Search results for 'David L. Eng' (try it on Scholar)

6 found
Sort by:
  1. Jonathan Boston, Andrew Bradstock & David L. Eng (eds.) (2010). Public Policy: Why Ethics Matters. Anue Press.score: 410.0
    1. Ethics and public policy .Jonathan.Boston,.Andrew.Bradstock,.and.David.Eng Introduction This book is about ethics and public policy. ...
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Jean-Luc Marion (1987). L'ego Et le Dasein Heidegger Et la “ Destruction ” de Descartes Dans "Sein Und Zeit". Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 92 (1):25 - 53.score: 21.0
    Descartes ne joue pas, dans la pensée de Heidegger, un rôle limité à l'interprétation de l'histoire de la philosophie. Lorsque Sein und Zeit entreprend de déterminer le mode d'être propre et irréductible du Dasein, Heidegger doit entrer en confrontation avec certes Husserl, mais surtout, par-delà la « conscience » husserlienne, avec Descartes lui-même. Car l'ennemi mortel du Dasein, cest l'ego du cogito. Dans quelle mesure cette rivalité n'induit-elle pas aussi une similitude? Die Rolle, die Descartes in dem Denken von Heidegger (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Wu Ch'eng: A. Yüan Dynasty Neo-Confu Scholar & David Gedalecia (1993). Wu Chueng: A Yuan Dynasty Neo-Confucian Scholar. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 20 (3):293-311.score: 12.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. David Gedalecia (1999). The Philosophy of Wu Chʻeng: A Neo-Confucian of the Yüan Dynasty = [Wu Chʻeng]. Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies, Indiana University.score: 12.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. David Gedalecia (1982). Wu Ch'eng's Approach to Internal Self-Cultivation and External Knowledge-Seeking. In Hok-lam Chan & William Theodore De Bary (eds.), Yüan Thought: Chinese Thought and Religion Under the Mongols. Columbia University Press.score: 12.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Sara L. Uckelman (2013). Medieval Disputationes de Obligationibus as Formal Dialogue Systems. Argumentation 27 (2):143-166.score: 6.0
    Formal dialogue systems model rule-based interaction between agents and as such have multiple applications in multi-agent systems and AI more generally. Their conceptual roots are in formal theories of natural argumentation, of which Hamblin’s formal systems of argumentation in Hamblin (Fallacies. Methuen, London, 1970, Theoria 37:130–135, 1971) are some of the earliest examples. Hamblin cites the medieval theory of obligationes as inspiration for his development of formal argumentation. In an obligatio, two agents, the Opponent and the Respondent, engage in an (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation