27 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
David M. Kaplan [23]David Michael Kaplan [4]
See also:
Profile: David Michael Kaplan (Macquarie University)
Profile: David Kaplan (University of California, Los Angeles)
Profile: David Michael Kaplan (Washington University in St. Louis)
  1. David M. Kaplan (ed.) (forthcoming). Integrating Mind and Brain Science: Mechanistic Perspectives and Beyond. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Gaurav H. Patel, David M. Kaplan & Lawrence H. Snyder (forthcoming). Topographic Organization in the Brain: Searching for General Principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. David M. Kaplan (2013). The Complex Interplay Between Three-Dimensional Egocentric and Allocentric Spatial Representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (5):553-554.
    Jeffery et al. characterize the egocentric/allocentric distinction as discrete. But paradoxically, much of the neural and behavioral evidence they adduce undermines a discrete distinction. More strikingly, their positive proposal reflects a more complex interplay between egocentric and allocentric coding than they acknowledge. Properly interpreted, their proposal about three-dimensional spatial representation contributes to recent work on embodied cognition.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. David M. Kaplan (2013). What's Wrong with Artificial Additives? The Philosophers' Magazine 61 (61):87-93.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. David M. Kaplan (2012). Agriculture Ethics. In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Wiley-Blackwell.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. David M. Kaplan (2012). Food Ethics. In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Wiley-Blackwell.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. David M. Kaplan (2012). Technology and Capitalism. In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Wiley-Blackwell.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. David M. Kaplan (2012). Technology and Globalization. In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Wiley-Blackwell.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. David Michael Kaplan (2012). How to Demarcate the Boundaries of Cognition. Biology and Philosophy 27 (4):545-570.
    Advocates of extended cognition argue that the boundaries of cognition span brain, body, and environment. Critics maintain that cognitive processes are confined to a boundary centered on the individual. All participants to this debate require a criterion for distinguishing what is internal to cognition from what is external. Yet none of the available proposals are completely successful. I offer a new account, the mutual manipulability account, according to which cognitive boundaries are determined by relationships of mutual manipulability between the properties (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. David Michael Kaplan (2012). Perception and Cognition: Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology. Philosophical Psychology 25 (3):463-468.
    Philosophical Psychology, Volume 0, Issue 0, Page 1-6, Ahead of Print.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Paul B. Thompson & David M. Kaplan (eds.) (2012). Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Carl F. Craver & David M. Kaplan (2011). Towards a Mechanistic Philosophy of Neuroscience. In Steven French & Juha Saatsi (eds.), Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Continuum. 268.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. David M. Kaplan & William Bechtel (2011). Dynamical Models: An Alternative or Complement to Mechanistic Explanations? Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (2):438-444.
    Abstract While agreeing that dynamical models play a major role in cognitive science, we reject Stepp, Chemero, and Turvey's contention that they constitute an alternative to mechanistic explanations. We review several problems dynamical models face as putative explanations when they are not grounded in mechanisms. Further, we argue that the opposition of dynamical models and mechanisms is a false one and that those dynamical models that characterize the operations of mechanisms overcome these problems. By briefly considering examples involving the generation (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. David Michael Kaplan (2011). Explanation and Description in Computational Neuroscience. Synthese 183 (3):339-373.
    The central aim of this paper is to shed light on the nature of explanation in computational neuroscience. I argue that computational models in this domain possess explanatory force to the extent that they describe the mechanisms responsible for producing a given phenomenon—paralleling how other mechanistic models explain. Conceiving computational explanation as a species of mechanistic explanation affords an important distinction between computational models that play genuine explanatory roles and those that merely provide accurate descriptions or predictions of phenomena. It (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. David Michael Kaplan & Carl F. Craver (2011). The Explanatory Force of Dynamical and Mathematical Models in Neuroscience: A Mechanistic Perspective. Philosophy of Science 78 (4):601-627.
    We argue that dynamical and mathematical models in systems and cognitive neuro- science explain (rather than redescribe) a phenomenon only if there is a plausible mapping between elements in the model and elements in the mechanism for the phe- nomenon. We demonstrate how this model-to-mechanism-mapping constraint, when satisfied, endows a model with explanatory force with respect to the phenomenon to be explained. Several paradigmatic models including the Haken-Kelso-Bunz model of bimanual coordination and the difference-of-Gaussians model of visual receptive fields are (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. David M. Kaplan (2010). Paul Ricoeur and Development Ethics. In Brian Treanor & Henry Isaac Venema (eds.), A Passion for the Possible: Thinking with Paul Ricoeur. Fordham University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. David M. Kaplan (2009). How to Read Technology Critically. In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Evan Selinger & Søren Riis (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Technology. Palgrave Macmillan.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. David M. Kaplan (2009). Review: What Things Still Don't Do. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (2):229 - 240.
    This paper praises and criticizes Peter-Paul Verbeek's What Things Do (2006). The four things that Verbeek does well are: (1) remind us of the importance of technological things; (2) bring Karl Jaspers into the conversation on technology; (3) explain how technology "co-shapes" experience by reading Bruno Latour's actor-network theory in light of Don Ihde's post-phenomenology; (4) develop a material aesthetics of design. The three things that Verbeek does not do well are: (1) analyze the material conditions in which things are (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. David M. Kaplan (2009). What Things Still Don't Do. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (2):229 - 240.
    This paper praises and criticizes Peter-Paul Verbeek’s What Things Do ( 2006 ). The four things that Verbeek does well are: (1) remind us of the importance of technological things; (2) bring Karl Jaspers into the conversation on technology; (3) explain how technology “co-shapes” experience by reading Bruno Latour’s actor-network theory in light of Don Ihde’s post-phenomenology; (4) develop a material aesthetics of design. The three things that Verbeek does not do well are: (1) analyze the material conditions in which (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. David M. Kaplan (ed.) (2008). Reading Ricoeur. State University of New York Press.
    Introduces readers to the work of Paul Ricoeur, one of the twentieth century’s leading philosophers.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. David M. Kaplan (2007). Paul Ricoeur and the Nazis. Research in Phenomenology 37 (2):219-236.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Richard Kearney, Laszlo Tengelyi, Patrick L. Bourgeois, David M. Rasmussen, Bernard P. Dauenhauer & David M. Kaplan (2007). Memorial for Paul Ricoeur. Research in Phenomenology 37 (2):147-236.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Richard Kearney, László Tengelyi, Patrick L. Bourgeois, David M. Rasmussen, Bernard P. Dauenhauer, David M. Kaplan, Charles E. Scott, Bernard Freydberg, Jamey Findling & Eric C. Sanday (2007). Brill Online Books and Journals. Research in Phenomenology 37 (2).
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. David M. Kaplan (2006). Paul Ricoeur and the Philosophy of Technology. Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 16 (1/2):42-56.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. David M. Kaplan (2005). What's Wrong With Genetically Modified Food? Journal of Philosophical Research 30 (Supplement):69-80.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. David M. Kaplan (2003). Ricoeur's Critical Theory. State University of New York Press.
    The first book-length treatment of Paul Ricoeur's conception of philosophy as critical theory.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. David M. Kaplan (ed.) (2003). Readings in the Philosophy of Technology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Readings in the Philosophy of Technology is a collection of the important works of both the forerunners of philosophy of technology and contemporary theorists, addressing a full range of topics on technology as it relates to ethics, ...
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation