Search results for 'Deborah L. Siegel' (try it on Scholar)

12 found
Sort by:
  1. Deborah L. Siegel (1997). The Legacy of the Personal: Generating Theory in Feminism's Third Wave. Hypatia 12 (3):46-75.score: 870.0
    This essay focuses on the repeated rhetorical moves through which the third wave autobiographical subject seeks to be real and to speak as part of a collective voice from the next feminist generation. Given that postmodernist, postructuralist, and multiculturalist critiques have shaped the form and the content of third wave expressions of the personal, the study is ultimately concerned with the possibilities and limitations of such theoretical analysis for a third wave of feminist praxis.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. R. L. Craig & P. S. Siegel (1979). Does Negative Affect Beget Positive Affect? A Test of the Opponent-Process Theory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 14 (6):404-406.score: 280.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Oliver L. Lacey & Paul S. Siegel (1949). An Analysis of the Unit of Measurement of the Galvanic Skin Response. Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (1):122.score: 280.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Leili Fatehi, Susan M. Wolf, Jeffrey McCullough, Ralph Hall, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P. Kahn, Cortney Jones, Stephen A. Campbell, Rebecca S. Dresser, Arthur G. Erdman, Christy L. Haynes, Robert A. Hoerr, Linda F. Hogle, Moira A. Keane, George Khushf, Nancy M. P. King, Efrosini Kokkoli, Gary Marchant, Andrew D. Maynard, Martin Philbert, Gurumurthy Ramachandran, Ronald A. Siegel & Samuel Wickline (2012). Recommendations for Nanomedicine Human Subjects Research Oversight: An Evolutionary Approach for an Emerging Field. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):716-750.score: 240.0
    The nanomedicine field is fast evolving toward complex, “active,” and interactive formulations. Like many emerging technologies, nanomedicine raises questions of how human subjects research (HSR) should be conducted and the adequacy of current oversight, as well as how to integrate concerns over occupational, bystander, and environmental exposures. The history of oversight for HSR investigating emerging technologies is a patchwork quilt without systematic justification of when ordinary oversight for HSR is enough versus when added oversight is warranted. Nanomedicine HSR provides an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. William J. Abraham, Jose Miguez Bonino, Robert F. Drinan, Leo Pfeffer, Seymour Siegel, George Huntston Williams & Sharon L. Worthing (2010). “The Church. In Charles Taliaferro & Chad V. Meister (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Christian Philosophical Theology. Cambridge University Press.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. L. G. Allan & S. Siegel (1997). Assessing a New Analysis of the McCollough Effect. Cognition 64:207-222.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. P. Chiappe, L. S. Siegel & L. Hasher (2002). Working Memory, Inhibition and Reading Skill. In Serge P. Shohov (ed.), Advances in Psychology Research. Nova Science Publishers. 9--30.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Ardi Roelofs, M. Howes, M. Siegel, F. Brown, Amy Needham, Renee Baillargeon, Donald Symons, L. Frazier, Gb Flores D.’Arcais & R. Coolen (1993). MICHAEL F. SCHOBER (New School for Social Research, New York) Spatial Perspective-Taking in Conversation. Cognition 47:281.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Paul S. Siegel, Edward A. Konarski & Scott L. Bernard (1986). Demand Characteristics and the Response Suppression Hypothesis. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (5):365-368.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Fred Siegel (1985). The Liberal Crack-Up Liberalism Reconsidered. Telos 1985 (63):196-199.score: 120.0
    R. Emmett Tyrrell, the editor of the neo-conservative monthly The American Spectator, has been justly denounced as a “mean-spirited punk” by fellow writers from The Nation and The New Republic. Tyrrell, a knock-down version of H.L. Mencken, writing without the master's verve or wit, is indeed a pretentious and thoroughly unpleasant fellow whose book The Liberal Crack-Up is given over to a nuke-the-whales humor, i.e., an extended and generally senseless tirade against feminists, peaceniks, environmentalists, etc. It is all the more (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Matthew D. Adler, Popular Constitutionalism and the Rule of Recognition: Whose Practices Ground U.score: 24.0
    The law within each legal system is a function of the practices of some social group. In short, law is a kind of socially grounded norm. H.L.A Hart famously developed this view in his book, The Concept of Law, by arguing that law derives from a social rule, the so-called “rule of recognition.” But the proposition that social facts play a foundational role in producing law is a point of consensus for all modern jurisprudents in the Anglo-American tradition: not just (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Arnaud Dewalque (2011). Expérience perceptuelle et contenus multiples. Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique.score: 24.0
    Mon intention est de discuter quelques aspects du débat actuel sur la perception qui oppose les partisans du conceptualisme (essentiellement John McDowell et Bill Brewer) aux partisans du non-conceptualisme (Fred Dretske, Gareth Evans, Christopher Peacocke, Michael Tye, Tim Crane, José Luis Bermúdez, Adina Roskies et d?autres). Je commencerai par fixer le cadre théorique du débat, par clarifier son enjeu et par retracer brièvement son origine. Ensuite, je mettrai en évidence une difficulté majeure de la position conceptualiste. Pour finir, j?examinerai l?une (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation