109 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
David Archard [110]David Benatar & Archard [1]
See also:
Profile: David Archard (Lancaster University)
  1. Margaret Brazier & David Archard (forthcoming). Editorial: Letting Babies Die. Journal of Medical Ethics.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. David Archard (2014). Insults, Free Speech and Offensiveness. Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (2):127-141.
    This article examines what is wrong with some expressive acts, ‘insults’. Their putative wrongfulness is distinguished from the causing of indirect harms, aggregated harms, contextual harms, and damaging misrepresentations. The article clarifies what insults are, making use of work by Neu and Austin, and argues that their wrongfulness cannot lie in the hurt that is caused to those at whom such acts are directed. Rather it must lie in what they seek to do, namely to denigrate the other. The causing (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. David Archard (2013). Against Paternalism: Justifying Coercive Paternalism by Sarah Conly, 2012 Cambridge, Cambridge University Press216 Pp, £55.00 (Hb). [REVIEW] Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (4):397-400.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. David Archard (2013). Dirty Hands and the Complicity of the Democratic Public. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (4):777-790.
    The alleged problem of the dirty hands of politicians has been much discussed since Michael Walzer’s original piece (Walzer 1974). The discussion has concerned the precise nature of the problem or sought to dissolve the apparent paradox. However there has been little discussion of the putative complicity, and thus also dirtying of hands, of a democratic public that authorizes politicians to act in its name. This article outlines the sense in which politicians do get dirty hands and the degree to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. David Archard (2013). Ethics, Sexual Orientation, and Choices About Children by Timothy F. Murphy, 2012 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 200 Pp, £18.95 (Hb). [REVIEW] Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (2):187-189.
  6. David Archard (2013). Nationalism and Patriotism. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. David Archard (2013). The Acceptable Face of Philosophy. Philosophy Now 95:12-13.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. David Archard, Monique Deveaux, Neil Manson & Daniel Weinstock (eds.) (2013). Reading Onora O'neill. Routledge.
    Onora O’Neill is one of the foremost moral philosophers writing today. Her work on ethics and bioethics, political philosophy and the philosophy of Kant is extremely influential. Her landmark Reith Lectures on trust did much to establish the subject not only on the philosophical and political agenda but in the world of media, business and law more widely. Reading Onora O’Neill is the first book to examine and critically appraise the work of this important thinker. It includes specially commissioned chapters (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Lucy Allais, Anita Allen, Andrew Altman, Elizabeth S. Anderson, Erik A. Anderson, David Archard, Faith Armitage, Barbara Arneil, Gustaf Arrhenius & Marcus Arvan (2012). Recognition of Reviewers. Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (4):363-366.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. David Archard (2012). Moral Compromise. Philosophy 87 (03):403-420.
    A moral compromise is a compromise on moral matters; it is agreement in the face of moral disagreement but where there is agreement on the importance of consensus -namely that it secures a morally desirable outcome. It is distinguishable from other forms of agreement, and an important distinction between moral compromise with public agreement and moral compromise with public disagreement is also made. Circumstances in which the former might be permissible are outlined, and the sense in which it is allowed (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. David Archard (2012). Privacy Rights, Moral and Legal Foundations, by Adam D. Moore. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2010, 237 Pp. ISBN 978-0-271-03685-4 Hb £57.95; ISBN 978-0271-036861 Pb £16.95. [REVIEW] European Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):338-340.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. David Archard (2012). The Future of the Family. Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):132-142.
    Much is said about the decline of the family, often in connection with the prevalence of certain social problems. In this article I consider two kinds of fear: (i) that the traditional family is disappearing; (ii) that new forms of family emerging are, in some or other respect, not worthy of the title. In themselves, neither fear, I argue, should give rise to pressing ethical concerns as such. On fear (i): if by ?traditional family? we mean one whose adult members (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Anita Allen, Elizabeth S. Anderson, Erik A. Anderson, David Archard, Marcus Arvan, Linda Barclay, Marcia Baron, Daniel Bar-Tal, Debra Bergoffen & Alyssa Bernstein (2011). Recognition of Reviewers. Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (4):341-345.
  14. David Archard (2011). Assisted Dying and Legal Change – Penney Lewis. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):215-216.
    No categories
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. David Archard (2011). Choosing Tomorrow's Children: The Ethics of Selective Reproduction – By Stephen Wilkinson. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):101-104.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. David Archard (2011). Reviews Cultural Identity and Political Ethics. By Paul Gilbert. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010. ISBN 9780748623884, Pb. £19.99. [REVIEW] Philosophy 86 (04):627-631.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. David Archard (2011). Why Moral Philosophers Are Not and Should Not Be Moral Experts. Bioethics 25 (3):119-127.
    Professional philosophers are members of bioethical committees and regulatory bodies in areas of interest to bioethicists. This suggests they possess moral expertise even if they do not exercise it directly and without constraint. Moral expertise is defined, and four arguments given in support of scepticism about their possession of such expertise are considered and rejected: the existence of extreme disagreement between moral philosophers about moral matters; the lack of a means clearly to identify moral experts; that expertise cannot be claimed (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Anita Allen, Andrew Altman, Erik A. Anderson, David Archard, Faith Armitage, Gustaf Arrhenius, Marcus Arvan, Michael Bacon, Daniel Bar-Tal & Paul Benson (2010). Recognition of Reviewers. Journal of Social Philosophy 41 (4):399-402.
  19. David Archard (2010). Messy Morality, the Challenge of Politics. Contemporary Political Theory 9 (2):253.
  20. David Archard (2010). Politics and Morality – By Susan Mendus. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (4):429-431.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. David Archard (2010). The Obligations and Responsibilities of Parenthood. In David Archard & David Benatar (eds.), Procreation and Parenthood: The Ethics of Bearing and Rearing Children. Oup Oxford.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. David Archard (2010). Whose Body is It Anyway|[Quest]| Justice and the Integrity of the Person. Contemporary Political Theory 9 (3):345.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. David Benatar & Archard & David (2010). Introduction. In David Archard & David Benatar (eds.), Procreation and Parenthood: The Ethics of Bearing and Rearing Children. Oup Oxford.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. David Archard & David Benatar (eds.) (2010). Procreation and Parenthood: The Ethics of Bearing and Rearing Children. Oxford University Press.
    Procreation and Parenthood offers new and original essays by leading philosophers on some of the main ethical issues raised by these activities.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Lucy Allais, David Archard, Neera Badhwar, Christian Barry, Paul Bloomfield, Campbell Brown, Vittorio Bufacchi, Erik Carlson, Paula Casal & Richard Chappell (2009). Referees for Volume 6. Journal of Moral Philosophy 6:549-550.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. David Archard (2009). Applying Philosophy: A Response to O'Neill. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (3):238-244.
    abstract I consider the putative originality of applied philosophy and seek to defend a version of it often called 'bottom up'. I review ways in which imagined cases may cause us to reconsider our normative commitments, and endorse a general attentiveness to the matter of how the world is and how it might reasonably be imagined. This is important if practical philosophers want to form the correct normative judgements, to be able to recognize the sui generis character of some moral (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. David Archard (2009). The Long Life – Helen Small. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236):568-570.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. David Archard (2009). The Morality of Embryo Use - by Louis M. Guenin. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):212-214.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. David Archard & Susan Mendus (2009). Introduction. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (3):217-218.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. David Archard & Marit Skivenes, Balancing a Child's Best Interests and a Child's Views.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. David Archard & Marit Skivenes, Hearing the Child.
    Given that in our view the child has a fundamental right to be heard in all collective deliberative processes determining his or her future, we set out, firstly, what is required of such processes to respect this right – namely that the child's authentic voice is heard and makes a difference – and, secondly, the distance between this ideal and practice exemplified in the work of child welfare and child protection workers in Norway and the UK, chiefly in their display (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. David Archard, Children's Rights. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Children are young human beings. Some children are very young human beings. As human beings children evidently have a certain moral status. There are things that should not be done to them for the simple reason that they are human. At the same time children are different from adult human beings and it seems reasonable to think that there are things children may not do that adults are permitted to do. In the majority of jurisdictions, for instance, children are not (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. David Archard (2008). Disgust, Offensiveness and the Law. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (4):314-321.
    abstract Martha Nussbaum's concern is to limit the role that emotions can legitimately play in the definition of the criminal law. She would allow nuisance laws to curtail the occasioning of disgust but only disgust of a certain kind. Problems arise for her account when she extends this analysis to the prevention of offensiveness. Unavoidable is an evaluation of those beliefs subscription to which explains the taking of offence. Hence the principal problem for a liberalism of the kind Nussbaum defends (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. David Archard (2008). Informed Consent: Autonomy and Self-Ownership. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (1):19–34.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. William Charlton, John Haldane, David Archard, Thom Brooks & Martha C. Nussbaum (2008). Review Symposium: Hiding From Humanity by Martha Nussbaum. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (4):291-349.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. David Archard (2007). Genetic Enhancement and Procreative Autonomy. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1 (1).
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. David Archard (2007). 4. Informed Consent and the Grounds of Autonomy. In Thomas Nys, Yvonne Denier & T. Vandevelde (eds.), Autonomy & Paternalism: Reflections on the Theory and Practice of Health Care. Peeters. 5--113.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. David Archard (2007). Is It Rape? On Acquaintance Rape and Taking Women's Consent Seriously - by Joan McGregor, Making Sense of Sexual Consent - by Mark Cowling & Paul Reynolds, the Logic of Consent, the Diversity and Deceptiveness of Consent as a Defence to Criminal Conduct - by Peter Westen, and Consent to Sexual Relations - by Lan Wertheimer. Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2):209–221.
  39. David Archard (2007). The Wrong of Rape. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):374–393.
    If rape is evaluated as a serious wrong, can it also be defined as non-consensual sex (NCS)? Many do not see all instances of NCS as seriously wrongful. I argue that rape is both properly defined as NCS and properly evaluated as a serious wrong. First, I distinguish the hurtfulness of rape from its wrongfulness; secondly, I classify its harms and characterize its essential wrongfulness; thirdly, I criticize a view of rape as merely ‘sex minus consent’; fourthly, I criticize mistaken (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. David Archard (2007). Apply Within. The Philosophers' Magazine 39 (39):50-52.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Matthew Festenstein & David Archard (2007). Negotiating Diversity: Liberalism, Democracy and Cultural Difference. Contemporary Political Theory 6 (4):496-497.
  42. David Archard (2006). Review of Lainie Friedman Ross, Children in Medical Research: Access Versus Protection. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (9).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. David Archard, The Value of Privacy.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. David Archard (2006). Andrew Mason , Community, Solidarity and Belonging: Levels of Community and Their Normative Significance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), Pp. Viii + 246. Utilitas 18 (02):188-.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. David Archard (2005). Children. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics. Oup Oxford.
    Whether children have rights is a debate that in recent years has spilled over into all areas of public life. It has never been more topical than now as the assumed rights of parents over their children is challenged on an almost daily basis. David Archard offers the first serious and sustained philosophical examination of children and their rights. Archard reviews arguments for and against according children rights. He concludes that every child has at least the right to the best (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. David Archard (2005). Political Reasonability. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):1 - 25.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Peter Johnson & David Archard (2005). Political Philosophy. Philosophical Books 46 (2):178-182.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. David Archard (2004). Children: Rights and Childhood. Routledge.
    Children: Rights and Childhood is widely regarded as the first book to offer a detailed philosophical examination of children's rights. Drawing on a wide variety of sources from law and literature to politics and psychology, David Archard provides a clear and accessible introduction to a topic that has assumed increasing relevance since the book's first publication. Divided clearly into three parts, Children: Rights and Childhood covers key topics such as: John Locke's writings on children Philippe Aries's Centuries of Childhood key (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. David Archard (2004). From Pluralist to Patriotic Politics, Putting Practice First. Contemporary Political Theory 3 (2):212.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 109