16 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: David Pineda (Universitat de Barcelona, Universitat de Girona)
Profile: David Pineda
  1. Juan F. Cardona, Lucila Kargieman, Vladimiro Sinay, Oscar Gershanik, Carlos Gelormini, Lucia Amoruso, María Roca, David Pineda, Natalia Trujillo, Maëva Michon, Adolfo M. García, Daniela Szenkman, Tristán Bekinschtein, Facundo Manes & Agustín Ibáñez (2014). How Embodied is Action Language? Neurological Evidence From Motor Diseases. Cognition 131 (2):311-322.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. David Pineda (2012). Physicalism, by Daniel Stoljar. Physicalism, by Daniel Stoljar 4 (32).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Juan José Acero, Tobies Grimaltos, David Pineda, Frank Arntzenius, Francesco Guala, Marek Polanski, Ana Barahona, Andrew Hamilton, Josep Lluis Prades & Josep Maria Bech (2011). Informantes de THEORIA (2009-2010) Referees for THEORIA (2009-2010). Theoria 70:119.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. David Pineda (2011). Non-Committal Causal Explanations. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):147-170.
    Some causal explanations are non-committal in that mention of a property in the explanans conveys information about the causal origin of the explanandum even if the property in question plays no causal role for the explanandum . Programme explanations are a variety of non-committal causal (NCC) explanations. Yet their interest is very limited since, as I will argue in this paper, their range of applicability is in fact quite narrow. However there is at least another variety of NCC explanations, causal (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. David Pineda (2008). Conciencia y dualismo. Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 27 (3):131-147.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. David Pineda (2006). A Mereological Characterization of Physicalism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):243 – 266.
    Physicalism is usually understood as the claim that every empirical entity is or is determined by physical entities. The claim is however imprecise until it is clarified what are the physical entities in question. A sceptical argument in the form of a dilemma tries to show that this problem of formulation of physicalism cannot be adequately met. If we understand physical entities as the entities introduced by current physics, the resulting claim becomes most probably false. If we instead understand physical (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. David Pineda (2005). Causal Exclusion and Causal Homogeneity. Dialectica 59 (1):63-66.
    In this brief note I claim that, contrary to what Esfeld argues in his paper in this same volume, Kim's position with respect to the problem of causal exclusion does indeed commit him to the causal heterogeneity of realized properties.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. David Pineda (2004). Por Qué El Problema Del Hiato Explicativo Es Realmente Un Problema Para El Fisicismo. Análisis Filosófico 24 (2):135-164.
    En este artículo exploro el compatibilismo, el punto de vista según el cual la tesis del hiato o hueco explicativo entre lo fenoménico y lo físico es compatible con una metafísica fisicista. Defiendo que el argumento del dualismo de propiedades es un argumento incompatibilista más fuerte que el argumento de Jackson-Chalmers o el de Kripke y exploro críticamente algunos intentos recientes de replicar al mismo. La conclusión a la que llego es que una posición compatibilista capaz de dar una respuesta (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. David Pineda (2003). Synchronous Events in by-Sentences. Theoria 18 (3):351-357.
    It has been suggested in the literature about actions that one can honour the philosophical intuition lying behind Davidson’s argument for the Anscombe Thesis (the claim that by-sentences --sentcnccs used to report actions of the general form: ‘A X-ed by V-ing’-- involve two descriptions of the same action) without accepting the argument’s conclusion. The suggestion in question is to interpret by-sentences as referring to two synchronous but different actions of the same agent. I argue that this suggestion, together with two (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. David Pineda (2002). The Causal Exclusion Puzzle. European Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):26-42.
    In a series of influential articles (Kim 1989b, 1992b, 1993a and 1998), Jaegwon Kim has developed a strong argument against nonreductive physicalism as a plausible solution to mental causation. The argument is commonly called the ’causal exclusion argument’, and it has become, over the years, one of the most serious threats to the nonreductivist point of view. In the first part of this paper I offer a careful reconstruction and detailed discussion of the exclusion argument. In the second part I (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. David Pineda (2001). Functionalism and Nonreductive Physicalism. Theoria 16 (40):43-63.
    Most philosophers of mind nowadays espouse two metaphysical views: Nonreductive Physicalism and the causal efficacy of the mental. Throughout this work I will refer to the conjunction of both claims as the Causal Autonomy of the Mental. Nevertheless, this position is threatened by a number of difficulties which are far more serious than one would imagine given the broad consensus that it has generated during the last decades. This paper purports to offer a careful examination of some of these difficulties (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. David Pineda (2001). Un argumento davidsoniano contra el monismo anómalo. Critica 33 (97):33-61.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. David Pineda (1999). Searle y El Problema de la Exclusion de la Exclusion Causal: Vindicacion Del Materialismo Frente Al Naturalismo Biologico. Teorema 18 (1):155-170.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. David Pineda (1998). Information and Content. Philosophical Issues 9:381-387.
    In this paper I discuss critically Stalnaker's views on content.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. David Pineda (1997). Filosofía de la Mente Y Ciencia Cognitiva. Theoria 12 (2):381-383.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. David Pineda (1993). La Forma Lbgica de les Oracions d'Acció I la Tesi d'Anscombe. Enrahonar: Quaderns de Filosofía 21:51-73.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation