Search results for 'Don Skinner' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. David Carr & Don Skinner (2009). The Cultural Roots of Professional Wisdom: Towards a Broader View of Teacher Expertise. Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (2):141-154.score: 240.0
    Perhaps the most pressing issue concerning teacher education and training since the end of the Second World War has been that of the role of theory—or principled reflection—in professional expertise. Here, although the main post-war architects of a new educational professionalism clearly envisaged a key role for theory—considering such disciplines as psychology, sociology and philosophy as indispensable for reflective practice—there are nevertheless well-rehearsed difficulties about crediting such disciplines with quite the (applied) role in educational practice of (say) physiology or anatomy (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Quentin Skinner (1988). Quentin Skinner on Interpretation'. In James Tully (ed.), Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics. Polity Press. 29--133.score: 210.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. David M. Kaplan (2009). What Things Still Don't Do. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (2):229 - 240.score: 24.0
    This paper praises and criticizes Peter-Paul Verbeek’s What Things Do ( 2006 ). The four things that Verbeek does well are: (1) remind us of the importance of technological things; (2) bring Karl Jaspers into the conversation on technology; (3) explain how technology “co-shapes” experience by reading Bruno Latour’s actor-network theory in light of Don Ihde’s post-phenomenology; (4) develop a material aesthetics of design. The three things that Verbeek does not do well are: (1) analyze the material conditions in which (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ryan Walter (2008). Reconciling Foucault and Skinner on the State: The Primacy of Politics? History of the Human Sciences 21 (3):94-114.score: 24.0
    Foucault and Skinner have each offered influential accounts of the emergence of the state as a defining element of modern political thought. Yet the two accounts have never been brought into dialogue; this non-encounter is made more interesting by the fact that Foucault's and Skinner's accounts are at odds with one another. There is therefore much to be gained by examining this divergence. In this article I attempt this task by first setting out the two accounts of the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Javier Muguerza (2011). Utopía y melancolía en Don Quijote. Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica 43:63-82.score: 24.0
    The clash between these two dimensions of human condition – but also their complementary nature – make utopia and melancholy specially compelling as they address us today from Don Quixote’s text, providing an accurate standing from which both the author and his protagonist become our contemporaries. Taking an ethic point of departure, we shall consider the aim of the fantasies of Don Quixote is to modify the reality in a certain moral sense, despite of his ridiculously and impractical goals. At (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Larry A. Hickman, Robert Rosenberger, Robert C. Scharff & Don Ihde (2012). Book Symposium on Don Ihde's Expanding Hermeneutics: Visualism in Science. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Technology 25 (2):249-270.score: 21.0
    Book Symposium on Don Ihde’s Expanding Hermeneutics: Visualism in Science Content Type Journal Article Category Book Symposium Pages 1-22 DOI 10.1007/s13347-011-0060-5 Authors Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, University of Copenhagen, Nørre Farimagsgade 5 A, Room 10.0.27, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark Larry A. Hickman, The Center for Dewey Studies, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA Robert Rosenberger, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, DM Smith Building, 685 Cherry Street, Atlanta, GA 30332-0345, USA Robert C. Scharff, University of New (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Robert Lamb (2009). Recent Developments in the Thought of Quentin Skinner and the Ambitions of Contextualism. Journal of the Philosophy of History 3 (3):246-265.score: 21.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. D. N. Byrne (2013). After Tocqueville – the Curious Adventures of Bernard-Henri Lévy and Don Watson. [REVIEW] Australian Review of Public Affairs - Drawing Board.score: 21.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Christopher Brooke (2009). “In Roman Costume and with Roman Phrases”: Skinner, Pettit and Hobbes on Republican Liberty. Hobbes Studies 22 (2):178-184.score: 21.0
  10. Ian Shapiro (2009). Reflections on Skinner and Pettit. Hobbes Studies 22 (2):185-191.score: 21.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Robert N. Audi (1976). B.F. Skinner on Freedom, Dignity, and the Explanation of Behavior. Behaviorism 4 (2):163-186.score: 21.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Willard F. Day (1977). On Skinner's Treatment of the First-Person, Third-Person Psychological Sentence Distinction. Behaviorism 5 (1):33-37.score: 21.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Martin Jay (2013). Intention and Irony: The Missed Encounter Between Hayden White and Quentin Skinner. History and Theory 52 (1):32-48.score: 21.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. L. G. Humphreys (1940). The Variability of Extinction Scores in 'Skinner-Box' Experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 26 (6):614.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Richard E. Creel (1980). Radical Epiphenomenalism: B.F. Skinner's Account of Private Events. Behaviorism 8 (1):31-53.score: 21.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. José Antonio Santiago Sánchez (2012). Anfitrion o la maldad del don. Daimon 58:141-154.score: 21.0
    En este artículo se utiliza el mito y la figura de Anfitrión para analizar el juego situacional entre los roles antitéticos, pero también complementarios, del anfitrión y el invitado, así como la dialéctica entre lo privado y lo público. Por último, el mito da pie para analizar el complejo papel de la deuda moral en dicha interactuaciónDon, público, privado, deuda moral, anfitrión, invitado.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Michael Printy (2009). Skinner and Pocock in Context: Early Modern Political Thought Today. History and Theory 48 (1):113-121.score: 21.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Tyler Doggett & Andy Egan (2007). Wanting Things You Don't Want: The Case for an Imaginative Analogue of Desire. Philosophers' Imprint 7 (9):1-17.score: 18.0
    You’re imagining, in the course of a different game of make-believe, that you’re a bank robber. You don’t believe that you’re a bank robber. You are moved to point your finger, gun-wise, at the person pretending to be the bank teller and say, “Stick ‘em up! This is a robbery!”.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Mark Phelan (2013). Evidence That Stakes Don't Matter for Evidence. Philosophical Psychology (4):1-25.score: 18.0
    Evidence that stakes don’t matter for evidence. . ???aop.label???. doi: 10.1080/09515089.2012.733363.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Alexander A. Guerrero (2007). Don't Know, Don't Kill: Moral Ignorance, Culpability, and Caution. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 136 (1):59-97.score: 18.0
    This paper takes on several distinct but related tasks. First, I present and discuss what I will call the “Ignorance Thesis,” which states that whenever an agent acts from ignorance, whether factual or moral, she is culpable for the act only if she is culpable for the ignorance from which she acts. Second, I offer a counterexample to the Ignorance Thesis, an example that applies most directly to the part I call the “Moral Ignorance Thesis.” Third, I argue for a (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Thomas Kroedel (2013). Why Epistemic Permissions Don't Agglomerate – Another Reply to Littlejohn. Logos and Episteme 4 (4):451–455.score: 18.0
    Clayton Littlejohn claims that the permissibility solution to the lottery paradox requires an implausible principle in order to explain why epistemic permissions don't agglomerate. This paper argues that an uncontentious principle suffices to explain this. It also discusses another objection of Littlejohn's, according to which we’re not permitted to believe lottery propositions because we know that we’re not in a position to know them.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Kenneth B. McIntyre (2008). Historicity as Methodology or Hermeneutics: Collingwood's Influence on Skinner and Gadamer. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):138-166.score: 18.0
    In this paper, I offer both a brief study of Collingwood's conception of historical explanation and epistemological historicity, and an examination of the influence of Collingwood's work on the historical methodology of Quentin Skinner and on Gadamer's hermeneutic philosophy. Collingwood's work on the philosophy of history manifests a tension between the realist implications of the doctrine of reenactment and the logic of question and answer on the one hand, and, on the other, the constructionist tendency of the rest of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Alexander Sarch (2011). Internalism About a Person's Good: Don't Believe It. Philosophical Studies 154 (02):161 - 184.score: 18.0
    Internalism about a person's good is roughly the view that in order for something to intrinsically enhance a person's well-being, that person must be capable of caring about that thing. I argue in this paper that internalism about a person's good should not be believed. Though many philosophers accept the view, Connie Rosati provides the most comprehensive case in favor of it. Her defense of the view consists mainly in offering five independent arguments to think that at least some form (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Noam Chomsky, In Leon A. Jakobovits & Murray S. Miron (1959). A Review of BF Skinner's Verbal Behavior. [REVIEW] Language 35 (1):26--58.score: 18.0
    I had intended this review not specifically as a criticism of Skinner's speculations regarding language, but rather as a more general critique of behaviorist (I would now prefer to say "empiricist") speculation as to the nature of higher mental processes. My reason for discussing Skinner's book in such detail was that it was the most careful and thoroughgoing presentation of such speculations, an evaluation that I feel is still accurate. Therefore, if the conclusions I attempted to substantiate in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Don Ihde (2008). Aging: I Don't Want to Be a Cyborg! [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (3):397-404.score: 18.0
    Examination is made of a range of cyborg solutions to bodily problems due to damage, but here with particular reference to aging. Both technological and animal implants, transplants and prosthetic devices are phenomenologically analyzed. The resultant trade-off phenomena are compared to popular culture technofantasies and desires and finally to human attitudes toward mortality and contingency. The parallelism of resistance to contingent existence and to becoming a cyborg is noted.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. David J. Cole (1999). I Don't Think So: Pinker on the Mentalese Monopoly. Philosophical Psychology 12 (3):283-295.score: 18.0
    Stephen Pinker sets out over a dozen arguments in The language instinct (Morrow, New York, 1994) for his widely shared view that natural language is inadequate as a medium for thought. Thus he argues we must suppose that the primary medium of thought and inference is an innate propositional representation system, mentalese. I reply to the various arguments and so defend the view that some thought essentially involves natural language. I argue mentalese doesn't solve any of the problems Pinker cites (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Keith DeRose (2000). Now You Know It, Now You Don't. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:91-106.score: 18.0
    Resistance to contextualism comes in the form of many very different types of objections. My topic here is a certain group or family of related objections to contextualism that I call “Now you know it, now you don’t” objections. I responded to some such objections in my “Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions” a few years back. In what follows here, I will expand on that earlier response in various ways, and, in doing so, I will discuss some aspects of David Lewis’s (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. David Papineau (2003). Why You Don’T Want to Get in the Box with Schrödinger's Cat. Analysis 63 (277):51–58.score: 18.0
    By way of an example, Lewis imagines your being invited to join Schrödinger’s cat in its box for an hour. This box will either fill up with deadly poison fumes or not, depending on whether or not some radioactive atom decays, the probability of decay within an hour being 50%. The invitation is accompanied with some further incentive to comply (Lewis sets it up so there is a significant chance of some pretty bad but not life-threatening punishment if you don’t (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Matthew H. Kramer (2001). On the Unavoidability of Actions: Quentin Skinner, Thomas Hobbes, and the Modern Doctrine of Negative Liberty. Inquiry 44 (3):315 – 330.score: 18.0
    During the past few decades, Quentin Skinner has been one of the most prominent critics of the ideas about negative liberty that have developed out of the writings of Isaiah Berlin. Among Skinner?s principal charges against the contemporary doctrine of negative liberty is the claim that the proponents of that doctrine have overlooked the putative fact that people can be made unfree to refrain from undertaking particular actions. In connection with this matter, Skinner contrasts the present-day theories (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. John Collins (2007). Meta-Scientific Eliminativism: A Reconsideration of Chomsky's Review of Skinner's Verbal Behavior. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (4):625 - 658.score: 18.0
    The paper considers our ordinary mentalistic discourse in relation to what we should expect from any genuine science of the mind. A meta-scientific eliminativism is commended and distinguished from the more familiar eliminativism of Skinner and the Churchlands. Meta-scientific eliminativism views folk psychology qua folksy as unsuited to offer insight into the structure of cognition, although it might otherwise be indispensable for our social commerce and self-understanding. This position flows from a general thesis that scientific advance is marked by (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. David James (2008). The Significance of Kierkegaard's Interpretation of Don Giovanni in Relation to Hegel's Philosophy of Art. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (1):147 – 162.score: 18.0
    (2008). The significance of kierkegaard's interpretation of Don Giovanni in relation to Hegel's philosophy of art1. British Journal for the History of Philosophy: Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 147-162.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Eduardo Mendieta, Evan Selinger & Don Ihde (2003). Don Ihde Bodies in Technology. Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (1):95–111.score: 18.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. William Day (2011). I Don't Know, Just Wait: Remembering Remarriage in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. In David LaRocca (ed.), The Philosophy of Charlie Kaufman. University Press of Kentucky.score: 18.0
    "In 'I Don't Know, Just Wait: Remembering Remarriage in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind', William Day shows how Kaufman's Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind should be considered part of the film genre known as remarriage comedy; but he also shows how Kaufman contributes something new to the genre. Day addresses, in particular, how the conversation that is the condition for reunion involves discovering 'what it means to have memories together as a way of learning how to be together'. (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Gregory Bergman (2011). I Watch, Therefore I Am: From Socrates to Sartre, the Great Mysteries of Life as Explained Through Howdy Doody, Marcia Brady, Homer Simpson, Don Draper, and Other Tv Icons. Adams Media.score: 18.0
    What's the world made of? Donuts! and Beer! -- Protagoras, Gorgias, Captain Kirk, and Denny Crane -- Socrates : The Sergeant Schultz of Ancient Greece -- Plato is the new American Idol -- Aristotle loves Lucy -- Charlie Harper's Non-Epicurean lifestyle -- St. Augustine's Highway to Heaven -- Scully shaves Mulder with Ockham's Razor -- Larry Hagman dreams of Descartes -- Locke versus Hobbes, or The Brady Bunch takes on Survivor -- Can or can't Kant like vampires? -- Reading Hegel (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Paul Vincent Spade, Why Don't Mediaeval Logicians Ever Tell Us What They're Doing? Or, What is This, a Conspiracy?score: 18.0
    What I want to talk about here is a puzzle for historians of philosophy who, like me, have spent a fair amount of time studying the history of mediaeval logic and semantic theory. I don’t know how to solve it, but in various forms it has come up repeatedly in my own work and in the work of colleagues I have talked with about it. I would like to share it with you now.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Kathryn Hunter (1996). “Don't Think Zebras”: Uncertainty, Interpretation, and the Place of Paradox in Clinical Education. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (3).score: 18.0
    Working retrospectively in an uncertain field of knowledge, physicians are engaged in an interpretive practice that is guided by couterweighted, competing, sometimes paradoxical maxims. When you hear hoofbeats, don't think zebras, is the chief of these, the epitome of medicine's practical wisdom, its hermeneutic rule. The accumulated and contradictory wisdom distilled in clinical maxims arises necessarily from the case-based nature of medical practice and the narrative rationality that good practice requires. That these maxims all have their opposites enforces in students (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Karl Schuhmann (1998). Skinner's Hobbes. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6 (1):115 – 125.score: 18.0
    Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Quentin Skinner. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. xvi-477. ISBN 0-521-55436-5. 35.00.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Don Marquis (2011). Don Marquis Replies. Hastings Center Report 41 (2):9-11.score: 18.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Robert C. Scharff (2012). Don Ihde: Heidegger's Technologies: Postphenomenological Perspectives. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 45 (2):297-306.score: 18.0
    Don Ihde: Heidegger’s technologies: Postphenomenological perspectives Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-10 DOI 10.1007/s11007-012-9215-z Authors Robert C. Scharff, Department of Philosophy, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824-3574, USA Journal Continental Philosophy Review Online ISSN 1573-1103 Print ISSN 1387-2842.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Sherwin Klein (1998). Don Quixote and the Problem of Idealism and Realism in Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (1):43-63.score: 18.0
    I discuss the characters Don Quixote and Sancho Panza and their relationship in order to understand better the place of idealistictheory and realistic practice in business ethics. The realism of Sancho Panza is required to make the idealism of Don Quixote effective.Indeed, the interaction and development of these characters can serve as a model for both the effective communication between andblending of the idealistic moral theoretician and the practical businessperson. Specifically, I argue that a quixotified Sancho Panza,as a combination of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Ullin T. Place (1988). Skinner's Distinction Between Rule-Governed and Contingency-Shaped Behaviour. Philosophical Psychology 1 (2):225 – 234.score: 18.0
    The distinction that Skinner draws in his 'An operant analysis of problem solving' (1966, 1969, 1984) between 'rule-governed' and 'contingency-shaped' behaviour is arguably the most important single contribution to the theory of behaviour that he has made in a long and uniquely distinguished career. The concept of a 'rule' as a 'contingency-specifying' verbal formula which exercises 'stimulus control' over other aspects of the behaviour of a linguistically competent human being presents a formidable challenge to contemporary cognitive psychology in that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Nicholas Asher (1984). Meanings Don't Grow on Trees. Journal of Semantics 3 (3):229-247.score: 18.0
    In “Meanings don't grow on Trees” I investigate Lewis's proposal for using syntactical information to distinguish between intensions. Lewis's proposal, if it succeeds, would eliminate certain deficiencies in the predictions made by possible world semantics concerning synonymy. I provide two criteria for judging semantic theories: descriptive adequacy and explanatory adequacy. I argue that Lewis's proposal concerning synonymy fails on both counts. I then offer a different approach to problems with synonymy. Synonymy judgments involve two different kinds of meaning: truth conditional (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Vicki L. Lee (1984). Some Notes on the Subject Matter of Skinner's Verbal Behavior. Behaviorism 12 (1):29-40.score: 18.0
    This paper offers some comments about the subject matter of Skinner's book Verbal Behavior (1957). It first presents an argument against the common misconception that Verbal Behavior is about language. It then discusses the nature of verbal behavior as a subdivision of op?rant .behavior. Following that, the paper identifies three aspects of the concept of verbal behavior that need some clarification. Finally, the paper concludes by pointing out that the significance of Verbal Behavior lies most centrally in its effort (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Yishai Cohen (2014). Don’T Count on Taurek: Vindicating the Case for the Numbers Counting. Res Publica 20 (3):245-261.score: 18.0
    Suppose you can save only one of two groups of people from harm, with one person in one group, and five persons in the other group. Are you obligated to save the greater number? While common sense seems to say ‘yes’, the numbers skeptic says ‘no’. Numbers Skepticism has been partly motivated by the anti-consequentialist thought that the goods, harms and well-being of individual people do not aggregate in any morally significant way. However, even many non-consequentialists think that Numbers Skepticism (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Mary K. Hendrickson, Harvey S. James & William D. Heffernan (2008). Does the World Need U.S. Farmers Even If Americans Don't? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (4):311-328.score: 18.0
    We consider the implications of trends in the number of U.S. farmers and food imports on the question of what role U.S. farmers have in an increasingly global agrifood system. Our discussion stems from the argument some scholars have made that American consumers can import their food more cheaply from other countries than it can produce it. We consider the distinction between U.S. farmers and agriculture and the effect of the U.S. food footprint on developing nations to argue there might (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. David M. Kaplan (2009). Review: What Things Still Don't Do. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (2):229 - 240.score: 18.0
    This paper praises and criticizes Peter-Paul Verbeek's What Things Do (2006). The four things that Verbeek does well are: (1) remind us of the importance of technological things; (2) bring Karl Jaspers into the conversation on technology; (3) explain how technology "co-shapes" experience by reading Bruno Latour's actor-network theory in light of Don Ihde's post-phenomenology; (4) develop a material aesthetics of design. The three things that Verbeek does not do well are: (1) analyze the material conditions in which things are (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Simon C. Moore & Mike Oaksford (2000). Is What You Feel What You Don't Know? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):211-212.score: 18.0
    Rolls defines emotion as innate reward and punishment. This could not explain our results showing that people learn faster in a negative mood. We argue that what people know about their world affects their emotional state. Negative emotion signals a failure to predict negative reward and hence prompts learning to resolve the ignorance. Thus what you don't know affects how you feel.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Raymond A. Belliotti (1989). Blood is Thicker Than Water: Don't Forsake the Family Jewels. Philosophical Papers 18 (3):265-280.score: 18.0
    (1989). BLOOD IS THICKER THAN WATER: DON'T FORSAKE THE FAMILY JEWELS. Philosophical Papers: Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 265-280. doi: 10.1080/05568648909506323.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Robert Lamb (2009). Quentin Skinner's Revised Historical Contextualism: A Critique. History of the Human Sciences 22 (3):51-73.score: 18.0
    Since the late 1960s Quentin Skinner has defended a highly influential form of linguistic contextualism for the history of ideas, originally devised in opposition to established methodological orthodoxies like the `great text' tradition and a mainly Marxist epiphenomenalism. In 2002, he published Regarding Method, a collection of his revised methodological essays that provides a uniquely systematic expression of his contextualist philosophy of history. Skinner's most arresting theoretical contention in that work remains his well-known claim that past works of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. David A. Washburn (1997). The MacKay-Skinner Debate: A Case for “Nothing Buttery”. Philosophical Psychology 10 (4):473 – 479.score: 18.0
    Donald M. MacKay believed that freedom of action and human dignity are compatible with a science of behavior. In 1971 he argued this position with B.F. Skinner in a televised debate. After a brief biography of MacKay, several major points from this debate will be reviewed. The discussion serves to emphasize the correspondence rather than competition between levels of analysis, whether the levels are disciplinary (e.g. psychology, neuroscience, physics) or a matter of perspective (inside story, outside story).
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000