Search results for 'David A. Rossiter' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  10
    E. G. Turner, M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven, E. Boswinkel, E. P. Wegener, A. H. R. E. Paap, M. Hombert & Cl Preaux (1953). Papyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Papyrologicum Universitatis Lugduno-Batavae, moderantibus M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven. I. The Warren PapyriPapyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Papyrologicum Universitatis Lugduno-Batavae, moderantibus M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven. II. Einige Wiener PapyriPapyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Papyrologicum Universitatis Lugduno-Batavae, moderantibus M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven. III. Some Oxford PapyriPapyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Papyrologicum Universitatis Lugduno-Batavae, moderantibus M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven. IV. De Herodoti reliquiis in papyris et membranis Aegyptiis servatisPapyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Papyrologicum Universitatis Lugduno-Batavae, moderantibus M. David, B. A. van Groningen, J. C. van Oven. V. Recherches sur le Recensement dans l'Egypte romaine Papyrologica Lugduno-Batava, edidit Institutum Pap. [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 73:163.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  16
    Thomas Frangenberg & Ludovico David (1994). The Geometry of a Dome: Ludovico David 's Dichiarazione Della Pittura Della Capella Del Collegio Clementino di Roma. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 57:191-208.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  2
    David A. White (1994). Is Kripke Really at The Helm?: David A. White. Religious Studies 30 (1):45-54.
    There is a very interesting phenomenon which takes place in philosophy. Theories which appeared ten or fifteen years ago in the literature of, say, the philosophy of language or the philosophy of mind, often make a reappearance in current discussions of problems in the philosophy of religion. As Yogi Berra once remarked, ‘It's déjà vu all over again’. However, there is always a possibility that the transition from the earlier context to the later one will be less than smooth. For (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  1
    David A. Conway (1974). Law, Liberty and Indecency: David A. Conway. Philosophy 49 (188):135-147.
    The distinction between private immorality and public indecency plays a significant and perhaps a crucial role in H. L. A. Hart's argument in Law, Liberty, and Morality . This distinction, and the uses to which he puts it, have, however, been largely overshadowed in the ‘debate’ between Professor Hart and Lord Devlin which has centred around such ‘great’ questions as whether a shared morality is necessary for a society. I shall argue that Hart's position, in so far as it is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5. David A. DeSteno (1997). Of the Self-Concept David A. DeSteno and Peter Salovey. Cognition and Emotion 2 (4).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  37
    David Bakhurst, F. T. Mikhailov, V. S. Bibler, V. A. Lektorsky & V. V. Davydov (1995). Social Being and the Human Essence: An Unresolved Issue in Soviet Philosophy. A Dialogue with Russian Philosophers Conducted by David Bakhurst. Studies in East European Thought 47 (1/2):3-60.
    This is a transcription of a debate on the concept of a person conducted in Moscow in 1983. David Bakhurst argues that Evald Ilyenkov's social constructivist conception of personhood, founded on Marx's thesis that the human essence is 'the ensemble of social relations', is either false or trivially true. F. T. Mikhailov, V. S. Bibler, V. A. Lektorsky and V. V. Davydov critically assess Bakhurst's arguments, elucidate and contextualize Ilyenkov's views, and defend, in contrasting ways, the claim that human (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  2
    David A. Buehler (1996). Ann Alpers, JD, is an Assistant Professor of Medicine and Member of the Program In Medical Ethics, University of California, San Francisco. David A. Bennahum Is Professor of Medicine and Family and Community Medi-Cine, Center for Ethics, Law and the Humanities, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque. [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 5:4-5.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. David A. Reidy, Hume's System: An Examination of the First Book of His Treatise, by David Pears. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990. Reviewed by David A. Reidy, Jr., University of Kansas. [REVIEW]
  9. Anthony Skelton (2013). Sidgwick’s Argument for Utilitarianism and His Moral Epistemology: A Reply to David Phillips. Revue d'Etudes Benthamiennes 12.
    David Phillips’s Sidgwickian Ethics is a penetrating contribution to the scholarly and philosophical understanding of Henry Sidgwick’s The Methods of Ethics. This note focuses on Phillips’s understanding of (aspects of) Sidgwick’s argument for utilitarianism and the moral epistemology to which he subscribes. In § I, I briefly outline the basic features of the argument that Sidgwick provides for utilitarianism, noting some disagreements with Phillips along the way. In § II, I raise some objections to Phillips’s account of the epistemology (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  67
    Uwe Steinhoff, A Critique of David Miller's Like Minded Group and Cooperative Practice Models of Collective Responsibility.
    Many authors writing about global justice seem to take national responsibility more or less for granted. Most of them, however, offer very little argument for their position. One of the few exceptions is David Miller. He offers two models of collective responsibility: the like-minded group model and the cooperative practice model. While some authors have criticized whether these two models are applicable to nations, as Miller intends, my criticism is more radical: I argue that these two models fail as (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  19
    José L. Tasset (2013). Razones para una buena muerte (La justificación de la eutanasia en la tradición utilitarista: De David Hume a Peter Singer). Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 18 (1-2):153-195.
    There are good moral reasons to support euthanasia, and these reasons are fundamentally of a utilitarian root. There are few moral reasons to oppose euthanasia in its strict sense, and they are clearly outweighed by the reasons argumented from a utilitarian perspective. Such teleological and consequentialist good reasons were originally advanced by David Hume in his brief and brilliant essay "Of Suicide" (1757), the true source for current Bioethics. Hume's arguments have been expanded in scope by some contemporary utilitarians, (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Norman Kemp Smith (1941). The Philosophy of David Hume: A Critical Study of its Origins and Central Doctrines. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Norman Kemp Smith's The Philosophy of David Hume continues to be unsurpassed in its comprehensive coverage of the ideas and issues of Hume's Treatise. Now, after years of waiting, this currently out-of-print and highly sought-after classic is being re-issued. This ground-breaking book has long been regarded as a classic study by scholars in the field, yet a new introduction by Don Garrett places the book in its contemporary context, showing Humes's continuing importance in the field.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  13. Barry Loewer & Jonathan Schaffer (eds.) (2015). A Companion to David Lewis. Wiley-Blackwell.
    In _A Companion to David Lewis_, Barry Loewer and Jonathan Schaffer bring together top philosophers to explain, discuss, and critically extend Lewis's seminal work in original ways. Students and scholars will discover the underlying themes and complex interconnections woven through the diverse range of his work in metaphysics, philosophy of language, logic, epistemology, philosophy of science, philosophy of mind, ethics, and aesthetics. The first and only comprehensive study of the work of David Lewis, one of the most systematic (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  7
    A. Schafer (2004). Biomedical Conflicts of Interest: A Defence of the Sequestration Thesis--Learning From the Cases of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1):8-24.
    No discussion of academic freedom, research integrity, and patient safety could begin with a more disquieting pair of case studies than those of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy. The cumulative impact of the Olivieri and Healy affairs has caused serious self examination within the biomedical research community. The first part of the essay analyses these recent academic scandals. The two case studies are then placed in their historical context—that context being the transformation of the norms of science through increasingly (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   25 citations  
  15.  23
    Jamie Morgan (2016). Power, Property, the Law, and the Corporation – a Commentary on David Ellerman's Paper: 'The Labour Theory of Property and Marginal Productivity Theory'. Economic Thought 5 (1):37.
    The point of departure of David Ellerman's paper is that the role of labour in economics can be looked at in a fundamentally different way than has typically been the case. The paper's purpose is, therefore, oppositional. However, it cannot simply be dismissed. It is clearly articulated, well reasoned, and most importantly, thought provoking. It requires one to rethink how one conceives some basic issues in economics. As such, one does not need to be entirely convinced by the argument (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  60
    David Nikkel (2010). A Response to David Rutledge. Tradition and Discovery 37 (2):16-19.
    This appreciative response to David Rutledge’s review of my book, Radical Embodiment, deals with the natureof categorization/generalization with respect to and in light of postmodernism, with the issue of the articulation of tacit knowledge, with Mark C. Taylor’s current a/theological stance regarding the concept of God, and finally with my model of divine embodiment that rejects special providence and revelation.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  10
    Stephen Kemp (2005). Saving the Strong Programme? A Critique of David Bloor's Recent Work. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):707-720.
    This article critically appraises David Bloor’s recent attempts to refute criticisms levelled at the Strong Programme’s social constructionist approach to scientific knowledge. Bloor has tried to argue, contrary to some critics, that the Strong Programme is not idealist in character, and it does not involve a challenge to the credibility of scientific knowledge. I argue that Bloor’s attempt to deflect the charge of idealism, which calls on the self-referential theory of social institutions, is partially successful. However, I suggest that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  18.  32
    Jennifer A. Herdt (2010). David Hume: A Dissertation on the Passions; The Natural History of Religion. [REVIEW] Hume Studies 36 (2):233-235.
    The present volume is the fifth out of eight total projected for the Clarendon Edition of the Works of David Hume. Its editor, Tom Beauchamp, is one of the general editors of the Clarendon Hume, together with David Fate Norton and M. A. Stewart. Beauchamp served as the editor for the Clarendon editions of An Enquiry concerning the Principle of Morals and An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, both of which have garnered critical acclaim. Like the previous volumes, this (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  17
    David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton (eds.) (2007). David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature (Two-Volume Set). Clarendon Press.
    David and Mary Norton present the definitive scholarly edition of Hume's Treatise, one of the greatest philosophical works ever written. This set comprises the two volumes of texts and editorial material, which are also available for purchase separately. -/- David Hume (1711 - 1776) is one of the greatest of philosophers. Today he probably ranks highest of all British philosophers in terms of influence and philosophical standing. His philosophical work ranges across morals, the mind, metaphysics, epistemology, religion, and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20. A. David Kline (1987). The Logical Impossibility of Collision: A. David Kline and Carl A. Matheson. Philosophy 62 (242):509-515.
    Absolutely no one still believes that every physical interactionconsists of material bodies bumping into each other. Those who have tried to work out a completely mechanistic physics have been unable to explain common phenomena like liquidity, gravitation and magnetism. In fact, there is great reason to doubt that such a physics could ever account for attractive forces in general.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21.  8
    A. Tellings (1998). A Virtue Approach Instead of a Kantian Approach as a Solution to Major Dilemmas in Meta-Ethics? A Criticism of David Carr. Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (1):47-56.
    This contribution is a criticism of some points David Carr brings forward both in his 1991 book (Educating the Virtues) but even more so in his 1996 article in this journal (After Kohlberg: Some Implications of an Ethics of Virtue for the Theory of Moral Education and Development). With the help of a virtue approach Carr tries to solve the moral objectivism-moral relativism dilemma and the deontologism-consequentialism dilemma in ethics. I will argue that his attempt, though very interesting, suffers (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Stephanie A. Nelson (1998). God and the Land: The Metaphysics of Farming in Hesiod and Vergil. With a Translation of Hesiod's Works and Days by David Grene. Oxford University Press Usa.
    In this pathbreaking book, which includes a powerful new translation of Hesiod's Works and Days by esteemed translator David Grene, Stephanie Nelson argues that a society's vision of farming contains deep indications about its view of the human place within nature, and our relationship to the divine. She contends that both Hesiod in the Works and Days and Vergil in the Georgics saw farming in this way, and so wrote their poems not only about farming itself, but also about (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. A. W. Apter (2000). Strong Compactness and a Global Version of a Theorem of Ben-David and Magidor. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 46 (4):453-460.
    Starting with a model in which κ is the least inaccessible limit of cardinals δ which are δ+ strongly compact, we force and construct a model in which κ remains inaccessible and in which, for every cardinal γ < κ, □γ+ω fails but □γ+ω, ω holds. This generalizes a result of Ben-David and Magidor and provides an analogue in the context of strong compactness to a result of the author and Cummings in the context of supercompactness.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton (eds.) (2007). David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature: Volume 1: Texts. Clarendon Press.
    David and Mary Norton present the definitive scholarly edition of Hume's Treatise, one of the greatest philosophical works ever written. The first volume contains the critical text of David Hume's Treatise of Human Nature , followed by the shortin which Hume set out the key arguments of the larger work; the volume concludes with A Letter from a Gentleman to his Friend in Edinburgh , Hume's later defence of the Treatise.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton (eds.) (2007). David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature: Volume 2: Editorial Material. Clarendon Press.
    David and Mary Norton present the definitive scholarly edition of Hume's Treatise, one of the greatest philosophical works ever written. This second volume contains their historical account of how the Treatise was written and published; an explanation of how they have established the text; an extensive set of annotations which illuminate Hume's texts; and a comprehensive bibliography and index.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton (eds.) (2011). David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature: Volume 1: Texts. OUP Oxford.
    David and Mary Norton present the definitive scholarly edition of Hume's Treatise, one of the greatest philosophical works ever written. The first volume contains the critical text of David Hume's Treatise of Human Nature, followed by the shortand concluding with A Letter from a Gentleman to his Friend in Edinburgh.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton (eds.) (2011). David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature: Volume 2: Editorial Material. OUP Oxford.
    David and Mary Norton present the definitive scholarly edition of Hume's Treatise, one of the greatest philosophical works ever written. This volume contains their account of how the Treatise was written and published; an explanation of how they established the text; an extensive set of annotations; and a detailed bibliography and index.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  1
    Jeremy Joyner White & John A. Gueguen (1998). A Humean Critique of David Hume's Theory of Knowledge. Upa.
    A Humean Critique of David Hume's Theory of Knowledge provides the first full-length Aristotilian-Thomistic critique of Hume's most mature and familiar work. While giving Hume proper respect and appreciation for his achievement, Jeremy White engages in a thoughtful critique through an approach based in Hume's own method.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  3
    David A. Kaden (2010). David Gelernter , Judaism: A Way of Being (New Haven, CT & London: Yale University Press, 2009), ISBN: 978-0300151923. Foucault Studies 9:212-215.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  2
    David A. Pailin (2002). David Ray Griffin Reenchantment Without Supernaturalism: A Process Philosophy of Religion. Cornell Studies in the Philosophy of Religion. (Ithaca NY and London: Cornell University Press, 2001). Pp. X+426. $55.00 (Hbk), $24.95 (Pbk). ISBN 0 8014 3778 4 (Hbk), 0 8014 8657 2 (Pbk). [REVIEW] Religious Studies 38 (2):225-246.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. David A. Scott (1973). Clark H. Pinnock and David F. Wells , "Toward a Theology for the Future". [REVIEW] The Thomist 37 (2):386.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Robin P. Cubitt & Robert Sugden (2003). Common Knowledge, Salience and Convention: A Reconstruction of David Lewis' Game Theory. Economics and Philosophy 19 (2):175-210.
    David Lewis is widely credited with the first formulation of common knowledge and the first rigorous analysis of convention. However, common knowledge and convention entered mainstream game theory only when they were formulated, later and independently, by other theorists. As a result, some of the most distinctive and valuable features of Lewis' game theory have been overlooked. We re-examine this theory by reconstructing key parts in a more formal way, extending it, and showing how it differs from more recent (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   27 citations  
  33. Howard Prosser (2008). Review: David Jeneman, Adorno in America, (University of Minnesota Press, 2007); Alex Thomson, Adorno: A Guide for the Perplexed (Continuum, 2006). [REVIEW] Thesis Eleven 93 (1):138-140.
    Review: David Jeneman, Adorno in America, ; Alex Thomson, Adorno: A Guide for the Perplexed.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  12
    Justin Cruickshank, Social Contract Ethnocentrism, Carol Jones & A. Mere Idea (2000). David A. Reidy/Rawls's Wide View of Public Reason: Not Wide Enough 49–72 Daniel Attas/the Case of Guest Workers: Exploitation, Citizenship and Economic Rights 73–92. [REVIEW] Res Publica 6:345-346.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  4
    David LaGuardia (2005). David A. Fein, Displacements of Power: Readings of the “Cent Nouvelles Nouvelles.” Lanham, Md.; New York; and Oxford: University Press of America, 2003. Paper. Pp. Vii, 111. $25. [REVIEW] Speculum 80 (4):1275-1276.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  11
    Sanford A. Lakoff (1980). Moral Responsibility and the "Galilean Imperative":A Double Image of the Double Helix: The Recombinant DNA Debate. Clifford Grobstein; Regulation of Scientific Inquiry: Social Concerns with Research. Keith M. Wulff; Recombinant DNA: Science, Ethics, and Politics. John Richards; The Recombinant DNA Debate. David A. Jackson, Stephen P. Stich; A Nation of Guinea Pigs: The Unknown Risks of Chemical Technology. Marshall S. Shapo; Limits of Scientific Inquiry. Gerald Holton, Robert S. Morrison. [REVIEW] Ethics 91 (1):100-.
  37. Michael Ruse (2011). Making Room for Faith in an Age of Science: A Response to David Wisdo. Zygon 46 (3):655-672.
    Abstract. I respond to the criticisms of David Wisdo of my position on the relationship between science and religion. I argue that although he gives a full and fair account of my position, he fails to grasp fully my use of the metaphorical basis of modern science in my argument that, because of its mechanistic commitment, there are some questions that science not only does not answer but that science does not even attempt to answer. Hence, my position stands (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  38.  6
    A. M. Bowie (1983). The Themes of Greek Lyric Poetry David A. Campbell: The Golden Lyre. The Themes of the Greek Lyric Poets. Pp. Viii + 312. London: Duckworth, 1983. £28. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 33 (02):169-170.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  5
    David Vincent Meconi (2007). Separatist Christianity: Spirit and Matter in the Early Church Fathers. By David A. Lopez. Heythrop Journal 48 (6):996–997.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. J. A. Chaldecott (1965). A History of Scientific and Technical Periodicals: The Origins and Development of the Scientific and Technological Press 1665–1790. By David A. Kronick. Pp. 274; Tables. New York: The Scarecrow Press, 1962. $6.50. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 2 (4):360.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. J. A. Chaldecott (1978). Bibliography A History of Scientific & Technical Periodicals: The Origins and Development of the Scientific and Technical Press, 1665–1790. By David A. Kronick. 2nd Edition. Metuchen, New Jersey: The Scarecrow Press, 1976. Pp. Xvi + 336. $13.50. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 11 (1):67.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. C. B. Cohen, S. E. Wheeler & D. A. Scott (2000). Prayer is Therapy-Cynthia B. Cohen, Sondra E. Wheeler, and David A. Scott Reply. Hastings Center Report 30 (6):5-5.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. David Detmer (2005). David A Sprintzen and Adrian van den Hoven, Eds., Sartre and Camus: A Historic Confrontation Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 25 (1):6-9.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. David LaGuardia (2005). Displacements of Power: Readings of the "Cent Nouvelles Nouvelles"David A. Fein. Speculum 80 (4):1275-1276.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. J. A. Nunn & L. J. Gregory (2005). Ffytche, DH (2002). Neural Codes Forconsciousvision. Trends inCognitiveScience, 6, 493–495. Ffytche, DH, Guy, CN, & Zeki, S.(1995). The Parallel Visual Motion Inputs Into Areas V1 and V5 of Human Cerebral Cortex. Brain, 118, 1375–1394. Ffytche, DH, Howard, RJ, Brammer, MJ, David, A., Woodruff, P., & Williams, S.(1998). The Anatomy of Conscious Vision: An fMRI Study of Visual Halluci. [REVIEW] In Robertson, C. L. & N. Sagiv (eds.), Synesthesia: Perspectives From Cognitive Neuroscience. Oxford University Press 57--144.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Victor C. A. Nweke (2015). David A. Oyedola and the Imperative to Disambiguate the Term “African Philosopher”: A Conversation From the Standpoint of the Conversational School of Philosophy – The Calabar Circle. Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 4 (2):93-99.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. A. P. A. P. (1987). Myth, Scandal, and History. The Heinrich Schliemann Controversy and a First Edition of the Mycenaean Diary. Edited by William M. Calder III and David A. [REVIEW] History and Theory 26 (2):235.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. John A. Scott (1994). David A. White, Rhetoric and Reality in Plato's Phaedrus Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 14 (6):416-418.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Hobart Tasmania, T. Patrick & M. A. Hill (1993). William E. Benitz, MD, is an Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Neo-Natal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford Univer-Sity Medical Center, Stanford, California David A. Bennahum, MD, is Professor of Medicine & Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, and Serves as Chair of The. [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2:253-254.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Peter A. Ubel & Arthur L. Caplan (1999). Jonathan Baron and David A. Asch “A Report From the USA: Social Responsibility, Personal Responsibility, and Prognosis in Public Judgements About Transplant Allocation.”. [REVIEW] Bioethics 13:57-68.
1 — 50 / 1000