14 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
David Pizarro [7]David A. Pizarro [7]
  1. David Pizarro, Benefiting From Misfortune: When Harmless Actions Are Judged to Be Morally Blameworthy.
    Dominant theories of moral blame require an individual to have caused or intended harm. However, across four studies we demonstrate cases where no harm is caused or intended, yet individuals are nonetheless deemed worthy of blame. Specifically, individuals are judged to be blameworthy when they engage in actions that enable them to benefit from another’s misfortune (for example, betting that a company’s stock will decline or that a natural disaster will occur). We present evidence suggesting that perceptions of the actor’s (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Joshua Knobe, Paul Bloom & David Pizarro, College Students Implicitly Judge Interracial Sex and Gay Sex to Be Morally Wrong.
    College students implicitly judge interracial sex and gay sex to be morally wrong Some moral intuitions arise from psychological processes that are not fully accessible to consciousness. For instance, most people disapprove of consensual adult incest between siblings, but are unable to articulate why—they just feel that it is wrong (Haidt, 2001). More generally, there is evidence for at least two sources of moral judgment: explicit conscious reasoning and tacit intuitions, which are motivated by emotional responses (Greene et al., 2001) (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Yoel Inbar & David Pizarro (2014). Disgust, Politics, and Responses to Threat. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):315-316.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Bárbara Jiménez, Jone Mendizabal, Mertxe Izaguirre, Jaime Otavo, David Pizarro, Davi Moreno, Jesús Villaro, Andoni Olariaga, Enrique Navarro & Antonio Casado (2012). Enrique Bernárdez: El lenguaje como cultura. Madrid, Alianza, 2008. Dilemata 8:201-208.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Eric Luis Uhlmann, Luke Lei Zhu, David A. Pizarro & Paul Bloom (2012). Blood is Thicker: Moral Spillover Effects Based on Kinship. Cognition 124 (2):239-243.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Daniel M. Bartels & David A. Pizarro (2011). The Mismeasure of Morals: Antisocial Personality Traits Predict Utilitarian Responses to Moral Dilemmas. Cognition 121 (1):154-161.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. David Pizarro, Yoel Inbar & Chelsea Helion (2011). On Disgust and Moral Judgment. Emotion Review 3 (3):267-268.
    Despite the wealth of recent work implicating disgust as an emotion central to human morality, the nature of the causal relationship between disgust and moral judgment remains unclear. We distinguish between three related claims regarding this relationship, and argue that the most interesting claim (that disgust is a moralizing emotion) is the one with the least empirical support.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. David A. Pizarro & Erik G. Helzer (2010). 7 Stubborn Moralism and Freedom Ofthe Will. In Roy F. Baumeister, Alfred R. Mele & Kathleen D. Vohs (eds.), Free Will and Consciousness: How Might They Work? University Press. 101.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Yoel Inbar, David A. Pizarro & Paul Bloom (2009). Conservatives Are More Easily Disgusted Than Liberals. Cognition and Emotion 23 (4):714-725.
  10. Yoel Inbar, David A. Pizarro, Joshua Knobe & Paul Bloom (2009). Disgust Sensitivity Predicts Intuitive Disapproval of Gays. Emotion 9 (3): 435– 43.
    Two studies demonstrate that a dispositional proneness to disgust (“disgust sensitivity”) is associated with intuitive disapproval of gay people. Study 1 was based on previous research showing that people are more likely to describe a behavior as intentional when they see it as morally wrong (see Knobe, 2006, for a review). As predicted, the more disgust sensitive participants were, the more likely they were to describe an agent whose behavior had the side effect of causing gay men to kiss in (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Eric Luis Uhlmann, David A. Pizarro & Paul Bloom (2008). Varieties of Social Cognition. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 38 (3):293-322.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Eric Luis Uhlmann, Victoria L. Brescoll & David Pizarro (2007). The Motivated Use and Neglect of Base Rates. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):284-285.
    Ego-justifying, group-justifying, and system-justifying motivations contribute to base-rate respect. People tend to neglect (and use) base rates when doing so allows them to draw desired conclusions about matters such as their health, the traits of their in-groups, and the fairness of the social system. Such motivations can moderate whether people rely on the rule-based versus associative strategies identified by Barbey & Sloman (B&S).
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. David A. Pizarro & Eric Luis Uhlmann (2005). Do Normative Standards Advance Our Understanding of Moral Judgment? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):558-559.
    Sunstein's review of research on moral heuristics is rich and informative – even without his central claim that individuals often commit moral errors. We question the value of positing such a normative moral framework for the study of moral judgment. We also propose an alternative standard for evaluating moral judgments – that of subjective rationality.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. David Pizarro (2000). Nothing More Than Feelings? The Role of Emotions in Moral Judgment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30 (4):355–375.
    In this paper, I review the primary arguments for the traditional position that holds emotions as antagonistic to moral judgments. I argue that this position is untenable given the information about emotions and emotional processes that has emerged in the psychological literature of recent years. I then offer a theoret- ical model of emotive moral judgment that takes a closer look at how emotions, specifically empathy, play an integral role in the process of moral judgment. I argue that emotions should (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation