  40
    Uwe Steinhoff, A Critique of David Miller's Like Minded Group and Cooperative Practice Models of Collective Responsibility.
    Many authors writing about global justice seem to take national responsibility more or less for granted. Most of them, however, offer very little argument for their position. One of the few exceptions is David Miller. He offers two models of collective responsibility: the like-minded group model and the cooperative practice model. While some authors have criticized whether these two models are applicable to nations, as Miller intends, my criticism is more radical: I argue that these two models fail (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  7
    A. Schafer (2004). Biomedical Conflicts of Interest: A Defence of the Sequestration Thesis--Learning From the Cases of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1):8-24.
    No discussion of academic freedom, research integrity, and patient safety could begin with a more disquieting pair of case studies than those of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy. The cumulative impact of the Olivieri and Healy affairs has caused serious self examination within the biomedical research community. The first part of the essay analyses these recent academic scandals. The two case studies are then placed in their historical context—that context being the transformation of the norms of science through increasingly (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   25 citations  
  20. Norman Kemp Smith (1941/2005). The Philosophy of David Hume: A Critical Study of its Origins and Central Doctrines. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Norman Kemp Smith's The Philosophy of David Hume continues to be unsurpassed in its comprehensive coverage of the ideas and issues of Hume's Treatise. Now, after years of waiting, this currently out-of-print and highly sought-after classic is being re-issued. This ground-breaking book has long been regarded as a classic study by scholars in the field, yet a new introduction by Don Garrett places the book in its contemporary context, showing Humes's continuing importance in the field.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  21.  12
    José L. Tasset (2013). Razones para una buena muerte (La justificación de la eutanasia en la tradición utilitarista: De David Hume a Peter Singer). Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 18 (1-2):153-195.
    There are good moral reasons to support euthanasia, and these reasons are fundamentally of a utilitarian root. There are few moral reasons to oppose euthanasia in its strict sense, and they are clearly outweighed by the reasons argumented from a utilitarian perspective. Such teleological and consequentialist good reasons were originally advanced by David Hume in his brief and brilliant essay "Of Suicide" (1757), the true source for current Bioethics. Hume's arguments have been expanded in scope by some contemporary utilitarians, (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  20
    Gabriel Vacariu, (2015) “Did David Ludwig (Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands) (in “A Pluralist Theory of the Mind”, 2015 Springer) Plagiarize Many of My Ideas From 2002-2008?”.
    “Did David Ludwig (Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands) (in “A Pluralist Theory of the Mind”, 2015 Springer) plagiarize many of my ideas from 2002-2008?”.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  50
    David Nikkel (2010). A Response to David Rutledge. Tradition and Discovery 37 (2):16-19.
    This appreciative response to David Rutledge’s review of my book, Radical Embodiment, deals with the natureof categorization/generalization with respect to and in light of postmodernism, with the issue of the articulation of tacit knowledge, with Mark C. Taylor’s current a/theological stance regarding the concept of God, and finally with my model of divine embodiment that rejects special providence and revelation.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  9
    Stephen Kemp (2005). Saving the Strong Programme? A Critique of David Bloor's Recent Work. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):707-720.
    This article critically appraises David Bloor’s recent attempts to refute criticisms levelled at the Strong Programme’s social constructionist approach to scientific knowledge. Bloor has tried to argue, contrary to some critics, that the Strong Programme is not idealist in character, and it does not involve a challenge to the credibility of scientific knowledge. I argue that Bloor’s attempt to deflect the charge of idealism, which calls on the self-referential theory of social institutions, is partially successful. However, I suggest that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  25. Robin P. Cubitt & Robert Sugden (2003). Common Knowledge, Salience and Convention: A Reconstruction of David Lewis' Game Theory. Economics and Philosophy 19 (2):175-210.
    David Lewis is widely credited with the first formulation of common knowledge and the first rigorous analysis of convention. However, common knowledge and convention entered mainstream game theory only when they were formulated, later and independently, by other theorists. As a result, some of the most distinctive and valuable features of Lewis' game theory have been overlooked. We re-examine this theory by reconstructing key parts in a more formal way, extending it, and showing how it differs from more recent (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   27 citations  
  26.  13
    David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton (eds.) (2007). David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature (Two-Volume Set). Clarendon Press.
    David and Mary Norton present the definitive scholarly edition of Hume's Treatise, one of the greatest philosophical works ever written. This set comprises the two volumes of texts and editorial material, which are also available for purchase separately. -/- David Hume (1711 - 1776) is one of the greatest of philosophers. Today he probably ranks highest of all British philosophers in terms of influence and philosophical standing. His philosophical work ranges across morals, the mind, metaphysics, epistemology, religion, and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  25
    Jennifer A. Herdt (2010). David Hume: A Dissertation on the Passions; The Natural History of Religion. [REVIEW] Hume Studies 36 (2):233-235.
    The present volume is the fifth out of eight total projected for the Clarendon Edition of the Works of David Hume. Its editor, Tom Beauchamp, is one of the general editors of the Clarendon Hume, together with David Fate Norton and M. A. Stewart. Beauchamp served as the editor for the Clarendon editions of An Enquiry concerning the Principle of Morals and An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, both of which have garnered critical acclaim. Like the previous volumes, this (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. A. David Kline (1987). The Logical Impossibility of Collision: A. David Kline and Carl A. Matheson. Philosophy 62 (242):509-515.
    Absolutely no one still believes that every physical interactionconsists of material bodies bumping into each other. Those who have tried to work out a completely mechanistic physics have been unable to explain common phenomena like liquidity, gravitation and magnetism. In fact, there is great reason to doubt that such a physics could ever account for attractive forces in general.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  29.  7
    A. Tellings (1998). A Virtue Approach Instead of a Kantian Approach as a Solution to Major Dilemmas in Meta-Ethics? A Criticism of David Carr. Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (1):47-56.
    This contribution is a criticism of some points David Carr brings forward both in his 1991 book (Educating the Virtues) but even more so in his 1996 article in this journal (After Kohlberg: Some Implications of an Ethics of Virtue for the Theory of Moral Education and Development). With the help of a virtue approach Carr tries to solve the moral objectivism-moral relativism dilemma and the deontologism-consequentialism dilemma in ethics. I will argue that his attempt, though very interesting, suffers (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. A. W. Apter (2000). Strong Compactness and a Global Version of a Theorem of Ben-David and Magidor. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 46 (4):453-460.
    Starting with a model in which κ is the least inaccessible limit of cardinals δ which are δ+ strongly compact, we force and construct a model in which κ remains inaccessible and in which, for every cardinal γ < κ, □γ+ω fails but □γ+ω, ω holds. This generalizes a result of Ben-David and Magidor and provides an analogue in the context of strong compactness to a result of the author and Cummings in the context of supercompactness.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton (eds.) (2011). David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature: Volume 1: Texts. Oxford University Press Uk.
    David and Mary Norton present the definitive scholarly edition of one of the greatest philosophical works ever written. This first volume contains the critical text of David Hume's Treatise of Human Nature, followed by the shortin which Hume set out the key arguments of the larger work; the volume concludes with A Letter from a Gentleman to his Friend in Edinburgh, Hume's defence of the Treatise when it was under attack from ministers seeking to prevent Hume's appointment as (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton (eds.) (2007). David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature: Volume 1: Texts. Clarendon Press.
    David and Mary Norton present the definitive scholarly edition of Hume's Treatise, one of the greatest philosophical works ever written. The first volume contains the critical text of David Hume's Treatise of Human Nature , followed by the shortin which Hume set out the key arguments of the larger work; the volume concludes with A Letter from a Gentleman to his Friend in Edinburgh , Hume's later defence of the Treatise.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton (eds.) (2007). David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature: Volume 2: Editorial Material. Clarendon Press.
    David and Mary Norton present the definitive scholarly edition of Hume's Treatise, one of the greatest philosophical works ever written. This second volume contains their historical account of how the Treatise was written and published; an explanation of how they have established the text; an extensive set of annotations which illuminate Hume's texts; and a comprehensive bibliography and index.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton (eds.) (2011). David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature: Volume 1: Texts. OUP Oxford.
    David and Mary Norton present the definitive scholarly edition of Hume's Treatise, one of the greatest philosophical works ever written. The first volume contains the critical text of David Hume's Treatise of Human Nature, followed by the shortand concluding with A Letter from a Gentleman to his Friend in Edinburgh.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton (eds.) (2011). David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature: Volume 2: Editorial Material. OUP Oxford.
    David and Mary Norton present the definitive scholarly edition of Hume's Treatise, one of the greatest philosophical works ever written. This volume contains their account of how the Treatise was written and published; an explanation of how they established the text; an extensive set of annotations; and a detailed bibliography and index.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  1
    Jeremy Joyner White & John A. Gueguen (1998). A Humean Critique of David Hume's Theory of Knowledge. Upa.
    A Humean Critique of David Hume's Theory of Knowledge provides the first full-length Aristotilian-Thomistic critique of Hume's most mature and familiar work. While giving Hume proper respect and appreciation for his achievement, Jeremy White engages in a thoughtful critique through an approach based in Hume's own method.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  3
    David A. Kaden (2010). David Gelernter , Judaism: A Way of Being (New Haven, CT & London: Yale University Press, 2009), ISBN: 978-0300151923. Foucault Studies 9:212-215.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  2
    David A. Pailin (2002). David Ray Griffin Reenchantment Without Supernaturalism: A Process Philosophy of Religion. Cornell Studies in the Philosophy of Religion. (Ithaca NY and London: Cornell University Press, 2001). Pp. X+426. $55.00 (Hbk), $24.95 (Pbk). ISBN 0 8014 3778 4 (Hbk), 0 8014 8657 2 (Pbk). [REVIEW] Religious Studies 38 (2):225-246.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. David A. Scott (1973). Clark H. Pinnock and David F. Wells , "Toward a Theology for the Future". [REVIEW] The Thomist 37 (2):386.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Howard Prosser (2008). Review: David Jeneman, Adorno in America, (University of Minnesota Press, 2007); Alex Thomson, Adorno: A Guide for the Perplexed (Continuum, 2006). [REVIEW] Thesis Eleven 93 (1):138-140.
    Review: David Jeneman, Adorno in America, ; Alex Thomson, Adorno: A Guide for the Perplexed.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  20
    Frederik Herzberg (2010). The Consistency of Probabilistic Regresses. A Reply to Jeanne Peijnenburg and David Atkinson. Studia Logica 94 (3):331-345.
    In a recent paper, Jeanne Peijnenburg and David Atkinson [ Studia Logica, 89:333-341 ] have challenged the foundationalist rejection of infinitism by giving an example of an infinite, yet explicitly solvable regress of probabilistic justification. So far, however, there has been no criterion for the consistency of infinite probabilistic regresses, and in particular, foundationalists might still question the consistency of the solvable regress proposed by Peijnenburg and Atkinson.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  42. Michael Ruse (2011). Making Room for Faith in an Age of Science: A Response to David Wisdo. Zygon 46 (3):655-672.
    Abstract. I respond to the criticisms of David Wisdo of my position on the relationship between science and religion. I argue that although he gives a full and fair account of my position, he fails to grasp fully my use of the metaphorical basis of modern science in my argument that, because of its mechanistic commitment, there are some questions that science not only does not answer but that science does not even attempt to answer. Hence, my position stands (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  43.  9
    Justin Cruickshank, Social Contract Ethnocentrism, Carol Jones & A. Mere Idea (2000). David A. Reidy/Rawls's Wide View of Public Reason: Not Wide Enough 49–72 Daniel Attas/the Case of Guest Workers: Exploitation, Citizenship and Economic Rights 73–92. [REVIEW] Res Publica 6:345-346.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Francis J. Beckwith (2006). Defending Abortion Philosophically: A Review of David Boonin's a Defense of Abortion. [REVIEW] Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (2):177 – 203.
    This article is a critical review of David Boonin's book, A Defense of Abortion (Cambridge University Press, 2002), a significant contribution to the literature on this subject and arguably the most important monograph on abortion published in the past twenty years. Boonin's defense of abortion consists almost exclusively of sophisticated critiques of a wide variety of pro-life arguments, including ones that are rarely defended by pro-life advocates. This article offers a brief presentation of the book's contents with extended assessments (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  45.  11
    Sanford A. Lakoff (1980). Moral Responsibility and the "Galilean Imperative":A Double Image of the Double Helix: The Recombinant DNA Debate. Clifford Grobstein; Regulation of Scientific Inquiry: Social Concerns with Research. Keith M. Wulff; Recombinant DNA: Science, Ethics, and Politics. John Richards; The Recombinant DNA Debate. David A. Jackson, Stephen P. Stich; A Nation of Guinea Pigs: The Unknown Risks of Chemical Technology. Marshall S. Shapo; Limits of Scientific Inquiry. Gerald Holton, Robert S. Morrison. [REVIEW] Ethics 91 (1):100-.
  46.  2
    Richard A. McCormick (1991). The Preembryo as Potential: A Reply to John A. Robertson. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1 (4):303-305.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  5
    David Vincent Meconi (2007). Separatist Christianity: Spirit and Matter in the Early Church Fathers. By David A. Lopez. Heythrop Journal 48 (6):996–997.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  2
    A. M. Bowie (1983). The Themes of Greek Lyric Poetry David A. Campbell: The Golden Lyre. The Themes of the Greek Lyric Poets. Pp. Viii + 312. London: Duckworth, 1983. £28. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 33 (02):169-170.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. C. B. Cohen, S. E. Wheeler & D. A. Scott (2000). Prayer is Therapy-Cynthia B. Cohen, Sondra E. Wheeler, and David A. Scott Reply. Hastings Center Report 30 (6):5-5.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. David Detmer (2005). David A Sprintzen and Adrian van den Hoven, Eds., Sartre and Camus: A Historic Confrontation Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 25 (1):6-9.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000