Search results for 'Dennis M. McCullough' (try it on Scholar)

20 found
Sort by:
  1. Garland E. Allen & Dennis M. McCullough (1968). Notes on Source Materials: The Edwin Grant Conklin Papers at Princeton University. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 1 (2):325 - 331.score: 870.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Loretta M. Kopelman & Laurence B. McCullough (1999). Hume, Bioethics, and Philosophy of Medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (4):315 – 321.score: 280.0
  3. Leili Fatehi, Susan M. Wolf, Jeffrey McCullough, Ralph Hall, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P. Kahn, Cortney Jones, Stephen A. Campbell, Rebecca S. Dresser, Arthur G. Erdman, Christy L. Haynes, Robert A. Hoerr, Linda F. Hogle, Moira A. Keane, George Khushf, Nancy M. P. King, Efrosini Kokkoli, Gary Marchant, Andrew D. Maynard, Martin Philbert, Gurumurthy Ramachandran, Ronald A. Siegel & Samuel Wickline (2012). Recommendations for Nanomedicine Human Subjects Research Oversight: An Evolutionary Approach for an Emerging Field. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):716-750.score: 280.0
    The nanomedicine field is fast evolving toward complex, “active,” and interactive formulations. Like many emerging technologies, nanomedicine raises questions of how human subjects research (HSR) should be conducted and the adequacy of current oversight, as well as how to integrate concerns over occupational, bystander, and environmental exposures. The history of oversight for HSR investigating emerging technologies is a patchwork quilt without systematic justification of when ordinary oversight for HSR is enough versus when added oversight is warranted. Nanomedicine HSR provides an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Laurence B. McCullough & Carol M. Ashton (1994). A Methodology for Teaching Ethics in the Clinical Setting: A Clinical Handbook for Medical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (1).score: 240.0
    The pluralism of methodologies and severe time constraints pose important challenges to pedagogy in clinical ethics. We designed a step-by-step student handbook to operate within such constraints and to respect the methodological pluralism of bioethics and clinical ethics. The handbook comprises six steps: Step 1: What are the facts of the case?; Step 2: What are your obligations to your patient?; Step 3: What are your obligations to third parties to your relationship with the patient?; Step 4: Do your obligations (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Juliann E. Aukema, Deborah G. McCullough, Betsy Von Holle, Andrew M. Liebhold, Kerry Britton & Susan J. Frankel (2010). Historical Accumulation of Nonindigenous Forest Pests in the Continental United States. BioScience 60 (11):886-897.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Laurence B. McCullough, Frank A. Chervenak & Susan M. Scott (1995). Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. HEC Forum 7 (6):379-380.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Lisa Marie Anderson, Nataša Bakić-Mirić, Gloria B. Clark, Stephen Coleman, Donald J. Dietrich, Christian R. Donath, John P. Frayne, Hall Gardner, Omer Gersten, Grant Havers, Thomas William Heyck, Peter M. Hill, Christa Jansohn, Justin T. Jones, Eleni Karasavvidou, Hugh Lindsay, Jean-Philippe Mathy, Edwin R. Mccullough, Markus Meckl, Ljubica Miočević, Brayton Polka, Michele Pridmore-Brown, George Robb, Kenneth Robbins, Arlene W. Saxonhouse, Frank Schalow, Carlo Scognamiglio, Stanley Shostak, Lora Sigler, Matthew Stanley, John E. Weakland, Alison Webster, Gabriele Weinberger & Eva-Sabine Zehelein (2009). Null. The European Legacy 14 (4):473-507.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Juliann E. Aukema, Deborah G. McCullough, Betsy Von Holle, Andrew M. Liebhold, Kerry Britton & Susan J. Frankel (2010). Historical Accumulation of Nonindigenous Forest Pests in the Continental United States. BioScience 60 (11):886-897.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Patricia Agre, Frances A. Campbell, Barbara D. Goldman, Maria L. Boccia, Nancy Kass, Laurence B. McCullough, Jon F. Merz, Suzanne M. Miller, Jim Mintz & Bruce Rapkin (forthcoming). Improving Informed Consent: The Medium is Not the Message. Irb.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. F. A. Chervenak, L. B. McCullough, A. Grünebaum, B. Arabin, M. I. Levene & R. L. Brent (2012). Planned Home Birth in the United States and Professionalism: A Critical Assessment. Journal of Clinical Ethics 24 (3):184-191.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Ellen Wright Clayton, Laurence B. McCullough, Leslie G. Biesecker, Steven Joffe, Lainie Friedman Ross, Susan M. Wolf & For the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (2014). Addressing the Ethical Challenges in Genetic Testing and Sequencing of Children. American Journal of Bioethics 14 (3):3-9.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. M. E. McCullough, R. Kurzban & B. A. Tabak (forthcoming). Cognitive Mechanisms for Revenge and Forgiveness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Geoffrey C. Poole, Jason B. Dunham, Druscilla M. Keenan, Sally T. Sauter, Dale A. Mccullough, Christopher Mebane, Jeffrey C. Lockwood, Don A. Essig, Mark P. Hicks, Debra J. Sturdevant, Elizabeth J. Materna, Shelley A. Spalding, John Risley & Marianne Deppman (2004). The Case for Regime-Based Water Quality Standards. BioScience 54 (2):155.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Daniel M. Fox (2007). Selective Appropriation, Medical Ethics, and Health Politics: The Complementarity of Baker, McCullough, and Me. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (1):23-30.score: 36.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Felicity A. Goodyear‐Smith, Tannis M. Laidlaw & Robert G. Large (1998). Riposte: In Praise of Scholarship: A Reply to McCullough. Health Care Analysis 6 (3):223-226.score: 36.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Gertrude M. White (2001). John Adams, by David McCullough. The Chesterton Review 27 (4):533-536.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Bruce Ellis Benson & Norman Wirzba (eds.) (2005). The Phenomenology of Prayer. Fordham University Press.score: 24.0
    This collection of ground-breaking essays considers the many dimensions of prayer: how prayer relates us to the divine; prayer's ability to reveal what is essential about our humanity; the power of prayer to transform human desire and action; and the relation of prayer to cognition. It takes up the meaning of prayer from within a uniquely phenomenological point of view, demonstrating that the phenomenology of prayer is as much about the character and boundaries of phenomenological analysis as it is about (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. H. C. M. L. Rodrigues & P. P. van den Berg (2014). Randomized Controlled Trials of Maternal‐Fetal Surgery: A Challenge to Clinical Equipoise. Bioethics 28 (8):405-413.score: 12.0
    This article focuses on maternal-fetal surgery (MFS) and on the concept of clinical equipoise that is a widely accepted requirement for conducting randomized controlled trials (RCT). There are at least three reasons why equipoise is unsuitable for MFS. First, the concept is based on a misconception about the nature of clinical research and the status of research subjects. Second, given that it is not clear who the research subject/s in MFS is/are, if clinical equipoise is to be used as a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. H. C. M. L. Rodrigues, P. P. van den Berg & M. Duwell (2013). Dotting the I's and Crossing the T's: Autonomy and/or Beneficence? The 'Fetus as a Patient' in Maternal–Fetal Surgery. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (4):219-223.score: 12.0
    Chervenak and McCullough, authors of the most acknowledged ethical framework for maternal–fetal surgery, rely on the ‘ethical–obstetrical’ concept of the fetus as a patient in order to determine what is morally owed to fetuses by both physicians and the women who gestate them in the context of prenatal surgery. In this article, we reconstruct the argumentative structure of their framework and present an internal criticism. First, we analyse the justificatory arguments put forward by the authors regarding the moral status (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Arnold M. Ludwig (1997). How Do We Know Who We Are?: A Biography of the Self. Oxford University Press.score: 12.0
    "The terrain of the self is vast," notes renowned psychiatrist Arnold Ludwig, "parts known, parts impenetrable, and parts unexplored." How do we construct a sense of ourselves? How can a self reflect upon itself or deceive itself? Is all personal identity plagiarized? Is a "true" or "authentic" self even possible? Is it possible to really "know" someone else or ourselves for that matter? To answer these and many other intriguing questions, Ludwig takes a unique approach, examining the art of biography (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation