Search results for 'Dialectic' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Dirk Baltzly (1999). Aristotle and Platonic Dialectic in Metaphysics Gamma. Apeiron 32 (4):171-202.score: 18.0
    I come not to clarify Aristotle’s defence of the principle of non-contradiction, but to put it in its proper context. I argue that remarks in Metaphysics IV.3 together with the argument of IV.4, 1006a11-31 show that Aristotle practises Plato’s method of dialectic in his defence of PNC. I mean this in the strong sense that he uses the very methodology described in the middle books of the Republic and, I claim, illustrated in such dialogues as Parmenides, Sophist and Theaetetus.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Roy Bhaskar (2008). Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom. Routledge.score: 18.0
    Introduction: Critical realism, hegelian dialectic and the problems of philosophy preliminary considerations -- Objectives of the book -- Dialectic : an initial orientation -- Negation -- Four degrees of critical realism -- Prima facie objections to critical realism -- On the sources and general character of the hegelian dialectic -- On the immanent critique and limitations of the hegelian dialectic -- The fine structure of the hegelian dialectic -- Dialectic : the logic of absence, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Mehmet Karabela (2011). The Development of Dialectic and Argumentation Theory in Post-Classical Islamic Intellectual History. Dissertation, McGill Universityscore: 18.0
    This dissertation is an analysis of the development of dialectic and argumentation theory in post-classical Islamic intellectual history. The central concerns of the thesis are; treatises on the theoretical understanding of the concept of dialectic and argumentation theory, and how, in practice, the concept of dialectic, as expressed in the Greek classical tradition, was received and used by five communities in the Islamic intellectual camp. It shows how dialectic as an argumentative discourse diffused into five communities (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Peter Rule (2011). Bakhtin and Freire: Dialogue, Dialectic and Boundary Learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (9):924-942.score: 18.0
    Dialogue is a seminal concept within the work of the Brazilian adult education theorist, Paulo Freire, and the Russian literary critic and philosopher, Mikhail Bakhtin. While there are commonalities in their understanding of dialogue, they differ in their treatment of dialectic. This paper addresses commonalities and dissonances within a Bakhtin-Freire dialogue on the notions of dialogue and dialectic. It then teases out some of the implications for education theory and practice in relation to two South African contexts of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Nicholas Joll (2009). Adorno's Negative Dialectic: Theme, Point, and Methodological Status. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2):233–53.score: 18.0
    This paper provides a critical interpretation of the theme, point, and methodological status of Adorno’s so-called negative dialectic. The theme at issue, ‘non-identity’, comes in several varieties; and the point of Adorno’s dialectic, namely reconciliation, is multifaceted. Exploration of those topics shows that negative dialectic seques into substantive doctrines, including a version of transcendentalism and a claim about deformation. The peculiar methodological status of negative dialectic explains that adumbration. In the appraisive register, my principal contentions include (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jack Reynolds (2009). The Master-Slave Dialectic and the 'Sado-Masochistic Entity': Some Objections. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities 14 (3):11-25.score: 18.0
    Hegel’s famous analyses of the ‘master-slave dialectic’, and the more general struggle for recognition which it is a part of, have been remarkably influential throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Bound up with the dominance of this idea, however, has been a corresponding treatment of sadism and masochism as complicit projects that are mutually necessary for one another in a manner that is structurally isomorphic with the way in which master and slave depend on one another. In clinical diagnoses (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Eleonore Stump (1989). Dialectic and its Place in the Development of Medieval Logic. Cornell University Press.score: 18.0
    Introduction Since my work in medieval logic has concentrated on dialectic. I have tried to trace scholastic treatments of dialectic to discussions of it in ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Francisco J. Gonzalez (2008). And the Rest is Sigetik: Silencing Logic and Dialectic in Heidegger's Beiträge Zur Philosophie. Research in Phenomenology 38 (3):358-391.score: 18.0
    Faced with the impossibility of saying Being directly given that all language is language of beings, Heidegger proposes an overcoming of logic in favor of what he calls Sigetik: a way of addressing Being in and through silence, i.e., without asserting anything of Being. After considering what such a Sigetik actually involves and how it is possible, this paper asks why Heidegger rejects the alternative of that indirect saying of Being that he identifies with dialectic. It is then argued (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jonathan Francis Bennett (1974). Kant's Dialectic. New York]Cambridge University Press.score: 18.0
    Jonathan Bennett here examines the second half of the Critique of Pure Reason, the Dialectic, where Kant is concerned with problems about substance, the nature ...
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Richard Robinson (1953/1984). Plato's Earlier Dialectic. Oxford University Press.score: 18.0
    Following strict rules of interpretation, this book focuses on the ideas in Plato's early and middle dialogues that lie within the fields now called logic and methodology, specifically elenchus and dialectic and the method of hypothesis.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Michael Leff (2000). Rhetoric and Dialectic in the Twenty-First Century. Argumentation 14 (3):241-254.score: 18.0
    The paper presents a historical overview of some characteristic differences between rhetoric and dialectic in the pre-modern tradition. In the light of this historical analysis, some current approaches to dialectic are characterized, with special attention to Ralph Johnson's concept of dialectical tier.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Nektarios Limnatis (ed.) (2010). The Dimensions of Hegel's Dialectic. Continuum.score: 18.0
    An important and long over-due study of the significance of Hegel's dialectic.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. D. V. Nikulin (2010). Dialectic and Dialogue. Stanford University Press.score: 18.0
    In the beginning : dialogue and dialectic in Plato -- Dialectic : via antiqua -- Dialectic : via moderna -- Dialogue : a systematic outlook -- Dialogue : interruption -- Against writing -- (Dialectical) conclusion.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Alan W. Norrie (2010). Dialectic and Difference: Dialectical Critical Realism and the Grounds of Justice. Routledge.score: 18.0
    Introduction: Natural necessity, being, and becoming -- Accentuate the negative -- Diffracting dialectic -- Opening totality -- Constellating ethics -- Metacritique I : philosophy's primordial failing -- Metacritique II : dialectic and difference -- Conclusion: Natural necessity and the grounds of justice : natural necessity as material meshwork.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. John Rees (1998). The Algebra of Revolution: The Dialectic and the Classical Marxist Tradition. Routledge.score: 18.0
    The Algebra of Revolution is the first book to study Marxist method as it has been developed by the main representatives of the classical Marxist tradition, namely Marx and Engels, Luxembourg, Lenin, Lukacs, Gramsci, and Trotsky. This book provides the only single volume study of major Marxist thinkers' views on the crucial question of the dialectic, connecting them with pressing contemporary, political and theoretical questions. This title available in eBook format. Click here for more information . Visit our eBookstore (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Marta Spranzi (2011). The Art of Dialectic Between Dialogue and Rhetoric: The Aristotelian Tradition. John Benjamins Pub. Co..score: 18.0
    introduction Dialectic and the notion of tradition The past does not pull back but presses forward. (Hannah Arendt 1977: 10) Through the confrontation over ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Louise Cummings (2003). Formal Dialectic in Fallacy Inquiry: An Unintelligible Circumscription of Argumentative Rationality? [REVIEW] Argumentation 17 (2):161-183.score: 18.0
    Since its inception in the work on fallacies of Charles Hamblin, formal dialectic has been the object of an unparalleled level of optimism concerning the potential of its analytical contribution to fallacy inquiry. This optimism has taken the form of a rapid proliferation of formal dialectical studies of arguments in general and fallacious arguments in particular under the auspices of theorists such as Jim Mackenzie and John Woods and Douglas Walton, to name but a few. Notwithstanding the interest in, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Erik C. W. Krabbe (2013). Topical Roots of Formal Dialectic. Argumentation 27 (1):71-87.score: 18.0
    Formal dialectic has its roots in ancient dialectic. We can trace this influence in Charles Hamblin’s book on fallacies, in which he introduced his first formal dialectical systems. Earlier, Paul Lorenzen proposed systems of dialogical logic, which were in fact formal dialectical systems avant la lettre, with roles similar to those of the Greek Questioner and Answerer. In order to make a comparison between ancient dialectic and contemporary formal dialectic, I shall formalize part of the Aristotelian (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Douglas Beck Low (1987). The Existential Dialectic of Marx and Merleau-Ponty. P. Lang.score: 18.0
    Our work represents the culmination of a study that is a search for a method. It is a search that has led us away from the remnants of Cartesianism that are found in Sartre’s Critique of Dialectical Reason, which we do not deal with here, and toward a comparative study of Karl Marx and Maurice Merleau-Ponty, which we do take up in detail. The present manuscript argues, in fact, that both Marx and Merleau-Ponty operate with a method that may be (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. H. Hamner Hill & Michael Kagan (1995). Aristotelian Dialectic. Informal Logic 17 (1).score: 18.0
    "Aristotelian Dialectic" is a dialogue between two persons, T and Q, concerning Aristotle's views on the nature of dialectic and rhetoric and also on the role of dialectic and rhetoric in modern education. T advances two theses: that Aristotle views dialectic and rhetoric as intellectual martial arts. to be used to combat the sophists; and that these arts form the basis of Homeric education. T defends this view by examining what Aristotle has to say in the (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Julius Stenzel (1940/1973). Plato's Method of Dialectic. New York,Arno Press.score: 18.0
    Introduction.--The literary form and philosophical content of the Platonic dialogue.--Plato's method of dialectic.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. David Zarefsky (2006). Strategic Maneuvering Through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialectic and Rhetoric. [REVIEW] Argumentation 20 (4):399-416.score: 18.0
    Persuasive definitions – those that convey an attitude in the act of naming – are frequently employed in discourse and are a form of strategic maneuvering. The dynamics of persuasive definition are explored through brief case studies and an extended analysis of the use of the “war” metaphor in responding to terrorism after September 11, 2001. Examining persuasive definitions enables us to notice similarities and differences between strategic maneuvering in dialectical and in rhetorical argument, as well as differences between the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. J. D. G. Evans (1977). Aristotle's Concept of Dialectic. Cambridge University Press.score: 18.0
    This book provides a systematic account of Aristotle's theory of dialectic.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. G. Thomas Goodnight (1993). A ?New Rhetoric? For a ?New Dialectic?: Prolegomena to a Responsible Public Argument. [REVIEW] Argumentation 7 (3):329-342.score: 18.0
    This essay offers, as a counterpart to pragma-dialectical argument, a “new rhetoric” produced in the situated discourse of a public forum when a community addresses matters of common urgency and undertakes informed action. Such a rhetoric takes the principles of discourse ethics as its informing dialectic by identifying an interlocutor as one who is obligatedboth to argue effectively,and also to hold open, even reinforce, norms of communicative reason. Implications concerning the study of fallacies and theethos obligations of communicative reasoning (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Hanns Hohmann (2000). Rhetoric and Dialectic: Some Historical and Legal Perspectives. [REVIEW] Argumentation 14 (3):223-234.score: 18.0
    The thesis is defended that rhetoric is not, as is often said, a discipline which is hierarchically subordinate to dialectic. It is argued that the modalities of the links between rhetoric and dialectic must be seen in a somewhat different light: rhetoric and dialectic should be viewed as two complementary disciplines. On the basis of a historical survey of the views of various authors on the links between rhetoric and dialectic, it is concluded that efforts to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Scott Austin (2007). Parmenides and the History of Dialectic: Three Essays. Parmenides Pub..score: 18.0
    Essay one: Parmenidean dialectic -- Essay two: Parmenidean metaphysics -- Essay three: Parmenides and the history of dialectic.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Jakob L. Fink (ed.) (2012). The Development of Dialectic From Plato to Aristotle. Cambridge University Press.score: 18.0
    The period from Plato's birth to Aristotle's death (427-322 BC) is one of the most influential and formative in the history of Western philosophy. The developments of logic, metaphysics, epistemology, ethics and science in this period have been investigated, controversies have arisen and many new theories have been produced. But this is the first book to give detailed scholarly attention to the development of dialectic during this decisive period. It includes chapters on topics such as: dialectic as interpersonal (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Eleanor Kaufman (2012). Deleuze, the Dark Precursor: Dialectic, Structure, Being. The Johns Hopkins University Press.score: 18.0
    Deleuze, The Dark Precursor is organized around three themes that critically overlap: dialectic, structure, and being.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Erik C. W. Krabbe (2000). Meeting in the House of Callias: Rhetoric and Dialectic. [REVIEW] Argumentation 14 (3):205-217.score: 18.0
    The purpose of this paper is to briefly describe and compare the original goals and perspectives of both rhetoric and dialectic in theory and in practice. Dialectic is the practice and theory of conversations; rhetoric that of speeches. For theory of dialectic, this paper will turn to Aristotle's Topics and Sophistical Refutations; for theory of rhetoric, to his Rhetoric. Thus it will appear that rhetoric and dialectic are pretty close. Yet, on the other hand, there is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Jan Helge Solbakk (forthcoming). The Whole and the Art of Medical Dialectic: A Platonic Account. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy:1-14.score: 18.0
