Search results for 'David L. Mosher' (try it on Scholar)

9 found
Sort by:
  1. David L. Mosher (1981). The Argument of St. Augustine's Contra Academicos. Augustinian Studies 12:89-113.score: 870.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ralph L. Mosher & Paul R. Sullivan (1976). A Curriculum in Moral Education for Adolescents. Journal of Moral Education 5 (2):159-172.score: 240.0
    Abstract: The need for a new role for guidance in secondary schools is stressed. Guidance through the curriculum is presented as a means of stimulating cognitive, moral and ego development by secondary school pupils. An experimental curriculum in moral education is described and evaluated. Highlights of the different phases are presented along with a rationale for this new approach. High school pupils learned the process of moral dilemma discussions, developed counselling and teaching skills and then lead moral dilemma discussions with (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Donald L. Mosher & Susan B. Bond (1992). Ethics- Perceived or Reasoned From Principles?: A Rejoinder to Korn, Huelsman, and Reed. Ethics and Behavior 2 (3):203 – 214.score: 240.0
    In response to Korn, Huelsman, and Reed's (1992)question, "Who defines those interests, and how serious must the setback be?" (p. 126), we argue that a wrongful (unjust) harm (a setback of interest) is not equivalent to a hurt (a temporary distressing mental state) and that the interests of importance are welfare interests (general means to our ulterior aims), not just a desire to avoid unpleasant mental states (hurts). To set back a welfare interest is to reverse its course or to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Donald L. Mosher & Susan B. Bond (1992). "Little Rapes," Specious Claims, and Moral Hubris: A Reply to Korn, Huelsman, Reed, and Aiello. Ethics and Behavior 2 (2):109 – 121.score: 240.0
    Because they failed to include our informed consent, guided imagery scenarios, and debriefing, the relevance of Korn, Huelsman, Reed, and Aiello's (1992) data remains unknown. The design of their Study 1 did not test the greater objectivity of role taking over involved participation. The design of their Study 2 did not demonstrate the effects of demand characteristics. The older "personal acquaintances" were not at higher risk of rape as they claimed. Properly gathered data from the University of Connecticut's laboratory demonstrated (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Loren R. Mosher & David Cohen (2003). Needed: A Study of Consent Forms. Ethics 5 (10).score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. David Mosher (1962). A Reply to Mr. Wheatley. Theoria 28 (3):308-312.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. T. M. Reed (1982). Book Review:Moral Education: A First Generation of Research and Development. Ralph L. Mosher. [REVIEW] Ethics 92 (3):576-.score: 140.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Susan Mosher Stuard (2000). Branislav M. Nedeljković, ed., Liber croceus.(Recueil pour l'Histoire, la Langue et la Littérature du Peuple Serbe, 3/24.) Belgrade: Académie Serbe des Sciences et des Arts, 1997. Paper. Pp. xxxii, 647. [REVIEW] Speculum 75 (1):226-227.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Susan Mosher Stuard (1991). David Herlihy, Opera Muliebria: Women and Work in Medieval Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1990. Pp. Xiv, 210; Black-and-White Illustrations and Figures, Tables. $29.95. [REVIEW] Speculum 66 (4):888-889.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation