Search results for 'David M. Douglas' (try it on Scholar)

438 found
Sort by:
See also:
  1. J. Conrad, V. Crapanzano, M. Crick, J. Cripps, M. David, J. Derrida, N. B. Dirks, T. Docherty, N. Dorian & M. Douglas (1997). Collard, J. 54 Comito, T. 198 Condor, J. 205n2 Condry, E. 87-8, 90, 91. In Andrew Dawson, Jennifer Lorna Hockey & Andrew H. Dawson (eds.), After Writing Culture: Epistemology and Praxis in Contemporary Anthropology. Routledge. 264.score: 8700.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. David M. Douglas (2011). The Social Disutility of Software Ownership. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):485-502.score: 960.0
    Software ownership allows the owner to restrict the distribution of software and to prevent others from reading the software’s source code and building upon it. However, free software is released to users under software licenses that give them the right to read the source code, modify it, reuse it, and distribute the software to others. Proponents of free software such as Richard M. Stallman and Eben Moglen argue that the social disutility of software ownership is a sufficient justification for prohibiting (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Donald G. Douglas (1973). Philosophers on Rhetoric: Traditional and Emerging Views. Skokie, Ill.,National Textbook Co..score: 900.0
    Johnstone, H. W., Jr. Rhetoric and communication in philosophy.--Smith, C. R. and Douglas, D. G. Philosophical principles in the traditional and emerging views of rhetoric.--Wallace, K. R. Bacon's conception of rhetoric.--Thonssen, L. W. Thomas Hobbes's philosophy of speech.--Walter, O. M., Jr. Descartes on reasoning.--Douglas, D. G. Spinoza and the methodology of reflective knowledge in persuasion.--Howell, W. S. John Locke and the new rhetoric.--Doering, J. F. David Hume on oratory.--Douglas, D. G. A neo-Kantian approach to the epistomology (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. David M. Douglas (2011). A Bundle of Software Rights and Duties. Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3):185-197.score: 870.0
    Like the ownership of physical property, the issues computer software ownership raises can be understood as concerns over how various rights and duties over software are shared between owners and users. The powers of software owners are defined in software licenses, the legal agreements defining what users can and cannot do with a particular program. To help clarify how these licenses permit and restrict users’ actions, here I present a conceptual framework of software rights and duties that is inspired by (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. David R. Bell & Mary Douglas (1972). Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. Philosophical Quarterly 22 (88):280.score: 280.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Daniel Kim, Kristin Schleiter, Bette-Jane Crigger, John W. McMahon, Regina M. Benjamin & Sharon P. Douglas (2010). A Physician's Role Following a Breach of Electronic Health Information. Journal of Clinical Ethics 21 (1):30.score: 280.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. P. M. Ryan & K. Douglas (2005). The Politics of Representation. In Thomas E. Wartenberg & Angela Curran (eds.), The Philosophy of Film: Introductory Text and Readings. Blackwell Pub.. 213--224.score: 280.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. W. R. Sorley, Margaret Washburn, W. B. Pillsbury, Hubert M. Foston, Charles Douglas, Alexander F. Shand, B. A. W. Russell, James Lindsay & W. R. Scott (1896). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 5 (17):119-133.score: 280.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Judith Felson Duchan (2000). Janet W. Astington, Paul L. Harris and David R. Olson, Eds., Developing Theories of Mind; Henry M. Wellman, the Child's Theory of Mind; Douglas Frye and Chris Moore, Eds., Children's Theories of Mind: Mental States and Social Understanding Judith Felson Duchan. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 10 (2):277-288.score: 243.0
  10. Judith Felson Duchan (2000). Janet W. Astington, Paul L. Harris and David R. Olson, Eds., Developing Theories of Mind; Henry M. Wellman, the Child's Theory of Mind; Douglas Frye and Chris Moore, Eds., Children's Theories of Mind: Mental States and Social Understanding Judith Felson Duchan. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 10 (2):277-288.score: 243.0
  11. J. F. Douglas, M. L. Rose, J. H. Dark & A. J. Cronin (2011). Transplant Research and Deceased Donors: Laws, Licences and Fear of Liability. Clinical Ethics 6 (3):140-145.score: 240.0
    Transplantation research on samples and organs from deceased donors in England, Wales and Northern Ireland is under threat. The key problems relate to difficulties encountered in gaining consent for research projects, as distinct from consent to donation for clinical transplantation. They are due partly to the terms of the Human Tissue Act 2004 (the 2004 Act), and partly to its interpretation by the Human Tissue Authority (HTA). They include excessive interaction with donor representatives regarding ‘informed consent’ to research projects, uncertainty (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. A. E. Douglas (1962). Cicero, in Pisonem R. G. M. Nisbet: Cicero: In L. Calpurnium Pisonem Oratio. Pp. Xxxii+208. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961. Cloth, 30s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 12 (03):216-218.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. A. J. Cronin, M. L. Rose, J. H. Dark & J. F. Douglas (2011). British Transplant Research Endangered by the Human Tissue Act. Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (8):512-514.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. A. E. Douglas (1983). Three of Cicero's Philosophical Works Esther Bréguet: Cicéron, La République, Tom. 1: Livre I; Tom. 2: Livres II–IV. (Collection Budé.) Pp. 277 (193–247 Double); 209 (7–120 Double). Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1980. Konrat Ziegler: M. Tullius Cicero, De Legibus. 3. Auflage Überarbeitet Und Durch Nachträge Ergänzt von Woldemar Görler. (Heidelberger Texte, Lateinische Reihe, 20.) Pp. 171. Freiberg/Würzburg: Verlag Ploetz, 1979. Paper. Julio Pimental Alvarez: Marco Tulio Cicerón, Disputas Tusculanas, Vol. 1: Libros I–II; Vol. 2: Libros III–IV. (Bibliotheca Scriptorum Et Romanorum Mexicana.) Pp. Ccxxi + 87 (Double); Cxxxv + 130 (Double). Ciudad Universitaria México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, 1979. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 33 (02):213-215.score: 240.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. A. E. Douglas (1973). Cicero: Brutus Edmondo V. D'Arbela: M. Tullio Cicerone: Bruto. Pp. 279. Milan: Istituto Editoriale Italiano, 1968. Paper, L. 3,500. Bernhard Kytzler: M. Tullius Cicero: Brutus. Pp. 368. Munich: Heimeran, 1970. Cloth, DM. 24. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 23 (02):181-182.score: 240.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. A. E. Douglas (1968). Quintilian Book III Joachim Adamietz: M. F. Quintiliani Institutionis Oratoriae Liber Iii. (Studia Et Testimonia Antiqua, Ii.) Pp. 236. Munich: Fink, 1966. Cloth, DM. 32. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 18 (01):62-64.score: 240.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. E. Corazza, H. Douglas, J. L. Dowell, J. Franklin, A. S. Gillies, S. C. Goldberg, D. K. Heikes, C. Liu, C. Ortiz Hill & M. W. Pelczar (2004). Cling, AD, 101. Synthese 137 (477).score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Conor M. W. Douglas, Bryn Lander, Cory Fairley & Janet Atkinson-Grosjean (forthcoming). The Roles of User/Producer Hybrids in the Production of Translational Science. Social Epistemology.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. A. E. Douglas & M. J. Lossau (1966). Untersuchungen Zur Antiken Demosthenesexegese. Journal of Hellenic Studies 86:190.score: 240.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Ross King, Whelan D., E. Kenneth, Ffion Jones, Reiser M., G. K. Philip, Christopher Bryant, Muggleton H., H. Stephen, Douglas Kell, Oliver B. & G. Stephen (2004). Functional Genomic Hypothesis Generation and Experimentation by a Robot Scientist. Nature 427 (6971):247--52.score: 240.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Douglas L. Medin, Mary L. Borkhius & Roger T. David (1970). Response Latency and Brightness Judgments by Monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (3p1):480.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Michael J. Wood & Karen M. Douglas (2013). “What About Building 7?” A Social Psychological Study of Online Discussion of 9/11 Conspiracy Theories. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Judith Boss, Giordano Bruno, Vere Chappell, John Cottingham, Peter A. Danielson, Rene Descartes, Thomas Douglas, John Finis, R. J. Hollingdale & Vittorio Hösle (1999). Boss, Judith and James M. Nuzum. Teaching Philosophy 22 (2):237.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. A. E. Douglas, Anaximenes & M. Fuhrmann (1968). Ars Rhetorica Quae Vulgo Fertur Aristotelis Ad Alexandrum. Journal of Hellenic Studies 88:167.score: 240.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Alan E. Douglas (1992). M. T. Griffin, E. M. Atkins (Edd.): Cicero, On Duties. (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought.) Pp. Li + 189. Cambridge University Press, 1991. £19.50 (Paper, £6.95). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (02):445-.score: 240.0
  26. Alan Douglas (1991). Velásquez G. Oscar (ed.): M. T. Ciceronis Somnium Scipionis. Texto, introducción y notas. (Textos latinos anotados, 2.) Pp. 43. Santiago de Chile: Pontifica Universidad Católica de Chile (Facultad de Filosofia), 1989. Paper.Arbea G. Antonio (ed.): Lorenzo Valla, Proemium libri primi Dialecticae. Texto, introducción y notas. (Textos latinos anotados, 1.) Pp. 43. Santiago de Chile: Pontifica Universidad Católica de Chile (Facultad de Filosofia), 1989. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (01):237-.score: 240.0
  27. T. M. O. Douglas & C. M. Peck (2013). Education by Any Means Necessary: An Historical Exploration of Community-Based Pedagogical Spaces for Peoples of African Descent. Educational Studies 49 (1):67-91.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. A. E. Douglas (1955). M. Calidius and the Atticists. Classical Quarterly 5 (3-4):241-.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. J. W. B. Douglas & J. M. Blomfield (1957). Maternal Employment and the Welfare of Children: An Account of a Survey in Progress. The Eugenics Review 49 (2):69.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. A. E. Douglas (1977). The Fog Lifts M. Winterbottom (Tr.): The Elder Seneca, Declamations. (Loeb Classical Library.) Two Volumes. Pp. Xxxi + 525; 640. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard U.P.; London: Heinemann, 1974. Cloth, £3·40 Each. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 27 (02):187-188.score: 240.0
  31. E. M. Douglas (1912). The Owl of Athena. Journal of Hellenic Studies 32:174.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. J. A. Douglas & J. M. Edmonds (1950). John Phillips's Geological Maps of the British Isles. Annals of Science 6 (4):361-375.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. David J. Stump (1995). Douglas M. Jesseph, Berkeley's Philosophy of Mathematics Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 15 (2):113-115.score: 117.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Robert B. Talisse, Maureen Eckert, Norman Bowie, Steven M. Cahn, Randall Curren, Alan Goldman, Tziporah Kasachkoff, Peter Markie, John O'Connor, David Rosenthal, Robert Simon, David Shatz, George Sher, Douglas Stalker & Christine Vitrano (2009). A Teacher's Life: Essays for Steven M. Cahn. Lexington Books.score: 108.0
    This is a collection of 13 essays honoring Steven Cahn, presented to him on the occasion of his 25th year as Professor of Philosophy at the City University of New York.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Loretta M. Kopelman, David Resnick & Douglas L. Weed (2004). What is the Role of the Precautionary Principle in the Philosophy of Medicine and Bioethics? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (3):255 – 258.score: 87.0
    (2004). What is the Role of the Precautionary Principle in the Philosophy of Medicine and Bioethics? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 255-258.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Douglas Walton & David M. Godden (2005). Persuasion Dialogue in Online Dispute Resolution. Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):273-295.score: 87.0
    In this paper we show how dialogue-based theories of argumentation can contribute to the construction of effective systems of dispute resolution. Specifically we consider the role of persuasion in online dispute resolution by showing how persuasion dialogues can be functionally embedded in negotiation dialogues, and how negotiation dialogues can shift to persuasion dialogues. We conclude with some remarks on how persuasion dialogues might be modelled is such a way as to allow them to be implemented in a mechanical or computerized (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Douglas Walton & David M. Godden (2004). Denying the Antecedent as a Legitimate Argumentative Strategy: A Dialectical Model. Informal Logic 24 (3).score: 87.0
    The standard account of denying the antecedent (DA) is that it is a deductively invalid form of argument, and that, in a conditional argument, to argue from the falsity of the antecedent to the falsity of the consequent is always fallacious. In this paper, we argue that DA is not always a fallacious argumentative strategy. Instead, there is a legitimate usage ofDA according to which it is a defeasible argument against the acceptability of a claim. The dialectical effect of denying (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Douglas Walton & David M. Godden, Alternatives to Suspicion and Trust as Conditions for Challenge in Argumentative Dialogues.score: 87.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. David M. Godden & Douglas Walton (2006). Argument From Expert Opinion as Legal Evidence: Critical Questions and Admissibility Criteria of Expert Testimony in the American Legal System. Ratio Juris 19 (3):261-286.score: 87.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. David M. Godden & Douglas Walton (2008). Defeasibility in Judicial Opinion: Logical or Procedural? Informal Logic 28 (1):6-19.score: 87.0
    While defeasibility in legal reasoning has been the subject of recent scholarship, it has yet to be studied in the context of judicial opinion. Yet, being subject to appeal, judicial decisions can default for a variety of reasons. Prakken (2001) argued that the defeasibility affecting reasoning involved in adversarial legal argumentation is best analysed as procedural rather than logical. In this paper we argue that the defeasibility of ratio decendi is similarly best explained and modeled in a procedural and dialectical (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. James G. Gosselink, Gary P. Shaffer, Lyndon C. Lee, David M. Burdick, Daniel L. Childers, Nancy C. Leibowitz, Susan C. Hamilton, Roel Boumans, Douglas Cushman, Sherri Fields, Marguerite Koch & Jenneke M. Visser (1990). Landscape Conservation in a Forested Wetland Watershed. Bioscience 40 (8):588-600.score: 87.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. David M. Grilly & Douglas P. Ferraro (1973). Effects of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol on Delayed Matching-to-Sample Choice Speeds in Chimpanzees. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 2 (6):413-415.score: 87.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. David M. Potter & Douglas van Belle (2004). News Media Coverage Influence on Japan's Foreign Aid Allocations. Japanese Journal of Political Science 5 (1):113-135.score: 87.0
    This study explores the role that news coverage plays in the allocation of Japanese development aid. Conceptually, it is expected that democratic foreign policy officials, including those working in bureaucratic governmental structures will try to match the magnitude of their actions with what they expect is the public's perception of the importance of the recipient. News media salience serves an easily accessible indicator of that domestic political importance and, in the case of foreign aid, this suggests that higher levels of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. David M. Craig, Harlan Beckley & Douglas A. Hicks (2003). Letters, Notes, & Comments. Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (1):153 - 167.score: 87.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Wendy J. Glenn, David M. Moss, Douglas Kaufman, Kay Norlander-Case, Charles W. Case & Robert A. Lonning (2005). Why the University of Connecticut? In Wendy J. Glenn, David M. Moss & Richard Lewis Schwab (eds.), Portrait of a Profession: Teaching and Teachers in the 21st Century. Praeger.score: 87.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. David M. Potter & Douglas A. Van Belle (2004). The Influence of News Coverage on Japanese Foreign Development Aid. Japanese Journal of Political Science 5 (1):113-135.score: 87.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Douglas Walton & David M. Godden (2007). Redefining Knowledge in a Way Suitable for Argumentation Theory. In Christopher W. Tindale Hans V. Hansen (ed.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. Ossa. 1--13.score: 87.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Colin Gunton (1977). Jürgen Moltmann. Man: Christian Anthropology in the Conflicts of the Present. E.T. By John Sturdy. Pp. Xi + 124. (Fortress Press, 1974.) $3.25.The Experiment Hope, E.T. And Ed. By M. Douglas Meeks. Pp. Xvii + 190. (Fortress Press, 1975.) $8.95. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 13 (2):259.score: 84.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Alistair Kee (1985). Jurgen Moltmann (Translated by M. Douglas Meeks). On Human Dignity: Political T/Zeolo and Ethics. Pp. Xiv + 225. (London: SCM Press, 1984.) £8.50. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 21 (4):615-617.score: 84.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. David J. Chalmers, Robert M. French & Douglas R. Hofstadter (1992). High-Level Perception, Representation, and Analogy:A Critique of Artificial Intelligence Methodology. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intellige 4 (3):185 - 211.score: 81.0
    High-level perception--”the process of making sense of complex data at an abstract, conceptual level--”is fundamental to human cognition. Through high-level perception, chaotic environmen- tal stimuli are organized into the mental representations that are used throughout cognitive pro- cessing. Much work in traditional artificial intelligence has ignored the process of high-level perception, by starting with hand-coded representations. In this paper, we argue that this dis- missal of perceptual processes leads to distorted models of human cognition. We examine some existing artificial-intelligence models--”notably (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 438