    The aim of this paper is to investigate Plato’s conception of the whole in the Phaedrus and the theory of medical dialectic underlying this conception. Through this analysis Plato’s conception of kairos will also be adressed. It will be argued that the epistemological holism developed in the dialogue and the patient-typology emerging from it provides us with a way of perceiving individual situations of medical discourse and decision-making that makes it possible to bridge the gap between observations of a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. MauriceA Finocchiaro (1988). Dialectic and Argument in Philosophy: A Case Study of Hegel's Phenomenological Preface. [REVIEW] Argumentation 2 (2):175-190.score: 18.0
    This article examines two problems: the role of argument in philosophy, vis-àÏs other philosophical activities; and the nature of argument in philosophy, vis-à-vis argument in other fields. The examination proceeds by reference to the notion of dialectic, which is regarded by some as offering an alternative to argument, and by reference to Hegel's Preface to the Phenomenology of Spirit, which explicitly discusses these very issues. The latter is reconstructed as the argument that philosophy is dialectical in part because it (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Charlotte Jørgensen (2014). Rhetoric, Dialectic and Logic: The Wild-Goose Chase for an Essential Distinction. Informal Logic 34 (2):152-166.score: 18.0
    Taking Blair’s recent contribution to the debate about the triad as its starting point, the article discusses and challenges attempts to reduce the intricate relationship between rhetoric, dialectic and logic to a trichotomy with watertight compartments or to separate them with a single clear-cut criterion. I argue that efforts to pinpoint an essential difference, among the various typical differences partly grounded in disciplinary traditions, obscure the complexities within the fields. As a consequence, crosscutting properties of the fields as well (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar (2007). About Old and New Dialectic: Dialogues, Fallacies, and Strategies. Informal Logic 27 (1):27-58.score: 18.0
    We shall investigate the similarities and dissimilarities between old and new dialectic. For the ‘old dialectic’, we base our survey mainly on Aristotle’s Topics and Sophistical Refutations, whereas for the ‘new dialectic’, we turn to contemporary views on dialogical interaction, such as can, for the greater part, be found in Walton’s The New Dialectic. Three issues are taken up: types of dialogue, fallacies, and strategies. Though one should not belittle the differences in scope and outlook that (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Uwe Petersen (2002). Diagonal Method and Dialectical Logic: Tools, Materials, and Groundworks for a Logical Foundation of Dialectic and Speculative Philosophy. Der Andere Verlag.score: 18.0
    bk. 1. Tools for dialectic -- bk. 2. Historical-philosophical background materials -- bk. 3. Groundworks for dialectical logic.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Fredric Jameson (2009). Valences of the Dialectic. Verso.score: 18.0
    After half a century exploring dialectical thought, renowned cultural critic Fredric Jameson presents a comprehensive study of a misrepresented, vital strain in Western philosophy. The dialectic, the concept of the evolution of an idea through internal contradiction and conflict, transformed two centuries of Western philosophy. To Hegel, who dominated nineteenth-century thought, it was a metaphysical system. In the works of Marx, the dialectic became a tool for materialist historical analysis, a theoretical maneuver that his critics derided and his (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Kan'ichi Kuroda (2001). Dialectic of Praxis: Umemoto's Philosophy of Subjectivity and Uno's Methodology of Social Science. Kaihoh-Sha.score: 18.0
    Machine generated contents note: Dialectic of Praxis -- I. Philosophy of Subjectivity and -- Historical Materialism 7 -- A. What is the "Toposical Tachiba"? 7 -- B. The Present and Past of Umemoto's Theory of Subjectivity 17 -- C. The Basis and Structure of Degeneration 36 -- II. Confused 'Dialectic of the Subject of Cognition' 48 -- A. Destruction of the Logic of Origo 48 -- 1. Summary of Umemoto's Epistemology 49 -- 2. Umemoto's Defect in Epistemology 56 (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Scott Jacobs (2000). Rhetoric and Dialectic From the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics. Argumentation 14 (3):261-286.score: 16.0
    Normative pragmatics can bridge the differences between dialectical and rhetorical theories in a way that saves the central insights of both. Normative pragmatics calls attention to how the manifest strategic design of a message produces interpretive effects and interactional consequences. Argumentative analysis of messages should begin with the manifest persuasive rationale they communicate. But not all persuasive inducements should be treated as arguments. Arguments express with a special pragmatic force propositions where those propositions stand in particular inferential relations to one (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. David Goodwin (1992). The Dialectic of Second-Order Distinctions: The Structure of Arguments About Fallacies. Informal Logic 14 (1).score: 16.0
    Arguments about fallacies generally attempt to distinguish real from apparent modes of argumentation and reasoning. To examine the structure of these arguments, this paper develops a theory of dialectical distinction. First, it explores the connection between Nicholas Rescher's concept of distinction as a "dialectical countermove" and Chaim Perelman and L. Olbrecht-Tyteca's "dissociation of ideas." Next, it applies a theory of distinction to Aristotle's extended arguments about fallacies in De Sophisticis Elenchis, primarily with a view to analyzing its underlying strategies of (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Adrian Haddock (2008). Danto's Dialectic. Philosophia 36 (4):483-493.score: 15.0
    Arthur C. Danto’s Analytical Philosophy of History has a Kantian ambition: to state the conditions that make historical knowledge possible and to show “the unhappy destiny” that attends attempts to extend modes of representation beyond these conditions. Even though Danto’s book fails to achieve this ambition, it succeeds in making a number of important—if neglected—suggestions in the course of its attempt. One concerns the significance of the progressive tense for our thinking about human agency. Another concerns the way agency can (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Catherine Malabou (2010). Plasticity at the Dusk of Writing: Dialectic, Destruction, Deconstruction. Columbia University Press.score: 15.0
    After defining plasticity in terms of its active embodiments, Malabou applies the notion to the work of Hegel, Heidegger, Levinas, Levi-Strauss, Freud, and ...
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Anthony Mansueto (1996). From Dialectic to Organization: Bogdanov's Contribution to Social Theory. Studies in East European Thought 48 (1):37 - 61.score: 15.0
    This paper situates Bogdanov in the context of social theory generally and socialist theory in particular. It outlines briefly the principal characteristics of his mature system, and assesses the strengths and weaknesses of his approach to the fundamental problems of social thought. The paper devotes particular attention to the problem of just how systems develop from less complex to more complex forms of organization, and evaluates Bogdanov’s solution to this problem against the background of populist, social democratic, and Leninist alternatives.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Hans-Georg Gadamer (1976). Hegel's Dialectic: Five Hermeneutical Studies. Yale University Press.score: 15.0
    These five essays on Hegel give the English-speaking reader a long-awaited opportunity to read the work of one of Germany's most distinguished philosophers, Hans-Georg Gadamer.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Jamie Morgan (2004). The Nature of a Transcendental Argument: Toward a Critique of Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom. Journal of Critical Realism 3 (2):305-340.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Olga Petrovskaya, Carol McDonald & Marjorie McIntyre (2011). Dialectic of the University: A Critique of Instrumental Reason in Graduate Nursing Education. Nursing Philosophy 12 (4):239-247.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Elizabeth Jayne White (2013). Bakhtinian Dialogic and Vygotskian Dialectic: Compatabilities and Contradictions in the Classroom? Educational Philosophy and Theory:1-17.score: 15.0
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Richard Norman (1980). Hegel, Marx, and Dialectic: A Debate. Humanities Press.score: 15.0
  47. Robert Kane (2009). Free Will and the Dialectic of Selfhood: Can One Make Sense of a Traditional Free Will Requiring Ultimate Responsibility? Ideas y Valores 58 (141):25-43.score: 15.0
    For four decades, I have been developing a distinctive view of free will according to which agents are required to be ultimately responsible for the creation or formation of their own wills (characters and purposes). The aim of this paper is to explain how a free will of this traditional kind -which..
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Carlo Sini (1990). Dialectic, Rhetoric and Writing: The Problem of Method. [REVIEW] Argumentation 4 (1):101-108.score: 15.0
    The problem of method is the problem of knowledge itself. As it is known, method (méthodos) also means way (odós). Philosophy is at the same time a form of knowledge and a technique of argumentation. In this second meaning, philosophy is mainly an art of both logical and rhetorical word. Consequently a profane voice reveals itself in the signs of philosophic knowledge, which on the one hand establishes the “logistic” (logistiké) soul, on the other the totalizing view of truth. Then (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Raymond Aron (1975). History and the Dialectic of Violence: An Analysis of Sartre's Critique De La Raison Dialectique. Blackwell.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Archie J. Bahm (1970). Polarity, Dialectic, and Organicity. Springfield, Ill.,Thomas.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000