Search results for 'Derek Wall' (try it on Scholar)

999 found
Sort by:
  1. Derek Wall (1994). Green History: A Reader in Environmental Literature, Philosophy, and Politics. Routledge.score: 120.0
    Charting the origins of the modern ecology movement over more than two thousand years, this volume gives a voice to those hidden from history, revealing "green" themes within artistic and scientific thought. This title available in eBook format. Click here for more information . Visit our eBookstore at: www.ebookstore.tandf.co.uk.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Barbara Wall (1981). Bernard Wall and The. The Chesterton Review 7 (3):198-224.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Steven Wall (1998). Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint. Cambridge University Press.score: 60.0
    Are liberalism and perfectionism compatible? In this study Steven Wall presents and defends a perfectionist account of political morality that takes issue with many currently fashionable liberal ideas but retains the strong liberal commitment to the ideal of personal autonomy. He begins by critically discussing the most influential version of anti-perfectionist liberalism, examining the main arguments that have been offered in its defense. He then clarifies the ideal of personal autonomy, presents an account of its value and shows that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. John Wall (2005). Moral Creativity: Paul Ricoeur and the Poetics of Possibility. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    In Moral Creativity, John Wall argues that moral life and thought are inherently and radically creative. Human beings are called by their own primordially created depths to exceed historical evil and tragedy through the ongoing creative transformation of their world. This thesis challenges ancient Greek and biblical separations of ethics and poetic image-making, as well as contemporary conceptions of moral life as grounded in abstract principles or preconstituted traditions. Taking as his point of departure the poetics of the will (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Illan Rua Wall (2012). Wendy Brown: Walled States, Waning Sovereignty. Feminist Legal Studies 20 (1):61-62.score: 40.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Steven Wall (2010). On Justificatory Liberalism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (2):123-149.score: 30.0
    In a number of publications, Gerald Gaus has presented an ambitious account of political morality that gives the ideal of public justification pride of place. This article critically discusses Gaus’s characterization and defense of the ideal of public justification in politics. It also presents an account and an argument in support of first-person political justification.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Edmund Wall (2001). Sexual Harassment and Wrongful Communication. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (4):525-537.score: 30.0
  8. Steven Wall (2009). Self-Ownership and Paternalism. Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (4):399-417.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Steven Wall (2010). Neutralism for Perfectionists: The Case of Restricted State Neutrality. Ethics 120 (2):232-256.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. David Wall (2009). Akrasia and Self-Control. Philosophical Explorations 12 (1):69 – 78.score: 30.0
    According to Gary Watson (1977), if we choose not to implement a judgment about what it is best to do then we must have changed that judgment. On those grounds he rejects an otherwise plausible account of akrasia, or weakness of will, that explains it in terms of the relative strengths of the agent's desires to act against and in accordance with their evaluative judgment. However, Watson seems to assume what I call a 'principle of closure of evaluation', a principle (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Steven Wall (2007). Democracy and Equality. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):416–438.score: 30.0
    Many writers claim that democratic government rests on a principled commitment to the ideal of political equality. The ideal of political equality holds that political institutions ought to be arranged so that they distribute political standing equally to all citizens. I reject this common view. I argue that the ideal of political equality, under its most plausible characterizations, lacks independent justificatory force. By casting doubt on the ideal of political equality, I provide indirect support for the claim that democratic government (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Steven Wall, Perfectionism in Moral and Political Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. David Wall (2009). Are There Passive Desires? Dialectica 63 (2):133-155.score: 30.0
    What is the relation between desire and action? According to a traditional, widespread and influential view I call 'The Motivational Necessity of Desire' (MN), having a desire that p entails being disposed to act in ways that you believe will bring about p . But what about desires like a desire that the committee chooses you without your needing to do anything, or a desire that your child passes her exams on her own? Such 'self-passive' desires are often given as (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Steven Wall (2003). Just Savings and the Difference Principle. Philosophical Studies 116 (1):79-102.score: 30.0
    The issue of just savings between generations presents an important,and for the most part unappreciated, problem for Rawls's theory ofdistributive justice. This paper argues that the just savingsprinciple, as Rawls formulates it in his recent work, standsin tension with the difference principle. When thought through,the just savings principle – and more precisely the foundationon which it rests – give us reason to reject the differenceprinciple in favor of a less egalitarian principle ofdistributive justice.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Lynn A. Jansen & Steven Wall (2009). Paternalism and Fairness in Clinical Research. Bioethics 23 (3):172-182.score: 30.0
    In this paper, we defend the ethics of clinical research against the charge of paternalism. We do so not by denying that the ethics of clinical research is paternalistic, but rather by defending the legitimacy of paternalism in this context. Our aim is not to defend any particular set of paternalistic restrictions, but rather to make a general case for the permissibility of paternalistic restrictions in this context. Specifically, we argue that there is no basic liberty-right to participate in clinical (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Steven Wall (2007). Collective Rights and Individual Autonomy. Ethics 117 (2):234-264.score: 30.0
  17. Steven Wall (2006). Rawls and the Status of Political Liberty. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2):245–270.score: 30.0
    In his late work, Rawls makes strong claims about the status of political liberty. These claims, if accepted, would have significant implications for the content of "justice as fairness." I discuss the nature of these claims, clarifying Rawls's fair value guarantee of the political liberties and critically discussing the arguments that he and others have given for assigning special importance to the political liberties. I conclude that justice as fairness, properly understood, is not a deeply democratic conception of justice.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Edmund Wall (2008). Searle's Derivation, Natural Law, and Moral Relativism. Philosophia 36 (2):237-249.score: 30.0
    Some philosophers have maintained that even if John R. Searle’s attempted derivation of an evaluative proposition from purely descriptive premises is successful, moral ought would not have been derived. Searle agrees. I will argue that if Searle has successfully derived “ought,” then, based on various approaches taken towards the content of “morality,” this is moral ought. I will also trace out some of the benefits of a successful derivation of moral ought in relation to natural law ethics. I sketch a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. John Wall (2003). Phronesis, Poetics, and Moral Creativity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (3):317-341.score: 30.0
    At least since Aristotle, phronesis (practical wisdom) and poetics (making or creating) have been understood as essentially different activities, one moral the other (in itself) non-moral. Today, if anything, this distinction is sharpened by a Romantic association of poetics with inner subjective expression. Recent revivals of Aristotelian ethics sometimes allow for poetic dimensions of ethics, but these are still separated from practical wisdom per se. Through a fresh reading of phronesis in the French hermeneutical phenomenologist Paul Ricoeur, I argue that (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. David R. Dowty, Robert Eugene Wall & Stanley Peters (1981). Introduction to Montague Semantics. Springer.score: 30.0
    INTRODUCTION Linguists who work within the tradition of transformational generative grammar tend to regard semantics as an intractable, perhaps ultimately ...
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Steven Wall (2003). Freedom as a Political Ideal. Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (2):307-334.score: 30.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Steven Wall (2010). John Christman and Joel Anderson (Eds.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), Pp. XII + 383. Utilitas 22 (2):238-240.score: 30.0
  23. Steven Wall (2006). Debate: Democracy, Authority and Publicity. Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (1):85–100.score: 30.0
  24. G. I. Wall (1968). The Concept of Vocational Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education 2 (1):51–65.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Steven Wall (2001). Neutrality and Responsibility. Journal of Philosophy 98 (8):389-410.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Steven P. Wall (1996). Public Justification and the Transparency Argument. Philosophical Quarterly 46 (185):501-507.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. John Wall, William Schweiker & W. David Hall (eds.) (2002). Paul Ricoeur and Contemporary Moral Thought. Routledge.score: 30.0
    Here, some of the most influential thinkers in theological and philosophical ethics develop new directions for research in contemporary moral thought. Taking as their starting point Ricoeur's recent work on moral anthropology, the contributors set a vital agenda for future conversations about ethics and just community.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Steven Wall (2007). Democracy and Restraint. Law and Philosophy 26 (3):307-342.score: 30.0
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Grenville Wall (1974). Moral Autonomy and the Liberal Theory of Moral Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education 8 (2):222–236.score: 30.0
  30. Edmund Wall (2000). The Problem of Group Agency. Philosophical Forum 31 (2):187–197.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Grenville Wall (1978). Against Subjective Intrinsic Value. Educational Philosophy and Theory 10 (2):39–49.score: 30.0
  32. Barbara E. Wall (2001). Navajo Conceptions of Justice in the Peacemaker Court. Journal of Social Philosophy 32 (4):532–546.score: 30.0
  33. Edmund Wall (2001). Marx, Law, and Coercion. Journal of Social Philosophy 32 (1):70–77.score: 30.0
  34. R. Mills Grant, A. Austin Simon, S. Thomson Derek & Hannah Devine-Wright (2009). Applying a Universal Content and Structure of Values in Construction Management. Journal of Business Ethics 90 (4).score: 30.0
    There has recently been a reappraisal of value in UK construction and calls from a wide range of influential individuals, professional institutions and government bodies for the industry to exceed stakeholders’ expectations and develop integrated teams that can deliver world class products and services. As such value is certainly topical, but the importance of values as a separate but related concept is less well understood. Most construction firms have well-defined and well-articulated values, expressed in annual reports and on websites; however, (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Carlota S. Smith & Robert Wall (1983). Introduction. Linguistics and Philosophy 6 (3):291-291.score: 30.0
    Although they might not express themselves in quite this way, non-philosophers tend to think that mereological composition is a vague matter : sometimes it occurs, sometimes it does not, and sometimes it sort of occurs. For example, when I am building a boat, at first the timbers that I have acquired for the job do not jointly compose an entity; in the end they do—they compose the boat that I have built; and in between they sort of or more or (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Edmund Wall (2003). Reply to Iddo Landau. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (2):235-241.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. John Wall (2010). Ethics in Light of Childhood. Georgetown University Press.score: 30.0
    Three enduring models -- What constitutes human being? -- What is the ethical aim? -- What is owed each other? -- Human rights in light of childhood -- The generative family -- The art of ethical thinking.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Edmund Wall (2001). Voluntary Action. Philosophia 28 (1-4):127-136.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. W. A. Wall & W. A. Watt (1898). Deterrent Punishment. International Journal of Ethics 8 (2):157-168.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. George B. Wall (1971). More on the Equivalence of Act and Rule Utilitarianism. Philosophical Studies 22 (5-6):91 - 95.score: 30.0
  41. Sanjay K. Agarwal, Sylvia Estrada, Warren G. Foster, L. Lewis Wall, Doug Brown, Elaine S. Revis & Suzanne Rodriguez (2007). What Motivates Women to Take Part in Clinical and Basic Science Endometriosis Research? Bioethics 21 (5):263–269.score: 30.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Constance R. Heiland, John P. Daniels, Hugh M. Shane & Jerry L. Wall (1984). The Ethical Imperative: Myth or Reality? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 3 (2):119-125.score: 30.0
    As a result of recent legislative developments and greater ease of accessibility, the Human Resources Manager (HRM) faces the challenge of not only maintaining records but also that of protecting employees from misuse of personal information contained in their individual personnel files. The widespread use of computers for maintaining employee records has resulted in new ethical dimensions and/or challenges for the HRM. Serious questions regarding accessibility to and dissemination of such personal information now confront the HRM. Unless policies are developed (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Robert Wall (1976). First Announcement and Call for Papers: Linguistics and Philosophy— an International Journal. Philosophy and Social Criticism 3 (3):333-334.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Sarah Wall (2007). Organizational Ethics, Change, and Stakeholder Involvement: A Survey of Physicians. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 19 (3):227-243.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Grenville Wall (1985). Beyond Dominationor–Retreat Into Subjectivism? Journal of Philosophy of Education 19 (2):235–244.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Grenville Wall (1975). Freedom Versus Reason: A Reply. Philosophical Quarterly 25 (100):213-229.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Patricia Sue Wall (2008). Guide to the Ethics of Ex Parte Communications. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (3):555 - 559.score: 30.0
    Ex parte communications can become an administrative quagmire for anyone trying to deal with tribunals that regulate business matters. These communications involve contact between a decision maker and one party outside the presence of another, interested party. At a time when codes of ethics are enacted to make corporate financial officers and boards of directors more accountable to their stockholders, and thus, to restore the confidence of the investing public, it appears most important that administrative judges and hearing officers adhere (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. David Sobel & Steven Wall (2009). Introduction. In David Sobel & Steven Wall (eds.), Reasons for Action. Cambridge University Press.score: 30.0
  49. David Sobel & Steven Wall (eds.) (2009). Reasons for Action. Cambridge University Press.score: 30.0
  50. Thomas Carl Wall (2005). Au Hasard. In Andrew Norris (ed.), Politics, Metaphysics, and Death: Essays on Giorgio Agamben's Homo Sacer. Duke University Press.score: 30.0
1 — 50 / 999