12 found
Sort by:
  1. David Efird (2012). Polarized Yet Warranted Christian Belief. In Yujin Nagasawa (ed.), Scientific Approaches to the Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan. 224.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. David Efird (2010). Is Timothy Williamson a Necessary Existent? In Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Oup Oxford.
    Timothy Williamson (2002) has offered an argument for the claim that, necessarily, he exists, that is, that he is a necessary existent.1 Though this argument has attracted a great deal of attention (e.g., Rumfitt 2003 and Wiggins 2003), I present a new argument for the same conclusion which reveals a new way of denying the soundness of Williamson’s argument, one which denies not only that it is necessary that he exists but also that there are any true necessities about Williamson (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. David Efird (2010). The Subtraction Argument for the Possibility of Free Mass. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (1):50-57.
    Could an object have only mass and no other property? In giving an affirmative answer to this question, Jonathan Schaffer (2003, pp. 136-8) proposes what he calls ‘the subtraction argument’ for ‘the possibility of free mass’. In what follows, we aim to assess the cogency of this argument in comparison with an argument of the same general form which has also been termed a subtraction argument, namely, Thomas Baldwin’s (1996) subtraction argument for metaphysical nihilism, which is the claim that there (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. David Efird (2009). Divine Command Theory and the Semantics of Quantified Modal Logic. In Yujin Nagasawa & Erik J. Wielenberg (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan. 91.
    I offer a series of axiomatic formalizations of Divine Command Theory motivated by certain methodological considerations. Given these considerations, I present what I take to be the best axiomatization of Divine Command Theory, an axiomatization which requires a non-standardsemantics for quantified modal logic.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. David Efird (2009). Review of E. J. Lowe, A. Rami (Eds.), Truth and Truth-Making. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (8).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. David Efird & Tom Stoneham (2009). Is Metaphysical Nihilism Interesting? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):210-231.
    Suppose nothing exists. Then it is true that nothing exists. What makes that true? Nothing! So it seems that if nothing existed, then the principle that every truth is made true by something (the truthmaker principle) would be false. So if it is possible that nothing exists, a claim often called 'metaphysical nihilism', then the truthmaker principle is not necessary. This paper explores various ways to resolve this conflict without restricting metaphysical nihilism in such a way that it would become (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. David Efird & Tom Stoneham (2009). Justifying Metaphysical Nihilism: A Response to Cameron. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (234):132-137.
    Ross Cameron charges the subtraction argument for metaphysical nihilism with equivocation: each premise is plausible only under different interpretations of 'concrete'. This charge is ungrounded; the argument is both valid and supported by basic modal intuitions.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. David Efird (2008). Believing by Faith: An Essay in the Epistemology and Ethics of Religious Belief - by John Bishop. Philosophical Books 49 (3):283-285.
  9. David Efird (2008). God and the Ethics of Belief: New Essays in Philosophy of Religion - Edited by Andrew Dole and Andrew Chignell. Philosophical Books 49 (1):93-94.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. David Efird (2008). What is the Principle of Recombination? Dialectica 62 (4):483-494.
    In this paper, we give a precise characterization of the principle of recombination and argue that it need not be subject to any restrictions.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. David Efird & Tom Stoneham (2006). Combinatorialism and the Possibility of Nothing. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):269 – 280.
    We argue that Armstrong's Combinatorialism allows for the possibility of nothing by giving a Combinatorial account of the empty world and show that such an account is consistent with the ontological and conceptual aims of the theory. We then suggest that the Combinatorialist should allow for this possibility given some methodological considerations. Consequently, rather than being 'spoils for the victor', as Armstrong maintains, deciding whether there might have been nothing helps to determine which metaphysics of modality is to be preferred.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. David Efird & Tom Stoneham (2005). Truthmakers and Possible Worlds. Analysis 65 (288):290–294.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation