Works by David Vander Laan ( view other items matching `David Vander Laan`, view all matches )

7 found
Sort by:
  1. David Vander Laan (2011). Lewis' Argument for Possible Worlds. In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. David Vander Laan (2010). A Relevance Constraint on Composition. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):135 – 145.
    Whether certain objects compose a whole at a given time does not seem to depend on anything other than the character of those objects and the relations between them. This observation suggests a far-reaching constraint on theories of composition. One version of the constraint has been explicitly adopted by van Inwagen and rules out his own answer to the composition question. The constraint also rules out the other well-known moderate answers that have so far been proposed.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. David Vander Laan (2008). Rethinking Human Nature. Faith and Philosophy 25 (3):346-350.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. David Vander Laan (2007). The Sanctification Argument for Purgatory. Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):331-339.
    A recently advanced argument for purgatory hinges on the need for complete sanctification before one can enter heaven. The argument has a modal gap.The gap can be exploited to fashion a competing account of how sanctification occurs in the afterlife according to which it is in part a heavenly process.The competing account usefully complicates the overall case for purgatory and raises questions about how the notion ought to be understood.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. David Vander Laan (2006). Persistence and Divine Conservation. Religious Studies 42 (2):159-176.
    Plausibly, if an object persists through time, then its later existence must be caused by its earlier existence. Many theists endorse a theory of continuous creation, according to which God is the sole cause of a creature's existence at a given time. The conjunction of these two theses rather unfortunately implies that no object distinct from God persists at all. What strategies for resolving this difficulty are available? (Published Online April 7 2006).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. David Vander Laan (2001). A Regress Argument for Restrictive Incompatibilism. Philosophical Studies 103 (2):201 - 215.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation