Search results for 'De Caelo' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  1
    Stephen E. Kidd (2016). Epitasis_ and _Anesis_ in Aristotle, _De Caelo 2.6. Phronesis 61 (1):33-42.
    _ Source: _Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 33 - 42 _De caelo_ 2.6 describes irregular motion differently from the discussion at _Physics_ 5.4. The desire to make the one discussion congrue with the other has strained interpretation of the _De caelo_ passage. Aristotle provides a theory of irregular motion that is tripartite and the passage ought to be interpreted in such a way as to explain this tripartite motion. _Akmē_ is not a ‘top speed’ as it is generally translated, but (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  3
    Christopher Frey (2015). Capacities and the Eternal in Metaphysics Θ.8 and De Caelo. Phronesis 60 (1):88-126.
    _ Source: _Volume 60, Issue 1, pp 88 - 126 The dominant interpretation of Metaphysics Θ.8 commits Aristotle to the claim that the heavenly bodies’ eternal movements are not the exercises of capacities. Against this, I argue that these movements are the result of necessarily exercised capacities. I clarify what it is for a heavenly body to possess a nature and argue that a body’s nature cannot be a final cause unless the natural body possesses capacities that are exercised for (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  36
    Lucas Angioni (2010). Aristóteles e o progresso da investigação científica: o caso do De caelo. Scientiae Studia 8 (3):319-338.
    This article examines three passages of De caelo in order to discuss Aristotle’s epistemological attitude towards the theories advanced by him and towards the possibility of progress in the scientific research of the celestial world. It is concluded that, although the possibility of progress in scientific investigation is not central in Aristotle’s reflections, progress is not ruled out either as impossible or as undesirable.
    Translate
      Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  6
    James Bogen & J. Mcguire (1986). Aristotle’s Great Clock: Necessity, Possibility and the Motion of the Cosmos in De Caelo I.12. Philosophy Research Archives 12:387-448.
    This paper offers a detailed account of arguments in De Caelo I by which Aristotle tried to demonstrate the necessity of the perpetual existence and the perpetual rotation of the cosmos. On our interpretation, Aristotle’s arguments are naturalistic. Instead of being based on rules of logic and language, they depend, we argue, on natural science theories about abilities , e.g., to move and to change, which things have by nature and about the conditions under which these abilities can be (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  25
    Gerhard Endress (1995). Averroes' De Caelo Ibn Rushd's Cosmology in His Commentaries on Aristotle's On the Heavens. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 5 (1):9.
    Averroes defended philosophy by returning to the true Aristotle. For this purpose, Aristotle's book in which he explained the eternity, uniqueness and movement of the universe, occupied a place of special importance. But the Aristotelian philosopher had a hard time holding his own in the face of contradictions within the book and with respect to Aristotle's later works. In his early Compendium, later Paraphrase, and final Long Commentary of De Caelo, Ibn Rushd continued the efforts of the Hellenistic commentators (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  6
    Thomas K. Johansen (2009). From Plato's Timaeus to Aristotle's de Caelo: The Case of the Missing World Soul. In A. C. Bowen & C. Wildberg (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s de Caelo. Brill 1--9.
  7.  2
    A. Bibliography (2009). Aristotle's de Caelo. In A. C. Bowen & C. Wildberg (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s de Caelo. Brill 117--283.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  2
    Mary Louise Gill (2009). The Theory of the Elements in de Caelo 3and4. In A. C. Bowen & C. Wildberg (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s de Caelo. Brill 139.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  2
    Sarah Broadie (2009). The Possibilities of Being and Not-Being in De Caelo 1.11-12. In A. C. Bowen & C. Wildberg (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s de Caelo. Brill 1--29.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  2
    Pierre Pellegrin (2009). The Argument for the Sphericity of the Universe Inaristotle's de Caelo: Astronomy and Physics. In A. C. Bowen & C. Wildberg (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s de Caelo. Brill 117--163.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  2
    James G. Lennox (2009). De Caelo 2.2 and Its Debt to De Incessu Animalium. In A. C. Bowen & C. Wildberg (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s de Caelo. Brill 1--187.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  2
    R. J. Hankinson (2009). Natural, Unnatural, and Preternatural Motions: Contrariety and the Argument for the Elements in De Caelo 1.2–4. In A. C. Bowen & C. Wildberg (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s de Caelo. Brill 117--83.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. D. J. Allan (ed.) (2005). De Caelo. Clarendon Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Owen Goldin, Cosmic Orientation in Aristotle’s De Caelo.
    This paper examines how within De Caelo Aristotle argues that the heavens rotate to the right, because this is best. I isolate and evaluate its presuppositions and show how it comprises both a dialectical argument to cosmological principles and a partial demonstrative explanation on the basis of such principles. Second, I consider the expressions of epistemological hesitation that Aristotle offers in regard to this arguments, and draw conclusions concerning the status of cosmology as an Aristotelian science. In order to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  1
    Wolfgang Kullmann (2014). 2. Aristoteles’ frühzeitiges Interesse an der Naturwissenschaft in der Physik und der Schrift De caelo I–II. In Aristoteles Als Naturwissenschaftler. De Gruyter 37-60.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  5
    James Longrigg (1966). Aristotle's Elements Gustav Adolf Seek: Über die Elemente in der Kosmologie des Aristoteles: Untersuchungen zu 'De Generatione et Corruption' und 'De Caelo'. (Zetemata, 34.) Pp. viii+166. Munich: Beck, 1965. Paper, DM. 22. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 16 (01):35-37.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. J. Müller (1953). Buridani Iohannis: Quaestiones super libris quattuor De caelo et mundo. [REVIEW] Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie 31:377.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  2
    Andrea Falcon (2015). New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo. Ancient Philosophy 35 (2):464-467.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  9
    Aristotle (2005). De Caelo. Clarendon Press.
  20. Andrea Falcon (2001). Corpi E Movimenti Il de Caelo di Aristotele E la Sua Fortuna Nel Mondo Antico. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21.  17
    Josiah B. Gould (1993). Aristotle on Time and Possibility in De Caelo 1. 12. Philosophical Inquiry 15 (3-4):59-74.
  22.  4
    Cesare Alberto Musatti (2006). Il De caelo di Aristotele e alcuni suoi commentatori: Simplicio, Averroè e Pietro d'Alvernia. Quaestio 6 (1):524-549.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  13
    Gábor Betegh, Francesca Pedriali & Christian Pfeiffer (2013). The Perfection of Bodies: Aristotle's De Caelo I.1. Rhizomata 1 (1):30-62.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. A. A. Rini (2003). When Time is of the Essence: Prior Analytics I. 15 and De Caelo I. 12. Logique Et Analyse 183 (184):419-440.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25.  8
    W. K. C. Guthrie (1937). Aristotle De Caelo Aristotelis De Caelo libri IV. Recognovit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit D. J. Allan. (Scr. Class. Bibl. Oxon.) Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936. Cloth, 7s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (01):15-16.
  26.  16
    Lisa Farooque (2008). About Celestial Circulation: Averroes' Tahafūt Al-Tahafūt and Aristotle's De Caelo. Journal of Islamic Philosophy 4:21-38.
    For Averroes, celestial circulation is evidence of a divinely mandated rational universe. This paper follows Averroes’ account on cosmic contact between the eternal and the temporal, in Tahafūt al-tahafūt contra al-Ghazālī. It argues that the polemical perspective of the Tahafūt al-tahafūt frames Averroes’ appeal to Aristotle’s account of cosmic motion. Consequently, Averroes’ exceptional account of the universe contrasts Aristotle’s exemplary account of the mutual participation of intellect and nature. Their accounts of celestial circulation implicate the status of human nature conditioned (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Lindsay Judson (1983). Eternity and Necessity in de Caelo I. 12. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1:217-255.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  28.  8
    Karel Thein (2013). Some Conceptual Difficulties in Aristotle's De Caelo I.9. Rhizomata 1 (1):63-84.
  29.  3
    Owen Goldin (2011). Colloquium 3: Cosmic Orientation in Aristotle’s De Caelo. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 26 (1):91-129.
  30.  11
    Philip Merlan (1966). Two Theological Problems in Aristotle's "Met.Lambda" 6–9 and "de Caelo" A.9. Apeiron 1 (1):3 - 13.
  31.  4
    Juan Enrique Bolzán (1973). Aristoteles, De caelo, 310 b 11-14. Journal of the History of Philosophy 11 (4):443-451.
  32.  12
    D. J. Allan (1936). On the Manuscripts of the De Caelo of Aristotle. Classical Quarterly 30 (01):16-.
  33.  7
    Anton C. Pegis (1943). Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones Super Libris Quattuor De Caelo Et Mundo. [REVIEW] Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):551-553.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  3
    J. L. Stocks, H. H. Joachim, E. W. Webster, W. Rhys Roberts, E. S. Forster & Ingram Bywater (1925). De Caelo; De Generatione Et CorruptioneMeteorologicaRhetorica; De Rhetorica Ad Alexandrum; De Poetica. Journal of Hellenic Studies 45:266.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  9
    James Longrigg (1968). Aristotle De Caelo Leo Elders: Aristotle's Cosmology: A Commentary on the 'De Caelo'. Pp. 370. Assen (Netherlands): Van Gorcum, 1966. Cloth, Fl. 32. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 18 (02):166-168.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  3
    Edward Grant (2011). De Caelo, Commentaries on Aristotle's. In H. Lagerlund (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer 247--251.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  7
    H. J. Easterling (1961). Homocentric Spheres in "De Caelo". Phronesis 6 (2):138 - 153.
    Translate
      Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  8
    H. J. Easterling (1961). Homocentric Spheres in de caelo. Phronesis 6 (1):138-153.
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  7
    Sandra Duncan (2000). Signa de Caelo in the Lives of St Cuthbert: The Impact of Biblical Images and Exegesis on Early Medieval Hagiography. Heythrop Journal 41 (4):399–412.
    This article uses the two prose Lives of Cuthbert written by an anonymous monk of Lindisfarne and by Bede in the first half of the eighth century to illustrate how an understanding of the impact of biblical language and its accompanying exegetical tradition may help in the interpretation of hagiographical works. After an examination of recent scholarly work on the relationship scripture and hagiography and the impact of signa upon the early medieval thought‐world, the paper examines the incidents that are (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  3
    Edith Dudley Sylla (2005). Peter of Auvergne, Questions on Aristotle's “De Caelo,” Ed. Griet Galle. A Critical Edition with an Interpretative Essay. (Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, 1/29.) Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2003. Pp. 373*, 640; Black-and-White Figures and Tables. €120. [REVIEW] Speculum 80 (4):1352-1353.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  5
    Tad Brennan (1997). De Caelo S. Leggatt (Ed., Tr.): Aristotle: On the Heavens I and II (Classical Texts). Pp. Vii + 273. Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1995. £35/$49.95 (Paper, £14.95/$24.00). ISBN: 0-85668-662-X (0-85668-663-8). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 47 (02):282-284.
  42.  5
    Edward S. Forster (1923). Aristotle de Caelo and de Generatione Et Corruptione The Works of Aristotle Translated Into English: De Caelo. By J. L. Stocks, M.A., D.S.O.; De Generatione Et Corruptione. By Professor H. H. Joachim. Two Parts in One. 225 × 145 Mm. Oxford, at the Clarendon Press, 1922. 10s. Net. Aristotle on 'Coming-to-Be' and 'Passingaway' (de Generatione Et Corruptione). A Revised Text, with Introduction and Commentary. By Harold H. Joachim, Wykeham Professor of Logic in the University of Oxford. One Vol. 235 × 145 Mm. Preface, Etc., Pp. Xxxviii; Texts, Notes, and Indices, Pp. 303. Oxford, at the Clarendon Press, 1922. 32s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 37 (1-2):44-45.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  5
    C. J. F. Williams (1966). Aristotle and Corruptibility: A Discussion of Aristotle "De Caelo" I, Xii. Part II. Religious Studies 1 (2):203 - 215.
  44.  5
    C. J. F. Williams (1965). Aristotle and Corruptibility: A Discussion of Aristotle, "De Caelo" I, Xii. Part I. Religious Studies 1 (1):95 - 107.
  45.  4
    Paul Shorey (1905). On Simplicius De Caelo, 476, 11 Sqq. The Classical Review 19 (04):205-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  5
    Tad Brennan (1997). De Caelo. The Classical Review 47 (02):282-.
  47.  4
    A. P. Bos (1988). μαντεία in Aristotle, "de Caelo" II 1. Apeiron 21 (1):29 - 54.
  48.  3
    D. J. Allan (1939). Aristotle De Caelo Aristotle: On the Heavens. With an English Translation by W. K. C. Guthrie. Pp. Xxxvi+378. (Loeb Classical Library.) London: Heinemann, 1939. Cloth, 10s.(Leather, 12s. 6d.). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 53 (5-6):179-181.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. D. J. Allan (1938). Aristotelis de Caelo Libri Quattuor. Philosophical Review 47 (1):92-93.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  1
    J. Longrigg (1970). Aristotle, de Caelo Paul Moraux: Aristote: Du Ciel. Texte établi et traduit. Pp. cxc+165 (double). (Collection Budé.) Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1965. Paper. £3. 3s. 3d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 20 (02):171-174.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000