You are accessing PhilPapers from Open University (UK), an institution that is not subscribed to PhilPapers. Starting on July 1, 2014, we ask institutions that grant philosophy degrees and are based in high-GDP countries to contribute to PhilPapers' maintenance and development through a subscription. See this page for details. Please show your support by contacting your librarian.

Search results for 'Dindo Tabanao' (try it on Scholar)

4 found
Sort by:
  1. Antonio Chella, Haris Dindo & Ignazio Infantino (2008). A Cognitive Approach to Goal-Level Imitation. Interaction Studies 9 (2):301-318.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Giovanni Pezzulo & Haris Dindo (2013). Intentional Strategies That Make Co-Actors More Predictable: The Case of Signaling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):371-372.score: 30.0
    Pickering & Garrod (P&G) explain dialogue dynamics in terms of forward modeling and prediction-by-simulation mechanisms. Their theory dissolves a strict segregation between production and comprehension processes, and it links dialogue to action-based theories of joint action. We propose that the theory can also incorporate intentional strategies that increase communicative success: for example, signaling strategies that help remaining predictable and forming common ground.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Graham Thiele, Elske van de Fliert & Dindo Campilan (2001). What Happened to Participatory Research at the International Potato Center? Agriculture and Human Values 18 (4):429-446.score: 3.0
    During the 1980s, when a flexibleapproach to research, known asfarmer-back-to-farmer, was developed, theInternational Potato Center (CIP) became famousfor participatory research. Subsequently itappeared to have lost leadership in this field.This article documents participatory researchactivities in CIP over the past thirty years tofind out what happened. Even in the 1980s,implementation of participatory research wasactually limited. Participatory research in thecenter grew unevenly, with little clearencouragement from the CGIAR. Decentralizationof social scientists in the 1990s led to thefragmentation of participatory research and, inthe absence of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Dindo M. Campilan, Gordon Prain & Cherry Leah Bagalanon (1999). Evaluation From the Inside: Participatory Evaluation of Agricultural Research in the Philippines. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 11 (4):114-131.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation