8 found
Order:
  1.  62
    Dennis M. Ahern (1976). Is Mo Tzu a Utilitarian? Journal of Chinese Philosophy 3 (2):185-193.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  2. Dennis M. Ahern (1975). Hume on the Evidential Impossibility of Miracles. American Philosophical Quarterly:1 - 31.
    THE ESSAY "OF MIRACLES," IN ADDITION TO BEING ONE OF THE MOST PROVOKING SECTIONS OF HUME’S WRITINGS, IS ALSO ONE OF THE MOST WIDELY MISUNDERSTOOD. HUME CLAIMS HIS ARGUMENT IS SIMILAR TO AN ARGUMENT OF ARCHBISHOP TILLOTSON, AND I EXPLORE THE PARALLEL BETWEEN THE TWO ARGUMENTS IN DETAIL. FUNDAMENTAL TO BOTH IS THE CONCEPT OF EVIDENTIAL IMPOSSIBILITY: A PROPOSITION, P, IS EVIDENTIALLY IMPOSSIBLE IF AND ONLY IF ALLEGED EVIDENCE FOR THE TRUTH OF P WOULD NOT BE EVIDENCE FOR P, WERE (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  24
    Dennis M. Ahern (1977). Ineffabilityinthe Lao Tzu: The Taming of a Dragon. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 4 (4):357-382.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  12
    Dennis M. Ahern (1977). Miracles and Physical Impossibility. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):71 - 79.
    WHILE THERE IS AGREEMENT AMONG MANY (BUT NOT ALL) THEOLOGIANS AND PHILOSOPHERS THAT A MIRACULOUS EVENT SHOULD BE CONCEIVED IN OPPOSITION TO THE NATURAL ORDER, THERE IS DISAGREEMENT ABOUT WHY THIS OPPOSITION MUST BE PRESENT. IN THIS PAPER I EXAMINE ANTONY FLEW’S EXPLANATION OF HOW AND WHY MIRACLES AND NATURE ARE OPPOSED, SUGGESTING THAT HIS ACCOUNT IS, AS IT STANDS, PROBLEMATICAL AND IN NEED OF REVISION. I ARGUE THAT IF MIRACLES ARE TO BE THOUGHT OF AS SUPERNATURAL INTERVENTIONS INTO THE (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  18
    Dennis M. Ahern (1980). An Equivocation in Confucian Philosophy. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 7 (2):175-185.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  2
    Dennis M. Ahern (1979). Foreknowledge: Nelson Pike and Newcomb's Problem: DENNIS M. AHERN. Religious Studies 15 (4):475-490.
    The problem of foreknowledge and freedom presents a challenge to the defender of traditional Western theism. Nelson Pike has argued that the existence of an essentially omniscient God who possesses foreknowledge is incompatible with human freedom. Pike's opponents in this matter, among whom is Alvin Plantinga, argue that no incompatibility has yet been shown. I shall develop the view that neither Pike nor his opponents have conclusively settled the question whether foreknowledge and freedom are compatible. Furthermore there is a reason (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  6
    Dennis M. Ahern (1979). Foreknowledge: Nelson Pike and Newcomb's Problem. Religious Studies 15 (4):475 - 490.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Dennis M. Ahern (ed.) (1975). Studies in Epistemology: Essays. Blackwell.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography