71 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: David Michael Kaplan (Macquarie University)
Profile: David Michael Kaplan (Washington University in St. Louis)
Profile: David Kaplan (University of California, Los Angeles)
  1. Enrique Seira, David S. Kaplan & Eduardo Piedra, Entry Regulation and Business Start-Ups: Evidence From Mexico.
    We estimate the effect on business start-ups of a program that significantly speeds up firm registration procedures. The program was implemented in Mexico in different municipalities at different dates. Our estimates suggest that new start-ups increased by about 4% in eligible industries, and we present evidence that this is a causal effect. Most of the effect is temporary, concentrated in the first 10 months after implementation. The effect is robust to several specifications of the benchmark control group time trends. We (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. David M. Kaplan (ed.) (forthcoming). Integrating Mind and Brain Science: Mechanistic Perspectives and Beyond. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Gaurav H. Patel, David M. Kaplan & Lawrence H. Snyder (forthcoming). Topographic Organization in the Brain: Searching for General Principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. David M. Kaplan (2013). The Complex Interplay Between Three-Dimensional Egocentric and Allocentric Spatial Representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (5):553-554.
    Jeffery et al. characterize the egocentric/allocentric distinction as discrete. But paradoxically, much of the neural and behavioral evidence they adduce undermines a discrete distinction. More strikingly, their positive proposal reflects a more complex interplay between egocentric and allocentric coding than they acknowledge. Properly interpreted, their proposal about three-dimensional spatial representation contributes to recent work on embodied cognition.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. David M. Kaplan (2013). What's Wrong with Artificial Additives? The Philosophers' Magazine 61 (61):87-93.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. David M. Kaplan (2012). Agriculture Ethics. In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Wiley-Blackwell.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. David M. Kaplan (2012). Food Ethics. In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Wiley-Blackwell.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. David M. Kaplan (2012). Technology and Capitalism. In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Wiley-Blackwell.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. David M. Kaplan (2012). Technology and Globalization. In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Wiley-Blackwell.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. David Michael Kaplan (2012). How to Demarcate the Boundaries of Cognition. Biology and Philosophy 27 (4):545-570.
    Advocates of extended cognition argue that the boundaries of cognition span brain, body, and environment. Critics maintain that cognitive processes are confined to a boundary centered on the individual. All participants to this debate require a criterion for distinguishing what is internal to cognition from what is external. Yet none of the available proposals are completely successful. I offer a new account, the mutual manipulability account, according to which cognitive boundaries are determined by relationships of mutual manipulability between the properties (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. David Michael Kaplan (2012). Perception and Cognition: Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology. Philosophical Psychology 25 (3):463-468.
    Philosophical Psychology, Volume 0, Issue 0, Page 1-6, Ahead of Print.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Paul B. Thompson & David M. Kaplan (eds.) (2012). Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Lorenzo Altieri, Pamela Anderson, Patrick Bourgeois, Fred Dallmayr, Gregory Hoskins, Domenico Jervolino, Morny Joy, David Kaplan, Richard Kearney, Peter Kemp, Jason Springs, Henry Venema & John Whitmire (2011). Paul Ricoeur: Honoring and Continuing the Work. Lexington Books.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Carl F. Craver & David M. Kaplan (2011). Towards a Mechanistic Philosophy of Neuroscience. In Steven French & Juha Saatsi (eds.), Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Continuum. 268.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. David Kaplan (2011). An Idea of Donnellan. In Joseph Almog & Paolo Leonardi (eds.), Having In Mind: The Philosophy of Keith Donnellan. Oxford, but (c) David Kaplan. 122-175.
    This is a story about three of my favorite philosophers—Donnellan, Russell, and Frege—about how Donnellan’s concept of having in mind relates to ideas of the others, and especially about an aspect of Donnellan’s concept that has been insufficiently discussed: how this epistemic state can be transmitted from one person to another.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. David Kaplan (2011). Words on Words. Journal of Philosophy 108 (9):504-529.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. David M. Kaplan & William Bechtel (2011). Dynamical Models: An Alternative or Complement to Mechanistic Explanations? Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (2):438-444.
    Abstract While agreeing that dynamical models play a major role in cognitive science, we reject Stepp, Chemero, and Turvey's contention that they constitute an alternative to mechanistic explanations. We review several problems dynamical models face as putative explanations when they are not grounded in mechanisms. Further, we argue that the opposition of dynamical models and mechanisms is a false one and that those dynamical models that characterize the operations of mechanisms overcome these problems. By briefly considering examples involving the generation (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. David Michael Kaplan (2011). Explanation and Description in Computational Neuroscience. Synthese 183 (3):339-373.
    The central aim of this paper is to shed light on the nature of explanation in computational neuroscience. I argue that computational models in this domain possess explanatory force to the extent that they describe the mechanisms responsible for producing a given phenomenon—paralleling how other mechanistic models explain. Conceiving computational explanation as a species of mechanistic explanation affords an important distinction between computational models that play genuine explanatory roles and those that merely provide accurate descriptions or predictions of phenomena. It (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. David Michael Kaplan & Carl F. Craver (2011). The Explanatory Force of Dynamical and Mathematical Models in Neuroscience: A Mechanistic Perspective. Philosophy of Science 78 (4):601-627.
    We argue that dynamical and mathematical models in systems and cognitive neuro- science explain (rather than redescribe) a phenomenon only if there is a plausible mapping between elements in the model and elements in the mechanism for the phe- nomenon. We demonstrate how this model-to-mechanism-mapping constraint, when satisfied, endows a model with explanatory force with respect to the phenomenon to be explained. Several paradigmatic models including the Haken-Kelso-Bunz model of bimanual coordination and the difference-of-Gaussians model of visual receptive fields are (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. David M. Kaplan (2010). Paul Ricoeur and Development Ethics. In Brian Treanor & Henry Isaac Venema (eds.), A Passion for the Possible: Thinking with Paul Ricoeur. Fordham University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Kit Fine, David Kaplan, D. A. Martin, Derk Pereboom, David Sanson & Luca Struble (2009). Production and Necessity. Philosophical Review 118 (2).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. David M. Kaplan (2009). How to Read Technology Critically. In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Evan Selinger & Søren Riis (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Technology. Palgrave Macmillan.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. David M. Kaplan (2009). Review: What Things Still Don't Do. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (2):229 - 240.
    This paper praises and criticizes Peter-Paul Verbeek's What Things Do (2006). The four things that Verbeek does well are: (1) remind us of the importance of technological things; (2) bring Karl Jaspers into the conversation on technology; (3) explain how technology "co-shapes" experience by reading Bruno Latour's actor-network theory in light of Don Ihde's post-phenomenology; (4) develop a material aesthetics of design. The three things that Verbeek does not do well are: (1) analyze the material conditions in which things are (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. David M. Kaplan (2009). What Things Still Don't Do. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (2):229 - 240.
    This paper praises and criticizes Peter-Paul Verbeek’s What Things Do ( 2006 ). The four things that Verbeek does well are: (1) remind us of the importance of technological things; (2) bring Karl Jaspers into the conversation on technology; (3) explain how technology “co-shapes” experience by reading Bruno Latour’s actor-network theory in light of Don Ihde’s post-phenomenology; (4) develop a material aesthetics of design. The three things that Verbeek does not do well are: (1) analyze the material conditions in which (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. David M. Kaplan (ed.) (2008). Reading Ricoeur. State University of New York Press.
    Introduces readers to the work of Paul Ricoeur, one of the twentieth century’s leading philosophers.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. J. L. Austin, Anthony Brueckner, Noam Chomsky, Donald Davidson, Keith Donnellan, Michael Dummett, Gareth Evans, Gottlob Frege, H. P. Grice, Paul Horwich, David Kaplan, Saul Kripke, David Lewis, John McDowell, Michael McKinsey, Ruth Millikan, Stephen Neale, Hilary Putnam, W. V. Quine, Bertrand Russell, Nathan Salmon, Stephen Schiffer, John Searle, P. F. Strawson, Alfred Tarski & Ludwig Wittgenstein (2007). Philosophy of Language: The Central Topics. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. David Kaplan (2007). What's Wrong with Functional Foods? Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):177-187.
    A “functional food” is a food-based product that provides a demonstrable physiological benefit beyond its dietary or nutritional value. This class of foods for specific health uses are designed to assist in the prevention or treatment of disease, or to enhance and improve human capacities. They include products like vitamin-fortified grains, energy bars, low-fat or low-sodium foods, and sports drinks. Three sets of concerns about functional foods deserve attention. 1) Their health benefits are greatly exaggerated and, in many cases, non-existent; (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. David M. Kaplan (2007). Paul Ricoeur and the Nazis. Research in Phenomenology 37 (2):219-236.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Richard Kearney, Laszlo Tengelyi, Patrick L. Bourgeois, David M. Rasmussen, Bernard P. Dauenhauer & David M. Kaplan (2007). Memorial for Paul Ricoeur. Research in Phenomenology 37 (2):147-236.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Richard Kearney, László Tengelyi, Patrick L. Bourgeois, David M. Rasmussen, Bernard P. Dauenhauer, David M. Kaplan, Charles E. Scott, Bernard Freydberg, Jamey Findling & Eric C. Sanday (2007). Brill Online Books and Journals. Research in Phenomenology 37 (2).
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. David M. Kaplan (2006). Paul Ricoeur and the Philosophy of Technology. Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 16 (1/2):42-56.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. David Kaplan (2005). Reading ‘on Denoting’ on its Centenary. Mind 114 (456):933-1003.
    Part 1 sets out the logical/semantical background to ‘On Denoting’, including an exposition of Russell's views in Principles of Mathematics, the role and justification of Frege's notorious Axiom V, and speculation about how the search for a solution to the Contradiction might have motivated a new treatment of denoting. Part 2 consists primarily of an extended analysis of Russell's views on knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description, in which I try to show that the discomfiture between Russell's semantical and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. David M. Kaplan (2005). What's Wrong With Genetically Modified Food? Journal of Philosophical Research 30 (Supplement):69-80.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. David Kaplan (2004). Book Review: What Makes Us Think?: A Neuroscientist and a Philosopher Argue About Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain. [REVIEW] Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (1):115-118.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. David M. Kaplan (2003). Ricoeur's Critical Theory. State University of New York Press.
    The first book-length treatment of Paul Ricoeur's conception of philosophy as critical theory.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. David M. Kaplan (ed.) (2003). Readings in the Philosophy of Technology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. David Kaplan (1999). What is Russell's Theory of Descriptions? In A. . D. Irvine (ed.), Bertrand Russell: Critical Assessments. Routledge. 151--62.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Rani George & David Kaplan (1998). A Structural Model of Parent and Teacher Influences on Science Attitudes of Eighth Graders: Evidence From NELS: 88. Science Education 82 (1):93-109.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. David Kaplan (1996). Saul A. Kripke. Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I. Normal Modal Propositional Calculi. Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik Und Grundlagen der Mathematik, Vol. 9 (1963), Pp. 67–96. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (1):120-122.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. David S. Kaplan (1996). Managed Care: Gag Clauses and Doctor-Patient Communication: State Responses. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (2-3):213-218.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. David Kaplan (1990). Thoughts on Demonstratives. In Palle Yourgrau (ed.), Demonstratives. Oxford University Press. 34--49.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. David Kaplan (1990). Words. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 64:93 - 119.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Joseph Almog, John Perry, Howard K. Wettstein & David Kaplan (eds.) (1989). Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press, USA.
    This anthology of essays on the work of David Kaplan, a leading contemporary philosopher of language, sprang from a conference, "Themes from Kaplan," organized by the Center for the Study of Language and Information at Stanford University.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. David Kaplan (1989). Afterthoughts. In J. Almog, J. Perry & H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. 565-614.
  45. David Kaplan (1989). Demonstratives, Typescript, UCLA 1977;(Re) Printed in Almog, J., Perry, J., Wettstein, H. In John Perry, J. Almog & Howard K. Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. David Kaplan (1989). J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein. In John Perry, J. Almog & Howard K. Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. David Kaplan (1979). On the Logic of Demonstratives. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):81 - 98.
  48. David Kaplan (1977/1989). Demonstratives. In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. 481-563.
  49. David Kaplan (1975). How to Russell a Frege-Church. Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):716-729.
1 — 50 / 71