75 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
David Pears [51]David Francis Pears [13]David F. Pears [11]
  1. David Francis Pears (1987). The False Prison: A Study of the Development of Wittgenstein's Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    In this volume, Pears examines the internal organization of Wittgenstein's thought and the origins of his philosophy to provide unusually clear insight into the philosopher's ideas. Part I surveys the whole of Wittgenstein's work, while Part II details the central concepts of his early system; both reveal how the details of Wittgenstein's work fit into its general pattern.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   23 citations  
  2.  26
    David Francis Pears (1984/1998). Motivated Irrationality. St. Augustine's Press.
    This book is about self-deception and lack of self-control or wishful thinking and acting against one's own better judgement. Steering a course between the skepticism of philosophers, who find the conscious defiance of reason too paradoxical, and the tolerant empiricism of psychologists, it compares the two kinds of irrationality, and relates the conclusions drawn to the views of Freud, cognitive psychologists, and such philosophers as Aristotle, Anscombe, Hare and Davidson.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   25 citations  
  3.  21
    David Pears (2006). Paradox and Platitude in Wittgenstein's Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    This is a concise and readable study of five intertwined themes at the heart of Wittgenstein's thought, written by one of his most eminent interpreters. David Pears offers penetrating investigations and lucid explications of some of the most influential and yet puzzling writings of twentieth-century philosophy. He focuses on the idea of language as a picture of the world; the phenomenon of linguistic regularity; the famous "private language argument"; logical necessity; and ego and the self.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  4.  12
    David Pears & P. F. Strawson (1961). Individuals. Philosophical Quarterly 11 (44):262.
    Since its publication in 1959, Individuals has become a modern philosophical classic. Bold in scope and ambition, it continues to influence debates in metaphysics, philosophy of logic and language, and epistemology. Peter Strawson's most famous work, it sets out to describe nothing less than the basic subject matter of our thought. It contains Strawson's now famous argument for descriptive metaphysics and his repudiation of revisionary metaphysics, in which reality is something beyond the world of appearances. Throughout, Individuals advances some highly (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  5.  63
    David F. Pears (1991). Self-Deceptive Belief-Formation. Synthese 89 (3):393-405.
  6.  43
    David Pears (2004). The Anatomy of Courage. Social Research: An International Quarterly 71 (1):1-12.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7. David Pears (1988). The False Prison: Volume Two. Clarendon Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  8.  71
    David Pears (1977). The Relation Between Wittgenstein's Picture Theory of Propositions and Russell's Theories of Judgment. Philosophical Review 86 (2):177-196.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  9. David Francis Pears (1972). Bertrand Russell and the British Tradition in Philosophy. London,Fontana.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  10. David F. Pears (1961). Professor Norman Malcolm: Dreaming. Mind 70 (April):145-163.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  5
    David Francis Pears (1971). Wittgenstein. London,Fontana.
    Ludwig Wittgenstein was born in Vienna in 1889 and died in Cambridge in 1951. He studied engineering, first in Berlin and then in Manchester, and he soon began to ask himself philosophical questions about the foundations of mathematics. What are numbers? What sort of truth does a mathematical equation possess? What is the force of proof in pure mathematics? In order to find the answers to such questions, he went to Cambridge in 1911 to work with Russell, who had just (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  12.  24
    David Francis Pears (1990). Hume's System: An Examination of the First Book of His Treatise. Oxford University Press.
    In this compelling analysis David Pears examines the foundations of Hume's theory of the mind as presented in the first book of the Treatise. Past studies have tended to take one of two extreme views: that Hume relies exclusively on a theory of meaning, or that he relies exclusively on a theory of truth and evidence. Steering a middle course between these positions, Pears argues that Hume's theory of ideas serves both functions. He examines in detail its application to three (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  13.  41
    David F. Pears (1976). The Causal Conditions of Perception. Synthese 33 (June):25-40.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  14. David Pears (1987). The False Prison Vol. One. Clarendon Press.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15.  52
    David Pears (2004). Hume's Recantation of His Theory of Personal Identity. Hume Studies 30 (2):257-264.
  16.  49
    David Pears (1950). Hypotheticals. Analysis 10 (3):49 - 63.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  5
    David Pears (1993). The Ego and the Eye. Grazer Philosophische Studien 44:59-68.
    Wittgenstein's critique of sohpsism - his attempt to show that sohpsism loses its intended meaning on the way to achieving its aspired truth - is reconstructed from its erarly stages in the Notebooks 1914-1916 via the 1936 lecture notes to the passages in the Philosophical Investigations. The analogy of the geometrical eye and the pointing to it are used to show the connections between the different arguments here involved.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  27
    David Pears (1995). Wittgenstein's Naturalism. The Monist 78 (4):411-424.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19.  39
    David Francis Pears, David Charles & William Child (eds.) (2001). Wittgensteinian Themes: Essays in Honour of David Pears. Oxford University Press.
    A stellar group of philosophers offer new works on themes from the great philosophy of Wittgenstein, honoring one of his most eminent interpreters David Pears. This collection covers both the early and the later work of Wittgenstein, relating it to current debates in philosophy. Topics discussed include solipsism, ostension, rules, necessity, privacy, and consciousness.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  28
    David Pears (1996). The Originality of Wittgenstein's Investigation of Solipsism. European Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):124-137.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21.  0
    David Francis Pears (1970/1986). Ludwig Wittgenstein. Harvard University Press.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  22.  1
    David Pears (1994). Philosophical Theorizing and Particularism: Michael Dummett on Wittgenstein's Later Philosophy of Language. In Brian McGuiness & Gianluigi Oliveri (eds.), The Philosophy of Michael Dummett. Kluwer 45--57.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  29
    David Pears (1982). How Easy is Akrasia? Philosophia 11 (1-2):33-50.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  24.  51
    David Pears (1952). The Incongruity of Counterparts. Mind 61 (241):78-81.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25.  57
    David Pears (1950). Synthetic Necessary Truth. Mind 59 (234):199-208.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  20
    David Pears (1981). The Function of Acquaintance in Russell's Philosophy. Synthese 46 (2):149 - 166.
  27.  19
    David Pears (1989). Rule-Following in Philosophical Investigations. Grazer Philosophische Studien 33:249-261.
    The negative part of Wittgenstein's treatment of rule-following in the Philosophical Investigations is a critique of Platonic theories of meaning. The main argument, summarized in §§ 201-202 is a reductio: if Platonism were true, the difference between obeying and disobeying a linguistic rule would vanish. For Platonism requires the rule-follower to have in his mind something which will completely determine in advance all the correct applications of a descriptive word, but this is a requirement that could not be conceivably satisfied. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. David F. Pears (1975). Questions In The Philosophy Of Mind. London,: Duckworth.
  29.  49
    David Pears (1991). Wittgenstein's Account of Rule-Following. Synthese 87 (2):273 - 283.
  30. David F. Pears (1951). Logic And Language. Oxford,: Blackwell.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  31. David Francis Pears (ed.) (1972). Bertrand Russell. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  32.  33
    David Pears (1951). Universals. Philosophical Quarterly 1 (3):218-227.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  4
    David Pears (1990). Wittgenstein's Holism. Dialectica 44 (1‐2):165-173.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  6
    David Pears (1992). Wittgenstein's Concept of Showing. Grazer Philosophische Studien 42:91-105.
    Starting from an analysis of Wittgenstein's reasons for placing all true-seeming sentences about the relation between language and the world in the class of utterances that lack a truth-value and can only communicate in the privileged way, the doctrine of showing is investigated in Wittgenstein's later writings. In contrast to the view that the concept of showing simply disappeared with the abandonment of the picture theory of the sentence it is argued that much of his erarly doctrine of showing survives (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. David Pears (1980). Courage as a Mean. In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Aristotle's Ethics. University of California Press 171--187.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36.  15
    David Pears (1993). Hume on Personal Identity. Hume Studies 19 (2):289-299.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  6
    David Pears (1975). The Appropiate Causation of Intentional Basic Actions. Critica 7 (20):39 - 72.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  8
    David Pears (1994). Hintikka's Interpretation of Wittgenstein's Treatment of Sensation-Language. Grazer Philosophische Studien 49:1-18.
    Wittgenstein's critique of solipsism is explained as a development in three stages. In the first, which appeares in the Notebooks 1914-16 and Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, he criticizes the solipsist for not identifying his ego and, therefore, leaving the objects presented to it unidentified. He argues that this is like trying to identify the eye without using any psychological facts. In the second stage, which appeares in The Blue Book and Notes for Lectures on "Private Experience" and "Sensations", he assumes that the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  2
    David Pears (1968). Desires as Causes of Actions. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 1:83-97.
  40.  21
    David Pears (1996). Wittgenstein's Criticism of Cartesianism. Synthese 106 (1):49 - 55.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  0
    David Francis Pears (1963). Freedom and the Will. New York, St. Martin's Press.
  42.  7
    David Pears (1988). Irrational Action and Irrational Belief. Argumentation 2 (1):51-61.
    Many philosophers agree with Socrates that it is not possible to perform an akratic action consciously and freely. They take this view because they assimilate the internal irrationality of such a performance to the internal irrationality of drawing a theoretical conclusion which contadicts one's premisses. This article develops some arguments against that assimilation. The extreme cost of theoretical self-contradiction is forming the belief both that something is so and that it is not so. This is impossible for anyone who understands (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  18
    David Pears (2002). Literalism and Imagination: Wittgenstein's Deconstruction of Traditional Philosophy. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):3 – 16.
    In his later philosophy, Wittgenstein unlike Russell offers no theories, because he believes that philosophical theories are never explanatory. They try to imitate scientific theories, but they lack the empirical basis that gives science its explanatory power. Two examples of his deconstructive work are discussed. One is his critique of the theory that the direct objects of perception are always sense-data, describable in a radically private language. Austin too criticized the theory of sense-data, but Wittgenstein's critique, unlike Austin's, included an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  1
    David Pears (1993). The Ego and the Eye: Wittgenstein's Use of an Analogy. Grazer Philosophische Studien 44:59-68.
    Wittgenstein's critique of sohpsism - his attempt to show that sohpsism loses its intended meaning on the way to achieving its aspired truth - is reconstructed from its erarly stages in the Notebooks 1914-1916 via the 1936 lecture notes to the passages in the Philosophical Investigations. The analogy of the geometrical eye and the pointing to it are used to show the connections between the different arguments here involved.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  9
    David Pears (1992). Split Self-Reference and Personal Survival. Southwest Philosophy Review 8 (1):65-76.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. David Pears (1979). A Comparison Between Ayer's Views About the Privilege of Sense-Datum Statements and the Views of Russell and Austin. In Graham F. Macdonald (ed.), Perception and Identity. Cornell University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  3
    Antony Flew & David Pears (1965). David Hume: A Symposium. Philosophical Quarterly 15 (60):265.
  48.  7
    David F. Pears (1981). Two Kinds of Philosophical Analysis. Kagaku Tetsugaku 14:103-118.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  10
    H. H. Price, David Pears, William Kneale, Max Black, A. F. Peters, George E. Hughes, Margaret Macdonald, G. J. Warnock, T. D. Weldon, R. F. Holland, H. D. Lewis, Antony Flew, W. G. Maclagan, J. Harrison, Richard Wollheim, P. L. Heath, Donald Nicholl, Patrick Gardiner & Ernest Gellner (1951). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 60 (240):550-583.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  2
    David Pears (2011). Linguistic Regularity. In Enzo De Pellegrin (ed.), Interactive Wittgenstein. Springer 171--181.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 75